Effect of dexmedetomidine on fluid resuscitation in burn-injured patients.

Fluid creep occurs when resuscitation after extensive burn injury reaches volumes higher than predicted. Since this has been described in patients with high opioid requirements, continuous analgesics and sedatives, including dexmedetomidine, have been avoided during resuscitation. This study sought to describe the impact of dexmedetomidine on fluid resuscitation requirements. This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with burns greater than 20% total body surface area (TBSA) resuscitated between January 2017 and June 2022 at a regional burn center. Patients deceased within 48 hours of burn were excluded. Primary outcome was volume of fluid required in the first 24 and 48 hours post-burn. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of fluid-related adverse events within 7 days post-burn. A total of 170 patients were included: 55 in the dexmedetomidine cohort and 115 in the control cohort. After propensity matching for variables associated with fluid creep, the dexmedetomidine cohort required 4.2 ± 1.7 mL/kg/%TBSA in the first 24 hours compared to 3.6 ± 1.1 mL/kg/%TBSA in the control cohort (p=0.03). The difference was no longer significant at 48 hours (p=0.11). There were no differences in the incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome, delayed escharotomy/fasciotomy, intraabdominal hypertension, or renal replacement therapy. Dexmedetomidine exposure during acute resuscitation resulted in increased fluid requirements in the first 24 hours, suggesting it is independently associated with fluid creep; however, this increase was not sustained at 48 hours. Clinical significance of this finding is unclear as there was no increase in adverse events related to excessive fluid resuscitation between cohorts.

Impact of Vaccination on Cost and Course of Hospitalization Associated with COVID-19 Infection.

Objective: Examine the impact of vaccination status on hospital cost and course for patients admitted with COVID-19 infection. Design: Retrospective cohort study characterizing vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals hospitalized for COVID-19 between April 2021 to January 2022. Setting: Large academic medical center. Methods: Patients were included if they were greater than 18 years old, fully vaccinated or unvaccinated against COVID-19, and admitted for COVID-19 infection. Patients: 437 consecutively admitted patients for COVID-19 infection met inclusion criteria. Of these, 79 were excluded for unknown or partial vaccination status, transfer from an outside hospital, or multiple COVID-19 related admissions. Results: Overall, 279 (77.9%) unvaccinated patients compared to 79 (22.1%) vaccinated patients were hospitalized with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Average length of stay was significantly lower in the vaccinated group (6.47 days versus 8.92 days, P = 0.03). Vaccinated patients experienced a 70.6% lower risk of ICU admission (OR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.12-0.71, P = 0.006). The unadjusted cost of hospitalization was not found to be statistically significant ($119,630 versus $191,146, P = 0.06). After adjusting for age and comorbidities, vaccinated patients experienced a 26% lower cost of hospitalization compared to unvaccinated patients (P = 0.004). Unvaccinated patients incurred a significantly higher cost of hospitalization per day ($29,425 vs $13,845 P < 0.0001). Unvaccinated patients (n = 118, 42.9%) were more likely than vaccinated patients (n = 16, 20.3%) to require high-flow oxygen or mechanical ventilation (OR = 2.95, 95% CI 1.62-5.38, P = 0.0004). Conclusion: Vaccinated patients experienced a lower cost of hospitalization after adjusting for age and comorbidities and shorter length of stay compared to unvaccinated patients admitted for COVID-19.

Effect of Delay and Disruption in Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Trauma Patients: Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Trauma patients are at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding. The purpose of this study was to characterize percentage of VTE chemoprophylaxis given to trauma patients with and without a VTE. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective case-control study evaluated trauma patients admitted to a Level I trauma center. Adult patients were included when hospitalized at least 2 days and had a head abbreviated injury score of 1 or less. Non-VTE patients were matched by decade of life and injury severity score (ISS). The primary outcome was percentage of VTE chemoprophylaxis received over the first 14 days of admission. Descriptive statistics, chi-squared test, Student's t-test, and Cox proportional hazard were used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 44 VTE patients were included with 125 matched non-VTE patients. Baseline demographics included age in years (50.7 ± 19.6 vs 49.6 ± 19.4), ISS (18.9 ± 11.3 vs 19 ± 11.6), and lower extremity fracture (54.5% vs 40%), for VTE and non-VTE groups, respectively. The primary outcome of VTE chemoprophylaxis doses given was significantly lower for VTE patients than non-VTE patients (49.3% vs 59.3%, p = 0.0069). Significant predictors of VTE were percentage of VTE chemoprophylaxis doses given (p < 0.0001) and weight (p = 0.0042) based on regression analysis. Notably, there was a 7% decrease in the hazard for VTE for every 1% increase in VTE chemoprophylaxis given. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who developed VTE were more likely to have delays and disruptions in VTE chemoprophylaxis, even after controlling for age, sex, ISS, lower extremity fractures, and number of operations.

Continuous infusion versus intermittent infusion vancomycin in a burn center intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin is a common and critical drug for empiric antimicrobial therapy in the infected burn patient. However, profound physiologic changes may impede the clinical effectiveness and amplify the potential nephrotoxicity of vancomycin. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study at a large academic medical center and regional burn center. Patients with ≥10% total body surface area burn that received intravenous vancomycin were considered for study inclusion. Patients were assigned to the intermittent infusion or continuous infusion cohort if they received vancomycin for ≥48 h with ≥1 documented vancomycin serum concentration. The target steady state drug level for continuous infusion was 17-22 mg/L. The target steady state trough drug level for intermittent infusion was 15-20 mg/L. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were time to therapeutic drug level and nephrotoxicity respectively. RESULTS: Thirty continuous infusion subjects with 88 plasma drug levels and thirty intermittent infusion subjects with 80 plasma drug levels were analyzed within the study period. There was a significant difference in the number of subjects that achieved a plasma vancomycin level within the target range during the course of therapy (73.3% for continuous infusion vs. 26.7% for intermittent infusion, p = 0.0003). The time to therapeutic level was 3.90 days for continuous infusion and 5.22 days for intermittent infusion (p = 0.0393). Nephrotoxicity occurred less frequently in the continuous infusion cohort (23.3% vs. 53.8%). CONCLUSION: Continuous infusion vancomycin was associated with more rapid attainment of target levels and a lower rate of nephrotoxicity.

Impact of Multimodal Analgesia in Critically Ill Burn Patients.

Opioids are the mainstay of treatment for burn pain. However, these medications may be associated with respiratory depression and dependence. Multimodal analgesia is an alternative method that utilizes both opioid and nonopioid medications with different mechanisms. This study examines the impact of multimodal therapy for postoperative pain control in a burn intensive care unit.  This was a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to the burn unit at a tertiary medical center. Consecutively admitted patients with burns greater than or equal to 10% TBSA and intensive care unit length of stay greater than 7 days were eligible for inclusion (2012-2018). Patients were excluded if they received an opioid infusion greater than 48 hours.  Patients treated with multimodal analgesia were compared to those treated with opioids alone. Data were calculated for 5 days after surgery. There were 98 patients in the nonmultimodal group and 97 in the multimodal group. Mean cumulative opioid dose was lower in the multimodal group (1028.7 mg vs 1423.2 mg, P = .0031). Patients with greater than 20% burns had a larger reduction in mean opioid equivalents in the multimodal group (1106 vs 1594 mg, P = .009) compared to patients with burns less than 20% (940 vs 1282 mg, P = .058). There was no difference in mean pain scores on postoperative day 5 (6.2 ±â€¯2.2 vs 5.5 ±â€¯2.3, P = .07) or at intensive care unit discharge (4.7 ±â€¯2.4 vs 4.7 ±â€¯2.8, P = .99). The use of multimodal analgesia significantly reduced cumulative opioid equivalent dose without compromising pain control.    .

Effect of Flumazenil on Hypoactive Delirium in the ICU: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study.

To determine whether the use of flumazenil reverses hypoactive delirium and increases delirium-free days in critically ill patients who were exposed to benzodiazepine therapy during the ICU admission. DESIGN: This was a single-center, double-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled pilot study. SETTING: Adult ICUs at a large academic medical center in the United States. PATIENTS: Adult, critically ill patients with benzodiazepine exposure and hypoactive delirium based on the Confusion Assessment Method-ICU and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale assessments were considered for enrollment. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received a test dose of flumazenil starting at 0.1 mg intravenously and titrated up every 5 minutes by 0.1 mg increments up to a maximum total dose of 2 mg. Patients who demonstrated a Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale score increase of greater than 1 point were considered responders and randomized to flumazenil (0.05-0.3 mg/hr) or placebo infusion for up to 72 hours. Confusion Assessment Method-ICU scores were assessed twice daily for resolution of delirium. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The trial was stopped early based on the observed size effect and power analysis. Twenty-two of the 25 patients responded to the flumazenil test dose (88%). The median number of delirium-free days alive without coma within 14 days of enrollment was similar between the two infusion groups (12.7 vs 9.2; p = 0.19). There was no difference in the probability of delirium resolution within the first 14 days with 90% versus 70% in the flumazenil and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.2). There was no statistical difference (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.022-1.23; p = 0.079) in delirium- and coma-free days at the end of the study drug infusion. There was no difference between groups in ICU length of stay (7.8 ± 4.8 vs 7 ± 8; p = 0.74). No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that flumazenil test dose and infusion present a potential option for hypoactive delirium associated with benzodiazepine exposure; however, the possible benefit is unknown. Larger studies are warranted to further evaluate these findings.

Comparison of Self-Reported and Behavioral Pain Assessment Tools in Critically Ill Patients.

BACKGROUND: Self-reported and behavioral pain assessment scales are often used interchangeably in critically ill patients due to fluctuations in mental status. The correlation between scales is not well elucidated. The purpose of this study was to describe the correlation between self-reported and behavioral pain scores in critically ill patients. METHODS: Pain was assessed using behavioral and self-reported pain assessment tools. Behavioral pain tools included Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) and Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS). Self-reported pain tools included Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scales. Delirium was assessed using the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit. Patient preference regarding pain assessment method was queried. Correlation between scores was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients were included: 67 patients were nondelirious and 48 patients were delirious. The overall correlation between self-reported (NRS) and behavioral (CPOT) pain scales was poor (0.30, P = .018). In patients without delirium, a strong correlation was found between the 2 behavioral pain scales (0.94, P < .0001) and 2 self-reported pain scales (0.77, P < .0001). Self-reported pain scale (NRS) and behavioral pain scale (CPOT) were poorly correlated with each other (0.28, P = .021). In patients with delirium, there was a strong correlation between behavioral pain scales (0.86, P < .0001) and a moderate correlation between self-reported pain scales (0.69, P < .0001). There was no apparent correlation between self-reported (NRS) and behavioral pain scales (CPOT) in patients with delirium (0.23, P = .12). Most participants preferred self-reported pain assessment. CONCLUSION: Self-reported pain scales and behavioral pain scales cannot be used interchangeably. Current validated behavioral pain scales may not accurately reflect self-reported pain in critically ill patients.

Moderate-Intensity Insulin Therapy Is Associated With Reduced Length of Stay in Critically Ill Patients With Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic State.

OBJECTIVES: Insulin infusion therapy is commonly used in the hospital setting to manage diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state. Clinical evidence suggests both hypoglycemia and glycemic variability negatively impact patient outcomes. The hypothesis of this study was that moderate-intensity insulin therapy decreases hospital length of stay and prevalence of hypoglycemia in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state. DESIGN: Pre-post study. SETTING: Large academic medical center in the United States. PATIENTS: Two-hundred one consecutive, nonpregnant, adult patients admitted for diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state between October 2010 and December 2014. INTERVENTIONS: High-intensity insulin therapy versus moderate-intensity insulin therapy. High-intensity insulin therapy was designed to rapidly normalize blood glucose levels with bolus doses of insulin and rapid insulin titration. Moderate-intensity insulin therapy was designed to mitigate glycemic variability and hypoglycemia through avoidance of bolus dosing, a liberalized blood glucose target, and gradual insulin titration. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Hospital and ICU length of stay were reduced by 23.6% and 38%, respectively. The relative risk of remaining in the hospital at day 7 (0.51; p = 0.022) and day 14 (0.28; p = 0.044) were significantly reduced by the moderate-intensity insulin therapy strategy. The relative risk of remaining in the ICU at 48 hours was significantly lower in the moderate-intensity insulin therapy cohort (0.34; p = 0.0048). The prevalence (35% vs 1%; p = 0.0003) and relative risk (0.028; p = 0.0004) of hypoglycemia were significantly lower in the moderate-intensity insulin therapy cohort. Glycemic variability decreased by 28.6% (p < 0.0001). There was no difference in the time to anion gap closure (p = 0.123). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-intensity insulin therapy for diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state resulted in improvements in hospital and ICU length of stay, which appeared to be associated with decreased glycemic variability.

Effect of early and focused benzodiazepine therapy on length of stay in severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome.

Objective: Current evidence supports symptom-triggered therapy for alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). Early, escalating therapy with benzodiazepines (BZD) appears to decrease ICU length of stay (LOS); however, the effect on hospital LOS remains unknown. The hypothesis of this study is that focused BZD treatment in the first 24 h will decrease hospital LOS. Design: Pre-post cohort study. Setting: Academic medical center. Patients: This study included patients with severe AWS. The pre-intervention cohort (PRE) was admitted between January and November 2015. The post-intervention cohort (POST) was admitted between April 2016 and March 2017. Severe AWS was defined as patients requiring diazepam doses of >30 mg. Focused treatment was defined as >50% of total diazepam usage within the first 24 h of recognition of AWS. Intervention: In the PRE group, patients received symptom-triggered, escalating doses of diazepam and phenobarbital based on their Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). In the POST group, patients received a revised, time-limited course of therapy: escalating doses of BZD and phenobarbital were given during a 24-h loading phase, and all therapy was discontinued after a 72-h tapering phase. The SHOT scale was used as an adjunct to RASS to assess non-agitation symptoms of AWS and guide additional diazepam doses. Measurements and main results: The primary outcome was hospital LOS; secondary outcomes included ICU LOS, BZD use, and ventilator-free days. Five hundred thirty-two patients were treated using the AWS protocol; 113 experienced severe AWS. The PRE (n = 75) and POST (n = 38) groups were evenly matched in age, sex, history of AWS, and severity of illness. There was a substantial difference in POST patients who received focused treatment (51.3% vs. 73.7%, p = .03). The POST group had a significant decrease in hospital LOS (14.0 vs. 9.8 days, p = .03) and ICU LOS (7.4 vs. 4.4 days, p = .03). Conclusion: Early, focused management of severe AWS was associated with a decrease in ICU and hospital LOS.

Multimodal Analgesia and Opioid Use in Critically Ill Trauma Patients.

BACKGROUND: Opioids are the mainstay of pain management in critically ill trauma patients. However, the risks of opioid use mandate a different approach. Multimodal analgesia employs a combination of opioid and nonopioid agents using different mechanisms that have synergistic effects in treating pain. This study examines the effects of multimodal analgesia on the opioid requirements of critically ill trauma patients. STUDY DESIGN: This was a pre-post cohort study of adult trauma ICU patients before and after implementation of a multimodal pain management order set. Patients were excluded if their hospital stay was less than 5 days, head Abbreviated Injury Scale score was greater than 1, or pre-injury medications included methadone or buprenorphine. The total oral morphine equivalent (OME) dose was calculated for each 24-hour period on days 2 through 5 of admission and the last 24 hours before discharge using standardized ratios. The primary endpoint was cumulative OME doses over the second through fifth days of admission. RESULTS: There were 65 patients in the pre-group and 62 in the post-group. Median cumulative OME dose was significantly lower in the post-group (125.6 mg, interquartile range [IQR] 45.0 to 415.0 mg) compared with the pre-group (481.5 mg, IQR 174.8 to 881.3 mg), p < 0.001. Patients who received 3 or more multimodal agents had a lower cumulative OME dose (116.3 mg, IQR 52.5 to 496.5 mg) compared with those who were on 1 to 2 multimodal agents (363 mg, IQR 115.5 to 743 mg) or 0 multimodal agents (479 mg, IQR 185 to 736.5 mg), p = 0.024. There were no differences between pre-group and post-group mean pain scores on hospital day 5 (4.48 ± 0.34 vs 3.50 ± 0.38, p = 0.058) or at hospital discharge (3.43 ± 0.34 vs 3.56 ± 0.32, p = 0.789). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a multimodal pain management strategy significantly reduced opioid use in critically ill trauma patients without compromising patient comfort.

Dexmedetomidine for Refractory Intracranial Hypertension.

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a selective α2 adrenergic agonist that is commonly used for sedation in the intensive care unit (ICU). The role of DEX for adjunctive treatment of refractory intracranial hypertension is poorly defined. The primary objective of this study was to determine the effect of DEX on the need for rescue therapy (ie, hyperosmolar boluses, extraventricular drain [EVD] drainages) for refractory intracranial hypertension. Secondary objectives included the number of intracranial pressure (ICP) excursions, bradycardic, hypotensive, and compromised cerebral perfusion pressure episodes. This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients admitted to the neurosurgical ICU from August 1, 2009, to July 29, 2015, and who received DEX for refractory intracranial hypertension. The objectives were compared between the 2 time periods-before (pre-DEX) and during therapy (DEX). Twenty-three patients with 26 episodes of refractory intracranial hypertension met the inclusion criteria. The number of hyperosmolar boluses was decreased after DEX therapy was initiated. Mannitol boluses required were statistically reduced (1 vs 0.5, P = .03); however, reduction in hypertonic boluses was not statistically significant (1.3 vs 0.9, P = .2). The mean number of EVD drainages per 24 hours was not significantly different between the time periods (15.7 vs 14.0, P = .35). The rate of ICP excursions did not differ between the 2 groups (24.3 vs 22.5, P = .62). When compared to pre-DEX data, there was no difference in the median number of hypotensive (0 vs 0), bradycardic (0 vs 0), or compromised cerebral perfusion pressure episodes (0.5 vs 1.0). Dexmedetomidine may avoid increases in the need for rescue therapy when used as an adjunctive treatment of refractory intracranial hypertension without compromising hemodynamics.

Efficient and effective precepting of pharmacy students in acute and ambulatory care rotations: A Delphi expert panel study.

PURPOSE: Using the Delphi process, a panel of experienced preceptors achieved consensus on best practices to increase preceptor efficiency and effectiveness. METHODS: The Delphi panelists completed 3 survey rounds and a face-to-face meeting. Survey questions covered several topics, including preparation of students for rotations, preceptor efficiency and effectiveness, potential resident contributions to precepting, methods of developing critical-thinking skills and providing assessment and feedback, precepting time metrics, and barriers to preceptor effectiveness. Panel consensus was defined as agreement of ≥80%. RESULTS: Fifteen of 36 invited preceptors (42%) completed all 3 survey rounds. The expert panel reached consensus on 6 essentials for effective rotations, 8 precepting contributions that could be made by appropriately trained residents, precepting barriers, 4 strategies for teaching critical thinking, and 5 valuable characteristics of the One Minute Preceptor model. Panelists reported on time spent with students presenting new patient cases (median, 10 minutes per case), time devoted to assessment of students' clinical performance (median, 22 minutes per student weekly), and time dedicated to student professional development (median, 20 minutes per student weekly). CONCLUSION: Important strategies for preceptors identified by the panel included (1) a thorough orientation to logistics, expectations, and scheduling of activities, (2) using appropriately trained residents in student training, (3) providing opportunities for critical thinking and therapeutic decision-making, (4) giving frequent, quality feedback on clinical activities, and (5) giving feedback to learners on a regular basis.

Prevalence and Course of Atrial Fibrillation in Critically Ill Trauma Patients.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac dysrhythmia. Its prevalence, risk factors, course, and complications are not well described in critically ill trauma patients. This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study at an academic, level 1 trauma center. Trauma patients >18 years, identified from the trauma registry and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), were sequentially screened for AF. A matched cohort was created by selecting patients consecutively admitted before and after the patients who experienced AF. Of 2591 patients screened, 191 experienced AF, resulting in a prevalence of 7.4%. There was no difference in injury severity score (ISS) between those with and without AF, but patients with AF had higher observed mortality (15.5% vs 6.7%, P < .001). Patients with a history of AF (n = 75) differed from new-onset AF (n = 106) in their mean age, 78.9 ± 8.4 versus 69.2 ± 17.9 years; mean time to AF onset, 1.1 ± 2.3 versus 5.2 ± 10.2 days; median duration of AF, 29.8 (1-745.2) versus 5.9 (0-757) hours; and rate of AF resolution, 28% versus 82.1%, respectively. Despite a higher ISS, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and length of stay, the new-onset AF group experienced a similar rate of mortality compared to the history of AF group (14.7% vs 16.0%). Patients with AF had a higher mortality when compared to those in sinus rhythm. The course of AF in the new-onset AF group occurred later was shorter and was more likely to convert; however, these patients had a longer ICU stay when compared to those who had a history of AF.

Inadequate Sedation During Therapeutic Paralysis: Use of Bispectral Index in Critically Ill Patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving therapeutic paralysis may experience inadequate sedation due to intrinsic limitations of behavioral sedation assessment. Bispectral index (BIS™) provides an objective measure of sedation; however, the role of BIS™ is not well defined in intensive care unit (ICU) patients on neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to delineate the relationship between BIS™ and level of sedation for critically ill patients during therapeutic paralysis. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study conducted in ICU patients receiving continuous infusion NMBA and BIS™ monitoring. The primary endpoint was the correlation of BIS™ <60 during therapeutic paralysis with a Richmond Agitation Sedation Score (RASS) of -4 to -5 (i.e., deep or unarousable sedation) at the time of emergence from therapeutic paralysis. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were included in the analysis. Three of these patients (9.6 %) were inadequately sedated upon emergence from paralysis; that is, restless or agitated (RASS +1 to +2). We did not observe a correlation between BIS™ and RASS upon emergence from paralysis (r = 0.27, p = 0.14). The sensitivity of BIS™ <60 in predicting deep sedation (RASS -5 to -4) was 100 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0-100) with a positive predictive value of 35.7 %. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of BIS™ <60 in predicting light sedation or deeper (RASS -5 to -2) was 92.9 % (95 %CI 83.3-100) and 92.9 %, respectively. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that 1 in 10 critically ill patients receiving therapeutic paralysis may be inadequately sedated. BIS™ monitoring may serve as a useful adjunctive measure of sedation in critically ill patients receiving therapeutic paralysis.

Blood glucose response to rescue dextrose in hypoglycemic, critically ill patients receiving an insulin infusion.

BACKGROUND: There is inadequate guidance for clinicians on selection of the optimal dextrose 50% (D50W) dose for hypoglycemia correction in critically ill patients. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the blood glucose (BG) response to D50W in critically ill patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of critically ill patients who received D50W for hypoglycemia (BG < 70 mg/dL) while on an insulin infusion. The primary objective of this study was to determine the BG response to D50W. The relationship between participant characteristics and the dose-adjusted change in BG following D50W was analyzed using simple and multiple linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: There were 470 hypoglycemic events (BG < 70 mg/dL) corrected with D50W. The overall median BG response was 4.0 (2.53, 6.08) mg/dL per gram of D50W administered. Administration of D50W per protocol resulted in 32 episodes of hyperglycemia (BG > 150 mg/dL), resulting in a 6.8% rate of overcorrection; 49% of hypoglycemic episodes (230/470) corrected to a BG >100 mg/dL. A multivariable GEE analysis showed a significantly higher BG response in participants with diabetes (0.002) but a lower response in those with recurrent hypoglycemia (P = 0.049). The response to D50W increased with increasinginsulin infusion rate (P = 0.022). Burn patients experienced a significantly larger BG response compared with cardiac, medical, neurosurgical, or surgical patients. CONCLUSIONS: The observed median effect of D50W on BG was approximately 4 mg/dL per gram of D50W administered. Application of these data may aid in rescue protocol development that may reduce glucose variability associated with hypoglycemic episodes and the correction.

Alcohol withdrawal syndrome in critically ill patients: protocolized versus nonprotocolized management.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 18% to 25% of patients with alcohol use disorders admitted to the hospital develop alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). Symptom-triggered dosing of benzodiazepines (BZDs) seems to lead to shorter courses of treatment, lower cumulative BZD dose, and more rapid control of symptoms in non-critically ill patients. This study compares the outcomes of critically ill patients with AWS when treated using a protocolized, symptom-triggered, dose escalation approach versus a nonprotocolized approach. METHODS: This is a retrospective pre-post study of patients 18 years or older with AWS admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). The preintervention cohort (PRE) was admitted between February 2008 and February 2010. The postintervention cohort (POST) was admitted between February 2012 and January 2013. The PRE patients were treated by physician preference and compared with POST patients who were given escalating doses of BZDs and/or phenobarbital according to an AWS protocol, titrating to light sedations (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale score of 0 to -2). RESULTS: There were 135 episodes of AWS in 132 critically ill patients. POST patients (n = 75) were younger (50.7 [13.8] years vs. 55.7 [8.7] years, p = 0.03) than PRE patients (n = 60). Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were higher in the PRE group (6.1 [3.7] vs. 3.9 [2.9], p = 0.0004). There was a significant decrease in mean ICU length of stay from 9.6 (10.5) days to 5.2 (6.4) days (p = 0.0004) in the POST group. The POST group also had significantly fewer ventilator days (5.6 [13.9] days vs. 1.31 [5.6] days, p < 0.0001) as well as a significant decrease in BZD use (319 [1,084] mg vs. 93 [171] mg, p = 0.002). There were significant differences between the two cohorts with respect to the need for continuous sedation (p < 0.001), duration of sedation (p < 0.001), and intubation secondary to AWS (p < 0.001). In all of these outcomes, the POST cohort had a notably lower frequency of occurrence. CONCLUSION: A protocolized treatment approach of AWS in critically ill patients involving symptom-triggered, dose escalations of diazepam and phenobarbital may lead to a decreased ICU length of stay, decreased time spent on mechanical ventilation, and decreased BZD requirements. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic study, level III; therapeutic study, level IV.

Cost-minimization analysis of two fluid products for resuscitation of critically injured trauma patients.

PURPOSE: Results of a study to determine potential cost benefits of substituting an alternative electrolyte solution for 0.9% sodium chloride injection for the initial fluid resuscitation of trauma patients are presented. METHODS: Using data from a randomized clinical trial that compared 24-hour fluid resuscitation outcomes in critically injured trauma patients treated with 0.9% sodium chloride injection and those who received a balanced electrolyte solution (Plasma-Lyte A, Baxter Healthcare), a cost-minimization analysis was performed at a large medical center. The outcomes evaluated included fluid and drug acquisition costs, materials and nurse labor costs, and costs associated with electrolyte replacement. RESULTS: The use of Plasma-Lyte A was associated with a relatively higher fluid acquisition cost but a reduced need for magnesium replacement. During the first 24 hours of hospitalization, 4 of 24 patients (17%) treated with 0.9% sodium chloride injection and none of the patients who received the comparator product (n = 22) required supplemental magnesium. Patients treated with 0.9% sodium chloride injection received a median of 4 g of magnesium (interquartile range [IQR], 2.5-4.0 g), compared with a median of 0 g (IQR 0-2 g) in the comparator group. Taking into account the costs of consumable supplies and nursing labor, the cost-minimization analysis indicated a 24-hour cost differential of $12.35 in favor of Plasma-Lyte A. CONCLUSION: Substitution of Plasma-Lyte A for 0.9% sodium chloride injection for fluid resuscitation during the first 24 hours after traumatic injury was associated with decreased magnesium replacement requirements and a net cost benefit to the institution.