Advocacy groups and their role in rare diseases research.

One of the remarkable and unique aspects of the recent history of rare disease research has been the evolving role of patient advocacy groups and the collaborative partnership that exists among such groups and the scientists who study rare diseases, as well as the government officials charged with overseeing medical research and regulatory processes. This collaboration, which in many respects developed out of necessity on all sides, is unparalleled in other areas of medical research and product development. It has played a significant role over the past 30 years in the adoption of public policies, available research funding and other factors affecting the general climate for research on rare diseases. Specific areas of interest include the adoption of the Orphan Drug Act in the U.S. in 1983 and subsequent similar legislation elsewhere in the world; the relationship of patient advocacy groups with government research funding and regulatory entities; the role of patient advocacy groups in seeking to "de-risk" orphan product development through initiatives such as facilitating patient registries and disease natural histories; the role of advocacy groups in ensuring that patients have access to treatments; and the increasing globalization of patient advocacy initiatives.

Clinical research for rare disease: opportunities, challenges, and solutions.

Over 7000 rare diseases, each <200,000 US residents, affect nearly 30 million people in the United States. Furthermore, for the 10% of people with a rare disease and for their families, these disorders no longer seem rare. Molecular genetics have characterized the cause of many rare diseases and provide unprecedented opportunities for identifying patients, determining phenotypes, and devising treatments to prevent, stabilize, or improve each disease. Rare disease research poses challenges to investigators requiring specific approaches to: (1) the design of clinical studies; (2) the funding of research programs; (3) the discovery, testing, and approval of new treatments, and (4) the training of clinical scientists. Rigorous, statistically-valid, natural history-controlled, cross-over, and n-of-1 trials can establish efficacy and support regulatory approval of new treatments for rare diseases. The U.S. Orphan Drug Act of the U.S. FDA has stimulated industry investment in clinical trials to develop treatments for rare diseases. For trainees interested in finding a treatment for a rare disease, a commitment to longitudinal care of patients provides a base for the characterization of phenotype and natural history, a stimulus for innovation, a target population for research and helps fund training and research. The scientific methodology, financial resources, and logistics of clinical research for rare diseases have changed dramatically in the past two decades resulting in increased understanding of the pathophysiology of these disorders and direct benefit to patients.