Low vaccination coverage for human papillomavirus disease among young men who have sex with men, France, 2019.

BackgroundIn France, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has been recommended in 2016 for men who have sex with men (MSM) up to age 26 years.AimWe aimed to estimate HPV vaccine coverage in 18-28 year-old MSM and identify uptake determinants.MethodsWe collected data on socio-demographic characteristics, sexual behaviour, sexually transmitted diseases (STI) screening and vaccination uptake using a voluntary cross-sectional online survey conducted in 2019 targeting MSM. We calculated coverage of at least one dose of HPV vaccine and prevalence ratios (PR) of determinants with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using Poisson regression.ResultsOf 9,469 respondents (age range: 18-28 years), 15% (95% CI: 14-16) reported being vaccinated for HPV. Coverage was significantly higher among MSM < 24 years (PR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.13-1.39), with education level below university degree (PR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.08-1.32), living in rural areas (PR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.08-1.36), attending sex parties (PR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.03-1.33), using HIV-related biomedical prevention methods (PR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.12-1.54), with STI diagnosis (PR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.08-1.38) and with hepatitis A or B vaccination (PR: 4.56; 95% CI: 3.63-5.81 vs PR: 3.35; 95% CI: 2.53-4.44).ConclusionsThe HPV vaccination uptake among MSM in France was not satisfactory. It was higher among MSM benefitting from other vaccinations and biomedical preventive methods against HIV, suggesting a synergistic effect of the national preventive sexual health recommendations for MSM. Further efforts to improve HPV vaccination coverage targeting MSM are warranted.

Risk of Fecal Incontinence Following Receptive Anal Intercourse: Survey of 21,762 Men Who Have Sex With Men.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of receptive anal intercourse (RAI) is increasing. A few studies, with heterogeneous designs, have investigated the associated risk of fecal incontinence (FI). AIM: The primary objective of this study was to determine FI prevalence in a population of men who have sex with men (MSM) engaging in RAI. The secondary objective was to identify risk factors for severe FI. METHODS OUTCOMES: An online survey of 24,308 MSM was performed in 2019. Demographic and socioeconomic data were collected, together with information about RAI sexual practices, and FI defined by: "During the last month, have you experienced any involuntary leakage of stools?" RESULTS CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In total, 1,734 (8%) of the 21,762 participants reported FI. Mean age was 35.3 years. The prevalence of FI was correlated with RAI frequency: 12.7% (if RAI ≥ 1 /wk) versus 5.7% (if no RAI). In multivariate analysis, the factors associated with FI were age (OR: 1.01), low socioeconomic status (OR 1.32 to 1.40), HIV-seropositivity (OR: 1.78), high RAI frequency (OR: 1.64), chemsex (OR: 1.67) and fist-fucking (OR: 1.61). STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Main strengths of our study are population size and assessment of detailed modalities of sexual practices. Main limitations are the use of a convenience non-random sample and the assessment of FI only during the past month. CONCLUSION: This study of a large MSM population, highlights risk factors for FI among RAI practices: RAI ≥ 1 /wk, chemsex, fist-fucking, low socioeconomic status. Garros A, Bourrely M, Sagaon-Teyssier L, et al. Risk of Fecal Incontinence Following Receptive Anal Intercourse: Survey of 21,762 Men Who Have Sex With Men. J Sex Med 2021;18:1880-1890.

Increase in the overall level of protected anal sex in men who have sex with men in France: results from the repeated cross-sectional survey Rapport au Sexe, France, 2017-2019.

This study measures the evolution in the overall level of protection against HIV by men who have sex with men (MSM) in France. Using data from the 2017 and 2019 editions of Rapport au Sexe - an online survey - we compared the use of HIV prevention tools by MSM during their most recent anal intercourse (MRAI) with a casual male partner. We developed a classification with five categories ordered according to the effectiveness of each tool method in reducing the risk of acquiring HIV: Treatment as prevention (TasP), Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), exclusive condom use, Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) or nothing (i.e., no tool used). The percentage of MSM who did not use any prevention tool decreased from 25.9% in 2017 to 23.5% in 2019 (aOR [95%CI] = 0.9 [0.8-0.9]). The proportion of MSM who took PrEP during the MRAI increased from 5.4% in 2017 to 14.0% in 2019 (aOR [95%CI] = 2.9[2.5-3.3]). The proportion of MSM who used condoms exclusively decreased from 67.5% in 2017 to 61.3% in 2019 (aOR [95%CI] = 0.8 [0.7-0.8]). We observed an increase in the rate of protected anal sex, and a decrease in the rate of condom use. The implementation of PrEP may be one of the main driving forces behind these changes.

Self-reported injection practices among people who use drugs in French prisons: Public health implications (ANRS-Coquelicot survey 2011-2013).

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: The aims of this study were to describe the prevalences of injection practices and needle/syringe sharing in people who use drugs in French prisons, and to investigate associated factors. DESIGN AND METHODS: Using the ANRS-Coquelicot survey (2011-2013), a random sample of 1718 people who used drugs in free society was included. Information regarding a history of incarceration, drug-injection practices inside prison and needle/syringe sharing was collected during interviews. RESULTS: In our sample, 65.5% reported a history of injection and 57.4% had been incarcerated at least once. Among those who reported both of these conditions, 14% reported injection practices inside prison, 40.5% of whom had shared needles/syringes. In the multivariable model, the following variables were associated with injection practices inside prison: being a Russian-speaking detainee, having spent more time in prison, and having started to inject before 1996 and especially before 1987. Being Russian speaking was also associated with needle/syringe sharing in prison. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The prevalences of injection practices and needle/syringe sharing in prisons are alarmingly high. Effective interventions to prevent the transmission of infectious diseases among people who use drugs in the prison setting are essential. The implementation of international recommendations on the principle of equivalence between prisons and the community is still very limited in most countries, and should be complemented with tailored interventions for the most vulnerable prison populations, especially Russian-speaking detainees.