Strategies in pathogenesis: mechanistic specificity in the detection of generic signals.

The virulence genes of the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens are induced by more than 40 low-molecular-weight phenolic compounds. The prevailing opinion is that (i) wound-derived phenols produced on breach of the integrity of the cell wall act as the initiating signal in a series of events which results in host cell transformation, and (ii) a classical membrane receptor, putatively VirA, is responsible for the recognition of all such phenolic inducers. Here, we argue that the discovery of the subset of inducers that are relatives of the dehydrodiconiferyl alcohol glucoside (DCG) growth factors redirects our attention to work on the plant wound as a site of cell division, and suggests that we further explore the implications of early work on the relationship between transformation efficiency and the status of the cell cycle of the host. In addition, we argue that the significant structural diversity allowed in the para position of the phenol ring of inducers suggests that a receptor-ligand interaction based solely on structural recognition is insufficient, but that recognition followed by a specific proton transfer event may be sufficient to explain vir induction activity. Hence, the specificity of the response of A. tumefaciens may be a consequence of the features required for a chemical reaction to occur on the receptor surface. Finally, we review affinity labelling studies which exploit this phenol detection mechanism and which provide evidence that the phenol receptor may be other than VirA, the sensory kinase of the two component regulatory system implicated in Agrobacterium virulence.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The enantioselective participation of (S)- and (R)-diaminovaleric acids in the formation of delta-aminolevulinic acid in cyanobacteria.

Although it is recognized that 4,5-diaminovaleric acid, formed from glutamate 1-semialdehyde, functions as the intermediate in the last step of delta-aminolevulinic acid formation from glutamate, the enantioselectivity of the participating glutamate 1-semialdehyde aminotransferase for 4,5-diaminovaleric acid has remained unknown. In the present work the involvement of (S)- and (R)-4,5-diaminovaleric acids, newly available by organic synthesis, was investigated, using glutamate 1-semialdehyde aminotransferase from Synechococcus. The preferred enantiomer was (S)-4,5-diaminovalerate. In experiments on the transformation of (S)-4,5-diaminovalerate to delta-aminolevulinate it was found that glutamate 1-semialdehyde aminotransferase was unusual among aminotransferases in that the common amino acceptors pyruvate, oxaloacetate, alpha-ketoglutarate were inactive, while 4,5-dioxovaleric acid could be utilized as a sluggish amino acceptor in place of glutamate 1-semialdehyde. In conclusion, glutamate 1-semialdehyde aminotransferase is highly but not absolutely enantioselective for (S)-4,5-diaminovaleric acid, and 4,5-dioxovaleric acid can function as amino acceptor not because of a physiological role in the C5 pathway of delta-aminolevulinic acid formation, but because of its structural resemblance to glutamate 1-semialdehyde.