A rare case of acantholytic squamous cell carcinoma presenting on non-sun exposed palpebral conjunctiva.

Purpose: This report describes the clinical and histological characteristics and management of a keratinized lesion of the palpebral conjunctiva in a 59-year-old male. The lesion was identified as a rare acantholytic variant of squamous cell carcinoma that atypically arose from a non-sun exposed region of palpebral conjunctiva. Management was complete excision via Mohs surgery. Observations: A 59-year-old male presented with ocular irritation and chronic foreign body sensation in the right eye. Exam revealed a keratinized lesion in the right lower tarsal conjunctiva, and an initial shave biopsy was non-diagnostic. 12 months later, the patient presented with similar symptoms and a larger, more irregular lesion for which histopathology of a tarsal-involving excisional biopsy was consistent with acantholytic squamous cell carcinoma with involved margins. The patient subsequently underwent complete excision via Mohs surgery and a secondary reconstruction. Conclusions and importance: Acantholytic variants of squamous cell carcinoma are rare and are described as arising from areas with routine sun exposure. This case reports such a lesion arising from non-sun exposed tarsal conjunctiva, as identified by histopathology of a full-thickness excisional biopsy. The lesion was successfully managed with complete excision via Mohs surgery and secondary reconstruction. Given that this histologic variant may be more aggressive and have higher rates of recurrence than other forms of squamous cell carcinoma, this case highlights the importance of complete excisional biopsy and accurate histopathology of concerning periocular lesions and offers a template for management of similar lesions. The unique presenting location should bring awareness to consideration of this type of malignancy developing on palpebral conjunctiva.

Head-to-Head Comparison of Intermediate Vision of Two Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.

Purpose: To compare intermediate visual outcomes in patients previously implanted with bilateral Clareon monofocal IOLs versus bilateral Eyhance IOLs. Methods: This was a non-interventional, single-center, examiner-masked, comparative study. Participants were cataract patients presenting at least 3 months after uncomplicated, bilateral implantation of either Clareon or Eyhance non-toric and toric IOLs. Outcomes measures included binocular distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), binocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), binocular best-corrected defocus curve, postoperative mean residual spherical equivalent (MRSE), and residual astigmatism. Results: A total of 620 eyes of 310 subjects (155 subjects per group) were evaluated. The mean difference in DCIVA was 0.05 logMAR between the Eyhance and Clareon IOLs which was significant (p < 0.01), but within the 0.1 logMAR non-inferiority margin. Mean CDVA of the Clareon group was 0.01 ± 0.03 logMAR compared to 0.02 ± 0.03 logMAR of the Eyhance Group (p > 0.05). Defocus curves from +1.0 D to -3.0 D were not clinically nor statistically different between the Clareon and Eyhance groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study show that bilateral implantation of Clareon monofocal IOLs and Eyhance monofocal IOLs lead to similar distance and intermediate visual outcomes.

Modified adaptation of the twist-and-out technique for intraocular lens exchange.

Many methods can be used to explant an intraocular lens (IOL) after prior cataract surgery. Here, we describe a modified approach to the twist-and-out technique for IOL removal. The IOL is dissected and brought into the anterior chamber (AC), where 1 haptic is externalized. The adaptation in this technique occurs next; an additional paracentesis is made 180 degrees away from an adjacent side port, and the shaft of a 25-gauge cannula is threaded across the AC to connect these incisions. This maneuver frees both hands to use forceps within the incision, grasp the IOL, and rotate it around the forceps. The use of both hands allows for a smaller, more controlled movement than the original 1-handed pronation. The cannula shaft aids in twisting the IOL tightly around the forceps while protecting the corneal endothelium. The forceps-lens complex is then withdrawn, extracting the IOL whole with 1 efficient movement.