Self-assessment questionnaires document substantial variability in the clinical expression of rotator cuff tears.

The goal of this investigation was to document the variability in the clinical expression of full-thickness rotator cuff tears with practical and standardized patient self-assessment tools. One-hundred twenty-three consecutive patients with full-thickness cuff tears diagnosed by standard cuff-imaging methods (sonography, arthrography, or magnetic resonance imagery) assessed their own shoulder function and health status with the Simple Shoulder Test and the Short Form 36, respectively. As a group, these patients were substantially compromised in their ability to perform the functions of the Simple Shoulder Test and in the Short Form 36 scales of physical role, physical function, and comfort. As individuals, however, their self-assessments varied widely. The standard deviations were often greater than 50% of the mean and the range of responses often covered the entire scale from the minimum possible score to the maximum possible score. These results show the importance of documenting the clinical expression of cuff tears in patients at initial evaluation and when treatment is being considered. The results also show the practicality of standardized self-assessment questionnaires in such documentation.

Posteroinferior glenoplasty can change glenoid shape and increase the mechanical stability of the shoulder.

The treatment of recurrent posterior glenohumeral instability remains an unsolved clinical problem. Although various types of capsulorraphy have been advocated, outcome studies indicate that it is difficult to achieve a balance between stability and mobility. Alterations of the bony glenoid for posterior instability have been proposed, but are not well understood from a mechanical perspective. This investigation had 2 purposes: (1) to determine in a cadaver model if posteroinferior glenoplasty can change the shape of the glenoid, and (2) to determine if altering the shape of the glenoid can increase the mechanical stability of the glenohumeral joint. We determined the effective glenoid shape in 7 normal cadaver glenoids by tracking the path of the center of the humeral head as it was translated across the glenoid face in 8 different directions. These determinations enabled us to calculate the maximum effective slope of the glenoid in each direction. We then determined the mechanical stability of the glenoids in each of the 8 directions by measuring the tangential force required to dislocate the shoulder under a 50-N compressive load. The ratio of the dislocating force to the compressive load was defined as the stability ratio. All measurements were repeated after a standardized posteroinferior glenoplasty was performed. Posteroinferior glenoplasty increased the posteroinferior glenoid depth from 3.8 +/- 0.6 mm to 7.0 +/- 1.8 mm and shifted the center of the humeral head an average of 2.2 mm anteriorly and 1.8 mm superiorly. These changes in dimension could be directly visualized as an immediate mechanical consequence of the glenoplasty procedure, particularly because of the insertion of the bone wedge. Glenoplasty increased the posteroinferior glenoid slope from 0.55 +/- 0.07 to 0.83 +/- 0.12 and increased the posteroinferior stability ratio from 0.47 +/- 0.10 to 0.81 +/- 0.17. This is a more than 70% increase in the tangential force that can be resisted before dislocation. The increase can be quantitatively understood as a direct mechanical consequence of the altered shape of the glenoid concavity. These numbers indicate that, in this cadaveric model, posteroinferior glenoplasty results in defined changes in the effective glenoid shape and in the mechanical stability of the glenohumeral joint. However, this study does not establish the role of this procedure in the clinical management of posterior glenohumeral instability.