Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 65
Filter
1.
Ann Dermatol Venereol ; 136(8-9): 602-5, 2009.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19686895

ABSTRACT

Plant-induced dermatoses involve a variety of mechanisms and result from direct contact with the plant itself, part of the plant or an extract thereof; they may also involve phototoxic or photoallergic reactions. Subjects most exposed are woodworkers, agricultural workers, orchard workers, gardeners, etc. However, many subjects are also exposed during leisure activities (fishing, country walks, gardening, sports, etc.). History-taking is thus essential before beginning testing in order to establish any differential diagnoses. Tests consist of challenges using commercially available allergens, patch-tests using the plant itself or plant extracts, and skin prick-tests or photopatch-tests.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Patch Tests/methods , Plants/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Humans , Urticaria/diagnosis , Urticaria/etiology
2.
Contact Dermatitis ; 48(3): 158-61, 2003 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12755731

ABSTRACT

Contact sensitivity to plants containing 1 or more sesquiterpene lactones (SLs) is difficult to diagnose. The mixture of SLs (SL mix) has been shown to detect only about 60% of sensitized individuals. In order to improve the diagnosis of sensitization to plants containing SLs, we have tested a mixture of frullanolides contained in Frullania dilatata and Frullania tamarisci at 3 different concentrations (0.01%, 0.033% and 0.1% in petrolatum). 8605 consecutive eczema patients in 1 North American and 15 European dermatology departments were tested with this mix, and 0.35% of positive cases to the different concentrations were found. Routine use of this mix permitted detection of only a small percentage of extra cases and did not improve the SL mix score. The frullanolide mix should therefore be restricted to investigations in particular geographical zones and/or in particular occupations.


Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Frullania , Sesquiterpenes/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Isomerism , Male , San Francisco/epidemiology
3.
Contact Dermatitis ; 46(4): 207-10, 2002 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12081698

ABSTRACT

A 10-year multicentre analysis of the frequency of sensitivity to common preservatives collected in 16 centres in 11 countries has shown stable but persisting high levels of sensitivity to formaldehyde and 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one + 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (MCI/MI). It has also revealed a significant increase in the level of reactivity to methyldibromoglutaronitrile (MDBGN) from 0.7% in 1991 to 3.5% in 2000. The current high level of sensitivity to MDBGN requires an urgent safety re-evaluation and risk assessment update along with consideration of immediate lowering of use concentrations, especially in leave-on products.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Preservatives, Pharmaceutical/adverse effects , Allergens , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Europe/epidemiology , Formaldehyde/adverse effects , Humans , Nitriles/adverse effects , Patch Tests , Thiazoles/adverse effects
4.
Ann Dermatol Venereol ; 128(2): 115-7, 2001 Feb.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11275584

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cockroach and house dust mites (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dp and farinae, Df) are the most often implicated aeroallergens in severe asthma, hay fever and conjunctivitis. Cockroach allergy is still unknown in atopic dermatitis. PATIENTS AND METHOD: 146 children with atopic dermatitis-aged 6 months to 15 years- have been patch tested with the European standard series and some aeroallergens. We have studied the sensitisation to cockroach allergens and compared to Dp and Df. RESULTS: 113 children reacted positively at least to one of the 3 aeroallergens (77 p. 100), 61 children had a positive reaction to cockroach (42 p. 100) and 29 simultaneously to the 3 allergens. DISCUSSION: Delayed hypersensitivity to house dust mites in young children with atopic dermatitis suggests early epicutaneous sensitization due to an altered epidermal barrier. For us, cockroach could also be implicated in some flare-ups of atopic dermatitis. Eviction of cockroach and house dust mite should be proposed for children with a positive patch test to cockroach.


Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Cockroaches/immunology , Dermatitis, Atopic/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Atopic/etiology , Hypersensitivity, Delayed/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity, Delayed/etiology , Adolescent , Animals , Child , Child, Preschool , Dermatitis, Atopic/epidemiology , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Delayed/epidemiology , Infant , Mites/immunology , Patch Tests , Prevalence
5.
Contact Dermatitis ; 42(1): 27-35, 2000 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10644022

ABSTRACT

This study investigated whether a corticosteroid mix containing tixocortol pivalate, budesonide, and hydrocortisone-17-butyrate could detect contact allergy to corticosteroids. 2 corticosteroid mixes, 1 with a high (mix I) and 1 with a low (mix II) concentration and the 3 individual constituents, each at 2 concentrations, were inserted into the standard series of 16 participating clinics. Tests were read on day (D) 3 or 4. 5432 patients were tested, and 110 (2.0%) had positive reactions to at least 1 of the 8 test preparations. Of the 8 preparations, mix I identified most allergic patients, followed by mix II, budesonide 0.10%, budesonide 0.002%, and tixocortol pivalate, both concentrations (1.0 and 0.10%) tracing the same number. With the mixes, 53.2-59.6% of tixocortol pivalate allergy was missed. 47 patients were allergic to either concentration of tixocortol pivalate, 25% of these only to 1.0% and another 25% only to 0.10%. Testing with mix I and tixocortol pivalate 0.10% picked up 98/110, testing with tixocortol pivalate 1.0% and 0.10% and budesonide 0.10% picked up 105/110. 3379 patients were read on both D3 or D4 as well as on D7. Without a late reading (D7), up to 30% of contact allergy to corticosteroid markers was missed.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Patch Tests , Administration, Topical , Budesonide/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Drug Combinations , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Female , Humans , Hydrocortisone/adverse effects , Hydrocortisone/analogs & derivatives , Male
6.
Contact Dermatitis ; 40(5): 232-5, 1999 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10344475

ABSTRACT

Results of patch tests in 337 children aged 1 to 15 performed in our paediatric unit during the past 3 years have been analysed retrospectively in order to optimize the patch test series and to assess their relevance. This study represents the most important single-centre study reported so far over a short period. We found a positive patch test rate of 66%, with a peak incidence among children less than 3 years of age (88% versus 58.9%). The most common allergens were metals, especially nickel, fragrances and, less frequently, rubber chemicals. Concerning nickel, positive reactions rarely correlated with a relevant exposure and were difficult to interpret, especially in patients with atopic dermatitis, who are probably more likely to have irritant or false-positive reactions to metals. Based on the results and their relevance, we propose a shortened standard series of patch tests for paediatric patients.


Subject(s)
Allergens , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Patch Tests/standards , Adolescent , Allergens/adverse effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , France/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Nickel/adverse effects , Perfume/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Rubber/adverse effects
7.
Contact Dermatitis ; 40(2): 77-83, 1999 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10048651

ABSTRACT

Since November 1997, 14 successive cases of occupational contact dermatitis were observed in 13 laboratory technicians and 1 physician, working in a genetics laboratory in Leuven (Belgium) in 3 laboratories of bacteriology in Strasbourg, Montbeliard and Angers, and in the laboratory of hematology in Bordeaux (France). The dermatitis, located on the hands, forearms and face, relapsed after each exposure to an immersion oil for microscopy. Patch tests performed in 10 patients were positive to epoxy resin (ER) in the European standard series (10/10 patients) and to newly formulated Leica immersion oil (7/7), 1 patient testing negatively with the former oil. A breakdown performed in 2 patients with the oil's ingredients confirmed sensitization to liquid modified ER components, contained at >80% concentration in the oil. The presence of DGEBA was demonstrated by HPLC analysis at a +/-30% rate. Although the safety data sheet indicated a revision of the formula, nobody was alerted to the risk of sensitization and the need for skin protection. ERs, as a source of occupational allergy, can provoke epidemics of contact dermatitis in industry. This report of epidemic contact dermatitis from ERs, used for their optical properties in an immersion oil for microscopy, emphasizes the need for perpetual vigilance in occupational medicine and the usefulness of multicentre contacts in dermato-allergology.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Epoxy Resins/adverse effects , Medical Laboratory Personnel , Adult , Belgium/epidemiology , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Chromatography, Thin Layer , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Microscopy , Middle Aged , Oils/chemistry , Patch Tests
8.
Contact Dermatitis ; 40(2): 72-6, 1999 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10048650

ABSTRACT

To test the screening value of the sesquiterpene lactone (SL) mix in Europe today and describe epidemiological and clinical features of Compositae-sensitive patients, the SL mix 0.1% pet. was included in the standard patch test series in 11 European clinics. 10,695 patients were tested, and 106 (1%) had positive reactions, 74% of which were of current or old relevance. The prevalence of positive reactions varied between 0.1 and 2.7% in different centres. The median age of the 66 females was 51.5 years, and 55.2 in the 40 males. The 20 occupationally sensitized had a higher % of males and a median age of 43 years, whereas 7 UV-sensitive patients had a median age of 72 years. Garden plants were the major suspected sensitizers and the clinical patterns were partly, in accordance with plant dermatoses in general, involving hands, forearms and face, and partly widespread eczema in a large proportion of the patients. More than 1/3 were positive to perfume and/or colophony, possibly reflecting cross-reactivity. With only 1 case of active sensitization and no irritant reactions, the SL mix is a safe allergen and the overall prevalence of positive reactions supports its continued use in the standard patch test series.


Subject(s)
Asteraceae/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Lactones , Patch Tests/methods , Sesquiterpenes , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Asteraceae/immunology , Chi-Square Distribution , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Europe , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
9.
Ann Dermatol Venereol ; 125(8): 505-8, 1998 Aug.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9747316

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We report a case of sensitization to estrogen. CASE REPORT: A 40-year-old woman consulted for skin disorders which followed a cyclic pattern. At each menses, the patient developed pruritus and erythematous papulovesicular lesions over the members and trunk. Estraderm patch contact dermatitis was evident. Prick and patch tests with alcoholic solutions of estrone alone were positive. Serum tests were positive for anti-ethinyl-estradiol antibodies and anti-progesterone antibodies. DISCUSSION: Autoimmune dermatitis can be caused by sensitization to endogenous or exogenous sex hormones. Clinical manifestations and histological findings are variable and non-specific. The cyclic nature of the manifestations is however quite suggestive. Positive prick and patch tests performed with alcohol solutions of the hormones may give the diagnosis and serum tests may be positive for specific anti-steroid antibodies. These complementary explorations are however difficult to perform and interpret and definitive diagnosis is based on an association of clinical findings, skin tests, laboratory tests and the clinical course. In case of progesterone sensitization, the treatment of choice is estrogen inhibition of ovulation. For estrogen sensitization, anti-estrogen treatment appears to be more effective. Finally, bilateral ovariectomy may be required in difficult cases.


Subject(s)
Drug Eruptions/etiology , Estrogen Replacement Therapy/adverse effects , Estrone/adverse effects , Ethinyl Estradiol/adverse effects , Progesterone/adverse effects , Administration, Cutaneous , Adult , Autoimmune Diseases/chemically induced , Autoimmune Diseases/diagnosis , Estrone/administration & dosage , Ethinyl Estradiol/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Intradermal Tests , Patch Tests , Progesterone/administration & dosage
11.
Contact Dermatitis ; 35(6): 334-6, 1996 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9118627

ABSTRACT

8 children aged 1 to 13 years, clinically suspected of having contact dermatitis due to footwear, have been studied in our Paediatric Dermatology Unit from January 1980 to September 1995. Patch tests have been performed with the European standard series and with constituents of the patients' own shoes. In our study, patients appeared to be predominantly sensitive to rubber chemicals. Avoiding shoes or materials that had been identified improved the symptoms in most cases.


Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Foot Dermatoses/etiology , Rubber/adverse effects , Shoes/adverse effects , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/prevention & control , Female , Foot Dermatoses/diagnosis , Foot Dermatoses/prevention & control , Humans , Infant , Male , Patch Tests , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies
12.
Contact Dermatitis ; 35(1): 27-32, 1996 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8896951

ABSTRACT

Immediate and delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity are believed to be implicated in the physiopathology atopic dermatitis (AD). The purpose of this study was to evaluate Type I and Type IV allergy to aeroallergens in children with AD. 59 children (mean age 5.2 years), presenting with AD according to Hanifin and Rajka's criteria, were skin tested (patch and corresponding prick tests) with common environmental aeroallergens and a restricted panel of the European standard series over a 1-year period. History and clinical data were carefully recorded using a standardized evaluation sheet; total and specific IgE serum levels were evaluated. 17 of 59 patients (28.8%) had at least 1 positive patch test, 32 of 59 patients (54.2%) had at least 1 positive prick test. Corresponding patch and prick tests were observed in 8 out of 17 patients. 5 children with positive patch tests had negative prick tests. Irritant pustular reactions (2/59, i.e. 3%), "angry back" reactions (6/59, i.e. 10%) and doubtful reactions (3/59, i.e. 5%) were excluded from the positive group. Positive patch tests observed included, in decreasing order: D. pteronyssinus and D. farinae (26.8%), garden trees (12.2%), plantain (9.8%), timothy grass, mugwort and damp area trees (4.9% each), and orchard grass (2.44%). 6 children with positive aeroallergen patch tests and 11 children with negative aeroallergen patch tests had at least 1 positive patch test to standard allergens. All children with an irritant reaction to aeroallergens had no reaction to standard patch tests. The relevance of aeroallergens in upgrading the severity of AD lesions has still to be explored by challenge studies and by long-term follow-up.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/adverse effects , Allergens/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Atopic/complications , Patch Tests , Adolescent , Age of Onset , Animals , Child , Child, Preschool , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/pathology , Dust , Epidemiologic Factors , France/epidemiology , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Infant , Mites , Pollen , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/complications , Statistics, Nonparametric
13.
Contact Dermatitis ; 35(1): 40-4, 1996 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8896953

ABSTRACT

This article describes the results of an EECDRG multicentre study on contact allergy to corticosteroids. A total of 7238 patients were investigated: 6238 in 13 centres in the course of 1993, and 1000 patients in 1 centre in 1993 and 1994. The 5 corticosteroids tested were budesonide 0.1% pet., betamethasone-17-valerate 1% pet., clobetasol-17-propionate 1% pet., hydrocortisone-17-butyrate 1% eth., and tixocortol-21-pivalate 1% pet.; 189 (2.6%) gave a positive patchtest reaction (+, ++, + + +) to at least 1 of the corticosteroids. The data regarding the corticosteroid-sensitive patients, as well as the patchtest results, were recorded on a standardized form.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Administration, Topical , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/pharmacology , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Glucocorticoids , Humans , Incidence , Male
15.
Contact Dermatitis ; 33(5): 333-42, 1995 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8565489

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of reactivity to a series of commonly used fragrances in dermatological patients. A total of 48 fragrances (FF) were chosen, based on the publication of Fenn in 1989 in which the top 25 constituents of 3 types (1. perfumes, 2. household products, 3. soaps) of 400 commercial products on the US market had been determined. In a pilot study on a total of 1069 patients in 11 centres, the appropriate test concentration and vehicle were examined. For most fragrances, 1% and 5% were chosen, and petrolatum proved to be the best vehicle in comparison to isopropyl myristate and diethyl phthalate. In the main study, a set of 5 to 10 fragrances at 2 concentrations was patch tested in each centre on a minimum of 100 consecutive patients seen in the patch test clinic. These patients were also patch tested to a standard series with the 8% fragrance mix (FM) and its 8 constituents. In patients with a positive reaction to any of the 48 FF, a careful history with regard to past or present reactions to perfumed products was taken. A total of 1323 patients were tested in 11 centres. The 8% FM was positive in 89 patients (8.3% of 1072 patients). Allergic reactions to the constituents were most frequent to oak moss (24), isoeugenol (20), eugenol (13), cinnamic aldehyde (10) and geraniol (8). Reactions read as allergic on day 3/4 were observed only 10X to 7 materials of the new series (Iso E Super (2), Lyral (3), Cyclacet (1), DMBCA (1), Vertofix (1), citronellol (1) and amyl salicylate (1)). The remaining 41 fragrances were negative. 28 irritant or doubtful reactions on day 3/4 were observed to a total of 19 FF materials (more than 1 reaction: 5% citronellol (2), 1% amyl salicylate (2), 1% isononyl acetate (3), 0.1% musk xylol (2), 1% citral (2), and 1% ionone beta (2)). Clinical relevance of positive reactions to any of the FF series was not proved in a single case. This included the 4 reactions in patients who were negative to the 8% FM. In conclusion, the top 25 fragrances commonly found in various products caused few reactions in dermatological patients and these few appeared to be clinically irrelevant, with the possible exception of Lyral. However, this data should be interpreted in the light of the relatively small number of patients tested (only 100 in most centres).


Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Irritants/adverse effects , Monoterpenes , Patch Tests , Perfume/adverse effects , Acrolein/adverse effects , Acrolein/analogs & derivatives , Acyclic Monoterpenes , Aldehydes/adverse effects , Allergens/analysis , Cyclohexenes , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Irritant/etiology , Eugenol/adverse effects , Eugenol/analogs & derivatives , Europe , Household Products/adverse effects , Household Products/analysis , Humans , Irritants/analysis , Myristates , Perfume/analysis , Petrolatum , Pharmaceutical Vehicles , Phthalic Acids , Pilot Projects , Plants , Soaps/adverse effects , Soaps/analysis , Terpenes/adverse effects , United States , Xylenes/adverse effects
17.
Contact Dermatitis ; 29(5): 246-50, 1993 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8112063

ABSTRACT

We performed patch tests with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Dp) antigens from 2 different sources in 355 non-randomly selected patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and 398 subjects of a control group. The study demonstrated that contact sensitization to mites occurred in an appreciable % of AD cases (20.8%), using commonly available assay products. The differences recorded between the 2 materials tested were related to the concentration of P1 antigen. Non-atopic patients rarely showed positive reactions to Dp (0.75%), when strict criteria for readings were applied and if 2 readings were performed. Patients with positive patch tests did not necessarily show positive immediate skin tests. It would be useful to carry out tests systematically in atopic patients, even if it is not yet known what modern treatment would be best for the patient. Laboratories still do not provide standardized house dust mite preparations--measuring and codifying their biological activity--for use in patch tests. It is to be hoped that the extension of this type of test will lead to the production of better test materials, in syringes with homogeneous dispersion and concentration.


Subject(s)
Allergens , Autoantigens , Dermatitis, Atopic/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Atopic/immunology , Dermatitis, Contact/immunology , Mites/immunology , Nuclear Proteins , Patch Tests , Administration, Inhalation , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Allergens/administration & dosage , Allergens/adverse effects , Animals , Antigens, Nuclear , Autoantigens/administration & dosage , Autoantigens/adverse effects , Belgium , Child , Child, Preschool , Dust , Female , France , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Nuclear Proteins/administration & dosage , Nuclear Proteins/adverse effects , Skin Tests
18.
Contact Dermatitis ; 28(3): 180-3, 1993 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8462298

ABSTRACT

To obtain data on the frequency of sensitization among European hairdressers, the patch test results from 9 centres were evaluated. 8 allergens recommended by the ICDRG and EECDRG in the hairdressing series and PPD from the standard series were used to patch test 809 hairdressers and 104 clients suspected of contact sensitization. Among hairdressers, the mean frequencies of sensitization ranked as follows: GMT 19%, PPD 15%, APS 8%, PTD 8%, ONPPD 4% and PADH 4%. In contrast to GMT in acid permanent waves, the frequency of sensitization to AMT in alkaline permanent waves was only 4%. Frequencies of sensitization to pyrogallol and resorcinol were 0.8% and 0.6%, respectively. The frequencies of sensitization showed marked regional variations, particularly that to GMT, which was highest in Germany (51%), followed by Spain (22%) and London (19%). Clients of hairdressers showed a similar rank order of sensitization frequency, with the exception of APS, which was completely negative in this (small) series.


Subject(s)
Beauty Culture , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Hair Preparations/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/diagnosis , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Patch Tests , Retrospective Studies
19.
Ann Dermatol Venereol ; 120(3): 223-5, 1993.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8239361

ABSTRACT

Diffuse exanthema with fever followed by superficial nonfollicular aseptic pustules was observed in an 11-year old boy after conducting a thiomersal epicutaneous test and manipulation of a broken medical thermometer. The patient healed within two days without any treatment. The initial responsibility of mercury and its derivatives, and the primary sensitization and relevance of the epicutaneous tests are discussed. Mercury and its derivatives should be limited as much as possible in medicine and cosmetology.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Ethylmercury Compounds/adverse effects , Mercury/adverse effects , Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous/chemically induced , Child , Humans , Male , Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous/pathology , Skin Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...