Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Clin Neuropsychol ; 36(2): 503-522, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34233577

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Abundant evidence documents stereotype threat's (ST) detrimental effect on test performance across identities and contexts (i.e., eliciting underperformance). Review of the literature shows varied aspects of both stereotyped identities and cognition are inconsistently explored across studies. Only a portion of the literature focuses on ST's impact on Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC). It is important to understand and learn to mitigate ST, particularly for historically marginalized and systemically oppressed BIPOC patients. Relevance exists for neuropsychologists, who engage in activities (i.e., assessments) that may activate ST, and should be aware of additional factors impacting testing results and clinical decision making. METHOD: Using scoping review criteria (Peters et al., 2015) and Preferred Reporting Item for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, we reviewed literature across multiple databases (Google Scholar, PubMed, PsychINFO) on ST and cognition with a focus on BIPOC. RESULTS: The current literature suggests that race-based ST may be implicated in underperformance for executive functioning and separately working memory. There is limited research on the effects of ST for memory, language, attention, and visuospatial skills. CONCLUSION: Research on ST requires additional attention to establish interventions to mitigate negative effects in practice. These results provide 1) an overview of the cognitive implications of ST, 2) address the scope of this impact for BIPOC, and 3) provide possible intervention and training strategies for neuropsychologists and other clinicians to work to mitigate the effects of ST on BIPOC.


Subject(s)
Neuropsychology , Stereotyping , Cognition/physiology , Humans , Learning , Neuropsychological Tests
2.
Zoo Biol ; 38(6): 498-507, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31517405

ABSTRACT

The use of radio frequency identification (RFID) technology is common in animal-monitoring applications in the wild and in zoological and agricultural settings. RFID is used to track animals and to collect information about movements and other behaviors, as well as to automate or improve husbandry. Disney's Animal Kingdom® uses passive RFID technology to monitor nest usage by a breeding colony of northern carmine bee-eaters. We implemented RFID technologies in various equipment configurations, initially deploying low-frequency (LF) 125 kHz RFID and later changing to high-frequency (HF) 13.56 MHz RFID technology, to monitor breeding behavior in the flock. We installed antennas connected to RFID readers at the entrances of nest tunnels to detect RFID transponders attached to leg bands as birds entered and exited tunnels. Both LF-RFID and HF-RFID systems allowed the characterization of nest visitation, including the timing of nest activity, breeding pair formation, identification of egg-laying females, participation by nonresidents, and detection of nest disruptions. However, we collected a substantially larger volume of data using the increased bandwidth and polling speed inherent with HF-RFID, which permitted tag capture of multiple birds simultaneously and resulted in fewer missed nest visits in comparison to LF-RFID. Herein, we describe the evolution of the RFID setups used to monitor nest usage for more than 7 years, the types of data that can be gained using RFID at nests, and how we used these data to gain insights into carmine bee-eater breeding behavior and improve husbandry.


Subject(s)
Birds/physiology , Monitoring, Physiologic/veterinary , Nesting Behavior/physiology , Radio Frequency Identification Device , Telemetry , Animals , Animals, Zoo , Monitoring, Physiologic/instrumentation , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods
3.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 41(2): 115-120, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26523442

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify differences in terms of quality of life, the American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA), or adverse events (AEs) among patients with prostate cancer treated with either standard fractionation or hypofractionation proton-beam therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were prospectively randomized to receive 38 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in 5 treatments (n=49) or 79.2 Gy RBE in 44 treatments (n=33). All patients had low-risk prostate cancer and were treated with proton therapy using fiducial markers and daily image guidance. RESULTS: Median follow-up for both groups was 18 months; 33 patients had follow-up of 2 years or longer. Baseline median (range) AUA was 4.7 (0 to 13) for the 38 Gy RBE arm and 4.8 (0 to 17) for the 79.2 Gy RBE arm. We observed no difference between the groups regarding the Expanded Prostate Index Composite urinary, bowel, or sexual function scores at 3, 6, 12, 18, or 24 months after treatment. The only significant difference was the AUA score at 12 months (8 for the 38 Gy RBE arm vs. 5 for the 79.2 Gy RBE arm; P=0.04); AUA scores otherwise were similar between groups. No grade 3 or higher AEs occurred in either arm. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with proton therapy in this randomized trial tolerated treatment well, with excellent quality-of-life scores, persistent low AUA, and no grade 3 or higher AEs on either arm. We showed no apparent clinical difference in outcomes with hypofractionated proton-beam therapy compared with standard fractionation on the basis of this interim analysis.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Proton Therapy/methods , Radiation Dose Hypofractionation , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Aged , Disease-Free Survival , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Proton Therapy/adverse effects , Radiation Tolerance , Risk Assessment , Survival Analysis , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States
4.
J Med Radiat Sci ; 64(1): 18-24, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27741379

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric and radiobiological impact of intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and RapidArc planning for high-risk prostate cancer with seminal vesicles. METHODS: Ten high-risk prostate cancer cases were included in this retrospective study. For each case, IMPT plans were generated using multiple field optimisation (MFO) technique (two fields) with XiO treatment planning system (TPS), whereas RapidArc plans were generated using double-arc technique (two full arcs) with Eclipse TPS. IMPT and RapidArc plans were optimised for a total prescription dose of 79.2 Gy (relative biological effectiveness (RBE)) and 79.2 Gy, respectively, using identical dose-volume constraints. IMPT and RapidArc plans were then normalised such that at least 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) received the prescription dose. RESULTS: The mean and maximum PTV doses were comparable in IMPT plans (80.1 ± 0.3 Gy (RBE) and 82.6 ± 1.0 Gy (RBE) respectively) and RapidArc plans (80.3 ± 0.3 Gy and 82.8 ± 0.6 Gy respectively) with P = 0.088 and P = 0.499 respectively. The mean doses of the rectum and bladder were found to be significantly lower in IMPT plans (16.9 ± 5.8 Gy (RBE) and 17.5 ± 5.4 Gy (RBE) respectively) when compared to RapidArc plans (41.9 ± 5.7 Gy and 32.5 ± 7.8 Gy respectively) with P < 0.000 and P < 0.000 respectively. For the rectum, IMPT produced lower V30 (21.0 ± 9.6% vs. 68.5 ± 10.0%; P < 0.000), V50 (14.3 ± 5.8% vs. 45.0 ± 10.0%; P < 0.000) and V70 (6.9 ± 3.4% vs. 12.8 ± 3.6%; P < 0.000) compared to RapidArc. For the bladder, IMPT produced lower V30 (23.2 ± 7.0% vs. 50.9 ± 15.6%; P < 0.000) and V50 (16.6 ± 5.4% vs. 25.1 ± 9.6%; P = 0.001), but similar V70 (9.7 ± 3.5% vs. 10.5 ± 4.2%; P = 0.111) compared to RapidArc. RapidArc produced lower mean dose for both the right femoral head (19.5 ± 4.2 Gy vs. 27.4 ± 4.5 Gy (RBE); P < 0.000) and left femoral head (18.0 ± 4.3 Gy vs. 28.0 ± 5.6 Gy (RBE); P < 0.000). Both IMPT and RapidArc produced comparable bladder normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) (0.6 ± 0.2% vs. 0.5 ± 0.2%; P = 0.152). The rectal NTCP was found to be lower using IMPT (0.8 ± 0.7%) than using RapidArc (1.7 ± 0.7%) with P < 0.000. CONCLUSION: Both IMPT and RapidArc techniques provided comparable mean and maximum PTV doses. For the rectum, IMPT produced better dosimetric results in the low-, medium- and high-dose regions and lower NTCP compared to RapidArc. For the bladder, the NTCP and dosimetric results in the high-dose region were comparable in both sets of plans, whereas IMPT produced better dosimetric results in the low- and medium-dose regions.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Proton Therapy/adverse effects , Proton Therapy/methods , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Seminal Vesicles/radiation effects , Humans , Male , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Probability , Radiometry , Rectum/radiation effects , Retrospective Studies , Risk , Urinary Bladder/radiation effects
5.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother ; 21(3): 207-12, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27601952

ABSTRACT

AIM: This interim analysis evaluated changes in quality of life (QOL), American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA), or adverse events (AEs) among prostate cancer patients treated with hypofractionation. BACKGROUND: Results for hypofractionated prostate cancer with photon therapy are encouraging. No prior trial addresses the role of proton therapy in this clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients with low-risk prostate cancer received 38-Gy relative biologic effectiveness in 5 treatments. They received proton therapy at 2 fields a day, magnetic resonance imaging registration, rectal balloon, and fiducial markers for guidance pre-beam. We evaluated AEs, Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC) domains, and AUA at pretreatment and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. An AUA change >5 points and QOL change of half a standard deviation (SD) defined clinical significance. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 18 months; 17 patients reached follow-up of ≥24 months. For urinary function, statistically and clinically significant change was not seen (maximum change, 3). EPIC urinary QOL scores did not show statistically and clinically significant change at any end point (maximum, 0.45 SD). EPIC bowel QOL scores showed small but statistically and clinically significant change at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months (SD range, 0.52-0.62). EPIC sexual scores showed small but statistically and clinically significant change at 24 months (SD, 0.52). No AE grade ≥3 was seen. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with hypofractionated proton therapy tolerated treatment well, with excellent QOL scores, persistently low AUA, and no AE grade ≥3.

7.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 95(1): 353-359, 2016 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27084652

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We evaluated sparing of normal structures using 3-dimensional (3D) treatment planning for proton therapy of ocular melanomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We evaluated 26 consecutive patients with choroidal melanomas on a prospective registry. Ophthalmologic work-up included fundoscopic photographs, fluorescein angiography, ultrasonographic evaluation of tumor dimensions, and magnetic resonance imaging of orbits. Three tantalum clips were placed as fiducial markers to confirm eye position for treatment. Macula, fovea, optic disc, optic nerve, ciliary body, lacrimal gland, lens, and gross tumor volume were contoured on treatment planning compute tomography scans. 3D treatment planning was performed using noncoplanar field arrangements. Patients were typically treated with 3 fields, with at least 95% of planning target volume receiving 50 GyRBE in 5 fractions. RESULTS: Tumor stage was T1a in 10 patients, T2a in 10 patients, T2b in 1 patient, T3a in 2 patients, T3b in 1 patient, and T4a in 2 patients. Acute toxicity was mild. All patients completed treatment as planned. Mean optic nerve dose was 10.1 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE). Ciliary body doses were higher for nasal (mean: 11.4 GyRBE) than temporal tumors (5.8 GyRBE). Median follow-up was 31 months (range: 18-40 months). Six patients developed changes which required intraocular bevacizumab or corticosteroid therapy, but only 1 patient developed neovascular glaucoma. Five patients have since died: 1 from metastatic disease and 4 from other causes. Two patients have since required enucleation: 1 due to tumor and 1 due to neovascular glaucoma. CONCLUSIONS: 3D treatment planning can be used to obtain appropriate coverage of choroidal melanomas. This technique is feasible with relatively low doses to anterior structures, and appears to have acceptable rates of local control with low risk of enucleation. Further evaluation and follow-up is needed to determine optimal dose-volume relationships for organs at risk to decrease complications rates.


Subject(s)
Choroid Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Melanoma/radiotherapy , Organ Sparing Treatments/methods , Proton Therapy/methods , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Choroid Neoplasms/pathology , Eye Enucleation , Feasibility Studies , Female , Fiducial Markers , Follow-Up Studies , Glaucoma, Neovascular/prevention & control , Humans , Male , Melanoma/pathology , Middle Aged , Optic Disk/radiation effects , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Proton Therapy/adverse effects , Radiotherapy Dosage , Relative Biological Effectiveness , Time Factors , Visual Acuity/radiation effects
8.
Virus Res ; 167(1): 26-33, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22484152

ABSTRACT

Alphaviruses are enveloped, single-stranded positive sense RNA viruses that are transmitted by an arthropod vector to a wide host range, including avian and mammalian species. Arthropods and vertebrates have different cellular environments and this may cause the different cellular pathologies that are observed between the invertebrate vector and vertebrate hosts in both whole organisms and cultured cell lines. In this report, we used Sindbis virus and examined mosquito and mammalian cell lines for their ability to produce progeny virus particles. Total particles produced, viral titers, and overall infectivity (or the ratio of total particles-to-infectious particles) was investigated. Our results show (1) Sindbis infectivity is more a function of the host cell used in titering the virus rather than the cell line used to produce the virus, (2) the number of total and infectious particles produced is cell line dependent, and (3) the infectivity of released virus particles improves during the course of infection in both cells that have cytolytic infections and persistent infections.


Subject(s)
Culicidae/virology , Mammals/virology , Sindbis Virus/physiology , Virus Replication , Alphavirus Infections/virology , Animals , Cell Line , Culicidae/cytology , Humans , Sindbis Virus/genetics , Sindbis Virus/growth & development
9.
Spine J ; 10(9): 789-94, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20619749

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: After spinal fusion surgery, postoperative management often includes imaging with either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess the spinal canal and nerve roots. The metallic implants used in the fusion can cause artifact that interferes with this imaging, reducing their diagnostic value. Stainless steel is known to produce large amounts of artifact, whereas titanium is known to produce significantly less. Other alloys such as vitallium are now being used in spinal implants, but their comparison to titanium and stainless steel has not been well documented in the orthopedic literature. Titanium is a desirable metal because of its light weight and lower production of artifact on imaging, although it is not as stiff as stainless steel. Vitallium is proposed as a replacement for titanium because it has stiffness similar to stainless steel, while still being as light as titanium. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the amount of artifact produced on MRI and CT by three types of spinal implants: stainless steel, titanium, and vitallium. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective experimental design was used to compare three types of spinal implants used in posterior spinal fusion surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: The resulting images were evaluated by a radiologist to measure the amount of artifact (in millimeters) and by an orthopedic surgeon to assess the diagnostic quality (on a Likert scale). METHODS: A porcine torso was used for repeated MRI and CT scans before and after implantation with pedicle screws and rods made of the three metals being studied. RESULTS: Images produced after the insertion of vitallium rods and titanium screws as well as those with titanium rods and screws were found to have less artifact and a better overall diagnostic quality than those produced with stainless steel implants. Overall, there was not a difference between the amount of artifact in the spinal images with vitallium and titanium rods, with the exception of a few trials that showed small but statistically significant differences between the two metals, where titanium had slightly better images. CONCLUSIONS: If vitallium rods are used in posterior spinal surgery in place of implants made of titanium or stainless steel, any postoperative imaging of the spine using MRI or CT should have amounts of artifact that are similar to titanium and better than stainless steel.


Subject(s)
Artifacts , Internal Fixators , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Spinal Fusion/instrumentation , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Animals , Stainless Steel , Swine , Titanium , Vitallium
10.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 31(24): E911-5; discussion E916, 2006 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17108820

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Diagnostic testing. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to measure the accuracy and reliability of the Orthoscan (Orthoscan Technologies, Inc.) and to determine whether it can be substituted for radiographs in the surveillance of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: AIS is usually followed using scoliosis radiographs, which offer the most reliable way to quantify the curve, but carry the risk of exposure to ionizing radiation. The Orthoscan is a nonradiographic topographic method for measuring spinal curves. MATERIALS AND METHODS: There were 5 phases of this study that measured: the accuracy and reliability of the machine when used with a plastic model; the variability with a real patient; the intraobserver variability; the correlation between the measurements of the machine and that of the radiograph; and the correlation between the change in radiograph measurement over time and the change in Orthoscan measurement over time. RESULTS: In measurement of a static plastic model, the machine measured curves with a standard deviation of +/-1 degrees in trunk rotation and +/-2 degrees in curve measurement. Error increased with a real patient. Thirty-six comparisons in the thoracic spine, and 19 comparisons in the lumbar spine, were made between measurements using the Orthoscan and radiographs. Mean curves in the 2 groups were not significantly different and had poor-to-moderate correlation. Longitudinal evaluation included 47 curves in 28 patients. The Orthoscan predicted the radiograph change within an acceptable range 55.3% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: The Orthoscan does not accurately predict the scoliosis curve magnitude or the overall change in curve over time. While analysis in groups of patients using this technique reveals group means that begin to look acceptable, if the variability is too great, then this technology is not yet ready to replace the radiograph in the evaluation of a scoliosis curve.


Subject(s)
Anthropometry/instrumentation , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/instrumentation , Scoliosis/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Anthropometry/methods , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Kyphosis/diagnosis , Kyphosis/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/pathology , Models, Anatomic , Predictive Value of Tests , Radiography , Reproducibility of Results , Rotation , Scoliosis/diagnostic imaging , Thoracic Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Thoracic Vertebrae/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...