Evaluation of stereotactic VMAT lung treatment plans for small moving targets.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to perform patient quality controls and end-to-end tests for stereotactic VMAT lung treatment plans and to investigate the influence of various parameters on the results. METHOD: 18 plans were defined by an experimental design methodology to cover a large variety of stereotactic VMAT lung treatments including different doses per fraction, target diameters, target movements and respiratory parameters. Plans were first controlled using portal dosimetry and a homogeneous static cylindrical phantom. End-to-end tests were then performed in a dynamic respiratory thorax phantom. Measurements were conducted with ionization chamber and films. Calculations were performed with the AcurosXB and AAA algorithms in 6 FFF. RESULTS: Portal dosimetry gave excellent gamma pass rates (greater than 97.1 %) and dose deviations between measurement and calculations in a homogeneous static phantom were smaller than 2 %. The methodology followed for comparing calculated and measured doses in a moving target was validated in static fields (largest deviation smaller than  2 %). End-to-end tests showed mean deviations of 1.9 %, 3.3 % and 6.6 % for the 3, 2 and 1 cm diameter's target respectively. Deviations increased for larger movements for the 1 cm lesion. CONCLUSION: End-to-end tests revealed that stereotactic VMAT lung treatment plans for moving targets can be delivered within 5 % for 3 and 2 cm diameter targets and amplitudes up to 1.5 cm. The AcurosXB and AAA algorithms however tend to underestimate the dose to the target. Even with satisfactory patient quality controls like portal dosimetry, extra care should be taken for GTV lesions smaller than 2 cm.

Design and automation of specific geometric quality controls for cone-radiosurgery treatments.

PURPOSE: The Varian TrueBeam STx linac can be equipped with BrainLAB stereotactic cones and ExacTrac imaging system for SRS treatments. However, these two third-party systems lack integration in a self-performance diagnosis tool dedicated to the SRS platform. The aim of this work was to design and automate essential geometric tests considering the complete set of cones with diameter range from 4 to 15 mm. METHODS: EPID-based tests were focused on the cone alignment, the radiation isocentricity and the isocenters congruence. Images acquired with or without the BrainLAB pointer were analysed using the Hough transform and morphological filtering operations, after assessment of the algorithm accuracy using simulated images. The new Machine QA program was experimented over one year. RESULTS: A subpixel resolution of 0.02 mm was found for the circular-field center detection algorithm. The tests results did not depend on the pointer location. The maximum deviations reported were in accordance with the AAPM SRS guidelines. The accurate localization of the linac radiation isocenter allowed for guidance of the ExacTrac calibration. A misalignment reaching 0.2 mm was measured for all cones but one, highlighting the benefit of systematizing this control before each patient SRS treatment. CONCLUSION: An effective in-house QA program dedicated to SRS cones was developed to supplement the standard machine performance check on our mixed SRS platform. Specific geometric tests even include the smallest 4-mm cone, which could be of great interest for future clinical indications such as the radiosurgery of functional disorders.

Optimizing the effective spot size and the dosimetric leaf gap of the AcurosXB algorithm for VMAT treatment planning.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to provide and test a new methodology to adjust the AcurosXB beam model for VMAT treatment plans. METHOD: The effective target spot size of the AcurosXB v15 algorithm was adjusted in order to minimize the difference between calculated and measured penumbras. The dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) was adjusted using the asynchronous oscillating sweeping gap tests defined in the literature and the MLC transmission was measured. The impact of the four parameters on the small field output factors was assessed using a design of experiment methodology. Patient quality controls were performed for the three beam models investigated including two energies and two MLC models. RESULTS: Effective target spot sizes differed from the manufacturer recommendations and strongly depended on the MLC model considered. DLG values ranged from 0.7 to 2.3 mm and were found to be larger than the ones based on the sweeping gap tests. All parameters were found to significantly influence the calculated output factors, especially for the 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm field size. Interactions were also identified for fields smaller than 2 cm × 2 cm, suggesting that adjusting the parameters on the small field output factors should be done with caution. All patient quality controls passed the universal action limit of 90%. CONCLUSION: The methodology provided is simple to implement in clinical practice. It was validated for three beam models covering a large variety of treatment types and localizations.

Evaluation of a commercial synthetic computed tomography generation solution for magnetic resonance imaging-only radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the Siemens solution generating Synthetic computed tomography (sCT) for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only radiotherapy (RT). METHOD: A retrospective study was conducted on 47 patients treated with external beam RT for brain or prostate cancer who underwent both MRI and CT for treatment planning. sCT images were generated from MRI using automatic bulk densities segmentation. The geometric accuracy of the sCT was assessed by comparing the Hounsfield Units (HU) difference between sCT and CT for bone structures, soft-tissue, and full body contour. VMAT plans were computed on the CT for treatment preparation and then copied and recalculated with the same monitor units on the sCT using the AcurosXB algorithm. A 1%-1mm gamma analysis was performed and DVH metrics for the Planning Target Volume (PTV) like the Dmean  and the D98% were compared. In addition, we evaluate the usability of sCT for daily position verification with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for 14 prostate patients by comparing sCT/CBCT registration results to CT/CBCT. RESULTS: Mean HU differences were small except for the skull (207 HU) and right femoral head of four patients where significant aberrations were found. The mean gamma pass rate was 73.2% for the brain and 84.7% for the prostate and Dmean were smaller than 0.5%. Large differences for the D98% of the prostate group could be correlated to low Dice index of the PTV. The mean difference of translations and rotations were inferior to 3.5 mm and 0.2° in all directions with a major difference in the anterior-posterior direction. CONCLUSION: The performances of the software were shown to be similar to other sCT generation algorithms in terms of HU difference, dose comparison and daily image localization.

Field output factors for small fields: A large multicentre study.

PURPOSE: The determination of output factors in small field dosimetry is a crucial point, especially when implementing stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Herein, a working group of the French medical physicist society (SFPM) was created to collect small field output factors. The objective was to gather and disseminate information on small field output factors based on different detectors for various clinical SRT equipment and measurement configurations. METHOD: Participants were surveyed for information about their SRT equipment, including the type of linear particle accelerator (linac), collimator settings, measurement conditions for the output factors and the detectors used. Participants had to report both the ratio of detector readings and the correction factors applied as described in the IAEA TRS-483 code of practice for nominal field sizes smaller or equal to 3 cm. Mean field output factors and their associated standard deviations were calculated when data from at least 3 linacs were available. RESULTS: 23 centres were enrolled in the project. Standard deviations of the mean field output factors were systematically smaller than 1.5% for field sizes larger or equal to 1 cm and reached 5% for the smallest field size (0.5 cm). Deviations with published data were smaller than 2% except for the 0.5 cm circular fixed aperture collimator of the CyberKnife where it reached 3.5%. CONCLUSION: These field output factor values obtained via a large multicentre study can be considered as an external cross verification for any radiotherapy centre starting a SRT program and should help minimize systematic errors when determining small field output factors.

Comparison of five dose calculation algorithms in a heterogeneous media using design of experiment.

PURPOSE: Design of experiments (DoE) provides a methodology to reveal the influence of input values on the measured output with a limited number of trials. The purpose of this study was to describe how DoE can be used to evaluate the performances of several dose calculation systems in heterogeneous media, including algorithms like Pencil Beam (PB), Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA), Acuros XB (AXB), Monte Carlo (MC) and Collapsed Cone Volume (CCV). METHOD: This study was carried out using a CIRS Model 002LFC IMRT Thorax Phantom customized with a water-equivalent heterogeneity inside the lung. The calculated dose distributions were compared to Gafchromic® EBT3 film measurements. The beam configurations were selected using DoE to study the influence of five parameters simultaneously (energy, collimator angulation, gantry angulation, X and Y jaws) and to optimize the number of experiments. An analysis of variance was performed over the entire irradiation field and over various regions of interest (tumour, shadow of tumour and lungs). RESULTS: DoE enabled to quantify and determine the statistically significant factors, leading to an evaluation of the dose calculation systems in the lung case. The resulting scoring could be as follow (from best to worst): AXB_Dm, CCV, AXB_Dw, XVMC_Dm, XVMC_Dw, AAA and last PB. Differences between the algorithms were specially observed in the tumour and the shadow regions. CONCLUSION: DoE is a robust statistical method to compare several dose calculation systems. The various analyses lead to the conclusion that AXB handled more accurately most of the situations investigated in heterogeneous media.

[Interest of image-guided radiotherapy for brain tumors and positioning control]. / Apport du guidage par l'image pour le repositionnement au cours de la radiothérapie des tumeurs encéphaliques.

A narrow therapeutic index and more and more patients with long survival characterize primary and second brain tumors. Image-guided radiotherapy can increase accuracy of the patient's position during a course of intracranial irradiation thanks to a direct or indirect visualization of targets volumes. Treatment reproducibility and organ at risk-sparing are the primary issues, particularly with the development of stereotactic radiotherapy and protontherapy. Regarding intracranial treatments, image-guided radiotherapy seems to be a repetitive task based on skeletal structures registration. And yet, this innovation makes possible to assess the dosimetric impact of daily positioning variations avoiding invasive immobilizations. Image-guided radiotherapy offers automated tools to limit time consumption and furthers adaptive radiotherapy opportunities. Nevertheless, medical evaluation is still necessary and image processing should be strictly defined (frequency, use, performance). The purpose of this article is to describe image-guidance in brain irradiation, as repositioning tool and to focus on its recent prospects.

Design of experiments in medical physics: Application to the AAA beam model validation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of the design of experiments in the analysis of multiparametric problems related to the quality assurance in radiotherapy. The main motivation is to use this statistical method to optimize the quality assurance processes in the validation of beam models. METHOD: Considering the Varian Eclipse system, eight parameters with several levels were selected: energy, MLC, depth, X, Y1 and Y2 jaw dimensions, wedge and wedge jaw. A Taguchi table was used to define 72 validation tests. Measurements were conducted in water using a CC04 on a TrueBeam STx, a TrueBeam Tx, a Trilogy and a 2300IX accelerator matched by the vendor. Dose was computed using the AAA algorithm. The same raw data was used for all accelerators during the beam modelling. RESULTS: The mean difference between computed and measured doses was 0.1±0.5% for all beams and all accelerators with a maximum difference of 2.4% (under the 3% tolerance level). For all beams, the measured doses were within 0.6% for all accelerators. The energy was found to be an influencing parameter but the deviations observed were smaller than 1% and not considered clinically significant. CONCLUSION: Designs of experiment can help define the optimal measurement set to validate a beam model. The proposed method can be used to identify the prognostic factors of dose accuracy. The beam models were validated for the 4 accelerators which were found dosimetrically equivalent even though the accelerator characteristics differ.

Accuracy of a dose-area product compared to an absorbed dose to water at a point in a 2 cm diameter field.

PURPOSE: Graphite calorimeters with a core diameter larger than the beam can be used to establish dosimetric references in small fields. The dose-area product (DAP) measured can theoretically be linked to an absorbed dose at a point by the determination of a profile correction. This study aims at comparing the DAP-based protocol to the usual absorbed dose at a point protocol in a 2 cm diameter field for which both references exist. METHODS: Two calorimeters were used, respectively, with a sensitive volume of 0.6 cm (for the absorbed dose at a point measurement) and 3 cm diameter (for the DAP measurement). Profile correction was calculated from a 2D dose mapping using three detectors: a PinPoint chamber, a synthetic diamond, and EBT3 films. A specific protocol to read EBT3 films was implemented and the dose-rate and energy dependences were studied to assure a precise measurement, especially in the penumbra and out-of-field regions. RESULTS: EBT3 films were found independent on dose rates over the range studied but showed a strong under-response (18%) at low energies. Depending on the dosimeter used for calculating the profile correction, a deviation of 0.8% (PinPoint chamber), 0.9% (diamond), or 1.9% (EBT3 films) was observed between the calibration coefficient derived from DAP measurements and the one directly established in terms of absorbed dose to water at a point. CONCLUSIONS: The DAP method can currently be linked to the classical dosimetric reference system based in an absorbed dose at a point only with a confidence interval of 95% (k = 2). None of the detectors studied can be used to determine an absorbed dose to water at a point from a DAP measurement with an uncertainty smaller than 1.2%.

Using a dose-area product for absolute measurements in small fields: a feasibility study.

To extend the dosimetric reference system to field sizes smaller than 2 cm × 2 cm, the LNE-LNHB laboratory is studying an approach based on a new dosimetric quantity named the dose-area product instead of the commonly used absorbed dose at a point. A graphite calorimeter and a plane parallel ion chamber with a sensitive surface of 3 cm diameter were designed and built for measurements in fields of 2, 1 and 0.75 cm diameter. The detector surface being larger than the beam section, most of the issues linked with absolute dose measurements at a point could be avoided. Calibration factors of the plane parallel ionization chamber were established in terms of dose-area product in water for small fields with an uncertainty smaller than 0.9%.

[Quality control of dose delivered by in vivo dosimetry: can one tolerance be used for all localizations?]. / Contrôle qualité de la dose délivrée par dosimétrie in vivo : un critère de tolérance unique peut-il satisfaire toutes les localisations ?

PURPOSE: In vivo dosimetry measurements are accepted when the difference between measured and calculated dose is under 5%. A statistical analysis has been conducted to determine whether this tolerance matched the clinical practice for the studied localizations: pelvis, thorax, head and neck, breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The technical characteristics of the detectors were checked before being used in clinical practice. Then an automatic statistical analysis was implemented using the 2450 in vivo dosimetry measurements obtained during 1 year. MAIN RESULTS: The global average is 1.10%, the standard deviation 2.46% and the percentage of out of level measurements 4.09%. By distinguishing the localizations, the 5% tolerance appeared to be too narrow for the breast localization. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Several investigations were initiated to justify the modification of the tolerance for the breast localization. They highlighted an underestimation of the calculated dose when high beam angles are set: a new correction factor was defined to take account this error. A specific tolerance was also specified for the breast localization.