ABSTRACT
Immobility of patients in intensive care units (ICU) can lead to long-lasting physical and cognitive decline. During the last few years, bundles for rehabilitation were developed, including early mobilization. The German guideline for positioning therapy and mobilization, in general, recommends the development of ICU-specific protocols. The aim of this narrative review is to provide guidance when developing a best practice protocol in one's own field of work. It is recommended to a) implement early mobilization as part of a bundle, including screening and management of patient's awareness, pain, anxiety, stress, delirium and family's presence, b) develop a traffic-light system of specific in- and exclusion criteria in an interprofessional process, c) use checklists to assess risks and preparation of mobilization, d) use the ICU Mobility Scale for targeting and documentation of mobilization, e) use relative safety criteria for hemodynamic and respiratory changes, and Borg Scale for subjective evaluation, f) document and evaluate systematically mobilization levels, barriers, unwanted safety events and other parameters.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Delirium/rehabilitation , Early Ambulation , Intensive Care Units , Benchmarking , Combined Modality Therapy , Documentation/methods , Exercise Therapy , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Physical Therapy Modalities , Respiration, Artificial , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Early mobilization is an evident, interprofessional concept to improve the outcome of intensive care patients. It reduces psychocognitive deficits and delirium and attenuates a general deconditioning, including atrophy of the respiratory pump and skeletal muscles. In this regard the interdisciplinary approach of early mobilization, taking into account different levels of mobilization, appears to be beneficial. The purpose of this study was to explore opinions on collaboration and tasks between different professional groups. METHOD: During the 25th Bremen Conference on Intensive Medicine and Nursing on 20 February 2015, a questionnaire survey was carried out among the 120 participants of the German Early Mobilization Network meeting. RESULTS: In all, 102 questionnaires were analyzed. Most participants reported on the interdisciplinarity of the approach, but none of the tasks and responsibilities concerning early mobilization can be assigned to a single professional group. The practical implementation of mobilizing orally intubated patients may require two registered nurses as well as a physical therapist. Implementation in daily practice seems to be heterogeneous. CONCLUSIONS: There is no consensus regarding collaboration, competencies, and responsibilities with respect to early mobilization of intensive care patients. The approach to date has been characterized by a lack of interprofessional communication, which may lead to an inefficient use of the broad and varied base of knowledge and experienceof the different professions.
Subject(s)
Critical Care , Early Ambulation , Interdisciplinary Communication , Intersectoral Collaboration , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Combined Modality Therapy , Critical Care Nursing , Delirium/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Care Team , Physical Therapy Modalities , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
The non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is widespread in the clinical medicine and has attained meanwhile a high value in the clinical daily routine. The application of NIV reduces the length of ICU stay and hospitalization as well as mortality of patients with hypercapnic acute respiratory failure. Patients with acute respiratory failure in context of a cardiopulmonary edema should be treated in addition to necessary cardiological interventions with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or NIV. In case of other forms of acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure it is recommended the application of NIV to be limited to mild forms of ARDS as the application of NIV in severe forms of ARDS is associated with higher rates of treatment failure and mortality. In weaning process from invasive ventilation the NIV reduces the risk of reintubation essentially in hypercapnic patients. A delayed intubation of patients with NIV failure leads to an increase of mortality and should therefore be avoided. With appropriate monitoring in intensive care NIV can also be successfully applied in pediatric patients with acute respiratory insufficiency. Furthermore NIV can be useful within palliative care for reduction of dyspnea and improving quality of life. The aim of the guideline update is, taking into account the growing scientific evidence, to outline the advantages as well as the limitations of NIV in the treatment of acute respiratory failure in daily clinical practice and in different indications.
ABSTRACT
Intensive care medicine (ICM) is characterized by a high degree of complexity and requires intense communication and collaboration on interdisciplinary and multiprofessional levels. In order to achieve good quality of care in this environment and to prevent errors, a proactive quality and error management as well as a structured quality assurance system are essential. Since the early 1990s, German intensive care societies have developed concepts for quality management and assurance in ICM. In 2006, intensive care networks were founded in different states to support the implementation of evidence-based knowledge into clinical routine and to improve medical outcome, efficacy, and efficiency in ICM. Current instruments and concepts of quality assurance in German ICM include core intensive care data from the data registry DIVI REVERSI, quality indicators, peer review in intensive care, IQM peer review, and various certification processes. The first version of German ICM quality indicators was published in 2010 by an interdisciplinary and interprofessional expert commission. Key figures, indicators, and national benchmarks are intended to describe the quality of structures, processes, and outcomes in intensive care. Many of the quality assurance tools have proved to be useful in clinical practice, but nationwide implementation still can be improved.
Subject(s)
Critical Care/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Certification/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Germany , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Intersectoral Collaboration , Peer Review , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standardsABSTRACT
Treatment success in hospitals, particularly in intensive care units, is directly tied to quality of structure, process, and outcomes. Technological and medical advancements lead to ever more complex treatment situations with highly specialized tasks in intensive care nursing. Quality criteria that can be used to describe and correctly measure those highly complex multiprofessional situations have only been recently developed and put into practice.In this article, it will be shown how quality in multiprofessional teams can be definded and assessed in daily clinical practice. Core aspects are the choice of a nursing theory, quality assurance measures, and quality management. One possible option of quality assurance is the use of standard operating procedures (SOPs). Quality can ultimately only be achieved if professional groups think beyond their boundaries, minimize errors, and establish and live out instructions and SOPs.
Subject(s)
Critical Care/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Total Quality Management/standards , Critical Care/organization & administration , Critical Care Nursing/standards , Germany , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Intersectoral Collaboration , Quality Assurance, Health Care/organization & administration , Total Quality Management/organization & administrationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Modern concepts for sedation and analgesia and guidelines recommend light analgesia and sedation, so that patients on mechanically ventilation are more awake, compared to previous concepts. Hence, these patients are more alert and able to experience their situation on the ventilator and their endotracheal tube (ETT). PROBLEM: There is currently no convincing evidence of how patients tolerate the tube under present conditions, which interventions could help them, or whether they want to be sedated deeper because of the tube. Based upon our own observations, a broad range of reactions are possible. PURPOSE: The tolerance of the ETT in intensive care patients was explored. METHOD: A systematic literature research without time constraints in the databases PubMed and CINAHL was performed. Included were quantitative and qualitative studies written in German or English that investigated tolerance of the ETT in adult intensive care patients. Excluded were anesthetic studies including in- and extubation immediately before and after operations. RESULTS: Of the 2348 hits, 14 studies were included, including 4 qualitative studies about the experience of intensive care, 8 quantitative studies including 2 randomized controlled studies, and 2 studies with a mixed approach. Within the studies different aspects could be identified, which may in- or decrease the tolerance of an ETT. Aspects like breathlessness, pain during endotracheal suctioning and inability to speak decrease the tolerance. Information, the presence of relatives and early mobilization appear to increase the tolerance. CONCLUSION: Tolerance of the ETT is a complex phenomenon. A reflected and critical evaluation of the behavior of the patient with an ETT is recommended. Interventions that increase the tolerance of the ETT should be adapted to the situation of the patient and should be evaluated daily.
Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Conscious Sedation/nursing , Conscious Sedation/psychology , Intubation, Intratracheal/nursing , Intubation, Intratracheal/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Respiration, Artificial/nursing , Respiration, Artificial/psychology , Adult , Critical Care/psychology , Critical Care Nursing , HumansABSTRACT
There are a wide variety of strategies and methods used in securing and managing the oral endotracheal tube and mouth and oral care in German clinical intensive care nursing for mechanically ventilated patients. There are no nationally recognized guidelines or recommendations on this topic. A survey among intensive care nurses identified the most widely used nursing strategies and methods. Regarding the results of the survey and international literature findings, the commonly used strategies and methods are discussed. Following these discussions, there are recommendations for improving nursing care of orally intubated patients in intensive care, including the aspects of evidence identified, currently used methods and patient needs. Also included are aspects of patient safety, potential complications and quality-orientated nursing care within a system having limited overall nursing care resources.
Subject(s)
Bandages , Critical Care Nursing/methods , Critical Care/methods , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Intubation, Intratracheal/nursing , Oral Hygiene/nursing , Skin Ulcer/nursing , Skin Ulcer/prevention & control , Surgical Tape , Airway Extubation/nursing , Attitude of Health Personnel , Delphi Technique , Equipment Failure , Evidence-Based Nursing/methods , Health Surveys , Humans , Patient Positioning , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Quality Improvement , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults has increased in popularity and importance for the support of patients with cardiac or pulmonary failure. Although it is now quite commonly used in the intensive care unit, its use has rarely been described as a means of support during anaesthesia and surgery. We report the case of a patient who required curative resection of the oesophagus following previous left pneumonectomy where veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was required both during surgery and for the first three days postoperatively. We describe the anaesthetic management of this patient who only had a single lung, review other alternatives and discuss why extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was particularly suited to this case. To the best of our knowledge, the anaesthetic literature to date does not contain a case report of this type.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Esophagectomy/methods , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Aged , Carbon Dioxide/blood , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Male , SpirometryABSTRACT
The relevance of nursing interventions for patients with fecal incontinence/defecation problems in intensive care medicine is very often underestimated. Fecal incontinence can either be a symptom of a disease, an epiphenomenon or a primary disease. Fecal incontinence negatively influences the ability of affected intensive patients to care for themselves. Fecal incontinence and diarrhea often occur together, which in return restricts the patient's mobility. Improperly treated fecal incontinence can result in infections (e.g., skin disorders, existing catheter sores), secondary healing can be delayed (e.g., bedsores, sores on the back or groin/genital area) and can also result in contamination of other areas (e.g., intestinal infection). In the past, many improvised techniques and materials have been used to drain feces for patients who are either immobile or critically ill with temporary or persistent fecal incontinence. Continuous and safe fecal drainage is often a problem. There is no basic standard nursing concept that can be recommended or verified. At present there are a number of continuous fecal drainage systems that have been launched on the market. Different indications and fields of application have been recommended when dealing with continuous fecal drainage. This article shows weaknesses and strengths of continuous fecal drainage, explains how each functions, and illustrates possible indications and contra-indications with each of these. Deployment options and limits are presented and summarized in an algorithm as a practical help for decision-making.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ventilation in the prone position is carried out for improvement of pulmonary gas exchange in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We compared the effects of an incomplete prone position (IPP, 135( degrees )) with a complete prone position (CPP, 180( degrees )) in patients with ARDS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For this trial 59 patients with ARDS were randomly assigned and were positioned in a "cross-over" design: patients of group A were placed in IPP for 6 h and then immediately positioned in CPP for another 6 h. Patients in group B were positioned in reverse order. Blood gases, hemodynamic measurements, quasistatic respiratory compliance and assessments of side effects were performed before begin, 30 min and 6 h after first positioning, then 30 min and 6 h after second positioning and 2 after repositioning. RESULTS: Turning patients in IPP and CPP resulted in a significant increase in the arterial oxygenation index (p(a)O(2)/F(I)O(2)), but this effect was more pronounced in the CPP (before: 142+/-46 mm Hg, 6 h: 253+/-107 mm Hg) than in the IPP (before: 139+/-54 mm Hg, 6 h: 206+/-75 mm Hg), and compliance was improved only in CPP. The improvement in arterial oxygenation persisted 2 h after repositioning in the supine position in both groups. The oxygenation responder rate was lower during the IPP (70.3%) in comparison with the CPP (84.0%, p<0.05). The incidence of side effects tended to be increased during the CPP. CONCLUSION: Incomplete prone position improves oxygenation in ARDS patients, but less effectively than a "classic" CPP. In these patients the use of a CPP should be preferred.
