Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 129
Filter
1.
J Perinat Med ; 51(5): 628-633, 2023 Jun 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36706313

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the maximum 5-min Apgar score of 10 among different U.S. races and Hispanic ethnicity. METHODS: Retrospective population-based cohort study from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), and Division of Vital Statistics natality online database. We included only deliveries where the race and Hispanic ethnicity of the father and mother were listed as either Black, White, Chinese, or Asian Indian and as Hispanic or Latino origin or other. Proportions of 5-Minute Apgar scores of 10 were compared among different races and Hispanic ethnicity for six groups each for mother and father: Non-Hispanic or Latino White, Hispanic or Latino White, Non-Hispanic or Latino Black, Hispanic or Latino Black, Chinese, and Asian Indian. RESULTS: The study population consists of 9,710,066 mothers and 8,138,475 fathers from the US natality birth data 2016-2019. Black newborns had a less than 50% chance of having a 5-min Apgar score of 10 when compared to white newborns (OR 0.47 for Black mother and Black father; p<0.001). White babies (non-Hispanic and Hispanic) had the highest proportion of Apgar scores of 10 across all races and ethnicities. CONCLUSIONS: The Apgar score introduces a bias by systematically lowering the score in people of color. Embedding skin color scoring into basic data and decisions of health care propagates race-based medicine. By removing the skin color portion of the Apgar score and with it's racial and ethnic bias, we will provide more accuracy and equity when evaluating newborn babies worldwide.


Subject(s)
Delivery Rooms , White , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , United States/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Apgar Score
2.
J Perinat Med ; 51(1): 1-2, 2023 01 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35933112
4.
J Perinat Med ; 51(1): 83-86, 2023 Jan 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36018720

ABSTRACT

Overweight and obesity in pregnancy and prepregnancy are perinatal risks. Studies showed prevention of these risks with counseling about the risks and treatment strategies like lifestyle interventions as exercise on a daily basis, nutritional health and diet.


Subject(s)
Overweight , Pregnancy Complications , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Overweight/complications , Overweight/prevention & control , Pregnant Women , Pregnancy Complications/prevention & control , Obesity/complications , Obesity/prevention & control , Diet , Body Mass Index
7.
Eur J Clin Nutr ; 75(12): 1757-1763, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34702964

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To investigate the longitudinal development of maternal body weight and analyze the influence of obesity on obstetrics during more than two decades in Germany. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Data collected from the Federal state of Schleswig-Holstein (German Perinatal Survey) were analyzed with regard to the dynamics of maternal anthropometric variables (body weight, BMI) between 1995-7 and 2004-17. In total 335,511 mothers substantiated the presented study-collective. The statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY. RESULTS: Maternal BMI advanced significantly over the study period. Among a rise in mean periconceptional body weight (67.6-72.0 kg), the segment of obese women increased disproportionately (in average 9.4-19.2%). Despite the observed trend to late giving birth (mean maternal age 1995: 29.3 vs. 30.7 years in 2017), it was not advanced maternal age but parity that influenced the continuous increase in maternal weight (mean maternal body weight 1995-7: primi- bi-, multiparae 67.4, 68.3 and 69.0 kg vs. 2004-17: primi- bi-, multiparae 70.0, 71.5 and 73.2 kg respectively). CONCLUSION: Obesity is a major problem on health issues in obstetrics. Advancing maternal BMI, increasing mother's age and derived prenatal risks considerably complicate pregnancy and delivery. It has to be emphasized that its consequences do not end with delivery or childbed, but represent a livelong burden to the mother and their offspring. Hence, multimodal strategies to reduce/control periconceptional body weight are mandatory.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy Complications , Pregnant Women , Birth Weight , Body Mass Index , Female , Humans , Obesity/epidemiology , Parity , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology
8.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 3(3): 100334, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33607321

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most retractions of obstetrics and gynecology manuscripts are because of scientific misconduct. It would be preferable to prevent randomized controlled trials with scientific misconduct from ever appearing in the peer-reviewed scientific literature, rather than to have to retract them later. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the policies of obstetrics and gynecology and top medical journals in their author guidelines and electronic submission systems regarding prospective randomized controlled trial registration, ethics committee approval, research protocols, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guidelines, and data sharing and to detect the most common quality criteria requested for randomized controlled trials in these journals. STUDY DESIGN: Author guidelines were identified via online Google searches from the websites of selected peer-reviewed medical journals. Journals in obstetrics and gynecology were selected from the list of journals with impact factors based on the Journal Citation Report released by Clarivate Analytics on June 29, 2020, focusing on those publishing original clinical research in obstetrics, in particular randomized controlled trials. In addition, 4 of the top impact factor peer-reviewed general medical journals publishing randomized controlled trials were included. The requirements for selected quality criteria for randomized controlled trials analyzed in the author guidelines for each journal were details of 5 general issues: prospective randomized controlled trial registration (4 subcategories), ethics committee approval (4 subcategories), research protocol (3 subcategories), Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines (3 subcategories), and data sharing (3 subcategories). To evaluate the requirements within the electronic submission system, a mock submission of a randomized controlled trial was also done for each journal, and the same criteria were assessed on the online software for submission. The primary outcome was the overall percentage for each of the quality criteria that were listed as required within the author guidelines or required in the submission system among all journals. Planned subgroup analyses were top general medicine vs obstetrics and gynecology journals and top 4 obstetrics and gynecology vs other obstetrics and gynecology journals. RESULTS: Most studied peer-reviewed journals listed in their author guidelines 7 specific criteria for submission of randomized controlled trials: prospective registration and registration number, statement of ethical approval with name of approving committee and statement of informed consent, statement of adherence to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines, and data sharing statement. For most journals, the submission software did not require these or any other criteria for submission. There were minimal differences in criteria listed for top medical journals vs other obstetrics and gynecology journals and among top vs other obstetrics and gynecology journals. CONCLUSION: Prospective registration and registration number, statement of ethical approval with name of approving committee and statement of informed consent, statement of adherence to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines, and data sharing statement are the randomized controlled trial quality criteria requested by leading medical and obstetrics and gynecology journals. These obstetrics and gynecology journals agree to make, as much as possible, these criteria uniform and mandatory in author guidelines and also through improved submission software.


Subject(s)
Gynecology , Obstetrics , Prospective Studies , Publishing , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Research Design , Retraction of Publication as Topic
9.
J Perinat Med ; 49(3): 255-261, 2021 Mar 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33554570

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Fever is the single most frequently reported manifestation of COVID-19 and is a critical element of screening persons for COVID-19. The meaning of "fever" varies depending on the cutoff temperature used, the type of thermometer, the time of the day, the site of measurements, and the person's gender and race. The absence of a universally accepted definition for fever has been especially problematic during the current COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This investigation determined the extent to which fever is defined in COVID-19 publications, with special attention to those associated with pregnancy. RESULTS: Of 53 publications identified in which "fever" is reported as a manifestation of COVID-19 illness, none described the method used to measure patient's temperatures. Only 10 (19%) publications specified the minimum temperature used to define a fever with values that varied from a 37.3 °C (99.1 °F) to 38.1 °C (100.6 °F). CONCLUSIONS: There is a disturbing lack of precision in defining fever in COVID-19 publications. Given the many factors influencing temperature measurements in humans, there can never be a single, universally accepted temperature cut-off defining a fever. This clinical reality should not prevent precision in reporting fever. To achieve the precision and improve scientific and clinical communication, when fever is reported in clinical investigations, at a minimum the cut-off temperature used in determining the presence of fever, the anatomical site at which temperatures are taken, and the instrument used to measure temperatures should each be described. In the absence of such information, what is meant by the term "fever" is uncertain.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , Data Accuracy , Fever/diagnosis , Periodicals as Topic , Research Design/standards , Thermometry/standards , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19 Testing/instrumentation , COVID-19 Testing/standards , Female , Fever/virology , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Reference Standards , Research Design/statistics & numerical data , Thermometers , Thermometry/instrumentation , Thermometry/methods
10.
J Perinat Med ; 48(5): 450-452, 2020 Jun 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32401227

ABSTRACT

If the worries about the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are not already enough, some pregnant women have been questioning whether the hospital is a safe or safe enough place to deliver their babies and therefore whether they should deliver out-of-hospital during the pandemic. In the United States, planned out-of-hospital births are associated with significantly increased risks of neonatal morbidity and death. In addition, there are obstetric emergencies during out-of-hospital births that can lead to adverse outcomes, partly because of the delay in transporting the woman to the hospital. In other countries with well-integrated obstetric services and well-trained midwives, the differences in outcomes of planned hospital birth and planned home birth are smaller. Women are empowered to make informed decisions when the obstetrician makes ethically justified recommendations, which is known as directive counseling. Recommendations are ethically justified when the outcomes of one form of management is clinically superior to another. The outcomes of morbidity and mortality and of infection control and prevention of planned hospital birth are clinically superior to those of out-of-hospital birth. The obstetrician therefore should recommend planned hospital birth and recommend against planned out-of-hospital birth during the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has increased stress levels for all patients and even more so for pregnant patients and their families. The response in this difficult time should be to mitigate this stress and empower women to make informed decisions by routinely providing counseling that is evidence-based and directive.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Birth Setting , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Directive Counseling/methods , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Prenatal Care/methods , COVID-19 , Delivery, Obstetric/ethics , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Directive Counseling/ethics , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Patient Participation/methods , Patient Safety , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/ethics , SARS-CoV-2
11.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 147(3): 397-403, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31402446

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe obstetrical care and in-hospital outcomes in very preterm triplet pregnancies in a European multiregional cohort. METHODS: Data from a prospective population-based study of very preterm births between 22 + 0 and 31 + 6 weeks of gestation in 19 regions from 11 European countries participating in the EPICE project in 2011/2012 were used to describe triplet pregnancies and compare them with twins and singletons. RESULTS: Triplets constituted 1.1% of very preterm pregnancies (97/8851) and 3.3% of very preterm live births (258/7900); these percentages varied from 0% to 2.6% and 0% to 6% respectively across the regions. In-hospital mortality after live birth was 12.4% and did not differ significantly from singletons or twins or by birth order. However, 28.9% of mothers with a triplet pregnancy experienced at least one neonatal death. Ninety percent of live-born triplets were delivered by cesarean. Vaginal delivery was associated with an Apgar score of less than 7, but not with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of very preterm triplets varies across European regions. Most triplets were born by cesarean and those born vaginally had lower Apgar scores. Overall, in-hospital mortality after live birth was similar to singletons and twins.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy, Triplet/statistics & numerical data , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Triplets/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Birth Weight , Case-Control Studies , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant, Extremely Premature , Infant, Newborn , Live Birth/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Stillbirth/epidemiology
12.
Clin Epigenetics ; 10(1): 131, 2018 10 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30355290

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adiponectin critically contributes to metabolic homeostasis, especially by insulin-sensitizing action. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is characterized by insulin resistance leading to materno-fetal hyperglycemia and detrimental birth outcomes. By investigating paired subcutaneous (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) as well as blood (cell) samples of GDM-affected (n = 25) vs. matched control (n = 30) mother-child dyads of the prospective "EaCH" cohort study, we addressed whether alterations of adiponectin plasma, mRNA, and DNA methylation levels are associated with GDM and offspring characteristics. RESULTS: Hypoadiponectinemia was present in women with GDM, even after adjustment for body mass index (BMI). This was accompanied by significantly decreased mRNA levels in both SAT and VAT (P < 0.05), independent of BMI. Maternal plasma adiponectin showed inverse relations with glucose and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (both P < 0.01). In parallel to reduced mRNA expression in GDM, significant (P < 0.05) yet small alterations in locus-specific DNA methylation were observed in maternal fat (~ 2%) and blood cells (~ 1%). While newborn adiponectin levels were similar between groups, DNA methylation in GDM offspring was variously altered (~ 1-4%; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced adiponectin seems to be a pathogenic co-factor in GDM, even independent of BMI, affecting materno-fetal metabolism. While altered maternal DNA methylation patterns appear rather marginally involved, functional, diagnostic, and/or predictive implications of cord blood DNA methylation should be further evaluated.


Subject(s)
Adiponectin/genetics , Adiponectin/metabolism , DNA Methylation , Diabetes, Gestational/genetics , Subcutaneous Fat/metabolism , Adiponectin/blood , Adult , Body Mass Index , Diabetes, Gestational/blood , Diabetes, Gestational/metabolism , Down-Regulation , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Prospective Studies
13.
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc ; 19(4): 182-186, 2018 11 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30257817

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of the present study was to assess the influence of maternal age and maternal body mass index of early pregnancy on the risk of preterm delivery. Material and Methods: The study included 2.1 million liveborn single newborns with documented data at perinatal surveys. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS statistics program. Results: The risk of preterm births increased in obese women and in women with advanced age. Conclusion: Strategies should be developed to reduce preconceptional body mass index, and guidelines are required to help advise women who postponed childbearing.

15.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 18(1): 250, 2018 Jun 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29925339

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Both gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) as well as overweight/obesity during pregnancy are risk factors for detrimental anthropometric and hormonal neonatal outcomes, identified to 'program' adverse health predispositions later on. While overweight/obesity are major determinants of GDM, independent effects on critical birth outcomes remain unclear. Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate, in women with GDM, the relative/independent impact of overweight/obesity vs. altered glucose metabolism on newborn parameters. METHODS: The prospective observational 'Early CHARITÉ (EaCH)' cohort study primarily focuses on early developmental origins of unfavorable health outcomes through pre- and/or early postnatal exposure to a 'diabetogenic/adipogenic' environment. It includes 205 mother-child dyads, recruited between 2007 and 2010, from women with treated GDM and delivery at the Clinic of Obstetrics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany. Recruitment, therapy, metabolite/hormone analyses, and data evaluation were performed according to standardized guidelines and protocols. This report specifically aimed to identify maternal anthropometric and metabolic determinants of anthropometric and critical hormonal birth outcomes in 'EaCH'. RESULTS: Group comparisons, Spearman's correlations and unadjusted linear regression analyses initially confirmed that increased maternal prepregnancy body-mass-index (BMI) is a significant factor for elevated birth weight, cord-blood insulin and leptin (all P < 0.05). However, consideration of and adjustment for maternal glucose during late pregnancy showed that no maternal anthropometric parameter (weight, BMI, gestational weight gain) remained significant (all n.s.). In contrast, even after adjustment for maternal anthropometrics, third trimester glucose values (fasting and postprandial glucose at 32nd and 36th weeks' gestation, HbA1c in 3rd trimester and at delivery), were clearly positively associated with critical birth outcomes (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Neither overweight/obesity nor gestational weight gain appear to be independent determinants of increased birth weight, insulin and leptin. Rather, 3rd trimester glycemia seems to be crucial for respective neonatal outcomes. Thus, gestational care and future research studies should greatly consider late pregnancy glucose in overweight/obese women with or without GDM, for evaluation of critical causes and interventional strategies against 'perinatal programming of diabesity' in the offspring.


Subject(s)
Birth Weight , Diabetes, Gestational/blood , Insulin/blood , Leptin/blood , Obesity/blood , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/blood , Adult , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Body Mass Index , Female , Fetal Blood , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, Third/blood , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
16.
Ultraschall Med ; 39(3): 343-351, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27626240

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We undertook a randomized clinical trial to examine the outcome of a single vs. a double layer uterine closure using ultrasound to assess uterine scar thickness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participating women were allocated to one of three uterotomy suture techniques: continuous single layer unlocked suturing, continuous locked single layer suturing, or double layer suturing. Transvaginal ultrasound of uterine scar thickness was performed 6 weeks and 6 - 24 months after Cesarean delivery. Sonographers were blinded to the closure technique. RESULTS: An "intent-to-treat" and "as treated" ANOVA analysis included 435 patients (n = 149 single layer unlocked suturing, n = 157 single layer locked suturing, and n = 129 double layer suturing). 6 weeks postpartum, the median scar thickness did not differ among the three groups: 10.0 (8.5 - 12.3 mm) single layer unlocked vs. 10.1 (8.2 - 12.7 mm) single layer locked vs. 10.8 (8.1 - 12.8 mm) double layer; (p = 0.84). At the time of the second follow-up, the uterine scar was not significantly (p = 0.06) thicker if the uterus had been closed with a double layer closure 7.3 (5.7 - 9.1 mm), compared to single layer unlocked 6.4 (5.0 - 8.8 mm) or locked suturing techniques 6.8 (5.2 - 8.7 mm). Women who underwent primary or elective Cesarean delivery showed a significantly (p = 0.03, p = 0.02, "as treated") increased median scar thickness after double layer closure vs. single layer unlocked suture. CONCLUSION: A double layer closure of the hysterotomy is associated with a thicker myometrium scar only in primary or elective Cesarean delivery patients.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section , Cicatrix , Hysterotomy , Female , Humans , Hysterotomy/methods , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Uterus/diagnostic imaging , Uterus/pathology
17.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 96(12): 1484-1489, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28832909

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cesarean deliveries are the most common abdominal surgery procedure globally, and the optimal way to suture the hysterotomy remains a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of cesarean scar niches and the depth after single- or double-layer uterine closure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a randomized controlled trial in which women were allocated to three uterotomy suture techniques: continuous single-layer unlocked, continuous locked single-layer, or double-layer sutures. Transvaginal ultrasound was performed six weeks and 6-24 months after cesarean delivery [Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02338388)]. RESULTS: The study included 435 women. Six weeks after delivery, the incidence of niche was not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.52): 40% for single-layer unlocked, 32% for single-layer locked and 43% for double-layer sutures. The mean ± SD niche depths were 3.0 ± 1.4 mm for single-layer unlocked, 3.6 ± 1.7 mm for single-layer locked and 3.3 ± 1.3 mm for double-layer sutures (p = 1.0). There were no significant differences (p = 0.58) in niche incidence between the three groups at the second ultrasound follow up: 30% for single-layer unlocked, 23% for single-layer locked and 29% for double-layer sutures. The mean ± SD niche depth was 3.1 ± 1.5 mm after single-layer unlocked, 2.8 ± 1.5 mm after single-layer locked and 2.5 ± 1.2 mm after double-layer sutures (p = 0.61). There was a trend (p = 0.06) for the residual myometrium thickness to be thicker after double-layer repair at the long-term follow up. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of cesarean scar niche formation and the niche depth was independent of the hysterotomy closure technique.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section , Cicatrix/diagnostic imaging , Myometrium/diagnostic imaging , Myometrium/surgery , Suture Techniques , Ultrasonography/methods , Adult , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing/physiology
18.
J Perinat Med ; 45(3): 391, 2017 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28361784
19.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 217(2): 194.e1-194.e8, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28412085

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Vaginal childbirth is believed to be a significant risk factor for the development of pelvic floor dysfunction later in life. Previous studies have explored the use of medical imaging and simulations of childbirth to determine the stretch in the levator ani muscle. A report in 2012 has recorded magnetic resonance images of a live childbirth of a 24 year old woman giving birth vaginally for the second time, using a 1.0 Tesla open, high-field scanner. Our objective was to determine the stretch ratios in the levator muscle using these magnetic resonance images of live childbirth. STUDY DESIGN: Three-dimensional magnetic resonance image sequences were obtained to visualize coronal and axial planes before and after the childbirth. These images were obtained before the expulsion phase without pushing and were used to reconstruct the levator muscle and the fetal head in 3 dimensions. The fetal head was approximated to be an ellipsoid, and it is assumed that its middle section is visible in dynamic magnetic resonance images. Assuming incompressibility, the full deformation field of the fetal head is then calculated. Real-time cine magnetic resonance images were acquired for the during the expulsion phase, occurring over 2 contractions in the midsagittal plane. The levator muscle stretch is estimated using a custom program. The program calculates points of contact between the fetal head ellipsoid and the levator ani muscle model as the head descends down the birth canal and moves them orthogonal to its surface. Circumferential stretch was calculated to represent the extension needed to allow the passage of the fetal head. RESULTS: Starting from a position in the preexpulsion phase, the levator muscle experiences a maximum circumferential stretch of 248% on the posterior-medial portion of the levator ani muscle, as shown in previously published finite element simulations. However, the maximal stretch was notably less than that predicted by finite element models. This is because our baseline 3-dimensional model of the levator muscle is created from images taken shortly before expulsion and thus is already in a stretched state. Furthermore, the finite element models are created from images of a healthy nulliparous woman, while this study uses images from a para 2 woman. CONCLUSION: This study is the first attempt to estimate the stretch in levator ani muscle using magnetic resonance images of a live childbirth. The stretch was significant and the locations corroborate with previous findings of finite element models.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Parturition/physiology , Pelvic Floor/diagnostic imaging , Pelvic Floor/physiology , Delivery, Obstetric , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Pregnancy , Young Adult
20.
J Perinat Med ; 45(3): 305-308, 2017 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27219097

ABSTRACT

AIM: Fetal skull molding is important for the adaptation of the head to the birth canal during vaginal delivery. Importantly, the fetal head must rotate around the maternal symphysis pubis. The goals of this analysis were to observe a human birth in real-time using an open magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner and describe the fetal head configuration during expulsion. METHODS: Real-time cinematic MRI series (TSE single-shot sequence, TR 1600 ms, TE 150 ms) were acquired from the midsagittal plane of the maternal pelvis during the active second stage of labor at 37 weeks of gestation. Frame-by-frame analyses were performed to measure the frontooccipital diameter (FOD) and distance from the vertex to the base of the fetal skull. RESULTS: During vaginal delivery in an occiput anterior position, the initial FOD was 10.3 cm. When expulsion began, the fetal skull was deformed and elongated, with the FOD increasing to 10.8 cm and 11.2 cm at crowning. In contrast, the distance from the vertex to the base of the skull was reduced from 6.4 cm to 5.6 cm at expulsion. CONCLUSIONS: Fetal head molding is the change in the fetal head due to the forces of labor. The biomechanics of this process are poorly understood. Our visualization of the normal mechanism of late second-stage labor shows that MRI technology can for the first time help define the changes in the diameters of the fetal head during active labor.


Subject(s)
Fetus/diagnostic imaging , Head/diagnostic imaging , Labor Stage, Second/physiology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Biomechanical Phenomena , Computer Systems , Female , Fetus/physiology , Head/physiology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Labor Presentation , Male , Pregnancy , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...