[Long-term efficacy and safety of divozilimab during 2-year treatment of multiple sclerosis patients in randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS]. / Effektivnost' i bezopasnost' dvukhletnei terapii divozilimabom u patsientov s rasseyannym sklerozom v ramkakh randomizirovannogo dvoinogo slepogo platsebo-kontroliruemogo klinicheskogo issledovaniya BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody divozilimab (DIV) used as an intravenous infusion at a dose of 500 mg every 24 weeks during 100 weeks for the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), including relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS) with relapses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The multicenter, randomized, double-blind and double-masked phase III clinical trial (CT) BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS (NCT05385744) included 338 adult patients with MS distributed in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: DIV 500 mg and teriflunomide (TRF) 14 mg. After screening, subjects were included in the main CT period, which consisted of two cycles of therapy over 48 weeks, then entered an additional period from weeks 49 to 100, which included three cycles of therapy. The efficacy was assessed based on the results of brain MRI and registration of data on relapses. RESULTS: 308 subjects completed 5 therapy cycles according to the study protocol. An analysis of the effectiveness of DIV therapy over 2 years showed a persistent suppression of MRI and clinical activity of the disease in comparison with TRF, which was confirmed by all the studied MRI indicators (including CUA; total number of gadolinium-enhancing (GdE) lesions on T1-weighted scans ; number of new or enlarged lesions on T2-weighted scans; lesions volume change on T2-weighted scans; change in the volume of hypointense lesions on T1-weighted scans). The use of DIV was associated with a statistically significant decrease in ARR compared to TRF (p=0.0001). The ARR in the DIV group was 0.057, in the TRF group - 0.164 with 95% confidential interval for the frequency ratio [0.202; 0.593]. The incidence of GdE lesions on T1-weighted scans in the DIV group was significantly lower than in the TRF group. The average number of such lesions was 0.0±0.08 and 1.0±4.46 in the DIV and TRF groups, respectively (p<0.0001). Progression of EDSS was detected in 18 (10.7%) and 36 (21.3%) patients in the DIV and TRF groups, respectively (p=0.0075). The proportion of patients with relapses was 11.2% (n=19) in the DIV group and 23.1% (n=39) in the TRF group (p=0.0039). In the subpopulation of patients with SPMS, no cases of increase in EDSS were detected, and not a single case of exacerbation was recorded over 2 years of using DIV. Also, DIV has shown a favorable safety profile. Among the adverse reactions (AR), infusion reactions and laboratory abnormalities, such as a decrease in the number of leukocytes, neutrophils, and lymphocytes, were most often recorded. Identified AR were expected, had mild to moderate severity, and resolved without any negative consequences. CONCLUSION: The results of the BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS CT indicate a high sustained efficacy and safety of long-term use of DIV in comparison with TRF during 2 years of therapy.

[Efficacy and safety of antiCD20 monoclonal antibody divozilimab during 48-week treatment of multiple sclerosis patients in randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS]. / Effektivnost' i bezopasnost' 48 nedel'nogo primeneniya monoklonal'nogo antitela protiv CD20 divozilimaba u patsientov s rasseyannym sklerozom: rezul'taty randomizirovannogo dvoinogo slepogo platsebo-kontroliruemogo klinicheskogo issledovaniya BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody divozilimab (DIV) used as an intravenous infusion at a dose of 500 mg for the treatment of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in comparison with the teriflunomide (TRF). The study of the efficacy and safety of the use of the drug DIV was carried out for 48 weeks of therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The multicenter, randomized, double-blind and double-masked phase III clinical trial (CT) BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS included 338 adult patients with RRMS distributed in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: DIV 500 mg and TRF 14 mg. After screening, subjects were included in the main CT period, which consisted of two cycles of therapy over 48 weeks. The primary end point was «Mean annualized relapse rate 48 weeks after the last patient is randomized in the study¼. RESULTS: 321 subjects completed 48 weeks of therapy according to the study protocol. The analysis of the of efficacy data for the primary endpoint successively proved the hypothesis of superiority of the test drug DIV at a dose of 500 mg over the reference drug TRF. A rapid suppression of acute disease activity according to the brain MRI and clinical manifestations of the disease was shown after the first infusion of DIV in patients with RRMS. Thus, after 48 weeks of therapy in patients treated with DIV, there were no T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions, while in the TRF group such lesions were observed in 20.7% (35/169) of subjects. Evaluation of the CUA per scan showed that the mean values for the estimated period were statistically significantly lower in the DIV drug group compared to the TRF group: the ratio of the adjusted per scan rates (DIV/TRF) was 0.125 [95% CI: 0.089; 0.177]. Over the 48 weeks of therapy, the proportion of subjects with relapses was 9.5% (n=16/169) in the DIV group and 19.5% (33/169) in the TRF group (p=0.0086). DIV has shown a favorable safety profile. Among the adverse reactions (AR), infusion reactions and deviations of laboratory data, such as a decrease in the number of leukocytes, neutrophils, and lymphocytes, were most often recorded. Identified AR were expected, had mild to moderate severity, and resolved without any negative consequences. CONCLUSION: The results of the clinical study indicate the high efficacy and safety of DIV in comparison with TRF.

[Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Sampeginterferon-ß1a in the Treatment of Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: a Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial 104-Week Results]. / Dolgosrochnye dannye po effektivnosti i bezopasnosti preparata sampeginterferon-ß1a u patsientov s remittiruyushchim rasseyannym sklerozom: rezul'taty 104-nedel'nogo randomizirovannogo dvoinogo slepogo klinicheskogo issledovaniya.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of sampeginterferon-ß1a (samPEG-IFN-ß1a) 180 µg and 240 µg administered once every 2 weeks compared to placebo and low dose interferon beta-1a (LIB) 30 µg administered once weekly. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis aged 18-60 years, with Expanded Disability Status Scale score ≤5.5 were randomized at a ratio of 2:2:2:1 to the following groups: samPEG-IFN-ß1a 180 µg, samPEG-IFN-ß1a 240 µg, LIB, placebo. After 20 weeks, the placebo group completed the study. After week 52, the final analysis was performed, which included the primary endpoint analysis, the LIB group patients completed their participation in the study. The patients in samPEG-IFN-ß1a groups continued to receive therapy with samPEG-IFN-ß1a 240 µg until week 100 inclusive. The results of the final analysis after 52 weeks have been previously published. The current article presents a long-term efficacy and safety of samPEG-IFN-ß1a after 104 weeks of the trial. RESULTS: The annualized relapse rate over the second year was 0.16 in the samPEG-IFN-ß1a 180 µg group and 0.09 in the samPEG-IFN-ß1a 240 µg group. By week 104, the proportion of relapse-free patients was 77.0% (87/113) and 83.3% (95/114) in the samPEG-IFN-ß1a 180 µg and 240 µg groups, respectively. There were no negative dynamics of MRI markers, neurological deficit parameters and cognitive functions by scales and tests. The safety profile of samPEG-IFN-ß1a was consistent with the known safety profile of IFN-ß therapy. CONCLUSION: Treatment with samPEG-IFN-ß1a is an effective and safe first-line therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients.

[Efficacy and safety of sampeginterferon ß-1a in the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: results of 52 weeks of therapy in a randomized, double-blind clinical trial]. / Effektivnost' i bezopasnost' sampeginterferona ß-1a dlya lecheniya remittiruyushchego rasseyannogo skleroza: rezul'taty 52-nedel'nogo randomizirovannogo dvoinogo slepogo klinicheskogo issledovaniya.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of samPEG-IFN-ß1a 180 µg and 240 µg administered once every 2 weeks for the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) compared to placebo and low dose interferon beta-1a (LIB) 30 µg administered once weekly. The primary endpoint after 52 weeks of therapy was the time to first relapse, the hypotheses of non-inferiority and superiority to LIB were tested. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This international, multicenter, double blind, comparative, placebo-controlled clinical study enrolled 399 patients with the diagnosis of RRMS, randomized in 4 groups: samPEG-IFN-ß1a180 µg (n=114), samPEG-IFN-ß1a 240 µg (n=114), LIB (n=114) and placebo (n=57). Placebo group patients participated in the study for 20 weeks. After 52 weeks of therapy and 4 weeks of follow-up, LIB group patients completed their participation in the study, patients from PEG-IFN-ß1a groups continued to receive therapy until week 100 inclusive. The article presents the results of an analysis conducted after the end of 52 weeks of a double-blind, comparative, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. RESULTS: Final analysis of the efficacy and safety was performed after 52 weeks of study. Main statistical hypothesis testing proved that both doses of samPEG-IFN-ß1a were equally effective when compared to LIB by the primary endpoint - «Time to first relapse¼. Due to detection of statistically significant differences in the primary endpoint between the study drug and the reference drug, indicating a greater efficacy of the study drug, an additional testing was carried out and the hypothesis of superiority of samPEG-IFN-ß1a at a dose of 240 µg over the reference LIB was proved. Evaluation of the dynamics of certain key parameters of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and clinical outcomes demonstrated a positive effect of samPEG-IFN-ß1a therapy in the form of decreased activity of the demyelinating process in the brain and reduce the number of relapses. The proportion of patients without new T2 lesions after 52 weeks was 87.6% and 90.4% in 180 µg and 240 µg samPEG-IFN-ß1a groups, versus 72.6% in the LIB group (p=0.0199 and p=0.0033). No progression of multiple sclerosis was shown based on EDSS scale evaluation. During the study, the most common adverse reactions were flu-like symptoms and injection site reactions. CONCLUSION: The new drug samPEG-IFN-ß1a is an effective and safe agent for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis treatment, while having an advantage over other low-dose interferons in the form of reduced frequency of intramuscular injections.

[The new pegylated interferon beta-1a (sampeginterferon beta-1a, BCD-054) in the treatment of remitting multiple sclerosis]. / Novyi pegilirovannyi interferon beta-1a (sampéginterferon beta-1a, BCD-054) v terapii remittiruiushchego rasseiannogo skleroza.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of BCD 054 180 µg and 240 µg administered once every 2 weeks for the treatment of remitting multiple sclerosis compared to placebo and low dose interferon beta-1a (LIB) 30 µg administered once weekly. Results of a 20 week blinded interim analysis from a double blind, comparative, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical study are included. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This multinational, multicentre, double blind, comparative, placebo-controlled study enrolled 399 patients with the diagnosis of remitting multiple sclerosis: 114 patients in the sampeginterferon beta 1a and LIB groups each and 57 patients in the placebo group. To ensure the objectivity of data, the study protocol includes a blinded interim analysis to demonstrate the superiority of BCD 054 over placebo based on the number of combined unique active lesions (CUA) on MRI scans after 20 weeks of treatment. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: An integrated analysis of the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics was performed after 20 weeks of study. Mean CUA per scan was lower in the active treatment groups compared to placebo: 0,986±2,046, 0,619±1,055, 0,665±1,165, 1,673±2,376 (groups 1, 2, 3 and placebo group, respectively). The data for CUA per scan demonstrated the superiority of both BCD 054 180 µg and 240 µg over placebo. Patients receiving active treatment had fewer new and/or enlarging lesions after 20 weeks of treatment. The proportion of patients without new T2-weighted lesions was 74,3%, 86,7%, and 78,1% in groups 1, 2, and 3 compared to 64,9% in the placebo group. Manifestations of flu-like syndrome that is expected for interferon treatment were observed with the same incidence in all the active treatment groups. Its severity, duration or the need for symptomatic treatment did not appear to depend on the type of interferon used.