The pharmacokinetics of idraparinux, a long-acting indirect factor Xa inhibitor: population pharmacokinetic analysis from Phase III clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Idraparinux, a long-acting synthetic pentasaccharide, is a specific antithrombin-dependent inhibitor of activated factor X that has been investigated in the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic events. OBJECTIVES: To characterize the population pharmacokinetic profile of idraparinux in patients enrolled in van Gogh and Amadeus Phase III clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Idraparinux was administered once-weekly subcutaneously at a dose of 2.5 mg, or 2.5 mg (first dose) and then 1.5 mg for patients with severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance<30 mL min(-1)). A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using data from 704 patients with acute deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, 1310 patients suffering from atrial fibrillation, and 40 healthy subjects. Potential covariates analyzed included demographics (age, sex, weight and ethnicity), and serum creatinine and creatinine clearance determinations. RESULTS: A three-compartment model best described idraparinux pharmacokinetics, with interindividual variability on clearance, central volume of distribution, and absorption rate constant; residual variability was low. Typical clearance, central volume of distribution, absorption rate constant and volume of distribution at steady-state were 0.0255 L h(-1), 3.36 L, 1.37 h and 30.8 L, respectively. Peak concentration was reached at 2.5 h. The terminal half-life was 66.3 days and time to steady-state was 35 weeks. At steady-state, exposures were similar for patients without and with severe renal impairment receiving adjusted-dose. Creatinine clearance was the most important covariate affecting idraparinux clearance. The particular characteristics of idraparinux--rapid onset of action and long-acting anticoagulant effect--offer interesting clinical perspectives currently under investigation with idrabiotaparinux, the reversible biotinylated form of idraparinux.

The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of SL65.1498, a GABA-A alpha2,3 selective agonist, in comparison with lorazepam in healthy volunteers.

Benzodiazepines are effective short-term treatments for anxiety disorders, but their use is limited by undesirable side effects related to Central Nervous System impairment and tolerance development. SL65.1498 is a new compound that acts in vitro as a full agonist at the gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) 2 and 3 receptor and as a partial agonist at the 1 and 5 receptor subtypes. It is thought that the compound could be anxiolytic by its activation at the alpha2 and alpha3 receptor subtypes, without causing unfavourable side effects, which are believed to be mediated by the alpha1 and alpha5 subtypes. This study was a double-blind, five-way cross-over study to investigate the effects of three doses of SL65.1498 in comparison with placebo and lorazepam 2 mg in healthy volunteers. The objective was to select a dose level (expected to be therapeutically active), free of any significant deleterious effect. Psychomotor and cognitive effects were measured using a validated battery of measurements, including eye movements, body sway, memory tests, reaction-time assessments, and visual analogue scales. The highest dose of SL65.1498 showed slight effects on saccadic peak velocity and smooth pursuit performance, although to a much lesser extent than lorazepam. In contrast to lorazepam, none of the SL65.1498 doses affected body sway, visual analogue scale alertness, attention, or memory tests. This study showed that the three doses of SL65.1498 were well tolerated and induced no impairments on memory, sedation, psychomotor, and cognitive functions.

New metabolic and pharmacokinetic characteristics of thiocolchicoside and its active metabolite in healthy humans.

Thiocolchicoside (TCC) has been prescribed for several years as a muscle relaxant drug, but its pharmacokinetic (PK) profile and metabolism still remain largely unknown. Therefore, we re-investigated its metabolism and PK, and we assessed the muscle relaxant properties of its metabolites. After oral administration of 8 mg (a therapeutic dose) of 14C-labelled TCC to healthy volunteers, we found no detectable TCC in plasma, urine or faeces. On the other hand, the aglycone derivative obtained after de-glycosylation of TCC (M2) was observed and, in addition, we identified, as the major circulating metabolic entity, 3-O-glucuronidated aglycone (M1) obtained after glucuro-conjugation of M2. One hour after oral administration, M1 plus M2 accounted for more than 75% of the circulating total radioactivity. The pharmacological activity of these metabolites was assessed using a rat model, the muscle relaxant activity of M1 was similar to that of TCC whereas M2 was devoid of any activity. Subsequently, to investigate the PK profile of TCC in human PK studies, we developed and validated a specific bioanalytical method that combines liquid chromatography and ultraviolet detection to assay both active entities. After oral administration, TCC was not quantifiable with an lower limit of quantification set at 1 ng/mL, whereas its active metabolite M1 was detected. M1 appeared rapidly in plasma (tmax=1 h) and was eliminated with an apparent terminal half-life of 7.3 h. In contrast, after intramuscular administration both active entities (TCC and M1) were present; TCC was rapidly absorbed (tmax=0.4 h) and eliminated with an apparent terminal half-life of 1.5 h. M1 concentration peaked at 5 h and this metabolite was eliminated with an apparent terminal half-life of 8.6 h. As TCC and M1 present an equipotent pharmacological activity, the relative oral pharmacological bioavailability of TCC vs. intramuscular administration was calculated and represented 25%. Therefore, to correctly investigate the PK and bioequivalence of TCC, the biological samples obtained must be assayed with a bioanalytical method able to specifically analyse TCC and its active metabolite M1.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis and optimization of the experimental design for mizolastine solution in children.

Mizolastine is a second generation antihistamine agent approved in Europe for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and skin conditions for which Sanofi-Synthélabo is developing a pediatric solution. Our objective was to design the population pharmacokinetic (PK) study of mizolastine pediatric solution in children. A bioavailability study of this solution compared to the marketed tablet was performed in 18 young volunteers. These PK data were analyzed by nonlinear regression using a two-compartment open model with zero-order absorption. From the estimated parameters, we designed population PK studies in two groups of children: 6 to 12 years and 2 to 6 years, respectively. To compare several population designs and to derive the optimal ones, we used the determinant of the Fisher information matrix of the population characteristics using a first-order expansion of the model. We have evaluated a "reference" population design with 10 samples (from 0.25 to 36 hr after drug intake) per child in 6 children, which could not be implemented in practice for ethical reasons. We then derived optimal population designs with 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 samples per child and a total of 60 samples. Finally, the designs that were implemented in the population PK study were "compromise" population designs with 60 samples; one defined for 20 children 6 to 12 years old, and one with 24 children 2 to 6 years. In the older group, the population design involved 8 children with a catheter from which 6 samples at time 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 2, 3, and 6 hr after drug intake are collected, and 12 children with only one sample at time 8, 12, 24, or 36 hr. In the younger group, the population design involved 15 children with a catheter who are divided in three groups with four samples at different times from 0.25 to 6 hr after drug intake, and 12 children with only one sample at time 8, 12, 18, or 24 hr. The expected average increase of variances of these designs compared to the reference design were 1.6 and 1.8 for the older and younger group, respectively, which was decided to be acceptable. Better population designs would have involved three groups of children with five samples per child but could not be implemented in practice. The data of the PK study in children 6 to 12 years were available and were analyzed using NONMEM. A total of 53 concentrations were obtained in 18 children. The same two-compartment model with zero-order absorption was used. The interindividual variability in children was small. The estimated population parameters in children 6 to 12 years, were 0.28 L/kg for Vc/F, 0.10 L/hr per kg for CL/F, 0.53 hr-1 for lambda 1, 0.076 hr-1 for lambda 2, and 0.49 hr for Tabs. These values were close to the median values observed in young volunteers when standardized to 70 kg; notably, CL/F in L/hr per kg was similar, so that a dose of 0.15 mg/kg o.d. for mizolastine pediatric solution should give an equivalent area under the curve to a 10 mg o.d. tablet in adults.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of mizolastine in healthy volunteers with an indirect response model.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to model the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationship of mizolastine, a new H1-receptor antagonist obtained from histamine-induced wheal and flare inhibition test. METHODS: Fifteen healthy volunteers participated in this double-blind crossover study and randomly received single doses of 5, 10, 15, and 20 mg of mizolastine and placebo at 1 week intervals. Simultaneous histamine tests and blood samples were performed before and at 9 different times up to 24 hours after each dosing. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling were performed subject by subject for the 4 doses altogether by nonlinear regression. First, plasma concentrations were fit according to a two-compartment open model with zero order absorption and first order elimination. Then an indirect response model with inhibition of the formation rate was developed to describe the pharmacodynamic relationships between flare or wheal raw areas and plasma concentrations with the use of the pharmacokinetic parameters that were previously estimated. RESULTS: Mizolastine dose dependently inhibited the histamine-induced wheal and flare formation with a submaximum effect attained after 10 mg. The mean values of the pharmacodynamic parameters of apparent zero-order rate constant for the flare or wheal spontaneous appearance (k(in)), the first-order rate constant for the flare or wheal disappearance, the mizolastine concentration that produced 50% suppression of the maximum attainable inhibition of k(in), and the maximum attainable inhibition of the effect production were 14.1 cm2/h (coefficient of variation [CV], 32%), 0.68 h(-1) (CV, 24%), 21.1 ng/mL (CV, 77%), and 0.92 (CV, 8%), respectively, for the flare and 1.9 cm2/h (CV, 64%), 0.63 h-1 (CV, 39%), 43.9 ng/mL (CV, 68%), and 0.87 (CV, 12%), respectively, for the wheal inhibition. CONCLUSION: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationships of mizolastine were reliably described with the use of an indirect pharmacodynamic model; this led to an accurate prediction of the pharmacodynamic activity of mizolastine.

Study of cardiac repolarization in healthy volunteers performed with mizolastine, a new H1-receptor antagonist.

AIMS: The occurrence of serious dysrhythmias, such as torsades de pointes, with terfenadine and astemizole had led to a reexamination of the potential effect of H1 antihistamines on cardiac repolarization. Mizolastine is a potent, selective, nonsedating peripherally acting H1-receptor antagonist which is registered for rhinitis and urticaria at a recommended dose of 10 mg once daily. The present study was carried out to investigate the effects of therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of mizolastine, on ventricular repolarization in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy young volunteers participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised study with three parallel groups. Each group consisted of 2 way cross-over 7 day treatment periods where mizolastine (10, 20 or 40 mg) and placebo were randomly administered. On day 1 and day 7, 12-lead ECG recordings were performed prior and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 20 h after dosing and from day 2 to day 6, before dosing and 1, 2, 3, and 4 h after. RESULTS: Whatever the analysis used (raw data, changes from baseline, incidence of individual out-of-range values) no significant differences were observed at any dose level vs placebo, on any of ECG parameters (HR, PR, QRS, QT, and QTc). In particular, no effect of mizolastine vs placebo was shown on QT and QTc although 95% CIs were wide. The only subject who exhibited a QTc>/=450 ms received placebo for 7 days. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no evidence of an effect of mizolastine up to 40 mg (four times the therapeutic dose) on ventricular repolarization in healthy volunteers.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of mizolastine and validation from sparse data on patients using the nonparametric maximum likelihood method.

A population analysis of the kinetics of mizolastine was performed from concentrations on 449 allergic patients, using the nonparametric maximum likelihood method (NPML). A two-compartment open model with zero-order absorption was used to describe the kinetics of mizolastine after oral administration. A heteroscedastic variance model was assumed for the error. To explain the kinetic variability, eight covariates were introduced in the analysis: gender, pharmaceutical dosage form, age, body weight, serum creatinine concentration, creatinine renal clearance, plasma levels of hepatic transaminases ASAT and ALAT. Their relationships to the kinetic parameters were studied by means of the estimated distribution of each kinetic parameter conditional on different levels of each covariate. An important interindividual kinetic variability was found for all parameters. Moreover, several kinetic parameters among which the duration of absorption were found to be influenced by pharmaceutical dosage form and gender. Body weight and creatinine renal clearance were found to have a little influence on the oral clearance and the smallest disposition rate constant. This population analysis was validated on a separate group of 247 other patients. For each observed concentration of this sample, a predictive distribution was computed using the individual covariates. Predicted concentrations and standardized prediction errors were deduced. The mean and variance of the standardized prediction errors were, respectively, 0.21 and 2.79. Moreover, in the validation sample, the predicted cumulative distribution function of each observed concentration was computed. Empirical distribution of these values was not significantly different from a uniform distribution, as expected under the assumption that the population model estimated by NPML is adequate.

Lack of effect of mizolastine on the safety and pharmacokinetics of digoxin administered orally in repeated doses to healthy volunteers.

The effects of mizolatine, a new H1 receptor antagonist, on safety and pharmacokinetics of digoxin were studied in a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study. After administration of digoxine alone (0.25 mg o.d. for 7 days), 12 healthy young male volunteers (23+/-2 years) received either placebo and digoxin (0.25 mg o.d.) or mizolastine (10 mg o.d.) and digoxin (0.25 mg o.d.) during 7 days. The assessment criteria consisted in hemodynamic and ECG parameters recordings and the pharmacokinetics of digoxin during the last day of coadministration (day 14). No difference between the 2 treatment groups was evidenced on ECG, hemodynamic, and clinical and laboratory safety parameters. No change in AUC and tmax was recorded. No clinically relevant effect of mizolastine on the digoxin pharmacokinetics was found. However, a statistically significant increase in digoxin Cmax (3.03+/-0.18 nmolxl(-1) vs 2.52+/-0.19 nmolxl(-1), p < 0.05) and Cmin (0.99+/-0.08 nmolxl(-1) vs 0.87+/-0.07 nmolxl(-1), p=0.05) occurred after the coadministration vs digoxin alone. It can be concluded that mizolastine and digoxin at therapeutic dosages can be safely coadministered.

Clinical pharmacology of befloxatone: a brief review.

Clinical pharmacology studies of befloxatone, a new selective reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase-A (MAO-A), have addressed safety, with special emphasis on tyramine interactions, and have also investigated pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics in terms of both MAO-A inhibition (using 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol, DHPG, as a pharmacological activity marker) and effects on psychomotor and cognitive function, in young and elderly healthy volunteers. Clinical and laboratory safety data were satisfactory in healthy volunteers given single doses of up to 160 mg or repeated doses of up to 80 mg/day for 7 days. Tyramine interaction studies showed that the expected potentiation of the tyramine pressor effect occurred with a safety margin that was so wide as to make dietary restrictions unnecessary with dosages of up to 20 mg once daily in clinical settings. Absorption was rapid (tmax = 2 h), terminal halflife was about 11 h, and PK parameters increased linearly with the dose. Befloxatone induced a dose-dependent decrease in plasma DHPG levels from 2.5 mg upwards, and a 10-mg dose provided sub-maximal activity (80% DHPG decrease) of 24 h duration. No sedative or stimulant effects were detected using several batteries of psychometric tests. Befloxatone was devoid of deleterious effects on memory in young volunteers, and exhibited the EEG profile of a non-sedative antidepressant. In summary, available clinical pharmacology studies confirm that befloxatone is a safe and potent RIMA with no potential for inducing deleterious CNS effects.

Pharmacokinetic analysis of mizolastine in healthy young volunteers after single oral and intravenous doses: noncompartmental approach and compartmental modeling.

This paper presents the analysis of the kinetics of a new antihistamine, mizolastine, in 18 healthy volunteers, from concentrations measured after an intravenous infusion and two different oral administrations: tablet and capsule. Two approaches were used to analyze these data: (i) a noncompartmental approach implemented in PHARM-NCA; (ii) a compartmental modeling approach implemented in a new S-PLUS library, NLS2, which allows the estimation of variance parameters simultaneously with the kinetic parameters. For the compartmental modeling approach, two-compartment open models were used. According to the Akaike criterion, the best model describing the kinetics of mizolastine after oral administration was the zero-order absorption model. The kinetic parameters obtained with PHARM-NCA and NLS2 were similar. The estimated duration of absorption was greater for the tablets than for the capsules (with means equal to 1.13 hr and 0.84 hr respectively). After an intravenous infusion, the mean estimated clearance was 4.9 L/hr, the mean lambda 2-phase apparent volume of distribution was 89.6 L and the mean terminal half-life was 12.9 hr.

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of two dose regimens of befloxatone, a new reversible and selective monoamine oxidase inhibitor, at steady state in healthy volunteers.

The pharmacodynamic equipotency of 2 dose regimens (5 mg twice daily versus 10 mg once daily) of befloxatone, a new reversible and selective monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A) inhibitor, after single and multiple doses for 6 days was examined in a randomized, double-blind, three-way crossover, placebo-controlled trial of 12 healthy volunteers. Plasma levels of the deaminated metabolite 3-4 dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG), as measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with coulometric electrochemical detection, were used as an index of MAO inhibition. A single dose of befloxatone produced a significant dose-related reduction in plasma DHPG levels, as shown by the decrease in the 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) of DHPG, which peaked 2 hours after administration and persisted over 24 hours. Both dose regimens provided equipotent extent and duration of MAO-A inhibition at steady state, suggesting a once daily dosage should be sufficient for most patients. The pharmacokinetic bioavailability at steady state of both dose regimens was also similar. The concentration-time effect curve after a single dose revealed a hysteresis corresponding to the delay necessary to elicit MAO inhibition and/or elimination of DHPG. The relationship between plasma levels of DHPG and/or elimination of plasma concentrations of DHPG and befloxatone after a single dose can be modeled using the Emax model with a mean EC50 of 4.75 ng/mL, and suggests the presence of a maximal response from the single dose. This model permits prediction of steady-state levels of DHPG.

Inhibition of histamine-induced skin wheal and flare after 5 days of mizolastine.

Mizolastine is a new, nonsedating antihistamine providing satisfactory symptomatic relief in allergic rhinitis and urticaria. The purpose of this study was to use inhibition of wheal and flare formation after 2-mu g intradermal histamine injections as a measure of the antihistamine effect of repeated doses of mizolastine. Eight volunteers were enrolled in this four-arm, double-blind, cross-over, randomized study. Three dose levels of once-daily mizolastine (5 mg, 10 mg, and 15 mg) were compared with placebo during 5-day dose periods. Histamine tests were performed before drug intake on days 1 and 5, and then 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 24 hours after drug intake on day 5. All 3 doses of mizolastine were more effective than placebo in suppressing wheal and flare reactions, and the antihistamine activity was highest at both the 10- and 15-mg dose levels. The effect on the flare reaction appeared within 1 hour, reached a maximum effect 4 hours after administration, and persisted for as long as 24 hours. The relative changes in wheal and flare areas were correlated with mizolastine trough plasma levels on day 5. Safety was satisfactory in all groups. This study confirms that mizolastine is a rapid and potent antihistamine; and its long-lasting effectiveness indicates that a once-daily regimen is acceptable for clinical use.

Plasma and skin suction-blister-fluid pharmacokinetics and time course of the effects of oral mizolastine.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate plasma and skin suction-blister-fluid pharmacokinetics of oral mizolastine in order to determine whether the drug concentration in the fluid of suction-induced skin blisters could better predict the antihistamine activity than the plasma concentration. SETTING: Department of Internal Medicine, Université Paris 6. SUBJECTS: Ten healthy male volunteers. METHODS: The volunteers (mean age 26.8 years, mean weight 75.8 kg) received a single 10-mg oral dose of mizolastine at 1000 hours. The pharmacokinetic study included 11 plasma and 9 blister fluid samples and blister epidermal-roof specimens. Mizolastine was assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Each volunteer also received nine intradermal injections of 5 micrograms histamine. Antihistamine activity was assessed as the post-treatment percentages of changes in the histamine-induced relative wheal and flare areas versus baseline. RESULTS: Mizolastine mean Cmax (SD) and median tmax were, respectively, 380 ng.ml-1 and 0.8 h in plasma, and 21.8 ng.ml-1 and 10 h in blister fluid. Mizolastine could not be quantified in the epidermis. The maximal histamine-induced relative flare inhibition was 72.5% and was attained at the median time of 3 h post-dosing and therefore was delayed by 2.2 h with respect to the plasma tmax. Mean relative wheal inhibition, although lower, showed the same time profile. A direct relationship could not be found between drug concentrations in blister fluid and antihistamine activity. Simulated concentrations in the peripheral compartment better explain the maximum inhibition effect on flare, observed 3 h post-dosing, with a flatter hysteresis loop obtained when plotting relative flare inhibition versus plasma or blister-fluid drug concentrations. CONCLUSION: The mizolastine concentrations in the skin suction-blister fluid were not predictive of the antihistamine activity.

The psychomotor and cognitive effects of litoxetine in young and middle aged volunteers.

1. The effects of a range of doses of litoxetine (twice daily for 4 days), a novel specific serotonin re-uptake inhibitor, were evaluated in young and middle aged volunteers. 2. Psychometric testing was carried out at various time points on days 1 and 4 of each treatment period. The test battery consisted of critical flicker fusion (CFF), choice reaction time (CRT), compensatory tracking (CTT), Stroop and Sternberg memory scanning tests. Subjective feelings of sleep and sedation were measured by the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) and line analogue rating scales (LARS). 3. Pharmacokinetic profiles were determined from analyses of blood samples taken after the final dose on day 5. 4. Overall, there were few changes in any of the psychometric tests and although the higher doses of litoxetine improved CFF, these effects were weak in that differences could only be detected when the results were pooled against time. 5. The pharmacokinetic profile of litoxetine was very similar in both the young and middle aged subjects, and there was no difference regarding tolerability. 6. There is little evidence from this study to suggest that litoxetine has any intrinsic sedative activity which is likely to interfere with the performance of activities of everyday life.

Pharmacokinetic and bioavailability of diltiazem sustained-release: influence of food and time of administration.

Diltiazem is a calcium channel blocking agent known to be effective in the treatment of angina pectoris, hypertension and supraventricular arrhythmias. To improve the conditions of diltiazem administration in the treatment of hypertensive patients, a sustained-release formulation (Mono-Tildiem LP 300 mg) allowing a single daily oral administration has been developed. The aim of the present study was to first evaluate the influence of food intake and second to evaluate those of the time of administration on the pharmacokinetic parameters and the bioavailability of this sustained-release formulation. The influence of these factors was investigated over two different open, randomized, cross-over studies in 12 healthy volunteers. Although a significant decrease in Tmax and an increase in Cmax occurred when diltiazem sustained-release was administered with food intake, AUC0-48, and therefore the fraction absorbed, were not modified either by concurrent food intake or by different times of administration. The minor modifications of pharmacokinetic parameters of diltiazem sustained release observed were unlikely to induce any clinical consequence.

Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of a sustained-release diltiazem formulation (Mono-Tildiem LP 300 MG) after repeated administration in healthy volunteers.

The usual dosage regimen of diltiazem (Tildiem) is 60 mg 3-4 times a day. A sustained-release formulation has been developed (Mono-Tildiem LP 300 mg) in order to allow a single daily administration. Two repeated dosing studies were performed in healthy volunteers. The absolute bioavailability of sustained-release diltiazem LP 300 mg was investigated using concomitant i.v. administration of 13C-labelled drug: absolute bioavailability of the "once a day" formulation was 35%. The second study compared sustained-release diltiazem LP 300 mg with the standard formulation of diltiazem. The results showed that the diltiazem plasma concentrations obtained after the LP formulation remained stable between 2 and 14 h after administration and were compatible with a once a day administration. Relative bioavailability of sustained-release diltiazem LP 300 mg was 79.3% compared with diltiazem. Therefore, a unitary dose of sustained-release diltiazem LP 300 mg was chosen as the dose equivalent to the daily dose administered with the standard diltiazem formulation.

Flumazenil antagonizes the central effects of zolpidem, an imidazopyridine hypnotic.

Zolpidem is a new imidazopyridine-hypnotic that selectively binds to the central omega 1-receptor subtype. A double-blind, randomized, three-way, crossover placebo-controlled study was carried out in nine healthy male volunteers to assess the possible antagonism of central nervous system--depressant effects of zolpidem by flumazenil. Subjects received zolpidem (0.21 mg/kg) or placebo, intravenously, followed 17 minutes later by flumazenil (0.04 mg/kg) or placebo. Vigilance and performance were assessed by a trained anesthetist with use of ciliary reflex, response to a verbal instruction, subjective sedation, a tracking task, and a free recall task. Zolpidem produced a clinically relevant hypnotic effect in five subjects and significantly impaired performance in all nine subjects up to 90 minutes after dosing. Flumazenil rapidly antagonized clinical sedation in the five subjects who were asleep and significantly reversed the performance decrement within 3 minutes, without any escape phenomenon. Flumazenil did not change zolpidem plasma concentrations, confirming the pharmacodynamic nature of the interaction. Flumazenil may thus be a safe and effective antidote in patients with zolpidem overdosage.

EEG profile of intravenous zolpidem in healthy volunteers.

Zolpidem is an imidazopyridine which binds specifically to the omega 1 receptor. Zolpidem demonstrated potent hypnotic activity at a dose of 10 mg. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of zolpidem were studied after daytime administration in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Single doses of zolpidem (10 mg IV as a 3-min infusion and 20 mg orally) and placebo were firstly tested in 12 healthy young male volunteers. Two other doses (5 mg IV and orally) were then evaluated in 6 out of these 12 subjects. EEG (4 leads = Fp2-T4, Fp1-T3, T4-02 and T3-01), and Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS) were measured up to 5 h postdosing. Blood samples were also collected up to 24 h. The time course of the hypnotic activity of zolpidem, assessed by the score obtained on SSS, showed a similar profile whatever the route or the dose administered: slightly earlier onset after IV but sedative scores were reached at 30 min and the effect peaked between 1 and 1.5 h and lasted 4 h in both conditions. The EEG profile of zolpidem was characterised by a decrease of alpha activity and an increase in delta and in beta activity. The effect on beta activity was marked within the first hour and then disappeared. The time course of delta and alpha activities indicated a rapid onset (10 min after IV, 30 min after oral route) and a duration of 3-4 h. The amplitude of these relative EEG changes and their duration were independent of the route of administration and the dose administered. AUC and Cmax increased proportionally to the administered dose and elimination half life (2h), clearance and volume of distribution did not change according to the dose or the route of administration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

EEG profile of litoxetine after single and repeated administration in healthy volunteers.

1. Litoxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor with antidepressant activity in animal models and in depressed patients. 2. This double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled study was carried out in 12 healthy young male volunteers. The aim was to assess the EEG profile of litoxetine in parallel with its pharmacokinetics after a single dose or multiple administrations for 4 days (6 doses) of two dosages (10 mg and 25 mg). Spectral analysis of four EEG leads (F4-T4, F3-T3, T4-02 and T3-01) was done up to 12 h post-dose. 3. In single or multiple doses, litoxetine induced EEG changes characterised by a dose-related increase in fast beta energies, mainly beta 2, without any changes in slow waves (delta and theta). A slight reduction in alpha activity occurred only after repeated doses. 4. EEG changes occurred after a single oral administration and lasted at least 12 h with litoxetine blood concentrations ranging from 4 to 10 ng ml-1. With repeated administrations, the pharmacodynamic steady-state was achieved as the increase in beta 2 energies was the same before and 12 h post-dose. These effects occurred with litoxetine blood concentrations ranging from 3 to 7 ng ml-1 with the 10 mg dosage and from 8 to 18 ng ml-1 with the 25 mg dosage. The EEG profile did not change after 4 days of repeated administration, indicating that tolerance did not develop. 5. Cmax and AUC showed proportionality between the administered dosages of 10 and 25 mg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of mizolastine, a new antihistamine, on psychomotor performance and memory in elderly subjects.

The effects of a single 10 mg dose of the new H1 antihistamine mizolastine on psychomotor performance and memory in the elderly were assessed in a double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled study in 15 elderly female volunteers aged 66-77 years, using clemastine 2 mg as a positive control. Objective (critical flicker fusion, choice reaction time, digit symbol substitution, immediate and delayed free recall) and subjective (linear analogue rating scales) assessments were done on each test day before the dose, then 4 and 8 h post-dose. Plasma samples were also collected. A single oral dose of mizolastine within the range of recommended daily therapeutic dosages (10 mg) failed to induce subjective drowsiness and produced no detrimental effects on psychomotor performance or on short-term and long-term memory in the elderly subjects. In contrast, 2 mg clemastine induced significant impairments (decrease in critical flicker fusion, increase in recognition reaction time) in comparison with placebo and mizolastine, although it did not impair memory. The pharmacokinetic profile of mizolastine in the elderly study subjects was similar to that observed in healthy young volunteers. Therefore, it can be concluded that mizolastine 10 mg could be used safely in elderly out-patients as it preserves functions involved in activities of daily living.