Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Br J Dermatol ; 171(6): 1375-85, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24860919

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Occupational allergic contact dermatitis (OACD) is one of the most common occupational skin diseases in developed countries, but data about its temporal trends in incidence remain sparse. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to describe OACD trends in terms of industrial activities and main causal agents in France over the period 2001-2010. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from the French National Network of Occupational Disease Vigilance and Prevention (RNV3P, Réseau National de Vigilance et de Prévention des Pathologies Professionnelles). All OACD considered probably or certainly associated with an occupational exposure were included in the study. Trends were examined (i) on annual crude numbers of OACD and (ii) on reported odds ratios of OACD calculated using logistic regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 3738 cases of OACD were reported and the mean age of OACD cases was 35 years, 52% being women. The most frequent occupations were hairdressers, health care workers, cleaning staff and masons. The total number of OACD cases remained stable over the study period, but increases in OACD related to isothiazolinones (P = 0·002), epoxy resins (P = 0·012) and fragrances (P = 0·005) were observed. Conversely, decreases were noted for cement compounds (P = 0·002) and plant products (P = 0·031). These trends highlight specific sectors and exposures at risk of OACD. CONCLUSIONS: Trends in OACD depend on the nature of exposure. Observed decreases were consistent with prevention measures taken during the study period, and the increases observed serve to highlight those areas where preventative efforts need to be made to reduce skin allergies in the workplace.


Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Allergens/analysis , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Odds Ratio , Sex Distribution
2.
Prog Urol ; 23(12): 977-85, 2013 Oct.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24090782

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate a self-screening questionnaire for bladder cancer of occupational origin and analyse an influence of exposure to a carcinogen bladder tumor on prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred and thirty-one patients followed, between 2005 and 2010, for bladder cancer in two university centers have received a self-screening questionnaire derived from questionnaire KVP 08. Patients who responded positively to at least one of the items were considered to have a self-screening questionnaire "positive". Patients were finally invited to take an appointment for consultation in occupational pathology. RESULTS: The response rate to self-screening questionnaire was 39.9% (212/531). It was "positive" in 82 cases (38.7%). Among the 82 patients with a self-screening questionnaire "positive", 46 patients consulted in occupational pathology (56%). Occupational exposure to a bladder carcinogen was documented in 91.3% of cases. Among the 22 patients who consulted in occupational pathology with a self-screening questionnaire "negative", an occupational exposure to a bladder carcinogen was documented in 13.6% of cases. The sensibility of the self-screening questionnaire was 91.3%, the specificity 86.4% and the accuracy 89.7%. The relative risk to have an occupational exposure if the self-screening questionnaire was "positive" was 6.69. The analysis of groups "positive" versus "negative" does not reveal any statistically significant difference in terms of tumor aggressiveness and disease-free survival. CONCLUSION: The self-screening questionnaire was considered relevant with good reliability for detection of occupational exposure to a bladder carcinogen.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Self Evaluation , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/diagnosis , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies
3.
Rev Mal Respir ; 30(2): 99-104, 2013 Feb.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23419440

ABSTRACT

Multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) is a chronic condition, which belongs to the group of medically unexplained syndromes. Patients (men as well as women) complain of many subjective symptoms such as nose and mouth irritation, sore throat, dyspnea, tiredness, dizziness, headache and concentration difficulties. Patient typically report at least four or five symptoms occurring when they are exposed to particular substances, at a very low concentration that usually does not cause symptoms or harm in normal individuals. The common feature of products that appear to be responsible (either occupational or domestic) is that they have a strong smell and include: solvent, paint, glue, tar, oil, pesticides, perfume, cosmetics and spray products. MCS is nowadays considered to be one aspect of idiopathic environmental intolerance (IEI) whose other main aspect is hypersensitivity to electromagnetic fields. If the diagnosis is suspected clinically it can be confirmed using the Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory (QEESI(©)) self-questionnaire. MCS is often misdiagnosed as asthma or an allergic conditions which means that patients are frequently referred to respiratory and allergy specialists. Misdiagnosis can lead to many futile medical investigations. Psychotherapy can improve quality of life in some cases. Preventive measures are often ineffective and do not stop the condition worsening: hypersensitivity can spread to common environmental odors so that a few people become severely disabled and limited in their workplace as well as in private life. In France, 435 cases were registered in the university hospital occupational disease departments network (RNV3P) during the period 2007-2010. It is therefore important that every clinician be able to recognize the condition and ensure that their patients could get compensation when unable to go on working.


Subject(s)
Multiple Chemical Sensitivity/diagnosis , Adult , Asthma/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Environmental Exposure , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Liability, Legal , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Chemical Sensitivity/epidemiology , Multiple Chemical Sensitivity/therapy , Nasal Provocation Tests , Occupational Diseases/chemically induced , Occupational Exposure , Poisoning/diagnosis , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Distribution , Surveys and Questionnaires , Symptom Assessment
6.
Allerg Immunol (Paris) ; 27(2): 55-8, 1995 Feb.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7710656

ABSTRACT

The occupational origin of asthma is only found only late, from a diagnosis delay due to development. The aim of this work was to study the chronological characteristics of occupational asthma of different etiologies and to understand the occupational after-effects. A series of 144 cases were analysed (115 men and 29 women) who were seen in a consultation that specialised in occupational pathology, with the inclusion criteria those of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). The analysis was based on: the causative allergen or work protocol; the role of atopy; length of the latency phase; length of symptom exposure; diagnosis delay; occupational consequences. Asthma from isocyanates and flour between them accounted for 62% in this series. These were followed by asthma from wood (8.3%) and persulphates (7.6%). The mean length of the latency period was 7.5 years and the mean diagnosis delay was 2.5 years. Clinical history of atopy and the existence of rhinitis were much more common for the "biological" than the "chemical" asthmas (respectively 69% and 95%, against 36% and 15%). Amongst the 64% of patients who benefited from complete removal of the allergen, 78.5% who were cured or improved, though for those who kept the same conditions of work there was a persistence or even aggravation of symptoms. In 74 cases a certificate of occupational illness was given to the patient.


Subject(s)
Asthma/etiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Adult , Allergens/immunology , Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/immunology , Female , Humans , Male , Respiratory Function Tests , Retrospective Studies , Rhinitis/complications , Smoking
7.
Allerg Immunol (Paris) ; 27(1): 12-5, 1995 Jan.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7702734

ABSTRACT

The aim was to study the prevalence of respiratory allergy (rhinitis and asthma) in a population of bakers and pastrycooks. In 1991, 485 bakers and pastry cooks were examined by 27 work-physicians of Loire-Atlantic. The investigation was composed of a standardised questionnaire (signs of respiratory function, atopic history, smoking of tobacco ...), a clinical examination, and tests of respiratory function. An allergy assessment was made of all subjects with symptoms. 14.4% of subjects had rhinitis and 6.4% asthma. Development of these pathologies was clearly job-related for 2/3 of those with rhinitis and more than half of the asthmatics (55%). Occupational rhinitis and asthma were significantly more frequent in bakers than in pastrycooks and were linked to atopic history. Occupational asthma was associated with length of exposure to flour and with occupational rhinitis. In conclusion, these findings are comparable with or a little less than those that have been reported in occupational literature. They under-estimate the importance of the problem because of the occupational selection effect that is associated with these pathologies. Rhinitis and asthma are 1.5 to 3 time more common in bakers than in pastrycooks.


Subject(s)
Cooking , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Adult , Allergens/immunology , Animals , Asthma/epidemiology , Asthma/etiology , Flour/adverse effects , Flour/parasitology , France/epidemiology , Health Surveys , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Mites/immunology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Medicine , Prevalence , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/etiology , Smoking/epidemiology
8.
Allerg Immunol (Paris) ; 27(1): 7-10, 1995 Jan.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7702739

ABSTRACT

A survey was carried out on respiratory symptoms and skin prick response to common allergens, storage mite and occupational allergens. Among 178 symptomatics bakers and pastry workers from small businesses in western France, only 65 people underwent skin prick and specific-IgE. 12 (18%) workers were skin positive to at least one common or occupational allergens. The more often skin positive were D. Ptero. mite 36 (57%); Alpha amylase 23 (35%); wheat flour 17 (26%); saccharomyces cerevisiae 16 (25%); Ephestia 15 (24%). The sensitivity of skin test was better than specific IgE for D. Ptero. Mite 36 (57%); and Alpha amylase 23 (35%). The sensitivity of specific IgE was better than skin test for wheat flour 26 (45%) and rye flour 23 (40%). Occurrence of skin positive to occupational allergen among symptomatics with rhinitis and asthma is much more frequent in workers with skin positive to common allergens (40/36) than in workers with skin negative (8/20). Atopy must be regarded as an important predisposing factor for skin sensitisation to occupational allergens. We conclude in the necessity of a standardised allergologic exploration to be done in symptomatics bakers.


Subject(s)
Cooking , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Allergens , Animals , Edible Grain/immunology , Flour/adverse effects , Flour/parasitology , France/epidemiology , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Intradermal Tests , Mites/immunology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Pollen , Prevalence , Radioallergosorbent Test , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/etiology , Rodentia/immunology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/immunology , alpha-Amylases/adverse effects , alpha-Amylases/immunology
9.
J Occup Med ; 34(11): 1102-5, 1992 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1432301

ABSTRACT

Meningitis caused by Streptococcus suis type 2, a rare disease first recognized in 1968 (108 cases worldwide in 1989), is contracted by occupational exposure to pigs and often results in very severe disabilities (definitive deafness and ataxia in 50% of cases). We report the case of an employee in a rendering plant whose initial symptom was deafness. A detailed analysis of medical and veterinary literature is provided concerning the epidemiology of the disease, the clinical forms in man, bacteriological diagnosis and the role of the pig as healthy carrier. It is recommended that this occupational disease be officially recognized for compensation in France.


Subject(s)
Meningitis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Streptococcal Infections/diagnosis , Streptococcus suis , Animals , Carrier State/transmission , Carrier State/veterinary , France , Hearing Loss, Sudden/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sudden/etiology , Humans , Male , Meat-Packing Industry , Meningitis, Bacterial/transmission , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Streptococcal Infections/transmission , Streptococcal Infections/veterinary , Swine , Swine Diseases/transmission
10.
Rev Fr Mal Respir ; 11(5): 635-44, 1983.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6658151

ABSTRACT

Isocyanates are chemical compounds used in making polyurethane (for flexible or rigid foam, paint, varnish, glue and textiles). In strong concentrations isocyanates are powerful irritants producing chemical bronchopulmonary lesions. In weak doses they are responsible for occupational asthma and more rarely allergic alveolitis. Long term exposure to isocyanates may produce a deterioration in pulmonary function in asymptomatic patients. The pathophysiology of isocyanate asthma remains uncertain: immunological data remains contradictory while isocyanates have been shown to have a Betablocking effect. The maximum allowable concentration in the working environment, at present proposed in the U.S.A. is 0.005 ppm.


Subject(s)
Cyanates/adverse effects , Occupational Diseases/chemically induced , Respiratory Tract Diseases/chemically induced , Alveolitis, Extrinsic Allergic/chemically induced , Asthma/chemically induced , Bronchial Provocation Tests , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Respiratory Function Tests , Respiratory Tract Diseases/diagnosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...