ABSTRACT
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a risk factor for neurodegenerative diseases. This study determined whether continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), which can alleviate OSA symptoms, can reduce neurochemical biomarker levels. Thirty patients with OSA and normal cognitive function were recruited and divided into the control (n = 10) and CPAP (n = 20) groups. Next, we examined their in-lab sleep data (polysomnography and CPAP titration), sleep-related questionnaire outcomes, and neurochemical biomarker levels at baseline and the 3-month follow-up. The paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to examine changes. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed to increase the robustness of outcomes. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores were significantly decreased in the CPAP group. The mean levels of total tau (T-Tau), amyloid-beta-42 (Aß42), and the product of the two (Aß42 × T-Tau) increased considerably in the control group (ΔT-Tau: 2.31 pg/mL; ΔAß42: 0.58 pg/mL; ΔAß42 × T-Tau: 48.73 pg2/mL2), whereas the mean levels of T-Tau and the product of T-Tau and Aß42 decreased considerably in the CPAP group (ΔT-Tau: -2.22 pg/mL; ΔAß42 × T-Tau: -44.35 pg2/mL2). The results of ANCOVA with adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, baseline measurements, and apnea-hypopnea index demonstrated significant differences in neurochemical biomarker levels between the CPAP and control groups. The findings indicate that CPAP may reduce neurochemical biomarker levels by alleviating OSA symptoms.
ABSTRACT
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a global health concern and is typically diagnosed using in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG). However, PSG is highly time-consuming and labor-intensive. We, therefore, developed machine learning models based on easily accessed anthropometric features to screen for the risk of moderate to severe and severe OSA. We enrolled 3503 patients from Taiwan and determined their PSG parameters and anthropometric features. Subsequently, we compared the mean values among patients with different OSA severity and considered correlations among all participants. We developed models based on the following machine learning approaches: logistic regression, k-nearest neighbors, naïve Bayes, random forest (RF), support vector machine, and XGBoost. Collected data were first independently split into two data sets (training and validation: 80%; testing: 20%). Thereafter, we adopted the model with the highest accuracy in the training and validation stage to predict the testing set. We explored the importance of each feature in the OSA risk screening by calculating the Shapley values of each input variable. The RF model achieved the highest accuracy for moderate to severe (84.74%) and severe (72.61%) OSA. The level of visceral fat was found to be a predominant feature in the risk screening models of OSA with the aforementioned levels of severity. Our machine learning models can be employed to screen for OSA risk in the populations in Taiwan and in those with similar craniofacial structures.
