Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Lancet ; 386(10005): 1776-85, 2015 Oct 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26159392

ABSTRACT

Differences in religious faith-based viewpoints (controversies) on the sanctity of human life, acceptable behaviour, health-care technologies and health-care services contribute to the widespread variations in health care worldwide. Faith-linked controversies include family planning, child protection (especially child marriage, female genital mutilation, and immunisation), stigma and harm reduction, violence against women, sexual and reproductive health and HIV, gender, end-of-life issues, and faith activities including prayer. Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, and traditional beliefs have similarities and differences in their viewpoints. Improved understanding by health-care providers of the heterogeneity of viewpoints, both within and between faiths, and their effect on health care is important for clinical medicine, public-health programmes, and health-care policy. Increased appreciation in faith leaders of the effect of their teachings on health care is also crucial. This Series paper outlines some faith-related controversies, describes how they influence health-care provision and uptake, and identifies opportunities for research and increased interaction between faith leaders and health-care providers to improve health care.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/methods , Religion and Medicine , Abortion, Legal/ethics , Adolescent , Circumcision, Female/ethics , Delivery of Health Care/ethics , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Family Planning Services/ethics , Family Planning Services/methods , Family Planning Services/organization & administration , Female , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Immunization/ethics , Male , Marriage , Religion , Reproductive Techniques/ethics , Sex Offenses/ethics , Terminal Care/ethics
2.
Lancet ; 386(10005): 1786-94, 2015 Oct 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26159394

ABSTRACT

The sharpening focus on global health and the growing recognition of the capacities and scope of faith-based groups for improving community health outcomes suggest an intentional and systematic approach to forging strong, sustained partnerships between public sector agencies and faith-based organisations. Drawing from both development and faith perspectives, this Series paper examines trends that could ground powerful, more sustainable partnerships and identifies new opportunities for collaboration based on respective strengths and existing models. This paper concludes with five areas of recommendations for more effective collaboration to achieve health goals.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Interinstitutional Relations , Religion and Medicine , Cooperative Behavior , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Healthy People Programs/organization & administration , Humans , Public Sector/organization & administration
3.
PLoS One ; 10(6): e0128389, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26042731

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Faith-based organizations (FBOs) have been active in the health sector for decades. Recently, the role of FBOs in global health has been of increased interest. However, little is known about the magnitude and trends in development assistance for health (DAH) channeled through these organizations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were collected from the 21 most recent editions of the Report of Voluntary Agencies. These reports provide information on the revenue and expenditure of organizations. Project-level data were also collected and reviewed from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. More than 1,900 non-governmental organizations received funds from at least one of these three organizations. Background information on these organizations was examined by two independent reviewers to identify the amount of funding channeled through FBOs. RESULTS: In 2013, total spending by the FBOs identified in the VolAg amounted to US$1.53 billion. In 1990, FB0s spent 34.1% of total DAH provided by private voluntary organizations reported in the VolAg. In 2013, FBOs expended 31.0%. Funds provided by the Global Fund to FBOs have grown since 2002, amounting to $80.9 million in 2011, or 16.7% of the Global Fund's contributions to NGOs. In 2011, the Gates Foundation's contributions to FBOs amounted to $7.1 million, or 1.1% of the total provided to NGOs. CONCLUSION: Development assistance partners exhibit a range of preferences with respect to the amount of funds provided to FBOs. Overall, estimates show that FBOS have maintained a substantial and consistent share over time, in line with overall spending in global health on NGOs. These estimates provide the foundation for further research on the spending trends and effectiveness of FBOs in global health.


Subject(s)
Culture , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Organizations/economics , Health Expenditures , International Cooperation , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...