Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Surgery ; 154(2): 179-89, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23889947

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sufficient evidence suggests that preoperative biliary stenting is associated with increased complication rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and linked Medicare claims data (1992-2007) were used to identify patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. We evaluated trends in the use of preoperative biliary stenting, timing of physician visits relative to stenting, and time to surgical resection and symptoms in stented and unstented patients. RESULTS: Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in 2,573 patients, and 52.6% of patients underwent preoperative biliary stenting (N = 1,354). Of these, 75.3% underwent endoscopic stenting only, 18.9% received a percutaneous stent, and 5.8% underwent both procedures. The overall stenting rate increased from 29.6% of patients between 1992 and 1995 to 59.1% between 2004 and 2007 (P < .0001). Preoperative stenting was more common in patients with jaundice, cholangitis, pruritus, or coagulopathy (P < .05 for all). Of stented patients, 77.7% had had a stent placed prior to seeing a surgeon. Stenting prior to surgical consultation was associated with longer indwelling stent time compared to stenting after surgical consultation (37.3 vs 27.0 days, P < .0001). In addition, stented patients had longer times from surgeon visit to pancreatectomy than those who had not received stents (24.2 days vs 17.2 days, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Use of preoperative biliary stenting doubled between 1992 and 2007 despite evidence that stenting is associated with increased perioperative infectious complications. The majority of stenting occurred prior to surgical consultation and is associated with significant delay in time to operation. Surgeons should be involved early in order to prevent unnecessary stenting and improve outcomes.


Subject(s)
Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Stents , Aged , Drainage , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , SEER Program
2.
J Am Coll Surg ; 216(4): 814-24; discussion 824-7, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23376029

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend minimally invasive breast biopsy (MIBB) as the gold standard for the diagnosis of breast lesions. The purpose of this study was to describe geographic patterns and time trends in the use of MIBB in Texas. METHODS: We used 100% Texas Medicare claims data (2000-2008) to identify women older than 66 years of age who underwent breast biopsy. Biopsies were classified as open or MIBB. Time trends, racial/ethnic variation, and geographic variation in the use of biopsy techniques were examined. RESULTS: A total of 87,165 breast biopsies were performed on 75,518 breast masses in 67,582 women; 65.8% of the initial biopsies were MIBB. Radiologists performed 70.3% and surgeons performed 26.2% of MIBB. Surgeons performed 94.2% of open biopsies. Hispanic women were less likely to undergo MIBB (55.9%) compared with white (66.6%) and black (68.9%) women (p < 0.0001). Women undergoing MIBB were also more likely to live in metropolitan areas and have higher income and educational levels (p < 0.0001). The rate of MIBB increased from 44.4% in 2001 to 79.1% in 2008 (p < 0.0001). There are clear geographic patterns in MIBB use, with highest use near major cities. Although rates are increasing overall, rates of improvement in the use of MIBB vary considerably across geographic regions and remain persistently low in more rural areas. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an increase in the use of MIBB over time, MIBB use was consistently lower than recommended. We must identify specific barriers in rural areas to effectively change practice and achieve the statewide goal of 90% MIBB.


Subject(s)
Biopsy, Needle/statistics & numerical data , Biopsy, Needle/trends , Breast/pathology , Aged , Biopsy, Needle/methods , Female , Humans , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/trends , Texas , Time Factors
3.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 16(11): 2011-25, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22986769

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder disease is common and, if managed incorrectly, can lead to high rates of morbidity, mortality, and extraneous costs. The most common complications of gallstones include biliary colic, acute cholecystitis, common bile duct stones, and gallstone pancreatitis. Ultrasound is the initial imaging modality of choice. Additional diagnostic and therapeutic studies including computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic ultrasound, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography are not routinely required but may play a role in specific situations. DISCUSSION: Biliary colic and acute cholecystitis are best treated with early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients with common bile duct stones should be managed with cholecystectomy, either after or concurrent with endoscopic or surgical relief of obstruction and clearance of stones from the bile duct. Mild gallstone pancreatitis should be treated with cholecystectomy during the initial hospitalization to prevent recurrence. Emerging techniques for cholecystectomy include single-incision laparoscopic surgery and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Early results in highly selected patients demonstrate the safety of these techniques. The management of complications of the gallbladder should be timely and evidence-based, and choice of procedures, particularly for common bile duct stones, is largely influenced by facility and surgeon factors.


Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy , Gallbladder Diseases/surgery , Age Distribution , Algorithms , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic Resonance , Cholangitis/diagnosis , Cholangitis/surgery , Cholecystitis, Acute/diagnosis , Cholecystitis, Acute/epidemiology , Cholecystolithiasis/complications , Cholecystolithiasis/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Endosonography , Gallbladder Diseases/diagnosis , Gallbladder Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Gallstones/diagnosis , Gallstones/surgery , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery , Pancreatitis/epidemiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
4.
Ann Surg ; 256(3): 518-28, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22868362

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Routine preoperative laboratory testing for ambulatory surgery is not recommended. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective hernia repair (N = 73,596) were identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database (2005-2010). Patterns of preoperative testing were examined. Multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with testing and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 46,977 (63.8%) patients underwent testing, with at least one abnormal test recorded in 61.6% of patients. In patients with no NSQIP comorbidities (N = 25,149) and no clear indication for testing, 54% received at least one test. In addition, 15.3% of tested patients underwent laboratory testing the day of the operation. In this group, surgery was done despite abnormal results in 61.6% of same day tests. In multivariate analyses, testing was associated with older age, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) class >1, hypertension, ascites, bleeding disorders, systemic steroids, and laparoscopic procedures. Major complications (reintubation, pulmonary embolus, stroke, renal failure, coma, cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, septic shock, bleeding, or death) occurred in 0.3% of patients. After adjusting for patient and procedure characteristics, neither testing nor abnormal results were associated with postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative testing is overused in patients undergoing low-risk, ambulatory surgery. Neither testing nor abnormal results were associated with postoperative outcomes. On the basis of high rates of testing in healthy patients, physician and/or facility preference and not only patient condition currently dictate use. Involvement from surgical societies is necessary to establish guidelines for preoperative testing.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/statistics & numerical data , Elective Surgical Procedures , Health Services Misuse/statistics & numerical data , Herniorrhaphy , Preoperative Care/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Preoperative Care/statistics & numerical data , Quality Improvement , Risk , United States , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...