ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The professional situation of patients treated for childhood cancer differs from country to country. The aim of the study is to study, with the French sociocultural specificities, the first professional integration of these young people. METHODS: A sequential quantitative-qualitative mixed approach associates 16 individual interviews and responses to a self-questionnaire of 254 young cancer survivors (sex-ratio=1, median age 23.5 years diagnosed between 2000 and 2010; 68% leukemia) to 30 individual and collective interviews of professionals. Results They seem to have had fewer difficulties than the general population to find their first job (33% vs. 44%). Young women had more difficulties, young people thought they had stopped studying too early and those who mentioned their sequelae (mainly psychological and neurocognitive). The qualitative phase shows that, in this context, the information provided during the job interview plays an important role in access to the first job. DISCUSSION: The study showed a need for information, communication and training for all actors whose main axes could be: i) for young people: learn to introduce themselves and adapt speeches and postures, be aware of their non-obligation to reveal a situation relating to health and to the handicap; ii) for the medical profession: to promote communication and to find spaces for exchanges between specialists, generalists, occupational physicians; iii) for employers: better know the disease and the laws to adapt their eyes and practices.
Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Female , France , Humans , Male , Young AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Barriers to targeted colonoscopic screening of first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients have been the subject of considerable literature, always as seen from the patient's viewpoint. In the specific context of screening individuals with a family history, physicians may also play a predominant role in motivating their colorectal cancer patients to pass on screening information to their relatives. The aim of this study was to examine the views of general practitioners and specialists regarding barriers and facilitators affecting participation of relatives in colonoscopic screening. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted to collect and analyse information from two focus groups of 4 general practitioners and 9 gastroenterologists respectively, and from semi-structured individual interviews with 10 general practitioners, 2 surgeons and 3 oncologists. An extended focus group of 36 gastroenterologists was organized to validate the results. RESULTS: The main barriers to colonoscopic screening of FDRs were associated with lack of direct communication between physicians and FDRs. Physicians needed support in the task of informing index patients and persuading them to transfer information on screening to their FDRs. The general practitioners spoke of their expectations in terms of training in and motivation for promoting screening and the gastroenterologists expressed the wish for patient education material specific to colonoscopy and for systematic post-colonoscopy consultations to inform patients about their results, follow-up and screening their relatives. CONCLUSION: The findings, notably the need for specific education materials and for training to improve the motivation of physicians, will help to develop effective interventions intended to increase participation in screening.
Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Colonoscopy/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Adult , Aged , Data Collection , Female , Focus Groups , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Physician-Patient Relations , Physicians, Family/psychology , Risk , SpecializationABSTRACT
AIMS: To characterize determining factors for compliance with colonoscopy recommendations in the familial screening of colorectal cancer through exploration of individual psychosociological factors and issues relating to patient/physician/sibling communication. METHODS: A qualitative approach involving a review of the literature and interviews with general practitioners, specialists, patients, and their siblings. RESULTS: A confrontation of the content of interviews with data from the literature made it possible to confirm the relevance of classic prevention models, the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior in the French cultural and healthcare environments, as well as their ability to identify the main individual factors liable to motivate or to discourage familial screening. The family network plays a decisive part in the transmission of information from the patient towards siblings. Physicians have expectations relating to communication aids and backup. This study above all highlights the difficulty in determining who is best suited to giving information to the patient, and when and how to relay this information to first-degree relatives. CONCLUSION: In view of the many difficulties in establishing interaction between patient, physician and siblings that is liable to lead on to efficient screening, we propose the study of the usefulness of a health-counseling intervention aimed to tailor and follow-up the delivery of screening information to the first-degree relatives.
