Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Abdom Imaging ; 39(3): 526-32, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24504541

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivity of portal venous phase contrast-enhanced CT for the detection of renal stones. METHODS: This retrospective study included 97 CT examinations of the abdomen without and with intravenous contrast, including 85 (87.6%) examinations with at least one renal stone on the "gold standard" noncontrast images, as scored by a single radiologist. Three other radiologists each independently reviewed only the contrast-enhanced images from all 97 examinations and recorded all renal stones. Reviewer sensitivity for stones was categorized by stone diameter. Reviewer sensitivity and specificity for stone disease were also calculated on a per-kidney basis. RESULTS: The 97 cases included a total of 238 stones ≥1 mm, with a mean (±SD) of 1.2 ± 1.9 stones per kidney and a stone diameter of 3.5 ± 3.0 mm. Pooling data for the three reviewers, sensitivity for all stones was 81%; sensitivity for stones ≥2, ≥3, ≥4, and ≥5 mm was 88%, 95%, 99%, and 98%, respectively. Sensitivity for stone disease on a per-kidney basis was 94% when considering all stones; when considering only stones ≥2, ≥3, and ≥4 mm, sensitivity was 96%, 99%, and 100%, respectively. Specificity for stone disease on a per-kidney basis was 98% overall, 99% when considering only stones ≥2 mm, and 100% when considering only stones ≥3 mm. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced CT is highly sensitive for the detection of renal stones ≥3 mm in diameter and less sensitive for smaller stones. In cases where the clinical diagnosis is uncertain and performance of a CT examination is being contemplated, intravenous contrast utilization would allow assessment for stone disease while also optimizing evaluation for other conditions.


Subject(s)
Contrast Media/adverse effects , Kidney Calculi/diagnostic imaging , Portal Vein , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Administration, Intravenous , Aged , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Emerg Radiol ; 20(2): 155-61, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23212537

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this article is to illustrate and discuss the various etiologies of perforation of the mesenteric small bowel and associated findings on abdominal CT. Perforation of the mesenteric small bowel is an uncommon cause of an acute abdomen and can be due to various etiologies. In underdeveloped countries, infection is probably the most common cause, while in industrialized nations, perforation may be due to Crohn disease, diverticulitis, foreign body, trauma, tumor, mechanical obstruction, primary ischemic event, or iatrogenic causes. CT is usually the initial imaging examination in patients with an acute abdomen and is sensitive in diagnosing small bowel perforation. CT findings in the setting of small bowel perforation are often subtle, but when present, may help the radiologist determine a specific cause of perforation. The aims of this pictorial essay are to review the various causes of mesenteric small bowel perforation and to discuss and illustrate the CT findings that can help arrive at the diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Intestinal Perforation/diagnostic imaging , Intestine, Small/diagnostic imaging , Mesentery/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , Iatrogenic Disease , Intestinal Diseases/complications , Intestinal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Intestinal Perforation/epidemiology , Intestinal Perforation/etiology , Intestine, Small/injuries , Mesentery/injuries
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...