Vaccination of Adults With Cancer: ASCO Guideline.

PURPOSE: To guide the vaccination of adults with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies. METHODS: A systematic literature review identified systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and nonrandomized studies on the efficacy and safety of vaccines used by adults with cancer or their household contacts. This review builds on a 2013 guideline by the Infectious Disease Society of America. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 2013, to February 16, 2023. ASCO convened an Expert Panel to review the evidence and formulate recommendations. RESULTS: A total of 102 publications were included in the systematic review: 24 systematic reviews, 14 RCTs, and 64 nonrandomized studies. The largest body of evidence addressed COVID-19 vaccines. RECOMMENDATIONS: The goal of vaccination is to limit the severity of infection and prevent infection where feasible. Optimizing vaccination status should be considered a key element in the care of patients with cancer. This approach includes the documentation of vaccination status at the time of the first patient visit; timely provision of recommended vaccines; and appropriate revaccination after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, or B-cell-depleting therapy. Active interaction and coordination among healthcare providers, including primary care practitioners, pharmacists, and nursing team members, are needed. Vaccination of household contacts will enhance protection for patients with cancer. Some vaccination and revaccination plans for patients with cancer may be affected by the underlying immune status and the anticancer therapy received. As a result, vaccine strategies may differ from the vaccine recommendations for the general healthy adult population vaccine.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines.

Improved survival for dose-intensive chemotherapy in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 4,068 patients.

Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is a distinct clinicopathologic entity. Currently, there is a paucity of randomized prospective data to inform on optimal front-line chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) and use of consolidative mediastinal radiation (RT). To assess if distinct CIT approaches are associated with disparate survival outcomes, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing dose-intensive (DI-CIT) versus standard CIT for the front-line treatment of PMBCL. Standard approach (S-CIT) was defined as R-CHOP-21/CHOP-21, with or without RT. DI-CIT were defined as regimens with increased frequency, dose, and/or number of systemic agents. We reviewed data on 4,068 patients (2,517 DI-CIT; 1,551 S-CIT) with a new diagnosis of PMBCL. Overall survival for DI-CIT patients was 88% (95% CI: 85-90) compared to 80% for the S-CIT cohort (95% CI: 74-85). Meta-regression revealed an 8% overall survival (OS) benefit for the DI-CIT group (P<0.01). Survival benefit was maintained when analyzing rituximab only regimens; OS was 91% (95% CI: 89-93) for the rituximab-DI-CIT arm compared to 86% (95% CI: 82-89) for the R-CHOP-21 arm (P=0.03). Importantly, 55% (95% CI: 43-65) of the S-CIT group received RT compared to 22% (95% CI: 15-31) of DI-CIT patients (meta-regression P<0.01). To our knowledge, this is the largest meta-analysis reporting efficacy outcomes for the front-line treatment of PMBCL. DI-CIT demonstrates a survival benefit, with significantly less radiation exposure, curtailing long-term toxicities associated with radiotherapy. As we await results of randomized prospective trials, our study supports the use of dose-intensive chemoimmunotherapy for the treatment of PMBCL.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells for the treatment of a kidney transplant patient with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD).

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a potentially fatal complication following kidney transplantation, and there is a critical and unmet need for PTLD treatments associated with more pronounced and durable responses. To date, reports on the use of CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T (CAR-T) cells in patients after solid organ transplant (SOT) have been anecdotal, clinical presentations and outcomes have been heterogenous, and a longitudinal analysis of CAR-T cell expansion and persistence in PTLD patients has not been reported. Our report describes a patient with a history of renal transplant who received CD19-directed CAR-T cell therapy for the treatment of refractory PTLD, diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL)-type. We show that even with the background of prolonged immunosuppression for SOT, it is possible to generate autologous CAR-T products capable of expansion and persistence in vivo, without evidence of excess T-cell exhaustion. Our data indicate that CAR-T cells generated from a SOT recipient with PTLD can yield deep remissions without increased toxicity or renal allograft dysfunction. Future clinical studies should build on these findings to investigate CAR-T therapy, including longitudinal monitoring of CAR-T phenotype and function, for PTLD in SOT recipients.

Interferon alfa-2b in patients with low-grade lymphomatoid granulomatosis and chemotherapy with DA-EPOCH-R in patients with high-grade lymphomatoid granulomatosis: an open-label, single-centre, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Lymphomatoid granulomatosis is a rare Epstein-Barr virus-associated B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder with a median overall survival of less than 2 years. In this study, we hypothesised that low-grade lymphomatoid granulomatosis is immune-dependent and high-grade lymphomatoid granulomatosis is immune-independent. On the basis of this hypothesis, we investigated the activity and safety of new treatment with immunotherapy in patients with low-grade disease and standard chemotherapy in patients with high-grade disease. METHODS: In this open-label, single-centre, phase 2 trial, we enrolled patients aged 12 years or older with untreated, or relapsed or refractory lymphomatoid granulomatosis at the National Cancer Institute (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Patients with low-grade disease received dose-escalated interferon alfa-2b, starting at 7·5 million international units subcutaneously three times per week for up to 1 year past best response, and patients with high-grade disease received six cycles every 3 weeks of intravenous, dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab (DA-EPOCH-R). Starting doses were 50 mg/m2 per day as a continuous intravenous infusion from day 1 to day 4 (96 h) for etoposide; 60 mg/m2 twice daily by mouth from day 1 to day 5 for prednisone; 0·4 mg/m2 per day as a continuous intravenous infusion from day 1 to day 4 (96 h) for vincristine; 750 mg/m2 intravenous on day 5 for cyclophosphamide; 10 mg/m2 per day as a continuous intravenous infusion from day 1 to day 4 (96 h) for doxorubicin; and 375 mg/m2 intravenous on day 1 for rituximab. The doses of doxorubicin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide were adjusted up or down on the basis of neutrophil and platelet nadirs. Patients with residual or progressive disease after initial therapy crossed over to alternative therapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who had an overall response and the 5-year progression-free survival after initial or cross-over treatment. Analysis of response included all participants who underwent restaging imaging; safety analysis included all patients who received any dose of study drugs. The trial is open for enrolment and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00001379. FINDINGS: 67 patients were enrolled between Jan 10, 1991, and Sept 5, 2019 (42 [63%] were male). 45 patients received initial treatment with interferon alfa-2b (16 of whom crossed over to DA-EPOCH-R) and 18 received initial treatment with DA-EPOCH-R (eight of whom crossed over to interferon alfa-2b); four underwent surveillance only. After initial treatment with interferon alfa-2b, the overall response was 64% (28 of 44 evaluable patients) with 61% (27 of 44) having a complete response, whereas, after cross-over treatment with interferon alfa-2b, the overall response was 63% (five of eight evaluable patients) with 50% (four of eight) having a complete response. After initial treatment with DA-EPOCH-R, the overall response was 76% (13 of 17 evaluable patients) with 47% (eight of 17) having a complete response, whereas, after cross-over treatment with DA-EPOCH-R, the overall response was 67% (ten of 15 evaluable patients) with 47% (seven of 15) having a complete response. 5-year progression-free survival was 48·5% (95% CI 33·2-62·1) after initial treatment with interferon alfa-2b, 50·0% (15·2-77·5) after cross-over treatment with interferon alfa-2b, 25·4% (8·2-47·2) after initial treatment with DA-EPOCH-R, and 62·5% (34·9-81·1) after cross-over treatment with DA-EPOCH-R. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in patients treated with interferon alfa-2b included neutropenia (27 [53%] of 51 patients), lymphopenia (24 [47%]), and leukopenia (24 [47%]). The four most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in patients treated with DA-EPOCH-R included neutropenia (29 [88%] of 33 patients), leukopenia (28 [85%]), infection (18 [55%]), and lymphopenia (17 [52%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 13 (25%) of 51 patients receiving treatment with interferon alfa-2b and 21 (64%) of 33 patients receiving DA-EPOCH-R, with five treatment-related deaths: one thromboembolic, one infection, and one haemophagocytic syndrome with interferon alfa-2b, and one infection and one haemophagocytic syndrome with DA-EPOCH-R. INTERPRETATION: Interferon alfa-2b is efficacious for treating low-grade lymphomatoid granulomatosis and hence reducing progression to high-grade disease, whereas patients with high-grade lymphomatoid granulomatosis showed expected responses to chemotherapy. Uncontrolled immune regulation of Epstein-Barr virus is hypothesised to result in the emergence of low-grade disease after chemotherapy, for which treatment with interferon alfa-2b is efficacious. FUNDING: Intramural Research Programs of the National Cancer Institute and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health.

Toxicity and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in primary and secondary CNS lymphoma: a meta-analysis of 128 patients.

Relapsed/refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and secondary central nervous system lymphoma (SCNSL) are associated with short survival and represent an unmet need, requiring novel effective strategies. Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, effective in systemic large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), have shown responses in PCNSL and SCNSL in early reports, but with limited sample size. We, therefore, performed a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of all published data describing CAR T-cell use in PCNSL and SCNSL. This identified 128 patients with PCNSL (30) and SCNSL (98). Our primary objectives were to evaluate CAR T-cell specific toxicity (immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome [ICANS] and cytokine release syndrome [CRS]) as well as response rates in these 2 populations. Seventy percent of patients with PCNSL had CRS of any grade (13% grade 3-4) and 53% had ICANS of any grade (18% grade 3-4). Comparatively, 72% of the SCNSL cohort experienced CRS of any grade (11% grade 3-4) and 48% had ICANS of any grade (26% grade 3-4). Of the patients with PCNSL, 56% achieved a complete remission (CR) with 37% remaining in remission at 6 months. Similarly, 47% of patients with SCNSL had a CR, with 37% in remission at 6 months. In a large meta-analysis of central nervous system (CNS) lymphomas, toxicity of anti-CD19-CAR T-cell therapy was similar to that of registrational studies in systemic LBCL with no increased signal of neurotoxicity observed. Encouraging efficacy was demonstrated in patients with CNS lymphoma with no discernible differences between PCNSL and SCNSL.

Genomic profiling for clinical decision making in lymphoid neoplasms.

With the introduction of large-scale molecular profiling methods and high-throughput sequencing technologies, the genomic features of most lymphoid neoplasms have been characterized at an unprecedented scale. Although the principles for the classification and diagnosis of these disorders, founded on a multidimensional definition of disease entities, have been consolidated over the past 25 years, novel genomic data have markedly enhanced our understanding of lymphomagenesis and enriched the description of disease entities at the molecular level. Yet, the current diagnosis of lymphoid tumors is largely based on morphological assessment and immunophenotyping, with only few entities being defined by genomic criteria. This paper, which accompanies the International Consensus Classification of mature lymphoid neoplasms, will address how established assays and newly developed technologies for molecular testing already complement clinical diagnoses and provide a novel lens on disease classification. More specifically, their contributions to diagnosis refinement, risk stratification, and therapy prediction will be considered for the main categories of lymphoid neoplasms. The potential of whole-genome sequencing, circulating tumor DNA analyses, single-cell analyses, and epigenetic profiling will be discussed because these will likely become important future tools for implementing precision medicine approaches in clinical decision making for patients with lymphoid malignancies.

CAR T-cell therapy in highly aggressive B-cell lymphoma: emerging biological and clinical insights.

Recently, significant progress has been made in identifying novel therapies, beyond conventional immunochemotherapy strategies, with efficacy in B-cell lymphomas. One such approach involves targeting the CD19 antigen on B cells with autologous-derived chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) cells. This strategy is highly effective in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), as evidenced by recent regulatory approvals. Recent reports suggest that this is an effective strategy for high-grade B-cell lymphoma. The biological underpinnings of these entities and how they overlap with each other and DLBCL continue to be areas of intense investigation. Therefore, as more experience with CAR T-cell approaches is examined, it is interesting to consider how both tumor cell-specific and microenvironmental factors that define these highly aggressive subsets influence susceptibility to this approach.

Targeting The Tumor Microenvironment in Lymphomas: Emerging Biological Insights and Therapeutic Strategies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to discuss recent advances in elucidating the tumor microenvironment (TME) in B lymphomas and resultant novel therapeutic development. RECENT FINDINGS: While tumor morphology, immunophenotype, and molecular profile are established factors that predict outcome and guide therapy, the prognostic impact of infiltrating, non-tumor cells is now emerging. This is simultaneously facilitating the development of new therapies that target non-tumor cells. The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a complex ecosystem composed of infiltrating cells and byproducts, extracellular matrix, and other non-cellular tissues. In lymphomas, our current understanding of the role of the TME is principally informed by studies in B-cell lineage diseases. As we improve our understanding of lymphoma biology, the importance of the impact of the non-tumor cell microenvironment is becoming more apparent. This lays the foundation for the investigation and development of novel therapies and combination strategies that target non-tumor cells and tumor cell/non-tumor cell interactions.

Circulating tumor DNA predicts therapeutic outcome in mantle cell lymphoma.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is biologically and clinically heterogeneous and would benefit from prognostic biomarkers to guide management. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a novel prognostic biomarker in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that may have applicability in MCL. We analyzed ctDNA dynamics in previously untreated patients with MCL who received induction therapy with bortezomib and DA-EPOCH-R for 6 cycles followed by random assignment to observation or bortezomib maintenance in responding patients in a prospective phase 2 study. Most patients also underwent initial treatment window of bortezomib alone prior to induction. Serum was collected pretreatment, after the window, after cycles 1 and 2, at the end of induction, and at each follow-up visit along with restaging computed tomography scans. Next-generation sequencing was used to identify and quantify ctDNA encoding the immunoglobulin receptor sequences in serum as markers of minimal residual disease. Fifty-three patients were enrolled, with a median follow-up of 12.7 years. Patients without detectable ctDNA after 2 cycles of induction had longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with those with detectable ctDNA (median PFS, 2.7 vs 1.8 years; overall P = .005; median OS, 13.8 vs 7.4 years; overall P = .03). Notably, in vivo assessment of ctDNA dynamics during the bortezomib window was not prognostic, and there was no difference in PFS or OS with bortezomib maintenance. ctDNA monitoring after induction showed that molecular relapse preceded clinical relapse in some cases. In conclusion, interim ctDNA negativity strongly correlates with improved survival and supports the investigation of response-adapted strategies. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00114738.

Double-hit lymphoma: optimizing therapy.

Aggressive B-cell lymphoma is a heterogeneous entity with disparate outcomes based on clinical and pathological characteristics. While most tumors in this category are diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the recognition that some cases have high-grade morphology and frequently harbor MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 translocations has led to their separate categorization. These cases are now considered distinct from DLBCL and are named "high-grade B-cell lymphoma" (HGBL). Most are characterized by distinct rearrangements, but others have high-grade morphological features without these and are called HGBL-not otherwise specified. Studies have demonstrated that this group of diseases leads to poor outcomes following standard rituximab, cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone therapy; retrospective and recent single-arm, multicenter studies suggest they should be approached with dose-intense treatment platforms. As yet, this has not been validated in randomized trial settings due to the rarity of these diseases. In the relapsed and refractory setting, novel approaches such as anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells and antibodies against CD19 have demonstrated high efficacy in this subgroup. Recently, genomic studies have made much progress in investigating some of the molecular underpinnings that drive their lymphomagenesis and have paved the way for testing additional novel approaches.

Novel Biological Insights and New Developments in Management of Burkitt Lymphoma and High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma.

OPINION STATEMENT: Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is highly curable, and prompt institution of therapy is critical to achieving optimal outcomes. Although current "standard" approaches are very effective in disease eradication, treatment-related toxicity makes optimal delivery of curative therapy a challenge, especially in older and immunocompromised individuals. Reduced intensity approaches with fewer toxic complications have been the focus of some recent studies. A critical question is if they can replace "standard" approaches by maintaining high curability with improved tolerability. Additionally, new molecular insights in BL biology suggest that in the future, "targeted therapy" approaches may be feasible using small molecule inhibitors and novel strategies. Recently, a new category of aggressive lymphoma named "high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 translocations" has been recognized. This category overlaps clinically and biologically with BL and has an inferior prognosis compared to most B-cell lymphomas, and the optimal approach to its management remains, as yet, undefined. In this review, we discuss the current landscape of BL treatment including recent results with low-intensity regimens and also consider current approaches to HGBL. We also explore how recently elucidated novel biological insights in BL biology may shape future therapeutic directions including the use of novel cellular therapy approaches.

Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: Evolving Biologic Insights and Recent Therapeutic Advances.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare and clinically aggressive disease entity associated with poor survival. Though high-dose methotrexate-based immunochemotherapy approaches are effective at inducing responses, few patients experience long-term durable remissions. Recently, novel insights into the biology of this unique disease have been elucidated and have paved the way for the investigation of rational approaches such as Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibition and immunomodulation. Although these strategies can induce high response rates in PCNSL, remissions are short lived, with median progression-free survivals in the range of 6 months or less. Moving forward, understanding the mechanisms of treatment resistance with these and other novel agents is key to developing optimal combinatorial strategies. New approaches such as immune checkpoint inhibition and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy are under investigation for PCNSL and thus far demonstrate activity in anecdotal clinical experiences. Future trials should focus on investigating novel rational combinations designed to optimally target the biology of PCNSL and simultaneously investigate mechanisms of resistance leading to treatment failure.

Safety and efficacy of navitoclax, a BCL-2 and BCL-XL inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoid malignancies: results from a phase 2a study.

Navitoclax, a novel BCL-2 and BCL-XL inhibitor, demonstrated promising antitumor activity in the dose-escalation part of a phase 1/2a study (NCT00406809) in lymphoid tumors. Herein, we report the continued safety and efficacy results of the phase 2a portion. Twenty-six adult patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (n = 11, Arm A) and other relapsed/refractory lymphoid malignancies (n = 15, Arm B) were enrolled. Navitoclax administration schedule consisted of a 150-mg 7-day lead-in dose followed by 250-mg daily dosing with the option to further increase to 325 mg after 14 days if the 250-mg dose was tolerated. All patients experienced at least 1 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). Seventeen (65.4%) patients reported grade 3/4 TRAEs; thrombocytopenia (38.5%) and neutropenia (30.8%) were the most common. Two patients reported serious AEs; none were fatal (no deaths occurred within 30 days of last dose of study drug). The objective response rate (complete and partial) was 23.1% (6/26; Arm A: 9.1%, Arm B: 33.3%). Median progression-free survival and time to progression were identical: 4.9 months (95% CI: 3.0, 8.2); median overall survival: 24.8 months (95% CI could not be computed). Navitoclax monotherapy has an acceptable safety profile and meaningful clinical activity in a minority of patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoid malignancies.

Consensus Guidelines for Evaluation and Management of Pulmonary Disease in Sjögren's.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary disease is a potentially serious yet underdiagnosed complication of Sjögren's syndrome, the second most common autoimmune rheumatic disease. Approximately 16% of patients with Sjögren's demonstrate pulmonary involvement with higher mortality and lower quality of life. RESEARCH QUESTION: Clinical practice guidelines for pulmonary manifestations of Sjögren's were developed by the Sjögren's Foundation after identifying a critical need for early diagnosis and improved quality and consistency of care. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A rigorous and transparent methodology was followed according to American College of Rheumatology guidelines. The Pulmonary Topic Review Group (TRG) developed clinical questions in the PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and selected literature search parameters. Each article was reviewed by a minimum of two TRG members for eligibility and assessment of quality of evidence and strength of recommendation. Guidelines were then drafted based on available evidence, expert opinion, and clinical importance. Draft recommendations with a clinical rationale and data extraction tables were submitted to a Consensus Expert Panel for consideration and approval, with at least 75% agreement required for individual recommendations to be included in the final version. RESULTS: The literature search revealed 1,192 articles, of which 150 qualified for consideration in guideline development. Of the original 85 PICO questions posed by the TRG, 52 recommendations were generated. These were then reviewed by the Consensus Expert Panel and 52 recommendations were finalized, with a mean agreement of 97.71% (range, 79%-100%). The recommendations span topics of evaluating Sjögren's patients for pulmonary manifestations and assessing, managing, and treating upper and lower airway disease, interstitial lung disease, and lymphoproliferative disease. INTERPRETATION: Clinical practice guidelines for pulmonary manifestations in Sjögren's will improve early identification, evaluation, and uniformity of care by primary care physicians, rheumatologists, and pulmonologists. Additionally, opportunities for future research are identified.

How I treat lymphoma in pregnancy.

Lymphomas afflict all age groups of people, with certain types demonstrating a female predilection in adolescents and young adults. A proportion of lymphomas that are diagnosed in this population demographic occur in the setting of pregnancy. Most of these behave aggressively at presentation and require immediate or urgent therapy. Treatment must consider both maternal and fetal health, and management approaches are therefore influenced by gestational age at diagnosis and treatment and timing of delivery. Although there is a paucity of literature on how to treat these patients, limited retrospective reports demonstrate generally good outcomes and highlight the necessity of an experienced multidisciplinary team approach to management.

Multicenter Study of Risk-Adapted Therapy With Dose-Adjusted EPOCH-R in Adults With Untreated Burkitt Lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Burkitt lymphoma is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma curable with dose-intensive chemotherapy derived from pediatric leukemia regimens. Treatment is acutely toxic with late sequelae. We hypothesized that dose-adjusted etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, and rituximab (DA-EPOCH-R) may obviate the need for highly dose-intensive chemotherapy in adults with Burkitt lymphoma. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter risk-adapted study of DA-EPOCH-R in untreated adult Burkitt lymphoma. Low-risk patients received three cycles without CNS prophylaxis, and high-risk patients received six cycles with intrathecal CNS prophylaxis or extended intrathecal treatment if leptomeninges were involved. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS), and secondary endpoints were toxicity and predictors of EFS and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2017, 113 patients were enrolled across 22 centers, and 98 (87%) were high risk. The median age was 49 (range, 18-86) years, and 62% were ≥ 40 years. Bone marrow and/or CSF was involved in 29 (26%) of patients, and 28 (25%) were HIV positive. At a median follow-up of 58.7 months, EFS and OS were 84.5% and 87.0%, respectively, and EFS was 100% and 82.1% in low- and high-risk patients. Therapy was equally effective across age groups, HIV status, and International Prognostic Index risk groups. Involvement of the CSF identified the group at greatest risk for early toxicity-related death or treatment failure. Five treatment-related deaths (4%) occurred during therapy. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 16% of cycles, and tumor lysis syndrome was rare. CONCLUSION: Risk-adapted DA-EPOCH-R therapy is effective in adult Burkitt lymphoma regardless of age or HIV status and was well tolerated. Improved therapeutic strategies for adults with CSF involvement are needed (funded by the National Cancer Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01092182).