Prognostic Factors of Mandibular Osteoradionecrosis Including Accurate Colocalization of Avulsions and Dosimetric Dental Mapping Software, a Case-control Study.

PURPOSE: Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the mandible remains a significant complication in the intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) era. Dental dose cannot be predicted from heterogeneous IMRT dose distributions; mandibular dose metrics cannot guide dentist avulsion decisions in high-risk ORN situations. Using a mapping tool to report dental root dose, avulsions, and ORN sites, we re-examined ORN risk factors in a case-control study. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2008 to 2019, 897 consecutive patients with oral cavity/oropharynx or unknown primary cancer undergoing IMRT were analyzed to identify ORN cases. These were matched (1 ORN/2 controls) retrospectively for tumor location, surgery, and tobacco consumption in a monocentric case-control study. Univariate and multivariate analyses integrated ORN factors and accurate dental dose data (grouped into 4 mandibular sectors). Generalizability was investigated in a simulated population database. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients were included. The median follow-up was 5.2 and 4.5 years in the ORN and control groups, respectively. The median time to ORN was 12 months. In univariate analysis, post-IMRT avulsions at the ORN site (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.5-8.9; P = .005), tumor laterality (HR, 4.4; 95% CI, = 1.4-14, P = .01), mean mandibular dose (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, = 1.01-1.1; P = .018) and mean dose to the ORN site (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, = 1.1-1.2; P < .001) correlated with higher ORN risk. In multivariate analysis, mean dose to the ORN site (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, = 1.1-1.2; P < .001) and post-IMRT avulsions at the ORN site (HR, 4.6; 95% CI, = 1.5-14.7; P = .009) were associated with ORN. For each increase in gray in dental dose, the ORN risk increased by 12%. Simulations confirmed study observations. CONCLUSIONS: Dental dose and avulsions are associated with ORN, with a 12% increase in risk with each additional gray. Accurate dose information can help dentists in their decisions after IMRT.

Bioactive materials in endodontics.

Endodontic treatment in dentistry is a delicate procedure and many treatment attempts fail. Despite constant development of new root canal filling techniques, the clinician is confronted with both a complex root canal system and the use of filling materials that are harmful for periapical tissues. This paper evaluates reported studies on biomaterials used in endodontics, including calcium hydroxide, mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium phosphate ceramics and calcium phosphate cements. Special emphasis is made on promising new biomaterials, such as injectable bone substitute and injectable calcium phosphate cements. These materials, which combine biocompatibility, bioactivity and rheological properties, could be good alternatives in endodontics as root canal fillers. They could also be used as drug-delivery vehicles (e.g., for antibiotics and growth factors) or as scaffolds in pulp tissue engineering.