Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Am J Clin Hypn ; 60(2): 159-171, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28891777

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to determine whether hypnosis would be more effective than standard behavioral counseling in helping smokers to remain abstinent. A total of 140 current smokers were enrolled in a randomized controlled smoking cessation trial at an urban Veterans Affairs medical center. Participants (n = 102) who were able to quit for at least 3 days received either a hypnosis or behavioral relapse prevention intervention. Both relapse prevention interventions consisted of two 60 min face-to-face sessions and four 20 min follow-up phone calls (two phone calls per week). At 26 weeks, the validate\d point-prevalence quit rate was 35% for the hypnosis group and 42% for the behavioral counseling group (relative risk = 0.85; 95% confidence interval: 0.52-1.40). At 52 weeks, the validated quit rate was 29% for the hypnosis group and 28% for the behavioral group (relative risk  = 1.03; 95% confidence interval: 0.56-1.91). It was concluded that hypnosis warrants further investigation as an intervention for facilitating maintenance of quitting.


Subject(s)
Hypnosis/methods , Secondary Prevention/methods , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking Prevention/methods , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
2.
Psychol Serv ; 10(3): 265-275, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23244028

ABSTRACT

This study investigated the effectiveness of telephone-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy (T-CBT) in the management of chronic pain with older military veterans enrolled in VA primary-care clinics. We conducted a randomized clinical trial comparing T-CBT with telephone-delivered pain education (T-EDU). A total of 98 military veterans with chronic pain were enrolled in the study and randomized into one of two treatment conditions. Study participants were recruited from primary-care clinics at an urban VA medical center and affiliated VA community-based outpatient clinics (CBOCs). Pain management outcomes were measured at midtreatment (10 weeks), posttreatment (20 weeks), 3-month follow-up (32 weeks), and 6-month follow-up (46 weeks). No significant differences were found between the two treatment groups on any of the outcome measures. Both treatment groups reported small but significant increases in level of physical and mental health, and reductions in pain and depressive symptoms. Improvements in all primary outcome measures were mediated by reductions in catastrophizing. Telephone-delivered CBT and EDU warrant further study as easily accessible interventions for rural-living older individuals with chronic pain.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain/therapy , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Pain Management/methods , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Telephone , Aged , Chronic Pain/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients/psychology , Pain Management/psychology , Primary Health Care/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Urban Health , Veterans/psychology , Veterans Health
3.
Psychol Addict Behav ; 26(2): 358-63, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21707127

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to investigate expectancies regarding the interaction between cigarette smoking and use of alcohol among alcohol-dependent smokers in early recovery, using the Nicotine and Other Substances Interaction Expectancies Questionnaire (NOSIE). Participants were 162 veterans, 97% male, with a mean age of 50 years, enrolled in a clinical trial aimed at determining the efficacy of an intensive smoking cessation intervention versus usual care. At baseline, participants were assessed on measures of smoking behavior, abstinence thoughts about alcohol and tobacco use, symptoms of depression, and smoking-substance use interaction expectancies. In addition, biologically verified abstinence from tobacco and alcohol was assessed at 26 weeks. Participants reported that they expected smoking to have less of an impact on substance use than substance use has on smoking (p < .001). Severity of depressive symptoms was significantly associated with the expectancy that smoking provides a way of coping with the urge to use other substances (p < .01). The expectation that smoking increases substance urges/use was predictive of prospectively measured and biologically verified abstinence from smoking at 26 weeks (p < .03). The results add to our knowledge of smoking-substance use interaction expectancies among alcohol-dependent smokers in early recovery and will inform the development of more effective counseling interventions for concurrent alcohol and tobacco use disorders.


Subject(s)
Alcohol-Related Disorders/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Motivation , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Smoking/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adaptation, Psychological , Alcohol-Related Disorders/rehabilitation , Depression/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Regression Analysis , Severity of Illness Index , Smoking/therapy , Treatment Outcome
4.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 122(3): 186-94, 2012 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22014532

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an intensive tobacco cessation intervention for alcohol-dependent smokers in early recovery. METHODS: A total of 162 alcohol-dependent smokers were randomized to either intensive intervention for smoking cessation or usual care. The intensive intervention consisted of 16 sessions of individual cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) and combination nicotine replacement therapy that lasted 26 weeks. Usual care involved referral to a free-standing smoking cessation program that provided smoking cessation counseling of varying duration and guideline-concordant medications. The primary cessation outcome was verified 7-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA) at 12, 26, 38, and 52 weeks. RESULTS: At 12 and 26 weeks, the verified 7-day point-prevalence quit rate was significantly higher for the intensive intervention group than for the usual care group (both p=0.03). However, the quit rates for the two treatment groups were not significantly different at 38 or 52 weeks. Verified 30-day alcohol abstinence rates were not significantly different for the two treatment groups at any of the follow-up assessments. CONCLUSIONS: The intensive smoking cessation intervention yielded a higher short-term smoking quit rate without jeopardizing sobriety. A chronic care model might facilitate maintenance of smoking cessation during the first year of alcohol treatment and perhaps for longer periods of time. It is hoped that studies such as this will inform the development of more effective interventions for concurrent alcohol and tobacco use disorders.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism/therapy , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking/therapy , Tobacco Use Disorder/therapy , Adult , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Alcoholism/psychology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/psychology , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Time Factors , Tobacco Use Disorder/epidemiology , Tobacco Use Disorder/psychology , Treatment Outcome
5.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 11(6): 663-9, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19395688

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Bupropion is a first-line pharmacological aid for smoking cessation; however, no clinical trials have been conducted in a general population of hospitalized smokers. METHODS: We enrolled 85 smokers in a hospital-based randomized smoking cessation trial conducted at the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center. A total of 42 participants received a 7-week course of sustained-release bupropion and 43 participants received placebo. All participants received cognitive-behavioral counseling. We screened 14,997 patients, of whom 25% were current smokers. Of the 536 smokers who met the entry criteria, 451 opted not to enroll. We determined on-medication, end-of-medication, 3-month, and 6-month smoking cessation rates. RESULTS: At the end of 7 weeks of drug treatment, self-reported quit rates were equivalent in the bupropion and placebo arms, 37% versus 33%, respectively (p = .82). The validated quit rates for the bupropion and placebo groups were 27% versus 29%, respectively (p = 1.00). At 6 months, the self-reported quit rates were 29% in the bupropion group and 41% in the placebo group (p = .36). In a comparison of 6-month quit rates, validated either by salivary cotinine or by spousal proxy, we found nonsignificantly higher quit rates in the placebo group than in the bupropion group, 31% versus 15% (p = .12). DISCUSSION: The addition of sustained-release bupropion to counseling did not increase quit rates, but the study was underpowered. Because of the secular trend toward shorter hospital stays, recruitment was very difficult, raising questions regarding the feasibility of future hospital-based smoking cessation trials and interventions.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/therapeutic use , Bupropion/therapeutic use , Hospitalization , Smoking Cessation/methods , Tobacco Use Disorder/drug therapy , Adult , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy , Delayed-Action Preparations , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nicotine/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
7.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 10(5): 811-8, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18569754

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to determine whether hypnosis would be more effective in helping smokers quit than standard behavioral counseling when both interventions are combined with nicotine patches (NP). A total of 286 current smokers were enrolled in a randomized controlled smoking cessation trial at the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Participants in both treatment conditions were seen for two 60-min sessions, and received three follow-up phone calls and 2 months of NP. At 6 months, 29% of the hypnosis group reported 7-day point-prevalence abstinence compared with 23% of the behavioral counseling group (relative risk [RR] = 1.27; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.84-1.92). Based on biochemical or proxy confirmation, 26% of the participants in the hypnosis group were abstinent at 6 months compared with 18% of the behavioral group (RR = 1.44; 95% CI 0.91-2.30). At 12 months, the self-reported 7-day point-prevalence quit rate was 24% for the hypnosis group and 16% for the behavioral group (RR = 1.47; 95% CI 0.90-2.40). Based on biochemical or proxy confirmation, 20% of the participants in the hypnosis group were abstinent at 12 months compared with 14% of the behavioral group (RR = 1.40; 95% CI 0.81-2.42). Among participants with a history of depression, hypnosis yielded significantly higher validated point-prevalence quit rates at 6 and 12 months than standard treatment. It was concluded that hypnosis combined with NP compares favorably with standard behavioral counseling in generating long-term quit rates.


Subject(s)
Ganglionic Stimulants/administration & dosage , Hypnosis , Nicotine/administration & dosage , Smoking Cessation/methods , Tobacco Use Disorder/therapy , Administration, Cutaneous , Adult , Behavior Therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk , San Francisco , Tobacco Use Disorder/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome
8.
Arch Intern Med ; 164(16): 1797-803, 2004 Sep 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15364675

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bupropion hydrochloride is recommended for smoking cessation; however, there have been relatively few clinical trials examining its efficacy. METHODS: A total of 244 current smokers were enrolled in an outpatient randomized blinded smoking cessation trial conducted at the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif. Of the 244 participants, 121 received a 7-week course of bupropion and 123 received placebo. All participants received 2 months of transdermal nicotine replacement therapy and 3 months of cognitive-behavioral counseling. We determined on-medication treatment, end-of-medication treatment, 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year quit rates. RESULTS: During treatment with bupropion vs placebo, there was a trend toward increased quit rates among participants randomized to bupropion; the self-reported end-of-medication treatment quit rates were 64% for the bupropion group vs 57% for the placebo group (P =.23). The trend favoring bupropion persisted at 3 months of follow-up (P =.12) but was not apparent at 6 months and 1 year of follow-up (both P>.78). The 12-month quit rates, validated by either saliva cotinine or spousal proxy, were 22% in the bupropion group and 28% in the placebo group (P =.31). Based on biochemical validation, 19% of the bupropion group vs 24% of the placebo group had quit smoking by 1 year (P =.36). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized blinded trial of mostly veteran participants, the addition of a brief 7-week bupropion trial to treatment with nicotine replacement therapy and counseling did not significantly increase smoking cessation rates.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/therapeutic use , Bupropion/therapeutic use , Smoking Cessation/methods , Tobacco Use Disorder/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Nicotine/therapeutic use , Placebo Effect , Risk , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
9.
Chest ; 125(5): 1753-60, 2004 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15136387

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To describe our 5-year experience with a clinical pathway used to ensure the timely communication and evaluation of unsuspected radiologic findings (URFs) noted on clinically requested chest imaging. DESIGN: Prospective data collection on clinical practice. SETTING: Academically affiliated Veterans Affairs medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Pulmonary physicians, nurses, and radiologists. RESULTS: Over a period of 5 years, 1,629 URFs were referred to the pathway (from chest radiographs, 1,359 [83.4%]; from CT scans, 270 [16.6%]). Most URFs (78%) were nodules, with a specific diagnosis made in one third of URFs, and with a specific diagnosis thought to be clinically significant in another one third of URFs. The most common diagnosis was neoplasm, with over two thirds of these diagnoses being lung cancer. One third of lung cancers detected were either stage 1 or 2, with 1 in 17 of all URFs being stage IA lung cancer. The cost of the pathway was estimated at 28,600 dollars per year. CONCLUSIONS: URFs noted on chest imaging are frequently clinically significant, and a systematic approach to managing URFs, such as a clinical pathway, can significantly improve care in a large teaching hospital.


Subject(s)
Critical Pathways , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Thoracic/standards , Radiology Information Systems , Aged , Critical Pathways/economics , Female , Hospital Costs , Hospitals, Teaching , Hospitals, Veterans/economics , Hospitals, Veterans/standards , Humans , Male , Oregon , Prospective Studies , Radiography, Thoracic/economics , Radiology Information Systems/economics , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...