Selective estrogen receptor down-regulator and selective estrogen receptor modulators differentially regulate lactotroph proliferation.

BACKGROUND: We recently reported that estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha), even in absence of estrogen (E2), plays a critical role in lactotroph homeostasis. The anti-estrogen ICI 182780 (ICI), but not tamoxifen or raloxifene, rapidly promoted the degradation of ERalpha, and inhibited cell proliferation. However, all three ER antagonists suppressed PRL release, suggesting that receptor occupation is sufficient to inhibit prl gene expression whereas receptor degradation is required to suppress lactotroph proliferation. In this study our objective was to determine whether ERalpha degradation versus occupation, differentially modulates the biological outcome of anti-estrogens. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Using the rat lactotroph cell line, GH3 cells, we report that ICI induced proteosome mediated degradation of ERalpha. In contrast, an ERalpha specific antagonist, MPP, that does not promote degradation of ERalpha, did not inhibit cell proliferation. Further, ICI, but not MPP, abolished anchorage independent growth of GH3 cells. Yet, both ICI and MPP were equally effective in suppressing prl expression and release, as well as ERE-mediated transcriptional activity. CONCLUSION: Taken together, our results demonstrate that in lactotrophs, ERalpha degradation results in decreased cell proliferation, whereas ERalpha occupation by an antagonist that does not promote degradation of ERalpha is sufficient to inhibit prl expression.

Epidermal growth factor receptor cross-talks with ligand-occupied estrogen receptor-alpha to modulate both lactotroph proliferation and prolactin gene expression.

Both estrogen (E2) and EGF regulate lactotrophs, and we recently demonstrated that EGF phosphorylates S118 on estrogen receptor-alpha (ERalpha) and requires ERalpha to stimulate prolactin (PRL) release. However, the interactions between ligand-occupied ERalpha and activated ErbB1 and its impact on lactotroph function are unknown. Using rat GH3 lactotrophs, we found that both E2 and EGF independently stimulated proliferation and PRL gene expression. Furthermore, their combination resulted in an enhanced stimulatory effect on both cell proliferation and PRL gene expression. Inhibitors of ER as well as ErbB1 blocked the combined effects of E2 and EGF. Pretreatment with UO126 abolished the combined effects, demonstrating Erk1/2 requirement. Although bidirectionality in ER-ErbB1 cross-talk is a well-accepted paradigm, interestingly in lactotrophs, ErbB1 kinase inhibitor failed to block the effect of E2 on proliferation and stimulation of PRL gene expression, suggesting that ER does not require ErbB1 to mediate its effects. Furthermore, E2 did not affect the ability of EGF to induce c-Fos expression or modulate AP-1 activity. However, both E2 and EGF combine to enhance S118 phosphorylation of ERalpha, leading to enhanced E2-mediated estrogen response element transactivation. Taken together, our results suggest that, in lactotrophs, activated ErbB1 phosphorylates ERalpha to enhance the stimulatory effect of E2, thereby providing the molecular basis by which EGF amplifies the response of E2.

Estrogen receptor-alpha mediates the epidermal growth factor-stimulated prolactin expression and release in lactotrophs.

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) is a potent regulator of cell function in many cell types. EGF-receptor (EGFR/ErbB1)-activated Erk1/2 has been reported to activate estrogen receptor (ER) in an estrogen (E2)-independent manner. In the pituitary lactotrophs, both EGF and E2 stimulate prolactin (PRL) release, but the nature of interactions between ErbB and ERalpha signaling is unknown. Our objectives were to 1) characterize EGF-induced PRL release, 2) determine whether this effect requires ERalpha, and 3) determine the molecular basis for cross talk between ErbB and ERalpha signaling pathways. Using GH3 cells, a rat lactotroph cell line, we report that EGF stimulates PRL gene expression and release in a dose- and time-dependent manner. EGF caused a rapid and robust activation of Erk1/2 via ErbB1 and induced phosphorylation of S118 on ERalpha in an Erk1/2-dependent manner. The global antiestrogen ICI 182780 and the ERalpha-specific antagonist 1,3-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-methyl-5-[4-(2-piperidinylet hoxy)phenol]-1H-pyrazole dihydrochloride (MPP), but not the ERbeta-specific antagonist 4-[2-Phenyl-5,7-bis(trifluoromethyl) pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-3-yl]phenol (PHTPP), blocked the EGF-induced PRL release, indicating an ERalpha requirement. This was further supported by using ERalpha knockdown by small interfering RNA. Because the antiestrogens did not block EGF-induced Mek-1 or Erk1/2 phosphorylation, ERalpha is placed downstream from the ErbB1-activated Erk1/2. These results provide the first evidence that ErbB1-induced PRL release is ERalpha dependent.