Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 58(1): 48-56, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28750149

ABSTRACT

Azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M) is a potent angiotensin II receptor blocker that decreases blood pressure in a dose-dependent manner. It is a prodrug that is not detected in blood after its oral administration because of its rapid hydrolysis to the active moiety, azilsartan (AZL). AZL undergoes further metabolism to the major metabolite, M-II, and minor metabolites. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of mild to moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of AZL and its major metabolite. This was a single-center, open-label, phase 1 parallel-group study that examined the single-dose (day 1) and multiple-dose (days 4-8) - 40 mg - pharmacokinetics of AZL and M-II in 16 subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment by Child-Pugh classification (n = 8 per group) and subjects (n = 16) matched based on age, sex, race, weight, and smoking status. Mild or moderate hepatic impairment did not cause clinically meaningful increases in exposure to AZL and M-II. Mild or moderate hepatic impairment had no clinically meaningful effect on the plasma protein binding of AZL and M-II. Single and multiple doses of AZL-M 40 mg were well tolerated in all subject groups. Based on the pharmacokinetic and tolerability findings, no dose adjustment of AZL-M is required for subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/adverse effects , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/pharmacokinetics , Benzimidazoles/adverse effects , Benzimidazoles/pharmacokinetics , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury/etiology , Oxadiazoles/adverse effects , Oxadiazoles/pharmacokinetics , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/therapeutic use , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/pharmacokinetics , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Antihypertensive Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Benzimidazoles/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Female , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Oxadiazoles/therapeutic use
2.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 73(3): 279-288, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27999883

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to determine the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of a single 12.5- or 25-mg dose of alogliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, in pediatric (children and adolescents) and adult subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: A randomized, open-label, multicenter study was conducted in pediatric and adult subjects. Subjects in two pediatric groups (children and adolescents) were randomized 1:1 to receive a single oral dose of alogliptin 12.5 or 25 mg, respectively; all gender- and race-matched adult subjects received alogliptin 25 mg. Blood and urine samples were collected at prespecified time points for PK/PD analyses. A PK/PD model was developed using data from the study for steady-state simulations. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: In pediatric subjects receiving the 25-mg dose, the mean alogliptin peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) and AUC0-inf values were 26 and 23% lower, respectively, than in adults receiving the 25-mg dose, but maximum observed DPP-4 inhibition effect (Emax) and AUEC0-24 values were similar to those in adults. In pediatric subjects receiving the 12.5-mg dose, the mean alogliptin Cmax and AUC0-inf values were 58 and 54% lower, respectively, than those in adults, hence Emax and AUEC0-24 values were also lower by 11 and 17%, respectively. The PK/PD model simulated data were consistent with study results. No safety concern was found. CONCLUSIONS: A 25-mg dose of alogliptin in pediatric subjects achieved alogliptin exposures and DPP-4 inhibition similar to those in adult T2DM patients without safety concerns; therefore, this dose is recommended for a pediatric phase 3 trial.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Piperidines/therapeutic use , Uracil/analogs & derivatives , Adolescent , Adult , Area Under Curve , Child , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/metabolism , Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors/adverse effects , Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors/pharmacology , Female , Half-Life , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Hypoglycemic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Hypoglycemic Agents/pharmacology , Male , Piperidines/adverse effects , Piperidines/pharmacokinetics , Piperidines/pharmacology , Uracil/adverse effects , Uracil/pharmacokinetics , Uracil/pharmacology , Uracil/therapeutic use , Young Adult
3.
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev ; 5(5): 393-8, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27514506

ABSTRACT

Azilsartan medoxomil is a long-acting angiotensin II receptor blocker used to treat hypertension as monotherapy or in fixed-dose combination (FDC) with chlorthalidone. This study assessed the effects of food intake on the plasma pharmacokinetics of the active moiety, azilsartan, and of chlorthalidone when administered as separate tablets or in FDC. Cohort 1 (n = 24) received azilsartan medoxomil (80 mg) and chlorthalidone (25 mg) once in a fasted condition and once 30 minutes after the initiation of a high-fat meal (fed). Cohort 2 (n = 24) received the same drugs as an FDC tablet in the fasted and fed conditions. In cohort 1, the fed-fasted ratios for AUC0-inf and Cmax were 108.3 (101.6-115.5) and 103.7 (94.3-114.1), respectively, for azilsartan and 112.3 (106.5-118.4) and 100.3 (90.6-111.1), respectively, for chlorthalidone. In cohort 2, the corresponding ratios were 78.6 (67.6-91.4) and 78.6 (64.4-96.0) for azilsartan and 101.0 (96.5-86.7) and 75.9 (66.5-86.7) for chlorthalidone. The combination therapies were well tolerated, and food intake had no consistent effect on adverse events. Food intake had a somewhat greater effect on plasma pharmacokinetics after administration of the FDC tablet than after administration of separate tablets, but the effects of food on the plasma pharmacokinetics of the FDC were not expected to be clinically meaningful.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage , Benzimidazoles/administration & dosage , Chlorthalidone/administration & dosage , Food-Drug Interactions , Oxadiazoles/administration & dosage , Adult , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/administration & dosage , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/adverse effects , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/pharmacokinetics , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Antihypertensive Agents/pharmacokinetics , Benzimidazoles/adverse effects , Benzimidazoles/pharmacokinetics , Chlorthalidone/adverse effects , Chlorthalidone/pharmacokinetics , Cohort Studies , Dietary Fats/administration & dosage , Drug Combinations , Fasting , Female , Humans , Male , Oxadiazoles/adverse effects , Oxadiazoles/pharmacokinetics , Tablets , Young Adult
4.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 72(4): 447-57, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26725367

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This open-label, multicenter, single-dose study characterized the pharmacokinetics and short-term safety of azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M) in hypertensive pediatric subjects (12-16 years [cohort 1a; n = 9]; 6-11 years [cohort 2; n = 8]; 4-5 years [cohort 3; n = 3]). METHODS: Model-based simulations were performed to guide dosing, especially in 1-5-year olds, who were difficult to enroll. AZL-M was dosed according to body weight (20-60-mg tablet, cohorts 1a and 2; 0.66 mg/kg granule suspension, cohort 3). In cohort 1, gender-matched healthy adults (cohort 1b; n = 9) received AZL-M 80 mg. RESULTS: Exposure to AZL (active moiety of AZL-M), measured by dose-/body weight-normalized C max and AUC0-∞, was ∼15-30 % lower in pediatric subjects versus adults. In simulations, exposure with 0.66 mg/kg AZL-M in pediatric subjects weighing 8-25 kg approximated to AZL-M 40 mg (typical starting dose) in adults. The simulations suggest that 25-50-kg subjects require half the adult dose (10-40 mg), whereas 50-100-kg subjects can use the same dosing as adults. Adverse events were mild in intensity, apart from one moderate event (migraine). CONCLUSIONS: This dosing strategy should be safe in pediatric patients, as AZL exposure would not exceed that seen in adults with the highest approved AZL-M dose (80 mg).


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage , Antihypertensive Agents/pharmacokinetics , Benzimidazoles/administration & dosage , Benzimidazoles/pharmacokinetics , Hypertension/drug therapy , Oxadiazoles/administration & dosage , Oxadiazoles/pharmacokinetics , Adolescent , Adult , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Area Under Curve , Benzimidazoles/adverse effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Oxadiazoles/adverse effects
5.
Clin Pharmacokinet ; 55(5): 595-604, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26507722

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M) is an angiotensin II receptor blocker approved to treat hypertension. After oral dosing, AZL-M is quickly hydrolyzed to azilsartan (AZL). The aims of this study were to assess the effects of age, sex, and race on the pharmacokinetics of AZL-M in healthy subjects, as well as safety and tolerability. METHODS: Sixty-one healthy adults were enrolled in this phase I, single-blind, randomized placebo-controlled study (placebo control was for assessment of safety/tolerability only). Subjects were stratified by age (18-45 vs. 65-85 years), sex, and race (black vs. white) and given oral AZL-M 60 mg (3 × 20 mg capsules) or placebo as a single dose (Day 1) and consecutive daily doses (Days 4-8) (6:2 ratio for AZL-M:placebo per group). Pharmacokinetics were evaluated (AZL-M patients only) on Days 1-3 and 8-9 and safety/tolerability was monitored. RESULTS: Age, sex, and race had no clinically meaningful effect on AZL exposures after single or multiple dosing. Pharmacokinetic parameters remained similar between Days 1 and 8 for each age, sex, and race subgroup. The frequency of adverse events was similar for AZL-M (32%) and placebo (29%). No discontinuations or serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these pharmacokinetic and safety/tolerability findings, no AZL-M dose adjustments are required based on age, sex, or race (black/white).


Subject(s)
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/pharmacokinetics , Benzimidazoles/pharmacokinetics , Oxadiazoles/pharmacokinetics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/administration & dosage , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/adverse effects , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/blood , Benzimidazoles/administration & dosage , Benzimidazoles/adverse effects , Benzimidazoles/blood , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oxadiazoles/administration & dosage , Oxadiazoles/adverse effects , Oxadiazoles/blood , Racial Groups , Single-Blind Method , Young Adult
6.
Clin Pharmacokinet ; 52(5): 347-58, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23575872

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M) is a potent angiotensin II receptor blocker that decreases blood pressure in a dose-dependent manner. It is a pro-drug and not detected in blood after oral administration because of rapid hydrolysis to the active moiety, azilsartan (AZL). AZL undergoes further metabolism to the major metabolite M-II and minor metabolites. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of AZL and its major metabolite. METHODS: This was a single-center, open-label, phase I parallel-group study which examined the single-dose (40-mg) pharmacokinetics of AZL and M-II in 24 subjects with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis (n = 6 per group), respectively, and healthy matched subjects (n = 24). RESULTS: Renal impairment/disease did not cause clinically meaningful increases in exposure to AZL. M-II exposure was higher in all renally impaired subjects and highest in those with severe impairment (approx fivefold higher vs. control). M-II is pharmacologically inactive; increased exposure was not considered important in dose selection for AZL-M in subjects with renal impairment. Hemodialysis did not significantly remove AZL or M-II. Renal impairment had no clinically meaningful effect on the plasma protein binding of AZL or M-II. Single doses of AZL-M 40 mg were well tolerated in all subject groups. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the pharmacokinetic and tolerability findings, no dose adjustment of AZL-M is required for subjects with any degree of renal impairment, including end-stage renal disease.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/pharmacokinetics , Benzimidazoles/pharmacokinetics , Oxadiazoles/pharmacokinetics , Renal Dialysis , Renal Insufficiency/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/administration & dosage , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/adverse effects , Benzimidazoles/administration & dosage , Benzimidazoles/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/physiopathology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Oxadiazoles/administration & dosage , Oxadiazoles/adverse effects , Prodrugs , Renal Insufficiency/therapy , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...