Safety and preliminary efficacy of plerixafor (Mozobil) in combination with chemotherapy and G-CSF: an open-label, multicenter, exploratory trial in patients with multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma undergoing stem cell mobilization.

Plerixafor, a novel CXCR4 inhibitor, is effective in mobilizing PBSCs particularly when used in conjunction with G-CSF. In four cohorts, this pilot study explored the safety of plerixafor mobilization when incorporated into a conventional stem cell mobilization regimen of chemotherapy and G-CSF. Forty (26 multiple myeloma and 14 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma) patients were treated with plerixafor. Plerixafor was well tolerated and its addition to a chemo-mobilization regimen resulted in an increase in the peripheral blood CD34+ cells. The mean rate of increase in the peripheral blood CD34+ cells was 2.8 cells/microl/h pre- and 13.3 cells/microl/h post-plerixafor administration. Engraftment parameters were acceptable after myeloblative chemotherapy, with the median day for neutrophil and plt engraftment being day 11 (range 8-20 days) and day 13 (range 7-77 days), respectively. The data obtained from the analysis of the cohorts suggest that plerixafor can safely be added to chemotherapy-based mobilization regimens and may accelerate the rate of increase in CD34+ cells on the second day of apheresis. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the effect of plerixafor in combination with chemomobilization on stem cell mobilization and collection on the first and subsequent days of apheresis, and its impact on resource utilization.

Slow platelet recovery after PBPC transplantation from unrelated donors.

The effects of the composition of PBPC grafts from matched related donors (MRDs) and matched unrelated donors (MUDs) have not been compared. In a single-center study, the compositions of 55 MRD PBPC grafts and 33 MUD grafts were studied for their effect on the rate of engraftment in patients who had evidence of donor cell engraftment on day +28. The MUD grafts came more frequently from young male donors and contained more CD34(+) cells but similar numbers of colony-forming units granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) and burst forming units-erythroid. The recovery of neutrophils to >500/mm(3) was equally fast in both groups, but recovery of platelets to >20,000/mm(3) was significantly delayed in the MUD group (P<0.001). The MUD group also required more transfusions of platelets and red cells. Patients receiving grafts containing low numbers of CFU-GM had markedly delayed platelet recovery. The patients with the slowest engraftment tended to have prolonged transportation times. Storage experiments suggested a major loss of viable CD34(+) cells and CFU-GM when undiluted PBPC products are stored at room temperature. The data suggest that a fraction of the MUD grafts suffer during transportation. In vitro proliferation assays should be part of the validation and auditing of transportation of MUD grafts.

Matched-pair analysis of hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization using G-CSF vs. cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and G-CSF: enhanced CD34+ cell collections are not necessarily cost-effective.

Using matched-pair analysis, we compared two popular methods of stem cell mobilization in 24 advanced-stage breast cancer patients who underwent two consecutive mobilizing procedures as part of a tandem transplant protocol. For the first cycle, 10 microg/kg/day granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was given and apheresis commenced on day 4 and continued for < or =5 days (median 3 days). One week after the first cycle of apheresis, 4000 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, 400 mg/m2 etoposide, and 10 microg/kg G-CSF were administered for < or =16 days (cycle 2). Apheresis was initiated when the white blood cell (WBC) count exceeded 5000 cells/microL and continued for < or =5 days (median 3 days). Mean values of peripheral blood WBC (31,700+/-3200 vs. 30,700+/-3300/microL) were not significantly different between cycles 1 and 2. Mean number of mononuclear cells (MNC) collected per day was slightly greater with G-CSF mobilization than with the combination of chemotherapy and G-CSF (2.5+/-0.21x10(8) vs. 1.8+/-0.19x10(8) cells/kg). Mean daily CD34+ cell yield, however, was nearly six times higher (12.9+/-4.4 vs. 2.2+/-0.5x10(6)/kg; p = 0.01) with chemotherapy plus G-CSF. With G-CSF alone, 13% of aphereses reached the target dose of 5x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in one collection vs. 57% with chemotherapy plus G-CSF. Transfusions of red blood cells or platelets were necessary in 18 of 24 patients in cycle 2. Three patients were hospitalized with fever for a median of 3 days after cycle 2. No patients received transfusions or required hospitalization during mobilization with G-CSF alone. Resource utilization (cost of drugs, aphereses, cryopreservation, transfusions, hospitalization) was calculated comparing the median number of collections to obtain a target CD34+ cell dose of 5x10(6) cells/kg: four using G-CSF vs. one using the combination in this data set. Resources for G-CSF mobilization cost $7326 vs. $8693 for the combination, even though more apheresis procedures were performed using G-CSF mobilization. The cost of chemotherapy administration, more doses of G-CSF, transfusions, and hospitalizations caused cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and G-CSF to be more expensive than G-CSF alone. A less toxic and less expensive treatment than cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and G-CSF is needed to be more cost-effective than G-CSF alone for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization.

Hematopoietic growth factor after autologous peripheral blood transplantation: comparison of G-CSF and GM-CSF.

Autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation results in rapid hematologic recovery when sufficient numbers of CD34+ cells/kg are infused. Recent studies suggest that filgrastim (G-CSF) administration following transplantation leads to more rapid neutrophil recovery and lower total transplant costs. This study compares the use of G-CSF (5 microg/kg/day) with sargramostim (GM-CSF) 500 microg/day from day 0 until neutrophil recovery (ANC >1500/mm3) in patients with breast cancer or myeloma who had PBSC mobilized with the combination of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and G-CSF. Twenty patients (13 breast cancer and seven myeloma) received GM-CSF and 26 patients (14 breast cancer and 12 myeloma) received G-CSF. The patients were comparable for age and stage of disease, and received stem cell grafts that were not significantly different (CD34+ x 10(6)/kg was 12.5 +/- 11.1 (mean +/- s.d.) for GM-CSF and 19.8 +/- 18.5 for G-CSF; P = 0.10). The use of red cells (2.8 vs 2.3 units), and platelet transfusions (2.5 vs 3.1) was similar for the two groups, as was the use of intravenous antibiotics (4.3 vs 4.6 days) and the number of days with temperature >38.3 degrees C (2.3 vs 1.8). Platelet recovery was also similar in both groups (platelets >50,000/mm3 reached after 11.8 vs 14.9 days). The recovery of neutrophils, however, was faster using G-CSF. ANC >500/mm3 and >1000/mm3 were reached in the GM-CSF group at 10.5 +/- 1.5 and 11.0 +/- 1.7 days, respectively, whereas with G-CSF only 8.8 +/- 1.2 and 8.9 +/- 2.2 days were required (P < 0.001). As a result, patients given G-CSF received fewer injections than the GM-CSF patients (10.9 vs 12.3). Resource utilization immediately attributable to the use of growth factors and the duration of pancytopenia, excluding hospitalization, were similar for the two groups. This study suggests that neutrophil recovery occurs more quickly following autologous PBSC transplant using G-CSF in comparison to GM-CSF, but the difference is not extensive enough to result in lower total cost.

ATG plus corticosteroid therapy for acute graft-versus-host disease: predictors of response and survival.

Innovative treatment strategies for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) have not replaced corticosteroids as the primary therapy. We retrospectively reviewed 74 patients who received equine antithymocyte globulin (ATG) in addition to corticosteroids as therapy for GVHD, 21 who received primary therapy and 53 who received ATG after progressing or failing to improve with corticosteroids alone. The groups were comparable in clinical characteristics and in timing and severity of GVHD. After primary therapy with ATG 67% of patients' GVHD symptoms were stable or improved by 28 days versus 56% in those receiving secondary ATG (p = 0.57). In univariate analysis the absence of multiple organ, GI, and liver aGVHD and a clinical stage score < or = 4 were predictive of a favorable response, while in a multivariate logistic regression model only a clinical stage score < or = 4 was independently associated with a favorable response (odds ratio 0.08, 95% CI 0.02-0.32, p = 0.003). ATG response rates and 6-month survival (38 vs. 40%, p = 0.89) were similar following primary and secondary ATG. Patients stable or improved 28 days after ATG therapy had a significantly better 6-month survival than those whose aGVHD had progressed (50 vs. 30%, p = 0.02). Further study is required to assess whether some initial presentations of aGVHD would predictably fail corticosteroid therapy and may thus suggest a role for ATG in the primary management of aGVHD. For this determination, formal prospective comparative trials are needed.

Differences in CD34+ cell subpopulations between human bone marrow and "mobilized" peripheral blood as determined with counterflow centrifugal elutriation.

Engineering of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) from bone marrow (BM) or "mobilized" peripheral blood (MoPB) is becoming increasingly important. Counterflow centrifugal elutriation (CCE) has been used to separate cells on the basis of their size. In this study, CCE was applied to evaluate BM and MoPB for differences in their HPC populations. Using a standard 4-mL elutriation chamber at 2300 rpm, CD34+ cells from BM peaked at a flow rate of 19 mL/minute, with 85% of all CD34+ cells recovered from fractions 15-22 mL/minute. The CD34+ cells from MoPB, mobilized with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), peaked at 22 mL/minute, with 90% of all CD34+ cells recovered from fraction 19-26 mL/minute. Colony-forming cells (colony-forming units granulocyte/macrophage [CFU-GM] + burst-forming unit-erythroid [BFU-E] + multipotent colony-forming units [CFU-GEMMs]) followed the distribution of CD34+ cells very closely, also with a shift to higher flow-rates for MoPB compared with BM. The lower flow-rate fractions of both BM and MoPB contained an increased proportion of CD34+ cells that did not express HLA-DR and/or CD38 on their surface, suggesting that the earliest CD34+ cells were enriched in the low-flow rate fractions. Although CFU-GMs, BFU-Es, and CFU-GEMMs from BM all peaked in the same fraction (19 mL/minute), high-proliferative potential colony-forming cells (HPP-CFCs) were concentrated in fraction 17 mL/minute, indicating that these earlier progenitor cells were slightly smaller. With MoPB, HPP-CFCs did not appear to be smaller than BFU-Es or CFU-GEMMs. CCE appears to be an attractive method for separating HPCs from BM or MoPB into populations of different maturity. Differences in CD34+ cell populations between BM and MoPB may help explain the differences in repopulation kinetics observed after transplantation.

Successful allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in an adult with aplastic anemia following orthotopic liver transplantation for non-A, non-B, non-C hepatitis.

A 29-year-old male patient presented with acute liver failure from non-A, non-B and non-C hepatitis, necessitating orthotopic liver transplantation. After operation he developed progressive pancytopenia on the basis of aplastic anemia, which was probably hepatitis associated. After therapy with GM-CSF had failed, he underwent allogeneic BMT from his HLA genotypically identical brother following a conditioning regimen of CY 50 mg/kg x 4 and 500 cGy total lymphoid irradiation. He engrafted promptly but transfusion dependency did not resolve until CMV viremia was treated with ganciclovir. The patient is alive and well 2 years after BMT.