Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Neuropsychopharmacology ; 34(8): 1885-903, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19339966

ABSTRACT

The neurosteroid pregnenolone and its sulfated derivative enhance learning and memory in rodents. Pregnenolone sulfate also positively modulates NMDA receptors and could thus ameliorate hypothesized NMDA receptor hypofunction in schizophrenia. Furthermore, clozapine increases pregnenolone in rodent hippocampus, possibly contributing to its superior efficacy. We therefore investigated adjunctive pregnenolone for cognitive and negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder receiving stable doses of second-generation antipsychotics in a pilot randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Following a 2-week single-blind placebo lead-in, patients were randomized to pregnenolone (fixed escalating doses to 500 mg/day) or placebo, for 8 weeks. Primary end points were changes in BACS and MCCB composite and total SANS scores. Of 21 patients randomized, 18 completed at least 4 weeks of treatment (n=9/group). Pregnenolone was well tolerated. Patients receiving pregnenolone demonstrated significantly greater improvements in SANS scores (mean change=10.38) compared with patients receiving placebo (mean change=2.33), p=0.048. Mean composite changes in BACS and MCCB scores were not significantly different in patients randomized to pregnenolone compared with placebo. However, serum pregnenolone increases predicted BACS composite scores at 8 weeks in the pregnenolone group (r(s)=0.81, p=0.022). Increases in allopregnanolone, a GABAergic pregnenolone metabolite, also predicted BACS composite scores (r(s)=0.74, p=0.046). In addition, baseline pregnenolone (r(s)=-0.76, p=0.037), pregnenolone sulfate (r(s)=-0.83, p=0.015), and allopregnanolone levels (r(s)=-0.83, p=0.015) were inversely correlated with improvements in MCCB composite scores, further supporting a possible role for neurosteroids in cognition. Mean BACS and MCCB composite scores were correlated (r(s)=0.74, p<0.0001). Pregnenolone may be a promising therapeutic agent for negative symptoms and merits further investigation for cognitive symptoms in schizophrenia.


Subject(s)
Cognition Disorders/drug therapy , Nootropic Agents/administration & dosage , Pregnenolone/administration & dosage , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Brain/drug effects , Brain/metabolism , Brain/physiopathology , Brain Chemistry/drug effects , Brain Chemistry/physiology , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Cognition Disorders/metabolism , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Memory Disorders/drug therapy , Memory Disorders/etiology , Memory Disorders/metabolism , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Nootropic Agents/blood , Pilot Projects , Placebos , Pregnanolone/blood , Pregnenolone/blood , Schizophrenia/complications , Schizophrenia/metabolism , Treatment Outcome , Up-Regulation/drug effects , Up-Regulation/physiology
2.
J Am Chem Soc ; 130(49): 16770-7, 2008 Dec 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19049468

ABSTRACT

Chalcopyrite copper indium sulfide (CuInS2) and copper indium gallium selenide (Cu(InxGa(1-x))-Se2; CIGS) nanocrystals ranging from approximately 5 to approximately 25 nm in diameter were synthesized by arrested precipitation in solution. The In/Ga ratio in the CIGS nanocrystals could be controlled by varying the In/Ga reactant ratio in the reaction, and the optical properties of the CulnS2 and CIGS nanocrystals correspond to those of the respective bulk materials. Using methods developed to produce uniform, crack-free micrometer-thick films, CulnSe2 nanocrystals were tested in prototype photovoltaic devices. As a proof-of-concept, the nanocrystal-based devices exhibited a reproducible photovoltaic response.

3.
JAMA ; 290(20): 2693-702, 2003 Nov 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14645311

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Although olanzapine has been widely adopted as a treatment of choice for schizophrenia, its long-term effectiveness and costs have not been evaluated in a controlled trial in comparison with a standard antipsychotic drug. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and cost impact of olanzapine compared with haloperidol in the treatment of schizophrenia. DESIGN AND SETTING: Double-blind, randomized controlled trial with randomization conducted between June 1998 and June 2000 at 17 US Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred nine patients with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, serious symptoms, and serious dysfunction for the previous 2 years. Fifty-nine percent fully completed and 36% partially completed follow-up assessments. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive flexibly dosed olanzapine, 5 to 20 mg/d, with prophylactic benztropine, 1 to 4 mg/d (n = 159); or haloperidol, 5 to 20 mg/d (n = 150), for 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Standardized measures of symptoms, quality of life, neurocognitive status, and adverse effects of medication. Veterans Affairs administrative data and interviews concerning non-VA service use were used to estimate costs from the perspective of the VA health care system and society as a whole (ie, consumption of all resources on behalf of these patients). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups in study retention; positive, negative, or total symptoms of schizophrenia; quality of life; or extrapyramidal symptoms. Olanzapine was associated with reduced akathisia in the intention-to-treat analysis (P<.001) and with lower symptoms of tardive dyskinesia in a secondary analysis including only observations during blinded treatment with study drug. Small but significant advantages were also observed on measures of memory and motor function. Olanzapine was also associated with more frequent reports of weight gain and significantly greater VA costs, ranging from 3000 dollars to 9000 dollars annually. Differences in societal costs were somewhat smaller and were not significant. CONCLUSION: Olanzapine does not demonstrate advantages compared with haloperidol (in combination with prophylactic benztropine) in compliance, symptoms, extrapyramidal symptoms, or overall quality of life, and its benefits in reducing akathisia and improving cognition must be balanced with the problems of weight gain and higher cost.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/economics , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Haloperidol/economics , Haloperidol/therapeutic use , Pirenzepine/analogs & derivatives , Pirenzepine/economics , Pirenzepine/therapeutic use , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenia/economics , Adult , Akathisia, Drug-Induced , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Benzodiazepines , Benztropine/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Female , Haloperidol/adverse effects , Health Care Costs , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscarinic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Neuropsychological Tests , Olanzapine , Pirenzepine/adverse effects , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...