Safety and efficacy of ezetimibe monotherapy in 1624 primary hypercholesterolaemic patients for up to 2 years.

AIMS: This report examined the safety and efficacy of treatment for up to 2 years with the cholesterol absorption inhibitor, ezetimibe (EZE). METHODS: Two identical, randomised, double-blind trials (starting with 827 and 892 patients), evaluated the efficacy and safety of EZE 10 mg/day vs. placebo for 12 weeks in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia [low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) 3.3-5.1 mmol/l]. Upon completion of these base studies, patients were offered a 2-year, open-label extension study. Adverse event (AE) reports for EZE monotherapy-treated patients were summarised for 3-month intervals to allow for comparison with the placebo group of the 3-month base studies. The primary end-point for this analysis was the evaluation of the long-term safety and tolerability of EZE 10 mg monotherapy dosed daily for up to 24 months. RESULTS: The incidences of new AEs, treatment-related (TR) AEs, serious AEs (SAEs), TRSAEs and discontinuations as a result of AEs during any 3-month interval were comparable with the respective observations in the placebo group of the base studies. The incidences of AEs, TRAEs, SAEs, TRSAEs and discontinuations as a result of AEs decreased in almost every interval compared with earlier intervals throughout the 2-year study. In addition, the incidences of > or = 3-fold consecutive elevations of liver transaminases (0.7%) or > or = 10-fold increases in creatine phosphokinase (0.4%) for the entire 2-year treatment period were comparable with those of the placebo group (0.7% and 0.2% respectively). LDL-C reductions of approximately 18% were maintained throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with placebo, treatment with EZE for up to 2 years in 1624 patients showed no evidence of increased incidence of AEs with increased treatment duration, while showing sustained effects on LDL-C reduction.

Evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ezetimibe in primary hypercholesterolaemia: a pooled analysis from two controlled phase III clinical studies.

Ezetimibe is a novel cholesterol absorption inhibitor that blocks intestinal absorption of dietary and biliary cholesterol. Data from 1719 patients who participated in two multicentre, double-blind studies of ezetimibe were pooled to evaluate the drug's efficacy and safety in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia. Following dietary stabilisation, a two- to 12-week washout period, and a four-week, single-blind, placebo lead-in period, patients were randomised to ezetimibe 10 mg or placebo once daily in the morning for 12 consecutive weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was percent reduction in plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol from baseline at endpoint. Ezetimibe reduced LDL-cholesterol by a mean of 18.2% compared with an increase of 0.9% with placebo (p<0.01) and resulted in favourable, statistically significant changes in HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides and apo B. The response to ezetimibe was consistent across all subgroups analysed. Ezetimibe was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to placebo.

Long-term efficacy and safety of cerivastatin 0.8 mg in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Statins are the agents of choice in reducing elevated plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). HYPOTHESIS: Cerivastatin 0.8 mg has greater long-term efficacy in reducing LDL-C than pravastatin 40 mg in primary hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: In this double-blind, parallel-group, 52-week study, patients (n = 1,170) were randomized (4:1:1) to cerivastatin 0.8 mg, cerivastatin 0.4 mg, or placebo daily. After 8 weeks, placebo was switched to pravastatin 40 mg. Patients with insufficient LDL-C lowering after 24 weeks were allowed open-labeled resin therapy. RESULTS: Cerivastatin 0.8 mg reduced LDL-C versus cerivastatin 0.4 mg (40.8 vs. 33.6%, p <0.0001) or pravastatin 40 mg (31.5%, p<0.0001), and brought 81.8% of all patients, and 54.1% of patients with atherosclerotic disease, to National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) goals. Cerivastatin 0.8 mg improved mean total C (-29.0%), triglycerides (-18.3%), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (+9.7%) (all p < or = 0.013 vs. pravastatin 40 mg). Higher baseline triglycerides were associated with greater reductions in triglycerides and elevations in HDL-C with cerivastatin. Cerivastatin was well tolerated; the most commonly reported adverse events were arthralgia, headache, pharyngitis, and rhinitis. Symptomatic creatine kinase > 10x the upper limit of normal (ULN) occurred in 1, 1.5, and 0% of patients receiving cerivastatin 0.8 mg, cerivastatin 0.4 mg, and pravastatin 40 mg, respectively. Repeat hepatic transaminases >3 x ULN occurred in 0.3-0.5, 0.5, and 0% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: In long-term use, cerivastatin 0.8 mg effectively and safely brings the majority of patients to NCEP goal.

Effectiveness and tolerability of ezetimibe in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: pooled analysis of two phase II studies.

BACKGROUND: Ezetimibe (SCH 58235) is a novel cholesterol absorption inhibitor that selectively and potently blocks intestinal absorption of dietary and biliary cholesterol. OBJECTIVE: Data from 2 multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, 12-week studies of ezetimibe were pooled to evaluate the drug's effect on lipid parameters in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: After dietary stabilization (National Cholesterol Education Program Step I diet or a stricter diet), washout of lipid-altering drugs, and a 6-week placebo lead-in period, patients with baseline plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels > or = 130 and < or = 250 mg/dL and plasma triglyceride (TG) levels < or = 300 mg/dL were randomized to receive either ezetimibe 0.25, 1, 5, or 10 mg, or placebo administered once daily before the morning meal in study A (dose-response study) or ezetimibe 5 or 10 mg or placebo administered once daily before the morning meal or at bedtime in study B (dose-regimen study). RESULTS: A total of 432 patients were included in this pooled analysis, 243 in study A and 189 in study B. The 5- and 10-mg doses of ezetimibe significantly reduced LDL-C levels by 15.7% and 18.5%, respectively (P < 0.01 vs placebo) and significantly increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (hDL-C) levels by 2.9% and 3.5%, respectively (P < 0.05 vs placebo). A reduction in plasma TG levels was observed (P = NS). With the 10-mg dose of ezetimibe, 67.8% of patients achieved > or = 15% reduction in plasma LDL-C levels, and 22.0% achieved > or = 25% reduction. With the 5-mg dose, 54.0% of patients achieved > or = 15% reduction in plasma LDL-C levels, and 15.3% achieved > or = 25% reduction. The decrease in plasma LDL-C levels was significantly greater with ezetimibe 10 mg compared with ezetimibe 5 mg (P < 0.05). Ezetimibe was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to that of placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In these two 12-week studies, ezetimibe significantly decreased plasma LDL-C levels and increased plasma HDL-C levels, with a tolerability profile similar to that of placebo.

Effects of sibutramine on body weight and serum lipids: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in 322 overweight and obese patients with dyslipidemia.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular risk factors associated with obesity, including dyslipidemia, can be improved by weight loss. The main dyslipidemia associated with obesity is elevated serum triglyceride and decreased serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels. METHODS: A total of 322 obese patients (body mass index > or = 27) with serum triglyceride levels > or = 250 mg/dL and < or = 1000 mg/dL and serum HDL-C levels < or = 45 mg/dL (women) and < or = 40 mg/dL (men) were placed on a step I American Heart Association diet and subsequently randomized to sibutramine 20 mg (n = 162) or placebo (n = 160) once daily for 24 weeks. RESULTS: Patients taking sibutramine had significantly greater mean weight loss than those receiving placebo (-4.9 kg vs -0.6 kg, P < or = .05). Forty-two percent of the sibutramine group lost > or = 5% of baseline weight and 12% lost > or = 10% compared with 8% and 3%, respectively, of the placebo group (P < or = .05). Mean decreases in serum triglyceride levels among 5% and 10% weight-loss responders in the sibutramine group were 33.4 mg/dL and 72.3 mg/dL, respectively, compared with an increase of 31.7 mg/dL among all patients receiving placebo (P < or = .05). Mean increases in serum HDL-C levels for 5% and 10% weight-loss responders in the sibutramine group were 4.9 mg/dL and 6.7 mg/dL, respectively, compared with an increase of 1.7 mg/dL among all patients in the placebo group (P < or = .05). Adverse events and discontinuation rates were similar in the sibutramine and placebo groups, although sibutramine-treated patients had mean increases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure of 2 to 3 mm Hg relative to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In overweight and obese patients with high serum triglyceride levels and low serum HDL-C levels, treatment with sibutramine was associated with significant improvements in body weight and in serum triglyceride and HDL-C levels.

Efficacy and short-term safety of a new ACAT inhibitor, avasimibe, on lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteins, in patients with combined hyperlipidemia.

Although acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT) inhibitors have been shown to reduce lipid levels in several animal models, the safety and lipid modifying activity of any single agent in this class has not been demonstrated in humans. The safety and efficacy of avasimibe (CI-1011), a new, unique, wholly synthetic ACAT inhibitor, was evaluated in the treatment of 130 men and women with combined hyperlipidemia and hypoalphalipoproteinemia (low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C]). Following an 8-week placebo and dietary-controlled baseline period, patients were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with placebo, 50, 125, 250, or 500 mg avasimibe administered as capsules once daily for 8 weeks. At all evaluated doses, avasimibe treatment resulted in prompt and significant reductions (P<0.05) in plasma levels of total triglycerides (TG) and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C) with mean reductions of up to 23% and 30% respectively, apparently independent of dose. No statistically significant changes in total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), HDL-C or apolipoprotein (apo) B were detected. ApoAI levels were also unchanged on all doses of avasimibe apart from the 500 mg dosage, which was associated with a significant decrease in plasma apoAI. The relevance of this latter finding in only one dosage group is not known. All doses of avasimibe were well tolerated with no resulting significant abnormalities of biochemical, hematological, or clinical parameters.

New pharmacological agents under clinical investigation for treating disorders of lipoprotein regulation leading to atherosclerosis.

Coronary heart disease (CHD), whose primary aetiology is atherosclerosis, is the leading cause of mortality and a major cause of morbidity in the industrialised world [1]. Serum lipoprotein levels are aetiologically related to the risk of atherosclerosis and CHD [2]. The liver and the gastrointestinal system are the major protagonists involved in regulation of lipoprotein biochemical-physiological mechanisms and the development of hypercholesterolaemia. Furthermore, specific lipoprotein receptors are being discovered as targets for pharmacological intervention to correct lipoprotein disorders. Agents that target lipoprotein regulation in the liver, gastrointestinal-biliary and atherosclerotic tissues resulting in improved serum lipoprotein levels and/or control of primary and secondary dyslipidaemic disorders including diabetes, are currently undergoing clinical trials. The most novel promising compounds, after the greatly effective newest HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, are drugs that affect peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, PPARalpha and PPARgamma receptors, bile acid transport mechanisms, cholesterol absorption and cholesterol acyltransferase and other biochemical targets of lipoprotein regulation. Current knowledge and ongoing trials with these agents are described here within the boundaries of investigator confidentiality agreements.

Reduction of LDL cholesterol in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia by SCH 48461: results of a multicenter dose-ranging study.

SCH 48461, an inhibitor of gastrointestinal absorption of cholesterol, was evaluated for its effects on lipid parameters in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study. Following the baseline phase, which consisted of a 2- to 10-week drug washout and dietary stabilization phase and a 4-week placebo lead-in (placebo baseline phase), 190 patients were randomized to an 8-week double-blind active drug (SCH 48461 1, 6.25, 25, 100, 200, or 400 mg) or 40 mg lovastatin once daily each morning or placebo treatment phase. By week 2, patients who received SCH 48461 6.25 to 400 mg or lovastatin demonstrated greater reduction from baseline in directly measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels than patients in the placebo group (p < or = 0.03). Overall, the percent reductions in LDL-C from baseline increased as the dose of SCH 48461 increased, with 0.6% to 15.5% reductions from the minimum dose of 1 mg to the maximum dose of 400 mg. Lovastatin 40 mg/day reduced LDL-C by 30.7% (p < 0.01). Statistically significant decreases were also seen for total cholesterol and apolipoprotein B (apo B) with doses of 25 mg to 400 mg of SCH 48461 and lovastatin. SCH 48461 was well tolerated. There was a similar incidence of adverse events in each SCH 48461- or lovastatin-treated group compared to placebo. This study demonstrated a clinically and statistically significant cholesterol-lowering effect of SCH 48461 in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.

Probucol.

The purpose of this review article is twofold. It seeks to present an overview of research studies conducted on the many effects of probucol, and it demonstrates the interest in pursuing studies on probucol"s multiple specific actions and its future as a therapeutic agent. Within this article, the results of animal studies, experimental human studies, and clinical human studies are detailed, as is information on toxicology studies and on the side effects of the drug.