Pregnancy-associated breast cancer patients can safely undergo lymphatic mapping.

As more women put off pregnancy until their 30s and beyond, the possibility of pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) will rise. Treatment options for patients with PABC need to consider possible harm to the fetus. The goal of this study is to review our institution's experience with sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsies in patients with PABC. A prospectively accrued breast Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved data base was searched under separate IRB approval for cases of SLN biopsy in patients with PABC. Ten patients were identified between 1994 and 2006 out of 5,563 patients. A chart review was performed on all 10 patients. Ten patients with PABC and an average gestation age of 15.8 weeks underwent SLN biopsy. All patients successfully mapped. Positive SLN were identified in 5/10 patients (50%) while there was no evidence of metastases in 5/10 patients (50%). 9/10 (90%) of patients went on to deliver healthy children without any reported problems. One patient (10%) decided to terminate her pregnancy in the first trimester following surgery prior to the start of chemotherapy. SLN biopsy can safely be performed in patients with PABC with minimal risk to the fetus. By performing a SLN biopsy, a large proportion of patients with PABC may be spared the risk of a complete axillary lymph node dissection.

Problems with the use of breast conservation therapy for breast cancer in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1: a case report.

Patients with neurofibromatosis type I and breast cancer represent a subset of people who may be considered at high risk for secondary cancers after conventional whole breast radiation therapy and breast conservation surgery. A case of a 49-year-old woman with neurofibromatosis type I is presented. She was diagnosed with a 1.1-cm right breast infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Clinical, diagnostic imaging, and pathologic features are discussed. Her initial treatment plan of breast conserving therapy was thwarted when her sentinel node biopsy was positive for micrometastatic disease in 1/14 lymph nodes. She elected to have a bilateral simple mastectomy. This case addresses the rare dilemma of offering breast conservation therapy as a viable option for patients with neurofibromatosis type I. Current data on radiation-induced secondary cancers such as sarcoma after treatment for breast and other cancers are reviewed.

Significance of sentinel lymph node micrometastases in human breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The significance of micrometastatic disease in the sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) of patients with invasive breast cancer has been questioned. The objective of our study was to review the impact of micrometastatic carcinoma detected by SLN biopsy. STUDY DESIGN: Between January 1997 and May 2004, 2,408 patients with invasive breast cancer and an SLN with micrometastatic (N0[i+], N1mi) or no metastatic (N0[i-]) disease were identified through our breast database. Slide review was performed and reclassified by the 6(th) edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual. Of these, 27 were excluded from analysis because of evidence of macrometastatic disease on slide review or enrollment in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z10 study. RESULTS: Of 2,381 patients, 2,108 were N0(i-), 151 were N0(i+), and 122 were N1mi. Overall and disease-free survivals of patients with an N1mi SLN were substantially worse than those in patients with an N0(i-) SLN (p < 0.001 and p=0.006, respectively). Additional positive non-SLNs were identified in 15.5% (15 of 97) of N1mi patients and 9.3% (10 of 107) of N0(i+) patients undergoing completion axillary lymph node dissection. Overall survival of the N0(i+) SLN patients not undergoing axillary dissection was substantially less than those undergoing axillary dissection (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Detection of micrometastatic carcinoma (N1mi) in the SLNs of invasive breast cancer patients is a major indicator of poorer survival compared with N0(i-) patients. Although survival of patients with an N0(i+) SLN does not statistically differ from that of N0(i-) patients, 9.3% of these patients had additional axillary nodal disease on axillary dissection, and N0(i+) patients had a decreased survival when axillary dissection was omitted.

Breast cancer in patients with prior augmentation: presentation, stage, and lymphatic mapping.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether breast cancer patients who had prior breast augmentation presented at a more advanced stage than nonaugmented breast cancer patients, and to determine the mode of presentation and effectiveness of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in this same group of patients. A total of 4186 breast cancer patients from 1987 to 2002 were reviewed. Patients who had augmentation before their diagnosis of breast cancer were compared with a control group of nonaugmented breast cancer patients. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare tumor size, node positivity, and stage. The patient's age at presentation was also compared by the two-sided pooled t test. Seventy-six patients who previously underwent augmentation were identified with 78 breast cancers. Seventy percent (48 of 69) were initially detected by palpation, whereas 30 percent (21 of 69) were initially identified mammographically. Fifty-three percent (n = 41) underwent mastectomy and 47 percent (n = 37) underwent a lumpectomy. This compares with a 63.6 percent (2615 of 4110) breast conservation rate in the nonaugmented population during the same time period. The two groups did not differ regarding (tumor) size (p = 0.77), nodal positivity (p = 0.32), or stage (p = 0.34). The mean time between implant placement and a diagnosis of breast cancer was 14 years. The average age of the patients who had previously undergone augmentation at breast cancer diagnosis was 49.5 years (SD, 9.0 years) versus 57.1 years (SD, 13.5 years) for the nonaugmented patients (p < 0.0001). Forty-nine of the patients underwent lymphatic mapping, with a 100 percent success rate in identifying the sentinel lymph node. There have been no clinically detected axillary recurrences in the patients who had a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy. Breast cancer patients who have undergone previous augmentation are more likely to present with a palpable mass. This initial mode of detection does not appear to translate into a larger tumor size or worse prognosis. Breast conservation and lymphatic mapping can be performed successfully in previously augmented patients.

Novel techniques in sentinel lymph node mapping and localization of nonpalpable breast lesions: the Moffitt experience.

The concept of lymphatic mapping has helped to redefine the clinical significance of lymph nodes with respect to breast cancer. The combination technique using both blue dye and radiocolloid is the most effective method of lymphatic mapping. The data in the literature support the concept that all patients undergoing lumpectomy or especially mastectomy should undergo lymphatic mapping if a diagnosis of invasive cancer is remotely possible. The low morbidity, high sensitivity, and specificity of mapping indicate its use for increasing numbers of patients thought initially not to be candidates for the procedure.

The clinical relevance of positive sentinel nodes only versus positive nonsentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the difference in clinical outcomes for patients with histologically positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN+) compared with patients with histologically positive nonsentinel second echelon lymph nodes (NSLN+). METHODS: Eight hundred thirteen node positive patients from a prospectively accrued database of 3200 patients who underwent sentinel node mapping were evaluated. In all, 506 of the 813 patients (62%) were SLN+ only and 307 of the 813 patients (38%) were SLN+ plus at least one NSLN+. Patients' overall survival and disease-free survival were obtained and statistical analyses performed comparing the two groups. RESULTS: As the number of NSLN+ increased, there was a significant difference in disease-free survival (P = 0.001) and overall survival (P = 0.003) between those patients who had 0 to 4 NSLN+ and those who had 5 or more NSLN+. The SLN+ only patients did not show significant differences with respect to survival, based on the number of SLN+ (overall survival, disease-free survival; P = 0.742). CONCLUSIONS: The survival (overall survival, disease-free survival) for patients with 3 or more SLN+ was not statistically different than for patients with 1 or 2 SLN+ (P = 0.742). However, an alteration of biologic behavior was observed when multiple NSLN+ contain metastatic breast cancer. Involvement of 5 or more NSLN+ portends a significantly (P = 0.001) worse prognosis, regardless of the number of SLN+.

Effect of lymphatic mapping on diagnosis and treatment of patients with T1a, T1b favorable breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of nodal metastasis in a consecutive series of patients treated at the authors' institution with highly selective criteria, and to determine the impact that lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy have on the detection of nodal metastases in this carefully selected patient population. METHODS: Study patients were selected from the 7,750 breast cancer patients entered into the authors' database from April 1989 to August 2001, based on the following criteria: nonpalpable, T1a and T1b, non-high nuclear grade tumors, without lymphovascular invasion. RESULTS: Of the 7,750 patients in the database 1,327 (17%) were found to have T1a and T1b lesions. Three hundred eighty-nine patients were confirmed to meet all four selection criteria. This represents 5% (389/7,750) of the authors' breast cancer patients and 29.3% (389/1,327) of the authors' T1a/T1b tumors. One hundred sixty patients were diagnosed before routine use of lymphatic mapping, and only one patient had a positive axillary lymph node. Two hundred twenty-nine patients underwent lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy, and 10 had a positive axillary lymph node. The difference in proportions of nodal positivity between the mapped and unmapped patients was significant. CONCLUSIONS: This study clearly demonstrates the ability of lymphatic mapping and a more detailed examination of the sentinel node to increase the accuracy of axillary staging. It has been argued that this highly selected group of breast cancer patients possessing retrospectively identified "favorable" characteristics does not require axillary staging. This select population represents only 5% of breast cancer patients in this series, and the authors do not believe they can be accurately identified preoperatively. Therefore, the authors strongly argue for evaluation of the axillary nodal status by lymphatic mapping.

Completion axillary lymph node dissection minimizes the likelihood of false negatives for patients with invasive breast carcinoma and cytokeratin positive only sentinel lymph nodes.

OBJECTIVE: To document the incidence of metastatic disease in complete axillary lymph node dissections (CALND) of patients with invasive carcinoma after a sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy, positive only by immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin (CK-IHC). METHODS: Sections of all SLNs, negative by routine histology, were immunostained and examined for cytokeratin positive cells. Sections of lymph nodes from CALND specimens were interpreted using routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. RESULTS: A total of 409 patients (29.6%) had metastatic disease in at least one sentinel lymph node on H&E examination. Of 971 H&E negative patients, 78 (8.0%) were positive only by CK-IHC. Sixty-two of the CK-IHC positive only patients underwent CALND. Nine of these 62 patients (14.5%) had metastases identified in the CALND specimen. CONCLUSIONS: Because 14.5% of patients with invasive breast cancer and SLNs positive only by CK-IHC were found to have H&E positive lymph nodes on CALND, we conclude first, that CK-IHC should be used to evaluate SLNs, and second, that CALND should be considered when SLNs are positive by CK-IHC only. This approach will result in an absolute reduction of the false negative rate (absolute false negative rate reduced by 2.6% in our series).