Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Cancer Radiother ; 24(8): 892-897, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33144063

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa) group is heterogeneous in terms of prognosis. For unfavorable or favorable IR PCa treated by radiotherapy, the optimal strategy remains to be defined. In routine practice, the physician's decision to propose hormonal therapy (HT) is controversial. The PROACT survey aimed to evaluate pattern and preferences of daily practice in France in this IR population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web questionnaire was distributed to French radiotherapy members of 91 centers of the Groupe d'Etude des Tumeurs Uro-Genitales (GETUG). The questionnaire included four sections concerning: (i) the specialists who prescribe treatments and multidisciplinary decisions (MTD) validation; (ii) the definition of IR subsets of patients; (iii) radiotherapy parameters; (iv) the pattern of practice regarding cardiovascular (CV) and (iv) metabolic evaluation. A descriptive presentation of the results was used. RESULTS: Among the 82 responses (90% of the centers), HT schedules and irradiation techniques were validated by specific board meetings in 54% and 45% of the centers, respectively. Three-fourths (76%) of the centers identified a subset of IR patients for a dedicated strategy. The majority of centers consider PSA>15 (77%) and/or Gleason 7 (4+3) (87%) for an unfavorable IR definition. Overall, 41% of the centers performed systematically a CV evaluation before HT prescription while 61% consider only CV history/status in defining the type of HT. LHRH agonists are more frequently prescribed in both favorable (70%) and unfavorable (98%) IR patients. Finally, weight (80%), metabolic profile (70%) and CV status (77%) of patients are considered for follow-up under HT. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first survey on HT practice in IR PCa. The PROACT survey indicates that three-quarters of the respondents identify subsets of IR-patients in tailoring therapy. The CV status of the patient is considered in guiding the HT decision, its duration and type of drug.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Health Care Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Cancer Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , France , Humans , Male , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Prognosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Radiation Oncologists/statistics & numerical data
2.
Cancer Radiother ; 24(2): 143-152, 2020 Apr.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32057646

ABSTRACT

Prostate cancer is a sensitive adenocarcinoma, in more than 80% of cases, to chemical castration, due to its hormone dependence. Locally advanced and/or high-risk cancer is defined based on clinical stage, initial prostate specific antigen serum concentration value or high Gleason score. Hormone therapy associated with radiation therapy is the standard of management and improves local control, reduces the risk of distant metastasis and improves specific and overall survival. Duration of hormone therapy, dose level of radiation therapy alone or associated with brachytherapy are controversial data in the literature. The therapeutic choice, multidisciplinary, depends on the age and comorbidity of the patient, the prognostic criteria of the pathology and the urinary function of the patient. Current research focuses on optimizing local and distant control of these aggressive forms and incorporates neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy and also new hormone therapies.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Brachytherapy , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Grading , Prognosis , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/complications , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Radiotherapy Dosage , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
3.
Ann Oncol ; 25(9): 1854-1860, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24914041

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in the management of atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma (ALT/WD-LPS) remains controversial. METHODS: Two hundred eighty-three patients with operable ALT/WD-LPS, no history of previous cancer, chemotherapy (CT) or RT, treated between 1984 and 2011 registered in the Conticabase database were included and described. Overall (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and time to local relapse (TTLR) were evaluated from the time of first treatment. RESULTS: Three of 20 centers enrolled 58% of the patients. Median age at diagnosis was 61 (range 25-94) years, 147 patients (52%) were males, 222 (78%) patients had their primary tumor located in an extremity while 36 (13%) and 25 (9%) had tumors involving the girdle and the trunk wall, respectively. The median size of primary tumors was 17 cm (range 2-48 cm). Adjuvant RT was given to 132 patients (47%). Patients who received adjuvant RT had larger tumors (P = 0.005), involving more often the distal limbs (P < 0.001). Use of adjuvant RT varied across centers and along the study period. Other characteristics were balanced between the two groups. Median follow-up was 61.7 months. None of the patients developed metastasis during follow-up. The 5-year local relapse-free survival rates were 98.3% versus 80.3% with and without adjuvant RT, respectively (P < 0.001). Once stratified on time period (before/after 2003), adjuvant RT, tumor site and margin status (R0 versus other) were independently associated with TTLR. No OS difference was observed (P = 0.105). CONCLUSION: In this study, adjuvant RT following resection of ALT/WD-LPS was associated with a reduction of LR risk.


Subject(s)
Liposarcoma/mortality , Liposarcoma/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Liposarcoma/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
4.
Cancer Radiother ; 16(4): 247-56, 2012.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22652299

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Adenoid cystic carcinoma represents 1% of head and neck cancers. Adenoid cystic carcinomas are slow growing tumours with high potential for local recurrence. Treatment usually associates radiotherapy and surgery, but the role of radiotherapy remains unclear. We report a retrospective multicentric study of the management and prognostic factors of 169 adenoid cystic carcinomas of head and neck. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1982 and 2010, 169 patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck were referred to the Cercle des oncologues radiothérapeutes du Sud departments of radiotherapy either for primary untreated tumour (n=135) or for a recurrence of previously treated tumour (n=34). The site of adenoid cystic carcinoma was: parotid gland (n=48, 28.4%), minor salivary gland (n=35, 20.7%), submandibular gland (n=22, 13%), sinus cavities (n=22, 13%), other (n=42, 24.9%). Tumour stages were: T1 (12.4%); T2 (14.2%); T3 (12.4%); T4 (41.4%) and Tx (19.5%). Lymph node involvement was 13% and distant metastasis 8.9%. For adenoid cystic carcinomas of the parotid gland, major nerve involvement was evaluated. Preferential site of metastasis was the lung (87.5%). Treatments were: surgery alone (n=27), surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy (n=89), surgery and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (n=12), exclusive chemoradiotherapy (n=13), exclusive radiotherapy (n=14), other associations (n=5) and no treatment (n=7). Radiotherapy was delivered through photons (n=119), neutrons (n=6), both (n=4). Two patients had a brachytherapy boost. Median prescribed doses to T and N were respectively 65 Gy and 50 Gy for the 119 photons treated patients. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 58 months (range 1-250 months). As of December 1, 2010, 83 patients were alive with no evolutive disease (49%), 35 alive and had recurred, 18 had uncontrolled evolutive disease, 28 had died of adenoid cystic carcinoma and 5 of intercurrent disease. Overall survival and disease free survival were respectively 72% and 72% at 5 years, 53% and 32% at 10 years; 5 and 10-year freedom from local recurrence were 81% and 52% respectively. Nerve involvement was found in 17/48 parotid gland adenoid cystic carcinomas. The Cox model including all patients, showed that surgery (P<0.001), surgical margins (P=0.015), nerve involvement (P=0.0079), length of radiotherapy (P=0.018), and tumour location (P=0.041) were associated with disease free survival. CONCLUSION: In this large series of adenoid cystic carcinoma of head and neck with a majority of T3-T4 tumours, 10-year survivals were achieved for 50% of patients. Radiotherapy did not impact survival.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
5.
Cancer Radiother ; 14 Suppl 1: S182-8, 2010 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21129662

ABSTRACT

Testicular cancer is rare, representing only 1 % of malignant tumors, but the most common cancer in young men, 15 to 35 years. Adjuvant radiotherapy after orchidectomy in testicular seminoma stage I, reduces risk of relapse. It aims to eradicate micro-metastatic disease in lymph drainage territories. In the case of adjuvant radiotherapy, the relapse-free survival of 96 % with an overall survival of 98 % at 5 years. The irradiation volume is made up of lymph nodes paraaortic which it is possible to add the ipsilateral renal hilum to the testicular lesion. The current recommended dose is 20 Gy in 10 fractions and 2 weeks, usually delivered by two antero-posterior beams. The acute toxicities, mainly represented by nausea and diarrhea are usually quickly resolved to the end of irradiation. Regarding toxicities long-term, preservation of semen should be considered after surgery because of fear of infertility post-treatment. The risk of second cancer associated with exposure to ionizing radiation, albeit small, is especially important to consider these patients to significant life expectancy. Nevertheless, developments in radiotherapy techniques and lower doses and irradiated volumes can probably reduce this risk further.


Subject(s)
Seminoma/radiotherapy , Testicular Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adolescent , Adult , Diarrhea/diagnostic imaging , Disease-Free Survival , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Humans , Incidence , Lymph Nodes/parasitology , Lymph Nodes/radiation effects , Male , Nausea/diagnostic imaging , Radionuclide Imaging , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Radiotherapy/methods , Radiotherapy Dosage , Seminoma/epidemiology , Seminoma/pathology , Seminoma/surgery , Testicular Neoplasms/epidemiology , Testicular Neoplasms/pathology , Testicular Neoplasms/surgery , Young Adult
6.
Cancer Radiother ; 14(4-5): 373-5, 2010 Jul.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20430663

ABSTRACT

Clinical situations requiring protections of ovaries are mainly paediatric irradiations and pre-menopausal pelvic irradiations. The main complication of ovarian irradiation is the induced castration. Ovaries are extremely radiosensitive organs with strong interpersonal variations. The castrative effect of irradiation depends mainly on two factors: patient's age and the dose delivered to ovaries. The surgical technique of ovarian transposition allows to minimize the dose received by ovaries by taking them away, out of irradiation fields; the aim is to exclude them from the volume receiving 5 Gy or more, and if possible from those receiving 2 Gy. This technique becomes integrated into a multidisciplinary approach of conservation of fertility for patients exposed to other cytotoxic treatments.


Subject(s)
Ovary/radiation effects , Radiation Tolerance , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Adult , Age Factors , Child , Female , Fertility/radiation effects , Humans , Menopause, Premature/radiation effects , Ovariectomy , Ovary/anatomy & histology , Ovary/physiology , Pelvis/anatomy & histology , Premenopause/radiation effects , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiotherapy/methods , Radiotherapy Dosage , Young Adult
7.
Cancer Radiother ; 14(4-5): 376-8, 2010 Jul.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20418148

ABSTRACT

Although there is very little evidence for direct irradiation of the testes, they may receive significant doses, especially in the treatment of pelvic tumors in adults and in pediatrics. The exocrine function of the testis seems to be more sensitive to radiotherapy. There is a risk of sterility, even after low doses of radiation. In the adult or the child who has reached puberty, we should propose a self-preservation of semen prior to radiotherapy. In pre-pubescent children, the problem is more delicate. In all cases, it is necessary to limit the dose to the testicles without affecting the coverage of tumour volume. Patients and/or their caregivers should be systematically informed of the risk of infertility related to irradiation.


Subject(s)
Radiation Tolerance , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Testis/radiation effects , Adult , Child , Humans , Hypogonadism/diagnostic imaging , Infertility, Male/diagnostic imaging , Infertility, Male/prevention & control , Male , Organ Preservation/methods , Puberty/radiation effects , Radionuclide Imaging , Radiotherapy/methods , Radiotherapy Dosage/standards , Risk Assessment , Testis/anatomy & histology , Testis/physiology , Truth Disclosure
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...