EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY OF INJURIES IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT OF THE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF GEORGIA.

Injuries represent a significant burden on societies, resulting in deaths and health care costs incurred during Emergency Department visits and hospitalizations. This research aimed to estimate the burden of traumatic injury of patients treated and evaluated in the Emergency Department of the University Hospital in Georgia. A retrospective study was conducted at the University Hospital of Georgia for all trauma patients from January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2018. Visits were identified from existing electronic medical records, using the iCREATE Registry as a model. Data collected included patient demographics, injury characteristics, and injury costs. To estimate the direct costs of trauma treatment, data were obtained from the cost accounting database. A total of 2445 injured patients aged 0 to 91 years were medically examined during the study period and about 65% of them were male. Most of the injured patients were school-age children (31%). The leading mechanism of injury in the Emergency Departments were falls (45%). Most of the patients (78%) suffered from moderate injuries and needed only outpatient treatment. The total direct costs for all patients were $248 628. Fall-related injury costs accounted for most direct medical costs (51%), followed by road traffic crashes related costs (23%). Road traffic injured patients had the highest total mean costs ($269). Injuries result in a substantial number of Emergency Department visits and significant medical costs in Georgia. Understanding the characteristics of these injuries is essential for targeting injury prevention.

A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF THE MAXILLOFACIAL INJURIES IN TWO EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS IN TBILISI, GEORGIA.

Maxillofacial injuries are a global problem in our modern society. It can be a major cause of increased morbidity and mortality. Maxillofacial trauma can lead to scar distortion accompanied by emotional and psychological problems. The epidemiology of facial fractures varies in terms of trauma type, the extent of injury, and severity. The main aim of this research is to explore the scope, the burden, and the etiology of maxillofacial injuries in Tbilisi, Georgia. Data was retrospectively collected from two large emergency departments in Tbilisi, Georgia using a cross-sectional design. Inclusion criteria was patients admitted in hospitals during one year with diagnosis maxillofacial injury. SPSS 21 software was used for statistical analysis. Differences in categorical variables were assessed with Chi-square tests of independence. This research shows that men are still the most frequent victims of maxillofacial injuries. Out of 598 patients, whose age ranged from 1month to 87 years - 67% were males, and 33% patients were females, including both, maxillofacial trauma alone and also combined injuries. With only maxillofacial injuries, the male patients were still leading, with 51% (307) and female patients were 28% (167), these results gave us a statistically significant difference (p=0.026). The main causes of maxillofacial injuries were falls, which equaled to 63% (378 patients) from total recorded data, as in many other countries. The results of this research provide really important information about future preventive interventions in the country. It also shows us that educating the public with prevention strategies is substantial.

Under-reporting bicycle accidents to police in the COST TU1101 international survey: Cross-country comparisons and associated factors.

Police crash reports are often the main source for official data in many countries. However, with the exception of fatal crashes, crashes are often underreported in a biased manner. Consequently, the countermeasures adopted according to them may be inefficient. In the case of bicycle crashes, this bias is most acute and it probably varies across countries, with some of them being more prone to reporting accidents to police than others. Assessing if this bias occurs and the size of it can be of great importance for evaluating the risks associated with bicycling. This study utilized data collected in the COST TU1101 action "Towards safer bicycling through optimization of bicycle helmets and usage". The data came from an online survey that included questions related to bicyclists' attitudes, behaviour, cycling habits, accidents, and patterns of use of helmets. The survey was filled by 8655 bicyclists from 30 different countries. After applying various exclusion factors, 7015 questionnaires filled by adult cyclists from 17 countries, each with at least 100 valid responses, remained in our sample. The results showed that across all countries, an average of only 10% of all crashes were reported to the police, with a wide range among countries: from a minimum of 0.0% (Israel) and 2.6% (Croatia) to a maximum of a 35.0% (Germany). Some factors associated with the reporting levels were type of crash, type of vehicle involved, and injury severity. No relation was found between the likelihood of reporting and the cyclist's gender, age, educational level, marital status, being a parent, use of helmet, and type of bicycle. The significant under-reporting - including injury crashes that do not lead to hospitalization - justifies the use of self-report survey data for assessment of bicycling crash patterns as they relate to (1) crash risk issues such as location, infrastructure, cyclists' characteristics, and use of helmet and (2) strategic approaches to bicycle crash prevention and injury reduction.

Developing a policy game intervention to enhance collaboration in public health policymaking in three European countries.

BACKGROUND: One of the key elements to enhance the uptake of evidence in public health policies is stimulating cross-sector collaboration. An intervention stimulating collaboration is a policy game. The aim of this study was to describe the design and methods of the development process of the policy game 'In2Action' within a real-life setting of public health policymaking networks in the Netherlands, Denmark and Romania. METHODS: The development of the policy game intervention consisted of three phases, pre intervention, designing the game intervention and tailoring the intervention. RESULTS: In2Action was developed as a role-play game of one day, with main focus to develop in collaboration a cross-sector implementation plan based on the approved strategic local public health policy. CONCLUSIONS: This study introduced an innovative intervention for public health policymaking. It described the design and development of the generic frame of the In2Action game focusing on enhancing collaboration in local public health policymaking networks. By keeping the game generic, it became suitable for each of the three country cases with only minor changes. The generic frame of the game is expected to be generalizable for other European countries to stimulate interaction and collaboration in the policy process.