Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Nutr ; 62(7): 2827-2839, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37355497

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between adherence to the Mediterranean Diet (MD) /individual Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) and disease activity, disease impact, and functional status in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: RA patients followed at a hospital in Lisbon, Portugal, were recruited. DII was calculated using dietary intake data collected with a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Adherence to the MD was obtained using the 14-item Mediterranean Diet assessment tool. Disease Activity Score of 28 Joints (DAS28) and the DAS28 calculated with C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) were used to assess disease activity. Impact of disease and functional status were evaluated using the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) questionnaire and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), respectively. RESULTS: 120 patients (73.3% female, 61.8 ± 10.1 years of age) were included. Patients with higher adherence to the MD had significantly lower DAS28-CRP (median 3.27(2.37) vs 2.77(1.49), p = 0.030), RAID (median 5.65(2.38) vs 3.51(4.51), p = 0.032) and HAQ (median 1.00(0.56) vs 0.56(1.03), p = 0.013) scores. Higher adherence to the MD reduced the odds of having a higher DAS28 by 70% (OR = 0.303, 95%CI = (0.261, 0.347), p = 0.003). Lower adherence to MD was associated with higher DAS28-CRP (ß = - 0.164, p = 0.001), higher RAID (ß = - 0.311, p < 0.0001), and higher HAQ scores (ß = - 0.089, p = 0.001), irrespective of age, gender, BMI and pharmacological therapy. Mean DII of our cohort was not significantly different from the Portuguese population (0.00 ± 0.17 vs - 0.10 ± 1.46, p = 0.578). No associations between macronutrient intake or DII and RA outcomes were found. CONCLUSIONS: Higher adherence to the MD was associated with lower disease activity, lower impact of disease, and lower functional disability in RA patients.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Diet, Mediterranean , Humans , Female , Male , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , C-Reactive Protein , Surveys and Questionnaires , Portugal , Severity of Illness Index
2.
ARP Rheumatol ; 2(1): 64-73, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37042846

ABSTRACT

Intra-articular glucocorticoid injection (IAGCI) is frequently used to treat joint pain and inflammation. While its efficacy has been extensively studied, there are not as many detailed descriptions regarding safety. This review aimed to describe the immediate-, short- and long-term complications of IAGCI and their predictors. Most studies mainly report mild and self-limited adverse events with an incidence similar to placebo. However, the reported incidences vary significantly and are mostly inferred from retrospective data. Septic arthritis is the most feared adverse event due to its association with high mortality. Other short-term local complications include injection site pain, post-injection flare, skin hypopigmentation and atrophy, and tendon rupture. Systemic side effects are common, including vasovagal reactions, flushing, increased appetite and mood changes, hyperglycemia in diabetic patients, and bleeding in high-risk patients. Few predictors of complications have been systematically evaluated. However, male gender, advanced age, and pre-existing joint disease have been suggested in retrospective studies to correlate with infection risk. Overall, in most studies, only severe adverse event rates are reported, with no systematic prospective evaluations of safety and no report of predictors of complications. Therefore, since IAGCI is a routinely used treatment, more detailed knowledge of adverse events and complications is warranted.


Subject(s)
Arthralgia , Glucocorticoids , Humans , Male , Glucocorticoids/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Injections, Intra-Articular/adverse effects , Arthralgia/drug therapy , Pain/drug therapy
4.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 28(6): e692, 2022 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35696999

Subject(s)
Gout , Humans
6.
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol ; 34(4): 101528, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32448639

ABSTRACT

There has been a progressive interest on modifications of the human defense system following insults occurring in the interface between our body and the external environment, as they may provoke or worsen disease states. Studies suggest that billions of germs, which compose the gut microbiota influence one's innate and adaptive immune responses at the intestinal level, but these microorganisms may also impact rheumatic diseases. The microbiota of the skin, respiratory, and urinary tracts may also be relevant in rheumatology. Evidence indicates that changes in the gut microbiome alter the pathogenesis of immune-mediated diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis but also of other disorders like atherosclerosis and osteoarthritis. Therapeutic strategies to modify the microbiota, including probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation, have been received with skepticism, which, in turn, has drawn attention back to previously developed interventions such as antibiotics. Helminths adapted to humans over the evolution process, but their role in disease modulation, particularly immune-mediated diseases, remains to be understood. The present review focuses on data concerning modifications of the immune system induced by interactions with microbes and pluricellular organisms, namely helminths, and their impact on rheumatic diseases. Practical aspects, including specific microbiota-targeted therapies, are also discussed.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Probiotics , Rheumatic Diseases , Animals , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/immunology , Helminthiasis , Humans , Microbiota , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Rheumatic Diseases/microbiology , Rheumatic Diseases/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...