Comparison of HTK-Custodiol and St-Thomas solution as cardiac preservation solutions on early and midterm outcomes following heart transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: The choice of the cardiac preservation solution for myocardial protection at time of heart procurement remains controversial and uncertainties persist regarding its effect on the early and midterm heart transplantation (HTx) outcomes. We retrospectively compared our adult HTx performed with 2 different solutions, in terms of hospital mortality, mid-term survival, inotropic score, primary graft dysfunction and rejection score. METHODS: From January 2009 to December 2020, 154 consecutive HTx of adult patients, followed up in pre- and post-transplantation by 2 different tertiary centres, were performed at the University Hospital of Lausanne, Switzerland. From 2009 to 2015, the cardiac preservation solution used was exclusively St-Thomas, whereafter an institutional decision was made to use HTK-Custodiol only. Patients were classified in 2 groups accordingly. RESULTS: There were 75 patients in the St-Thomas group and 79 patients in the HTK-Custodiol group. The 2 groups were comparable in terms of preoperative and intraoperative characteristics. Postoperatively, compared to the St-Thomas group, the Custodiol group patients showed significantly lower inotropic scores [median (interquartile range): 35.7 (17.5-60.2) vs 71.8 (31.8-127), P < 0.001], rejection scores [0.08 (0.0-0.25) vs 0.14 (0.05-0.5), P = 0.036] and 30-day mortality rate (2.5% vs 14.7%, P = 0.007) even after adjusting for potential confounders. Microscopic analysis of the endomyocardial biopsies also showed less specific histological features of subendothelial ischaemia (3.8% vs 17.3%, P = 0.006). There was no difference in primary graft dysfunction requiring postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The use of HTK-Custodiol solution significantly improved midterm survival (Custodiol versus St-Thomas: hazard ratio = 0.20, 95% confidence interval: 0.069-0.60, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study comparing St-Thomas solution and HTK-Custodiol as myocardial protection during heart procurement showed that Custodiol improves outcomes after HTx, including postoperative inotropic score, rejection score, 30-day mortality and midterm survival.

Combined approach of carotid endarteriectomy and transcarotid transcatheter aortic valve implantation as a minimally invasive one-step treatment of aortic stenosis: a case report.

Background: Despite the gold-standard approach for transaortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains transfemoral (TF), alternative approaches are needed in patients who present contraindications to transfemoral access. Case summary: We report the case of a 79-year-old female with a symptomatic high-gradient severe aortic stenosis-mean gradient of 43 mmHg-and a significant supra-aortic trunk stenosis (left carotid artery: 90-99%; right carotid artery: 50-70%), and who was hospitalized for progressive dyspnoea New York Heart Association (NYHA) stage III. In this high-risk patient, it was decided to perform a TAVI. Because of a history of stenting of both common iliac arteries in a context of an arterial insufficiency of the lower limbs (Leriche classification stage III) and stenotic thoraco-abdominal aorta atheromatosis, an alternative approach to the transfemoral transaortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI) one was needed. It was decided to perform a combined transcarotid-TAVI (TC-TAVI) with EDWARDS S3 23 mm valve with a left endarteriectomy during the same operating time. Discussion: Our case illustrates an alternative approach to perform a percutaneous aortic valve implantation, despite supra-aortic trunk stenosis, in a high-risk surgical patient contraindicated to a TF-TAVI. Transcarotid transaortic valve implantation remains a safe alternative when TF-TAVI is contraindicated, and the combined approach of carotid endarteriectomy and TC-TAVI offers a minimally invasive one-step treatment in high operative risk patients.

Respect or resect in Barlow disease.

Mitral regurgitation in Barlow disease may still be challenging to be repaired. Most often it involves the posterior leaflet. Many techniques and concepts are currently available; the main goal being to restore a good surface of coaptation. Basic principles such as thorough analysis is still required whatever the approach to assess excess tissue height, width, and prolapse. Nowadays it seems that two different ways of treating mitral prolapse coexist: the nonresection one and the resection one. Both will be discussed and analyzed. Similarly, the use of artificial chordae seems to have a preponderant role to support the free edge and correct a prolapse. Native secondary chord transfer are easy and reliable but seem abandoned by many. Anterior leaflet prolapse is also dealt with and fewer options are available to address this leaflet. Then commissural prolapse is mentioned. It is an important area of the valve which should deserve better treatment than commissuroplasty. Finally, a special entity will be described; mitro annular disjunction. The approach is not or no longer an issue as only good long-term results are important in an era where percutaneous therapy is the only noninvasive technique.

Type A aortic dissection and pheochromocytoma: an indirect consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Type A aortic dissection is a cardiovascular emergency. Its incidence seems to have increased in the last few years; it is not clear whether this is a consequence of the ageing population or better awareness of the diagnosis (Erbel R, Alfonso F, Boileau C, Dirsch O, Eber B, Haverich A et al.; Task Force on Aortic Dissection, European Society of Cardiology. Diagnosis and management of aortic dissection Task Force on Aortic Dissection, European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2001;15;22:1642-81). Acute type A aortic dissection is often lethal without urgent surgical treatment with mortality rates of around 17% (Conzelmann LO, Weigang E, Mehlhorn U, Abugameh A, Hoffmann I, Blettner M et al. Mortality in patients with acute aortic dissection type A: analysis of pre- and intraoperative risk factors from the German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016;49:e44-e52). Pheochromocytomas are rare tumours, though often asymptomatic, they could be lethal if left untreated. The incidence is around 0.6 per 100,000 persons per year. The association of both aortic dissection and pheochromocytoma is rare. Here, we report a case of a 36-year-old patient with pheochromocytoma and hypertension, whose delay of surgery due to the Covid-19 pandemic led to acute type A aortic dissection.

Outcome of consistent guideline-based tricuspid management in patients undergoing degenerative mitral regurgitation correction.

Objectives: Despite coherent guidelines, management of functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) consequences on outcome in the context of degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) remains controversial due to lacking series of large magnitude with rigorous application of tricuspid guidelines and strict long-term echocardiographic follow-up. Thus, we aimed at gathering such a cohort to examine outcomes of patients undergoing DMR surgery following tricuspid surgery guidelines. Methods: All consecutive patients with isolated DMR 2005-2015 operated on with baseline FTR assessment and tricuspid annulus diameter measurement were identified. Operative complications, postoperative tricuspid regurgitation incidence, and survival were assessed overall and stratified by guideline-based tricuspid annuloplasty (TA) indication (severe FTR or tricuspid annulus diameter ≥40 mm). Results: Among 441 patients with DMR undergoing mitral repair (66 ± 13 years, 30% female, ejection fraction 66 ± 10%, systolic pulmonary artery pressures 39 ± 12 mm Hg) followed 6 [3-9] years, patients with TA (n = 234, 53%) had generally similar presentation versus without TA (n = 207, 47%; all P ≥ .2) except for more atrial fibrillation and larger left ventricle (both P ≥ .0003). Patients with TA showed longer bypass time, more maze procedures (all P ≤ .001), but hospital stay, renal-failure, pacemaker implantation, and operative mortality (overall 0.9%) were comparable (all P ≥ .2). Postoperative incidence of moderate/severe FTR (0% at 1 year) became over time greater among patients without TA (5-year 8% [4%-13%] vs 3% [1%-11%] and 10-year 10% [6%-16%] vs 4% [1%-16%], P = .01). Survival (95% confidence interval) throughout follow-up was 85% (77%-89%) at 10 years, with hazard ratio 0.57 (0.29-1.10), P = .09. for patients with TA versus without. Conclusions: In this large surgical DMR cohort, guideline-based FTR management was safe and effective. While long-term mortality did not reach significance, postoperative incidence of moderate/severe FTR, overall low, was nevertheless greater in patients who did not appear to require TA at surgery and linked to tricuspid annular dimension. Thus, future multicenter prospective cohorts with long-term follow-up are warranted to re-examine thresholds for TA performance and impact on survival.

"Respect when you can, resect when you should": A realistic approach to posterior leaflet mitral valve repair.

OBJECTIVE: Avoiding resection to treat posterior leaflet prolapse has become popular to repair degenerative mitral regurgitation. We never subscribed to such simplification but advocated an alternative approach based on the "respect when you can, resect when you should" concept. The present study reviewed posterior leaflet prolapse in degenerative disease with the aim to expose the 10-year experience with this surgical policy, in particular long-term outcomes such as survival, recurrent/severe mitral regurgitation, and reoperation. METHODS: From January 2005 to December 2015, 701 consecutive patients with severe mitral regurgitation underwent mitral valve repair in 2 distinct institutions. Mitral regurgitation was degenerative in 441 patients, of whom the 376 with posterior leaflet prolapse constituted the study population. Patients were followed up by echocardiograms until December 2017. Longitudinal data stratified by institution were analyzed by mixed-effects models. Outcome measures were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier test. RESULTS: Patients with posterior leaflet prolapse (24.7% isolated P2 and 75.3% P2 associated with other segments) were aged 65.8 ± 13 years, and 70.5% were male. Median follow-up was 61.1 months. There were 3 hospital deaths (0.8%). Reoperation was necessary in 7 patients (1.9%). After 1, 5, and 10 years, overall survival was 97.8%, 93.6%, and 86.7%, respectively; the overall survival of the proportion of patients with recurrent/residual >2+ mitral regurgitation was estimated at 0.7%, 1.9%, and 5.9% and that of patients with New York Heart Association III/IV at 0.8%, 1.9%, and 5.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The "resect with respect" approach yields low operative mortality, no systolic anterior motion, good surface of coaptation, and low incidence of residual/recurrent mitral regurgitation and of reoperation, thus supporting resection when required concept.

Mitral Valve Repair in Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation: State of the Art.

In industrialized countries, the most common etiology of mitral regurgitation (MR) is degenerative mitral valve (MV) disease. The natural history of severe degenerative MR is poor. However, its appropriate and timely correction is associated with a life expectancy similar to that of the normal population. Surgical MV repair is the gold standard treatment. This review will focus on the most recent evidence with a specific emphasis on surgical indications, timing of treatment, contemporary surgical techniques, Heart Teams and Centers of Excellence.

Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: the mitral valve could be the key.

OBJECTIVES: As we strongly believe that treating the mitral valve abnormalities is a key feature of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM), we have systematically corrected both the anterior and posterior leaflet (PL) size and geometry. We have analysed our immediate results and at mid-term follow-up. METHODS: From March 2010 until June 2015, 16 patients with HOCM underwent surgical correction of obstruction. The mean age was 51 years old (range, 32-72 years). All were symptomatic being New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 3 (n = 4) or 4 (n = 12). All had systolic anterior motion at echocardiogram with severe mitral regurgitation (MR). Intraventricular gradient preoperatively was 73.5 mmHg (range, 50-120 mmHg). All patients underwent a double-stage procedure: first septal resection through (i) the aortic valve and (ii) the detached anterior leaflet (AL) of the mitral valve and at second, mitral valve repair by (i) reducing PL height (leaflet resection or artificial neochordae) (ii) increasing AL height with pericardial patch. RESULTS: There was no in-hospital or late death. All patients were Class 1 NYHA at latest follow-up. Control echocardiography showed no MR, mean rest intraventricular gradient was 15 mmHg (range, 9-18 mmHg). CONCLUSIONS: Our good mid-term results support the concept that HOCM is not only a septal disease and that the mitral valve pathology is a key component that should be addressed. For most patients, the ideal surgical treatment should consist in a two-step procedure. It is even necessary to be studied whether treating the mitral valve alone could not suffice.

Functional tricuspid regurgitation: a need to revise our understanding.

The assessment of the etiology and severity of functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) has many limitations, especially when tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is more than severe. Instead of relying solely on TR severity, a new approach not only takes into account the severity of TR, but also pays strict attention to tricuspid annular dilation (size), the mode of tricuspid leaflet coaptation, and tricuspid leaflet tethering-factors often influenced by right ventricular enlargement and dysfunction. To simplify things, we propose a new staging system for functional tricuspid valve pathology using 3 parameters that may more accurately reflect the severity of the disease: TR severity, annular dilation, and mode of leaflet coaptation (extent of tethering). We believe that by utilizing these parameters, cardiologists and cardiac surgeons will be offered a better system for appraisal and decision-making in FTR.