Key factors associated with malaria infection among patients seeking care through the public sector in endemic townships of Ayeyarwady Region, Myanmar.

BACKGROUND: Ayeyarwady Region in Myanmar has made significant progress towards malaria elimination, with cases decreasing from 12,312 in 2015 to 122 in 2019. As transmission declines, malaria becomes increasingly focalized both in geographic hotspots and among population groups sharing certain risk factors. Developing a thorough profile of high-risk activities associated with malaria infections is critical to ensure intervention approaches are evidence-based. METHODS: A test-negative study was conducted from September 2017 to May 2018 in Ngaputaw, Pathein and Thabaung townships in Ayeyarwady Region. Patients that presented to selected public facilities or community health volunteers with fever answered survey questions on demographic and behavioural risk factors, including exposure to malaria interventions, and were assigned to case and control groups based on the result of a malaria rapid diagnostic test. A random-effects logistic regression model adjusted for clustering at the facility level, as well as any variables along the causal pathway described by a directed acyclic graph, was used to determine odds ratios and association with malaria infections. RESULTS: A total of 119 cases and 1744 controls were recruited from 41 public facilities, with a mean age of 31.3 and 63.7% male. Higher risk groups were identified as males (aOR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.9) and those with a worksite located within the forest (aOR 2.8, 95% CI 1.4-5.3), specifically working in the logging (aOR 2.7, 95% CI 1.5-4.6) and rubber plantation (aOR 3.0, 95% CI 1.4-6.8) industries. Additionally, links between forest travel and malaria were observed, with risk factors identified to be sleeping in the forest within the past month (aOR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-6.3), and extended forest travel with durations from 3 to 14 days (aOR 8.6, 95% CI 3.5-21.4) or longer periods (aOR 8.4, 95% CI 3.2-21.6). CONCLUSION: Malaria transmission is highly focalized in Ayeyarwady, and results illustrate the need to target interventions to the most at-risk populations of working males and forest goers. It will become increasingly necessary to ensure full intervention coverage of at-risk populations active in forested areas as Myanmar moves closer to malaria elimination goals.

Factors associated with the decline of malaria in Myanmar's Ayeyarwady Region between 2013 and 2017.

The burden of malaria in Myanmar has declined rapidly in recent years; cases decreased from 333,871 in 2013 to 85,019 in 2017 (75% decrease). Decline of malaria in the Ayeyarwady Region of Myanmar reflects this trend with an 86% decrease in cases over this period. In this exploratory analysis, quantitative and qualitative information were assessed to explore potential factors responsible for the decline of malaria in Ayeyarwady. Data on malaria incidence, programmatic financing, surveillance, case management, vector control interventions, climate and ecological factors, and policies and guidelines spanning 2013 to 2017 were compiled. Poisson regression models that adjust for correlation were used to analyze the association between annual malaria case numbers with malaria intervention factors at the township level. Between 2013 and 2017, there was a decrease in mean township-level malaria incidence per 1000 from 3.03 (SD 4.59) to 0.34 (SD 0.79); this decline coincided with the implementation of the government's multi-pronged malaria elimination strategy, an increase of approximately 50.8 million USD in malaria funding nationally, and a period of deforestation in the region. Increased funding in Ayeyarwady was invested in interventions associated with the decline in caseload, and the important roles of surveillance and case management should be maintained while Myanmar works towards malaria elimination.

Sorting through the lost and found: are patient perceptions of engagement in care consistent with standard continuum of care measures?

BACKGROUND: Indicators for determining one's status on the HIV care continuum are often measured using clinical and surveillance data but do not typically assess patient perspectives. We assessed patient-reported care status along the care continuum and whether it differed from medical records and surveillance data. METHODS: Between June 2013 and October 2014, a convenience sample of clinic-attending HIV-infected persons was surveyed regarding care-seeking behaviors and self-perceived status along the care continuum. Participant responses were matched to DC Department of Health surveillance data and clinic records. Participants' care patterns were classified using Health Resources Services Administration-defined care status: in care (IC), sporadic care (SC), or out of care (OOC). Semistructured qualitative interviews were analyzed using an open coding process to elucidate relevant themes regarding participants' perceptions of engagement in care. RESULTS: Of 169 participants, most were male participants (64%) and black (72%), with a mean age of 50.7 years. Using self-reported visit patterns, 115 participants (68%) were consistent with being IC, 33 (20%) SC, and 21 (12%) OOC. Among OOC participants, 52% perceived themselves to be fully engaged in HIV care. In the previous year, among OOC participants, 71% reported having a non-HIV-related medical visit and 90% reported current antiretroviral use. Qualitatively, most SC and OOC persons did not see their HIV providers regularly because they felt healthy. CONCLUSIONS: Participants' perceptions of HIV care engagement differed from actual care receipt as measured by surveillance and clinical records. Measures of care engagement may need to be reconsidered as persons not receiving regular HIV care maybe accessing other health care and HIV medications elsewhere.