Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 12(1): 51-4, 1993 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8462564

ABSTRACT

Cervical samples collected during speculum examination in 413 women were tested for the presence of Streptococcus agalactiae by Gram staining, a new latex agglutination test and standard cultures. The results of each method are reported in correlation with the clinical circumstances of isolation. Gram stain and the latex agglutination test had a sensitivity of 30% and 78%, and a specificity of 89% and 98% respectively compared with culture. The sensitivity of the latex agglutination test was higher in cases of premature rupture of membranes (90%), presumed chorioamnionitis (86%), presumed post-partum endometritis (86%) and presumed salpingitis (87%). This latex agglutination test appears to be useful for identifying patients who are heavily colonized with Streptococcus agalactiae and are at a high risk of infection.


Subject(s)
Genital Diseases, Female/microbiology , Latex Fixation Tests , Pregnancy Complications/microbiology , Streptococcus agalactiae/isolation & purification , Vagina/microbiology , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 11(6): 546-9, 1992 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1526240

ABSTRACT

Four commercial methods for identification of Haemophilus species were evaluated in comparison to conventional methods using 188 genital and neonatal Haemophilus strains. In the case of discrepancies between results obtained by the different methods, DNA-DNA hybridization was performed. The four commercial systems and conventional methods showed excellent correlation of results in 167 strains (88%). DNA-DNA hybridization was performed in 8 strains with discrepant identification results and 13 strains with discrepant biotyping results. In 15 cases discrepancies could be explained by the fact that the strains belonged to a newly recognised species of Haemophilus.


Subject(s)
Haemophilus/isolation & purification , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Female , Genital Diseases, Female/microbiology , Haemophilus/classification , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Nucleic Acid Hybridization
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...