A randomized, double-blind, parallel, single-site pilot trial to compare two different starting doses of methotrexate in methotrexate-naïve adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Methotrexate (MTX) is a cornerstone in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Despite its widespread use, expert opinions differ about the optimal MTX starting dosage to achieve rapid onset of action while averting increased occurrence of adverse effects. Plasma concentrations have not been assessed in previous studies that monitored clinical efficacy. OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to compare the pharmacokinetic parameters and clinical response of a standard (15 mg) and an accelerated (25 mg) dosing regimen, each administered orally once a week. METHODS: This randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel, single-site study included 19 MTX-naïve patients older than 18 years with rheumatoid arthritis. Patients participated for 16 weeks. Disease activity was assessed using the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS-28) as the primary outcome parameter. Plasma MTX concentrations were measured using HPLC at weeks 1, 5, 10, and 16. Tolerability was assessed via routine blood analysis (hematology and clinical chemistry) and a patient questionnaire to monitor adverse events. Reported or observed adverse events were recorded along with information about their severity and causal relationship to the study medication. RESULTS: Nineteen white patients (13 women and 6 men; mean age, 56 years; and mean weight, 74 kg) participated. At study entry, mean (SD) DAS-28-4v (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) was 4.73 (1.02). Health Assessment Questionnaire scores were 1.45 (0.85); for C-reactive protein, 11.45 (10.04) mg/dL; for alkaline phosphatase, 73.58 (19.91) U/L; for aspartate aminotransferase, 23.32 (7.13) U/L; and for creatinine, 0.87 (0.22) mg/dL. Although pharmacokinetic parameters such as AUC and C(max) were significantly higher after the accelerated dosing regimen, clinical activity scores (DAS-28) and inflammation parameters (C-reactive protein) did not indicate a significant benefit of an accelerated starting regimen. Considering toxicity, no elevation in liver function enzymes and no decrease in renal function were observed using the accelerated dosing (statistical significance set at P ≤ 0.05). No serious adverse events were noted. All observed adverse events were classified as study related. Overall, adverse events were noted in 58% of patients. Comparison of the two doses revealed that 60% of patients receiving the standard dosing regimen and 56% of patients receiving the accelerated dosing regimen reported adverse events, the most frequent being gastrointestinal. These events were generally self-limiting. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in clinical response between these two small selected patient groups who received an initial oral dose of either 15 or 25 mg MTX per week did not reach the level of statistical significance. The overall incidence of adverse effects, all classified as study related, was 58%, with 60% of patients receiving the standard dosage and 56% of patients receiving the accelerated dosing regimen reporting adverse effects. However, because of the small sample size, this study was not powered to detect differences in the incidence of adverse events between the two dosing groups. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00695188.

A short-chain methotrexate polyglutamate as outcome parameter in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving methotrexate.

OBJECTIVES: Methotrexate (MTX) is a cornerstone in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although in general MTX is very effective, the major drawback is the large inter-patient variability in clinical response. The circulating levels of MTX polyglutamates (MTXPGs) are supposed to correlate with clinical efficacy, therefore having a potential role in drug monitoring. However, there is a controversial discussion about the importance of methotrexate polyglutamates as outcome parameters in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis. The aim of the present study was to investigate the formation and pharmacokinetics of MTXPGs and to correlate their concentration with clinical response in MTX-naïve patients. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of erythrocyte MTXPGs was determined in samples of nineteen MTX-naïve patients by high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) using post-column photo-oxidation and fluorimetric detection. The relationship between erythrocyte concentrations of MTXPGs and the primary outcome parameter DAS-28 was assessed using the Spearman's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The short-chain polyglutamate MTXPG2 revealed to be a potential marker for clinical outcome in rheumatoid arthritis with a statistically significant positive correlation of MTXPG2 Cmax levels and improvement in DAS-28 (+0.518, p=0.023) over 16 weeks. Furthermore, Cmax levels of MTXPG2 negatively correlated with basophils (-0.478, p=0.038) and eosinophils (-0.531, p=0.019), both pro-inflammatory cells involved in the disease. CONCLUSIONS: MTXPG2 seems to be a potential indicator for clinical response and may serve as a marker for drug monitoring.

The influence of methotrexate on the gene expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-12A in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Methotrexate (MTX) is a cornerstone in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Among its anti-proliferative activity, the anti-inflammatory mechanisms of MTX seem to play a major role in the treatment of RA. MTX reduces the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1, IL-2, IL-6 and interferon (INF)-γ, while the gene expression of anti-inflammatory Th2 cytokines like IL-4 and IL-10 is increased - altogether resulting in the anti-inflammatory effect. As little is known about the impact of MTX on other cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of RA, the present trial investigated the effect of MTX on IL-12A and IL-18 gene expression by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). For comparison, the effect on IL-6 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF) was analysed. METHODS: Using real-time PCR, mRNA concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines were determined in PBMCs from 17 patients before and during MTX therapy. Furthermore, gene expression was correlated with clinical and pharmacokinetic parameters such as methotrexate polyglutamate concentrations (Spearman's correlation coefficient). To eliminate concomitant corticosteroids as confounding factor, a subgroup analysis for methotrexate without corticosteroids was performed in 6 patients. RESULTS: MTX statistically significantly reduced the mRNA expression of IL-12A by PBMCs in rheumatoid arthritis patients (Wilcoxon-test for paired samples, p<0.046). Consistent with other reports, IL-6 was reduced under MTX treatment. Although the combination of MTX and corticosteroids significantly reduced the gene expression of IL-18, this key molecule was unaffected by MTX without corticosteroids. Our results were further supported by a negative correlation of methotrexate polyglutamate concentrations and the mRNA expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-12A. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a novel effect of MTX reducing the gene expression of IL-12A independently of corticosteroid application in patients. This impact was further enhanced by a reduction of IL-12A-producing lymphocytes and neutrophils under MTX treatment. These results expand the understanding of the mechanism of action of the most widely used drug in RA.