An unusual case of erythema multiforme presenting to an orthodontic department: A case report.

A 16-year-old female patient presented to the orthodontic department with a 2-week history of painful oral lesions that were affecting her ability to eat. Clinical examination revealed widespread oral ulceration, crusted bleeding from the lips with evidence of a herpes simplex infection in the region of the right buccal commissure. A diagnosis of oral erythema multiforme (EM) was made after a detailed clinical history and examination by the oral and maxillofacial team. Supportive care was provided alongside management with topical corticosteroids. Within 6 weeks of initial presentation, complete resolution of the lesions had occurred and the patient was able to resume active orthodontic treatment.

The effect of treatment timing on clinical and psychological outcomes with Twin Block therapy: A multicentre two-arm parallel randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether delaying treatment with a twin block appliance affects treatment outcomes, in terms of skeletal and dental change and psychological disadvantage. DESIGN: Multicentre, two-arm parallel randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Three UK hospital orthodontic units. METHODS: A total of 75 participants were randomly allocated into an Immediate Treatment Group (ITG) (n= 41) and an 18-month delayed Later Treatment Group (LTG) (n=34). OUTCOMES: Dentofacial changes were recorded from lateral cephalograms and study models, psychological impact was measured using a child perception questionnaire (CPQ11-14) and an Oral Aesthetic Subjective Impact Score (OASIS) at registration (DC1), 18 months (DC2) and 3 years (DC3). RESULTS: The ITG initial effect was a mean ANB reduction was 1.6° (P<0.001) (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.89-2.29), and an overjet reduction of 5.06 mm (P<0.001) (95% CI = 3.96-6.16) (boys: aged 12 years 8 months; girls: aged 11 years 8 months). There were no statistically significant differences between the ITG and LTG for twin block treatment outcomes, but the ITG active treatment time was longer (P=0.004) (ITG: 13.1 months; LTG: 9.8 months). There was insufficient evidence to state that patients were psychologically disadvantaged by waiting 18 months for active twin block treatment (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Participants achieved similar clinical and psychological outcomes irrespective of whether they started their twin block at the age of referral (ITG) or 18 months later (LTG). This suggests that boys aged 12 years 8 months and girls aged 11 years 8 months, on average, are not disadvantaged by waiting 18 months for active twin block treatment.

Scope of practice and supervision of orthodontic therapists in the United Kingdom: Part 2: a national cross-sectional survey of orthodontic therapists.

BACKGROUND: Orthodontic therapists (OTs) are the most recent addition to the orthodontic clinical team. The General Dental Council (GDC) and the British Orthodontic Society have formulated guidance and guidelines relating to their scope of practice and level of supervision, however there has been no contemporary UK-based research investigating practice and supervision of OTs. The aim of this study was to investigate the scope of practice and level of supervision of OTs working in the UK. METHOD: Ethical approval was received from the University of Manchester Research Ethics Committee. An anonymous postal questionnaire was dispatched using postal details acquired through the British Orthodontic Societies mailing list. Three mailings of the questionnaire were conducted. RESULTS: A 74% response rate was achieved. OTs routinely conducted 16 of the 20 procedures from their scope of practice. Uncommon procedures included fitting headgear (24%), lingual appliances (27%), inserting or removing temporary anchorage devices (20%), and taking facebow record (18%). A total of 62% of OTs took patient consent for treatment. 59% were supervised through a written prescription with no direct supervision. OTs were directly supervised for only a quarter of their clinical practice. Orthodontists viewing frequency for OTs varied significantly, and was found to be the following: every 2-4 visits (36%), every other visit (35%), and every visit (26%). CONCLUSIONS: OTs mostly carried out the scope of practice as permitted by the GDC. Procedures uncommon to routine orthodontic practice were also uncommon to Orthodontic therapist clinical practice. OTs work mostly through written prescription with no direct supervision.

Scope of practice and supervision of orthodontic therapists in the United Kingdom: Part 1: a national cross-sectional survey of orthodontists.

OBJECTIVE: Since the introduction of orthodontic therapists (OTs), there has been little research on the scope of practice and the level of supervision they receive. This study investigates how OTs are being utilised and supervised, and how this compares with current recommendations. METHODS AND PARTICIPANTS: A postal cross-sectional survey was mailed to all UK General Dental Council (GDC) registered specialist orthodontists. RESULTS: A 59.7% response rate (747) was achieved. 52% of the respondents reported they worked with/employed an OT. The majority of orthodontists worked with an OT in primary care (67%) seeing predominantly NHS (56%) patients and performed a wide range of duties. Orthodontists reported a perceived increase in clinical output (74%) and time available for treatment planning (61%). The majority (85%) of orthodontists indicated they provide a written prescription for the OT. Forty-two per cent reported the prescription did not contain the required information as stipulated by the GDC. CONCLUSIONS: OTs are valued members of the orthodontic team, improving productivity and allowing orthodontists more time for treatment planning. The majority of orthodontists appeared to be working to the BOS and GDC recommendations, with greater awareness needed regarding the provision of a written treatment prescription.

The "Floss-Ligature" Ligation Technique.

This clinical pearl describes an alternative technique to aid effective ligation of rotated teeth during the aligning stage of fixed appliance treatment. This technique has the potential to improve patient experience and confidence, by reducing the risk of trauma and discomfort and treatment efficiency, by ensuring complete ligation of even severely rotated teeth.