Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
2.
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 114(7): 432-433, julio 2022. tab, ilus
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-205689

ABSTRACT

Introduction: esophageal anastomosis dehiscence is a serious complication after esophageal cancer surgery with high mortality risk. One of the treatment options is self-expanding esophageal prostheses. Our aim was to evaluate the outcome of esophageal prostheses in the management of suture dehiscences after oncologic surgery.Material and methods: we performed a descriptive and retrospective study with patients diagnosed with esophageal anastomosis fistula or dehiscence treated by esophageal prosthesis between the years 2015 and 2021. We considered technical success as the correct positioning of the prosthesis with visualization of anastomotic leak closure after release of the prosthesis during endoscopy, and clinical success the resolution of dehiscence after removal of the prosthesis 8 weeks after positioning.Results: technical success was 95% and clinical success 89%.Conclusion: in our center, esophageal prostheses are a treatment option for fistulas and anastomotic dehiscence after surgery with a high success rate and few complications. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/surgery , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/adverse effects , Esophageal Diseases/complications , Esophageal Fistula/complications , Esophageal Fistula/surgery , Prostheses and Implants/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Esophageal Neoplasms/complications , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies
3.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 114(10): 626-627, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35469401

ABSTRACT

Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent neoplasms, with an increasing incidence in recent years. Intestinal obstruction is present at the time of diagnosis in 10-30% of patients. The aim of our study is to describe our experience in the use of colonic SEMS in the treatment of colonic stenosing neoplasia. For this purpose, we retrospectively evaluated the 92 patients treated with self-expandable metallic prostheses in our hospital between 2016 and 2021. In 66.3% of patients the prosthesis placement was bridge to curative surgery and in 33.7% with palliative attitude. The stenosis location was differentiated: rectum (2.1%), rectosigmoid junction (20.7%), sigma (58.7%), left colon (8.7%), splenic angle (8.7%) and transverse colon (1.1%); being the size of the self-expandable metallic prostheses used 60x25 mm, 90x25 mm and 120x25 mm. The procedure was technically effective in 92.4% of the cases and clinically effective in 89.1%, with post-procedural perforations being detected in 9 patients (9.8%). Survival 30 days after prosthesis placement was 91.3%. No mortality directly related to the procedure was detected. In our experience, placement of self-expandable metallic prostheses is a safe and effective option in the initial management of neoplastic colon stenosis.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Intestinal Obstruction , Self Expandable Metallic Stents , Colonic Neoplasms/complications , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Colorectal Neoplasms/complications , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Constriction, Pathologic/etiology , Humans , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology , Intestinal Obstruction/surgery , Prostheses and Implants/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Self Expandable Metallic Stents/adverse effects , Stents/adverse effects , Tertiary Care Centers , Treatment Outcome
4.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 114(7): 432-433, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35170326

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: esophageal anastomosis dehiscence is a serious complication after esophageal cancer surgery with high mortality risk. One of the treatment options is self-expanding esophageal prostheses. Our aim was to evaluate the outcome of esophageal prostheses in the management of suture dehiscences after oncologic surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: we performed a descriptive and retrospective study with patients diagnosed with esophageal anastomosis fistula or dehiscence treated by esophageal prosthesis between the years 2015 and 2021. We considered technical success as the correct positioning of the prosthesis with visualization of anastomotic leak closure after release of the prosthesis during endoscopy, and clinical success the resolution of dehiscence after removal of the prosthesis 8 weeks after positioning. RESULTS: technical success was 95% and clinical success 89%. CONCLUSION: in our center, esophageal prostheses are a treatment option for fistulas and anastomotic dehiscence after surgery with a high success rate and few complications.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Diseases , Esophageal Fistula , Esophageal Neoplasms , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/surgery , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/adverse effects , Esophageal Diseases/complications , Esophageal Fistula/complications , Esophageal Fistula/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/complications , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Prostheses and Implants/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Stents/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...