Tissue Options for Construction of the Neovaginal Canal in Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty.

Gender-affirming vaginoplasty (GAV) comprises the construction of a vulva and a neovaginal canal. Although technical nuances of vulvar construction vary between surgeons, vulvar construction is always performed using the homologous penile and scrotal tissues to construct the corresponding vulvar structures. Therefore, the main differentiating factor across gender-affirming vaginoplasty techniques is the tissue that is utilized to construct the neovaginal canal. These tissue types vary markedly in their availability, histology, and ease of harvest and have different advantages and disadvantages to their use as neovaginal lining. In this narrative review, the authors provide a comprehensive overview of the tissue types and associated operative approaches used for construction of the neovagina in GAV. Tissue choice is guided by several factors, such as histological similarity to natal vaginal mucosa, tissue availability, lubrication potential, additional donor site morbidity, and the specific goals of each patient. Skin is used to construct the neovagina in most cases with a combination of pedicled penile skin flaps and scrotal and extra-genital skin grafts. However, skin alternatives such as peritoneum and intestine are increasing in use. Peritoneum and intestine are emerging as options for primary vaginoplasty in cases of limited genital skin or revision vaginoplasty procedures. The increasing number of gender-affirming vaginoplasty procedures performed and the changing patient demographics from factors such as pubertal suppression have resulted in rapidly evolving indications for the use of these differing vaginoplasty techniques. This review sheds light on the use of less frequently utilized tissue types described for construction of the neovaginal canal, including mucosal tissues such as urethral and buccal mucosa, the tunica vaginalis, and dermal matrix allografts and xenografts. Although the body of evidence for each vaginoplasty technique is growing, there is a need for large prospective comparison studies of outcomes between these techniques and the tissue types used to line the neovaginal canal to better define indications and limitations.

Optimizing aesthetics in gender-affirming vaginoplasty and vulvoplasty: a narrative review and discussion based on over 600 cases of transfeminine vulvar construction.

Background and Objective: The vulva is the external portion of a gender-affirming vaginoplasty or vulvoplasty procedure-the "visible" result of surgery. The vulvar appearance can play a major role in how individuals feel about their surgical results and new genital anatomy. Therefore, optimizing the aesthetics of the vulva is an important component of surgical care. Although there is no one "ideal" vulvar appearance, aesthetics are optimal when each major sub-unit of the vulva is reconstructed to create a proportional and cohesive vulvar unit. In this article we perform a narrative review of the literature and discuss clinical approaches to improve aesthetic satisfaction such as patient education, re-defining the "ideal" vulva, aesthetic surgery tenets and technical strategies based on our collective experience of over 630 gender-affirming vulvar constructions. Methods: A narrative review of the literature was completed accessing PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar using search terms "Vaginoplasty OR Vulvoplasty". Articles were removed if not pertaining to gender affirmation surgery, were not in English language, were not accessible or did not discuss aesthetics in the body of the text. Key Content and Findings: A total of 1,042 articles were identified from initial search criteria. Of those, 905 were excluded as they did not involve gender affirmation as an indication. An additional 112 papers were excluded as they were not accessible, not in English, focused on non-vulvar outcomes or did not comment on vulvar aesthetics. Ultimately 25 articles were included for narrative review; 21 of these included technical descriptions of vulva and 13 had direct aesthetic discussion. The anatomy and aesthetics of the transfeminine vulva are reviewed according to the previously described principle of anatomic vulvar sub-units: the labia majora, labia minora, clitoris, urethra and the introitus. Conclusions: Ultimately, creating the optimal vulva for each individual patient will demand flexible surgical decisions based on individual anatomy and available tissues. This narrative review provides an overview of current approaches to aesthetics in gender-affirming vulvar construction and technical insights based on our institutional experience of performing over 630 gender-affirming vaginoplasty and vulvoplasty procedures.

Gender-affirming Clitoroplasty and Construction of the Clitoro-urethral Complex: An Anatomy Guided Selection of Two Techniques.

OBJECTIVE: To present 2 clitoroplasty techniques-the preputial skin and urethral flap-and describe our rationale for using each technique to construct the clitoro-urethral complex in gender-affirming vaginoplasty. METHODS: For uncircumcised patients or circumcised patients with greater than 2 cm of inner preputial skin and at least 8 cm of shaft skin proximal to the circumcision scar, we use the preputial skin clitoroplasty, a modification of the Ghent style clitoroplasty. The entire corona is used after medial glans and urethral mucosa is excised. The corona is brought together 1 cm from midline to create the visible ovoid clitoris; the remaining coronal tissue remains lateral to the clitoris for erogenous sensation as clitoral corpora. The clitoris is anchored to the proximal tunica, positioned at the level of the adductor longus tendon. The folded neurovascular bundle is fixed in the suprapubic area. The ventral urethral is spatulated and urethral flap approximated to the clitoris. Preputial skin is sutured proximally as tension allows. The clitoro-urethral complex is inset into an opening created in the penile skin flap. For patients with less skin, we use the urethral flap clitoroplasty. More corpus spongiosum is used, as the urethra creates the clitoral hood; this is described in the literature and attributed to Pierre Brassard. The clitoris is inset following a dorsal urethrotomy, with a small collar of preputial skin sewn to the spongiosum and urethral mucosa. The urethra is transected about 1 cm distally. The ventral urethra is then spatulated and the urethroplasty completed. RESULTS: We prefer the preputial skin flap technique for its' greater coronal tissue volume for erogenous sensation and better esthetics, in our opinion. Circumcised patients should have at least 2 cm of skin distal to the circumcision scar. To avoid using skin graft for the introitus-a risk for introital stenosis-shaft skin proximal to the circumcision line should be at least 8 cm. CONCLUSION: We present 2 technical options for clitoroplasty and construction of the clitoro-urethral complex in gender-affirming vaginoplasty.

Second-stage Scrotoplasty with Autologous Tissue Augmentation after Metoidioplasty.

We present our technique for second-stage scrotoplasty with autologous tissue augmentation following gender-affirming metoidioplasty. This technique augments the scrotum while removing the upper labia majora and making the penis more visible and accessible. This procedure avoids the need for testicular prostheses and their potential for discomfort, displacement, extrusion, or infection. Our preliminary results show that the complication rate is low.

Developing Gender-Affirming Surgery Curricula for Plastic Surgery Residency and Fellowship via Delphi Consensus.

BACKGROUND: Gender-affirming surgery (GAS) is a rapidly growing field within plastic surgery, and residents and fellows must receive appropriate training. However, there are no standardized surgical training curricula. The objective of this study was to identify core curricula within the field of GAS. METHODS: Four GAS surgeons from different academic institutions identified initial curricular statements within six categories: (1) comprehensive GAS care, (2) gender-affirming facial surgery, (3) masculinizing chest surgery, (4) feminizing breast augmentation, (5) masculinizing genital GAS, and (6) feminizing genital GAS. Expert panelists consisting of plastic surgery residency program directors and GAS surgeons were recruited for three rounds of the Delphi-consensus process. The panelists decided whether each curriculum statement was appropriate for residency, fellowship, or neither. A statement was included in the final curriculum when Cronbach α value was greater than or equal to 0.8, meaning that 80% or more of the panel agreed on inclusion. RESULTS: A total of 34 panelists (14 plastic surgery residency program directors and 20 GAS surgeons representing 28 US institutions) participated. The response rate was 85% for the first round, 94% for the second, and 100% for the third. Out of 124 initial curriculum statements, 84 reached consensus for the final GAS curricula, 51 for residency, and 31 for fellowship. CONCLUSIONS: A national consensus on core GAS curriculum for plastic surgery residency and GAS fellowship was achieved by a modified Delphi method. Implementation of this curriculum will ensure that trainees in plastic surgery are adequately prepared in the field of GAS.

Urinary symptoms after genital gender-affirming penile construction, urethral lengthening and vaginectomy.

Transgender and non-binary (TGNB) individuals are seeking penile reconstruction in greater numbers; many pursue urethral lengthening surgery with a goal of voiding while standing. Changes in urinary function and urologic complications-i.e., urethrocutaneous fistulae and urinary stricture-are common. Familiarity with presenting symptoms and management strategies for urinary complaints after genital gender-affirming surgery (GGAS) can improve patient counseling and outcomes. We will describe current gender-affirming penile construction options with urethral lengthening and review associated urinary complications that present as urinary incontinence. The incidence and impact of lower urinary tract symptoms after metoidioplasty and phalloplasty are poorly characterized due to limited post-operative follow-up. Post-phalloplasty, urethrocutaneous fistula is the most common urethral complication, ranging in incidence from 15-70%. Assessment of concomitant urethral stricture is necessary. No standard technique exists for management of these fistula or strictures. Metoidioplasty studies report lower rates of stricture and fistula, 2% and 9% respectively. Other common voiding complaints include dribbling, urethral diverticula and vaginal remnants. History and physical exam in the post-GGAS evaluation require understanding of prior surgeries and attempted reconstructive efforts; adjuncts to physical exam include uroflowmetry, retrograde urethrography, voiding cysto-urethrogram, cystoscopy, and MRI. Following gender-affirming penile construction, TGNB patients may experience a host of urinary symptoms and complications that impact quality of life. Due to anatomic differences, symptoms require tailored evaluation which can be done by urologists in an affirming environment.

Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty: A Comparison of Algorithms, Surgical Techniques and Management Practices across 17 High-volume Centers in North America and Europe.

Penile inversion vaginoplasty is the most common gender-affirming genital surgery performed around the world. Although individual centers have published their experiences, expert consensus is generally lacking. Methods: Semistructured interviews were performed with 17 experienced gender surgeons representing a diverse mix of specialties, experience, and countries regarding their patient selection, preoperative management, vaginoplasty techniques, complication management, and postoperative protocols. Results: There is significant consistency in practices across some aspects of vaginoplasty. However, key areas of clinical heterogeneity are also present and include use of extragenital tissue for vaginal canal/apex creation, creation of the clitoral hood and inner labia minora, elevation of the neoclitoral neurovascular bundle, and perioperative hormone management. Pathway length of stay is highly variable (1-9 days). Lastly, some surgeons are moving toward continuation or partial reduction of estrogen in the perioperative period instead of cessation. Conclusions: With a broad study of surgeon practices, and encompassing most of the high-volume vaginoplasty centers in Europe and North America, we found key areas of practice variation that represent areas of priority for future research to address. Further multi-institutional and prospective studies that incorporate patient-reported outcomes are necessary to further our understanding of these procedures.

Skin Management During Robotic Peritoneal Flap Vaginoplasty for Penoscrotal Hypoplasia Secondary to Pubertal Suppression.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate an approach to skin management in cases of gender-affirming vaginoplasty in the setting of penoscrotal hypoplasia. Gender-affirming penile inversion vaginoplasty is a procedure that has traditionally relied upon the use of local genital tissues to both construct the vulva and line the neovaginal canal. Improved and earlier access to pubertal suppression has resulted in an increasing number of individuals presenting for vaginoplasty with penoscrotal hypoplasia and significantly less skin available to accomplish the goals of vaginoplasty. Robotic-assisted gender-affirming peritoneal flap vaginoplasty is one solution that has emerged to help address the challenge of limited skin and provide an alternative source of neovaginal lining. Although this technique provides valuable peritoneal tissue that is used to line a large portion of the neovaginal canal, external vulvar construction remains a challenge. Amid a growing number of cases of penoscrotal hypoplasia secondary to pubertal suppression, there is a need for resources that illustrate strategies to deal with these challenging scenarios. In this video the authors demonstrate their approach to vulvar construction in the setting of penoscrotal hypoplasia secondary to pubertal suppression. METHODS: This video demonstrates an approach to skin management during robotic peritoneal flap vaginoplasty in the setting of limited genital skin secondary to pubertal suppression at Tanner stage 2. RESULTS: Penile inversion vaginoplasty typically relies upon the penile skin tube reaching and reconstructing the introitus, and forming the distal aspect of the neovaginal canal. However, in most cases of penoscrotal hypoplasia secondary to pubertal suppression, there will not be enough length of penile skin to reach or construct the introitus. In these cases, the inverted penile skin tube is also often also too narrow in caliber to accommodate passage of a dilator for neovaginal dilation. These clinical scenarios are challenging and often require construction of the introitus with skin graft, complete splitting of the ventral penile skin tube and optimization of remaining skin to form other critical vulvar structures (labia minora and clitoral hood). CONCLUSION: As individuals with penoscrotal hypoplasia continue to present for gender-affirming vaginoplasty procedures, it is important to adjust traditional approaches to vulvar construction and optimize strategies to manage cases with limited genital skin. In this video the authors present their approach to skin management and vulvar construction in gender-affirming vaginoplasty with penoscrotal hypoplasia secondary to pubertal suppression.

Robotic Peritoneal Flap vs. Perineal Penile Inversion Techniques for Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To discuss perineal and robotic approaches to gender-affirming vaginoplasty. RECENT FINDINGS: The Davydov peritoneal vaginoplasty has its origins in neovaginal reconstruction for vaginal agenesis. It has been adapted as a robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedure and provides an alternative to perineal canal dissection in gender-affirming vaginoplasty. Both techniques represent variations of penile inversion vaginoplasty with successful outcomes and overall low rates of major complications reported in the literature. However, there are differing advantages and considerations to each approach. A perineal approach has been the gold standard to gender-affirming vaginoplasty for many decades. Robotic peritoneal gender-affirming vaginoplasty (RPGAV) is an emerging alternative, with potential advantages including less reliance on extragenital skin grafts in individuals with minimal genital tissue, especially among patients presenting with pubertal suppression, and safer dissection in revision vaginoplasty for stenosis of the proximal neovaginal canal. Additional risks of RPGAV include those associated with robotic abdominal surgeries.

Genital Hypoplasia in Gender-affirming Vaginoplasty: Prior Orchiectomy, Penile Length, and Other Factors to Guide Surgical Planning.

PURPOSE: Penile inversion vaginoplasty uses genital skin to construct the neovaginal canal. When genital skin is insufficient, extragenital tissue is needed. The purpose of this study is to evaluate which demographic factors and intraoperative anatomical measurements are associated with skin availability and the need for extragenital tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing penile inversion vaginoplasty from May 2016 through January 2021. Preoperative variables included patient demographics, orchiectomy and circumcision status, and stretched penile and scrotal skin lengths. Outcomes included measurements of available scrotal skin surface area and need for extragenital skin graft. RESULTS: A total of 235 patients were included. Patients with prior orchiectomy and shorter stretched scrotal and penile lengths had less scrotal skin available (P < .002) and were more likely to require extragenital skin grafts (P < .001). Patients with prior orchiectomy had 3 times greater odds of needing additional skin grafts. Length of time exposed to gender-affirming hormones did not predict scrotal skin availability (P = .8). CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with need for extragenital skin grafting with penile inversion vaginoplasty were prior orchiectomy and stretched penile skin length <8 cm. Scrotal skin length >10 cm was associated with low risk for needing additional graft. Considering these factors can help with preoperative planning and patient counseling.

Remote Stewardship for Medically Underserved Nurseries: A Stepped-Wedge, Cluster Randomized Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Antibiotic overuse is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. Many medically underserved centers lack pediatric antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) support. Telestewardship may mitigate this disparity. Authors of this study aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of a nursery-specific ASP delivered remotely. METHODS: Remote ASP was implemented in 8 medically underserved newborn nurseries using a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized design over 3 years. This included a 15-month baseline period, a 9-month "step-in" period using random nursery order, and a 12-month postintervention period. The program consisted of education, audit, and feedback; and 24/7 infectious diseases provider-to-provider phone consultation availability. Outcomes included each center's volume of antibiotic use and the proportion of infants exposed to any antibiotics. Safety measures included length of stay, transfer to another facility, sepsis, and mortality. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 9277 infants born (4586 preintervention, 4691 postintervention). Infants exposed to antibiotics declined from 6.2% pre-ASP to 4.2% post-ASP (relative risk 0.68 [95% confidence interval, 0.63% to 0.75%]). Total antibiotic use declined from 117 to 84.1 days of therapy per 1000 patient-days (-28% [95% confidence interval -22% to -34%]. No safety signals were observed. Most provider-to-provider consultations were <5 minutes in duration and occurred during normal business hours. CONCLUSIONS: The number of infants exposed to antibiotics and total antibiotic use declined in medically underserved nurseries after implementing a remote ASP. No adverse safety events were seen, and the remote ASP time demands were manageable. Remote stewardship may be a safe and effective strategy for optimizing antibiotic use in medically underserved newborn nurseries.

A Systematic Approach to Incision Planning and Graft Excision in Gender-affirming Vaginoplasty.

We present our systematic approach to incision planning and skin graft excision for gender-affirming vaginoplasty. This approach is adaptable to patients of different body habitus and genital skin surface area, and it allows for early skin graft harvest with predictable wound tension at closure. We also describe how to adapt in cases of severe genital hypoplasia.

An Option for Shaft-Only Gender-Affirming Phalloplasty: Vaginal Preservation and Vulvoscrotoplasty. A Technical Description.

SUMMARY: Genital masculinizing gender-affirming surgery is a growing field. Because of a spectrum of gender identity, gender expression, sexual expression, patient desires, and patient tolerance for complications, options for surgery vary accordingly. Shaft-only phalloplasty avoids urethral lengthening, but may still be accompanied by hysterectomy, vaginectomy, scrotoplasty, clitoroplasty (burying of the clitoris), glansplasty, and placement of erectile devices and testicular implants. Patients who desire retention of vaginal canal patency are candidates for vaginal preservation vulvoscrotoplasty; however, there is a paucity of literature describing the procedure and its outcomes. In this article, the authors review the technique used by the senior author at Oregon Health and Science University and report surgical outcomes for four patients. Future studies regarding patient-recorded outcome measures, aesthetics, sexual function, urologic function, patient satisfaction, and conversion to other options will help surgeons better understand patients pursuing gender-affirming surgery through shaft-only phalloplasty.

Outcomes of Transperineal Gender-Affirming Vaginectomy and Colpocleisis.

OBJECTIVES: There are multiple approaches to vaginectomy for the purpose of masculinizing gender-affirming genital surgery including mucosal fulguration and excision. The outcomes of the approaches are not well described. We aim to describe the surgical outcomes of gender-affirming vaginectomy and colpocleisis by complete mucosal excision. METHODS: We performed a case series study of 40 transmasculine patients who underwent gender-affirming vaginectomy and colpocleisis. Vaginectomy was performed by complete excision of the vaginal mucosa via a transperineal approach. We recorded perioperative outcomes and operative time. We performed a multivariate analysis to assess patient factors on operative outcomes. RESULTS: Forty vaginectomies were performed between September 2016 and April 2019, 27 (67.5%) in phalloplasty patients and 13 (32.5%) in metoidioplasty patients. Perioperative complications included 2 blood transfusions, 1 pelvic hematoma, and 1 Clostridium cifficile colitis. No urethral fistulae to the vaginal space, mucoceles, or visceral injures were seen with a median follow-up of 7.7 months. Operative time decreased significantly with later surgery year. CONCLUSIONS: This is a large series studying the outcomes of gender-affirming vaginectomy by complete mucosal excision approach in the literature. Perioperative complications were low. Operative time decreased overtime such that after approximately 20 cases, the procedure fairly consistently takes 2 to 2.5 hours to perform.

Neovaginal Canal Dissection in Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty.

PURPOSE: Gender-affirming vaginoplasty creates the vulva and vaginal canal for individuals assigned male sex at birth who have gender dysphoria. Dissection of the neovaginal space can be particularly challenging, with risk of injury to the anal and urethral sphincters, urethra and rectum. We present an anatomically based technique for vaginal canal dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients who underwent gender-affirming vaginoplasty by a single surgeon between May 2016 and July 2019. We describe our technique for dissection and report relevant outcomes. RESULTS: We performed 200 vaginoplasty procedures during the study period. Patient age ranged from 15-70 years (median 41). Body mass index ranged from 16-50.5 kg/m2 (median 27). The vaginal depth ranged from 10-16 cm, with a median of 14 cm and a mean of 13.7 cm. Vaginal depth was slightly greater for patients with a body mass index of ≥30 vs <30 kg/m2 (p=0.0145). Operative complications were observed in 2 patients (1.0%) with a full thickness rectal injury and in 3 (1.5%) with a partial thickness rectal injury. Two of these patients (1.0%) had progression to a rectovaginal fistula (1 full and 1 partial thickness injury), 1 patient (0.5%) had a urethral injury, 8 patients (4.0%) had vaginal stenosis, 3 patients (1.5%) had introital stenosis and 10 patients (5.0%) had stress urinary incontinence that later resolved. CONCLUSIONS: Neovaginal canal dissection in gender-affirming vaginoplasty is technically challenging. An anatomically based approach is associated with a low complication rate at our center.

Metoidioplasty With Urethral Lengthening: A Stepwise Approach.

BACKGROUND: Metoidioplasty is a gender-affirming surgical option for individuals who desire masculine genitalia while preserving erogenous sensation and avoiding the morbidity of phalloplasty. Concurrent urethral lengthening offers patients the potential to stand to urinate. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate an adaptation of the Belgrade technique of gender-affirming metoidioplasty and describe outcomes. METHODS: We identified 33 patients of which 12 underwent simple metoidioplasty and 21 underwent metoidioplasty with urethral lengthening between 2016 and 2020. Prior to surgery, all patients underwent at least 1 year of testosterone therapy to maximize clitoral growth. The clitoris is degloved and the superficial suspensory ligament divided to maximize phallic length. Labia minora flaps are developed and the urethral plate is divided to allow for maximal ventral extension. The resultant urethral defect is bridged with a buccal mucosa graft. To construct the ventral aspect of the urethra, an anterior vaginal wall flap and labia minora flap are sutured to the urethral plate and tubularized over a 16 Fr catheter. The medial aspect of the contralateral labia minora is de-epithelialized and overlaps the urethra, serving as ventral skin coverage for the phallic shaft. Bilateral labia majora flaps are then rotated anteriorly and superiorly to create a neoscrotum using the Ghent technique. RESULTS: For metoidioplasty with urethral lengthening, the median operative time was 408 minutes, estimated blood loss 400 mL, and length of stay 3 days. Of the 21 patients, 10 (47%) elected to undergo second stage scrotoplasty, 7 (33%) underwent testicular implant placement, and 2 (9%) required revision urethroplasty. Of the 10 patients (48%) who experienced postoperative complications, 7 were Clavien-Dindo grade I-II. There were no fistulae at a median follow-up time of 5.5 months (range 1-27.2). CONCLUSION: We provide a stepwise approach to metoidioplasty with urethral lengthening using a modified Belgrade technique, which was associated with a low rate of urethral complications.

Masculinizing Genital Surgery: An Imaging Primer for the Radiologist.

OBJECTIVE. Masculinizing genital surgeries for transgender individuals are currently performed at only a select few centers; however, radiologists in any geographic region may be confronted with imaging studies of transgender patients. The imaging findings of internal and external genital anatomy of a transgender patient may differ substantially from the imaging findings of a cisgender patient. This article provides the surgical and anatomic basis to allow appropriate interpretation of preoperative and postoperative imaging findings. We also expand on the most common complications and associated imaging findings. CONCLUSION. As these procedures become more commonplace, radiologists will have a growing role in the care of transgender patients and will be faced with new anatomic variants and differential diagnoses. Familiarity with these anatomic variations and postoperative complications is crucial for the radiologist to provide an accurate and useful report.