The Effect of Body Mass Index on the Creation of an End-Colostomy in Rectal Cancer Patients.

With the increasing prevalence of obesity, there has been a parallel increase in the incidence of rectal cancer. The association of body mass index (BMI) and end-colostomy creation versus primary anastomosis in patients undergoing proctectomy for rectal cancer has not been described. This is a retrospective study of patients with rectal cancer from 2012 to 2018 using data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project. 16,446 (92.1%) underwent primary anastomosis and 1,418 (7.9%) underwent creation of an end-colostomy. Patients with a BMI of 25-29.9 (overweight) comprised the most frequent group to have a proctectomy (reference group), but the least likely to have an end-colostomy. Patients with severe obesity (BMI 50+) had an adjusted odds ratio for end-colostomy of 2.7 (95% CI 1.5-4.7) compared to the reference group. Patients who have severe obesity should be counseled regarding the likelihood of an end-colostomy and may benefit from medical weight management or weight-loss surgery.

An analysis of sexual dimorphism in the tumor microenvironment of colorectal cancer.

Women with colorectal cancer (CRC) have survival advantages over men, yet the underlying mechanisms are unclear. T cell infiltration within the CRC tumor microenvironment (TME) correlates strongly with survival. We hypothesized that women with CRC have increased T cell infiltration and differential gene expression in the TME compared to men. Tissue microarrays comprising primary tumor, tumor infiltrated lymph nodes, and uninvolved colon were created from CRC patients. Proportions of CD4 positive (CD4+) and CD8 positive (CD8+) T cells were identified using immunohistochemistry. TME immune- and cancer-related genetic expression from primary and metastatic CRC tumor were also evaluated via the NanoStringIO360 panel and The Cancer Genome Atlas Project database. CD4+ was higher in tumor samples from women compared to men (22.04% vs. 10.26%, p=0.002) and also in lymph node samples (39.54% vs. 8.56%, p=0.001). CD8+ was increased in uninvolved colon from women compared to men (59.40% vs. 43.61%, p=0.015), and in stage I/II tumors compared to III/IV in all patients (37.01% vs. 23.91%, p=0.009). Top CD8+ tertile patients survived longer compared to the bottom (43.9 months vs. 25.3 months, p=0.007). Differential gene expression was observed in pathways related to Treg function, T cell activity, and T cell exhaustion, amongst several others, in women compared to men. Thus, significant sexual dimorphism exists in the TME that could contribute to survival advantages observed in female patients with CRC.

A novel approach to assessing technical competence of colorectal surgery residents: the development and evaluation of the Colorectal Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (COSATS).

OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate an objective method of technical skills assessment for graduating subspecialists in colorectal (CR) surgery-the Colorectal Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (COSATS). BACKGROUND: It may be reasonable for the public to assume that surgeons certified as competent have had their technical skills assessed. However, technical skill, despite being the hallmark of a surgeon, is not directly assessed at the time of certification by surgical boards. METHODS: A procedure-based, multistation technical skills examination was developed to reflect a sample of the range of skills necessary for CR surgical practice. These consisted of bench, virtual reality, and cadaveric models. Reliability and construct validity were evaluated by comparing 10 graduating CR residents with 10 graduating general surgery (GS) residents from across North America. Expert CR surgeons, blinded to level of training, evaluated performance using a task-specific checklist and a global rating scale. The mean global rating score was used as the overall examination score and a passing score was set at "borderline competent for CR practice." RESULTS: The global rating scale demonstrated acceptable interstation reliability (0.69) for a homogeneous group of examinees. Both the overall checklist and global rating scores effectively discriminated between CR and GS residents (P < 0.01), with 27% of the variance attributed to level of training. Nine CR residents but only 3 GS residents were deemed competent. CONCLUSIONS: The Colorectal Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill effectively discriminated between CR and GS residents. With further validation, the Colorectal Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill could be incorporated into the colorectal board examination where it would be the first attempt of a surgical specialty to formally assess technical skill at the time of certification.

Rectocele in children: a case report.

Rectocele is an abnormal protrusion of the anterior wall of the rectum into the vagina. When symptomatic, it will typically cause obstructed defecation. It is almost exclusively found in females with rare reports in males and never been described in the literature in children younger than 18 years of age so far. We are presenting 3 cases of rectocele with obstructed defecation in the pediatric population. These children presented with the complaints of constipation along with refractory straining. They were diagnosed by defecography. Two were treated surgically and one conservatively. Surgical intervention completely cured the problem with uneventful postoperative course. Further multicenter studies with the aid of radiologic studies on children with "hard to treat" constipation should be considered to better define that disorder in the pediatric age group. A more vigilant approach may have implications in the prevention of more severe rectal and uterovaginal prolapse in the future.

Practice parameters for the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis.

The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons is dedicated to assuring high-quality patient care by advancing the science, prevention, and management of disorders and diseases of the colon, rectum, and anus. The Standards Committee is composed of Society members who are chosen because they have demonstrated expertise in the specialty of colon and rectal surgery. This committee was created to lead international efforts in defining quality care for conditions related to the colon, rectum, and anus. This is accompanied by developing Clinical Practice Guidelines based on the best available evidence. These guidelines are inclusive, and not prescriptive. Their purpose is to provide information on which decisions can be made, rather than dictate a specific form of treatment. These guidelines are intended for the use of all practitioners, health care workers, and patients who desire information about the management of the conditions addressed by the topics covered in these guidelines. It should be recognized that these guidelines should not be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care or exclusive of methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure must be made by the physician in light of all of the circumstances presented by the individual patient.