RNF43 mutation analysis in serrated polyposis, sporadic serrated polyps and Lynch syndrome polyps.

AIMS: RNF43 is suggested to be involved in the serrated pathway towards colorectal cancer and encodes a transmembrane Ring-type E3 ubiquitin ligase that negatively regulates the Wnt pathway. This study aimed to elucidate the role of RNF43 gene variants in serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS) and serrated polyps. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three cohorts were tested. The first cohort included germline DNA of 26 SPS patients tested for pathogenic variants in RNF43 by Sanger sequencing all exons. In the second cohort we tested somatic DNA for RNF43 mutations from sporadic serrated lesions: 25 hyperplastic polyps, 35 sessile serrated lesions and 38 traditional serrated adenomas (TSA). In the third cohort we investigated RNF43 mutations in 49 serrated polyps and 60 conventional adenomas from 40 patients with Lynch syndrome. No germline RNF43 pathogenic variants were detected in our SPS cohort. In sporadic colorectal lesions we detected RNF43 deleterious frameshift mutations in three TSA and one SSL. The RNF43 mutations in previously described homopolymeric hot-spots were detected in microsatellite-instable (MSI) polyps and the other RNF43 mutations in microsatellite-stable (MSS) serrated polyps. RNF43 hot-spot mutations were discovered in seven serrated polyps and 12 conventional adenomas from Lynch patients. CONCLUSION: Truncating germline RNF43 mutations are uncommon in SPS patients. Somatic mutations in RNF43 were found in sporadic TSA and SSL and both serrated polyps and adenomas from Lynch syndrome patients, suggesting that they do not develop early in the pathway to CRC and are not specific for serrated polyp subtypes.

Reasons why the diagnosis of serrated polyposis syndrome is missed.

OBJECTIVES: Serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS) is a relatively new and under-recognized colorectal cancer (CRC) predisposition syndrome. Previous studies have reported miss-rates of SPS diagnosis varying from 40 to 82%. As SPS patients and their first-degree relatives have an increased risk of CRC, early recognition is important. We aimed to determine the miss-rate of SPS and to determine the reasons for missed diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified all patients diagnosed with at least one colorectal polyp or carcinoma detected at our tertiary referral center between January 1986 and July 2013 using the nationwide pathology registry. On the basis of cumulative polyp count with size and location, SPS patients were identified. We checked whether the SPS diagnosis was made in the medical files and, if not, what might have been the reason for missing the diagnosis. RESULTS: We randomly assessed 5000 patients, of whom 25 patients fulfilled the WHO criteria for SPS. In six patients, no previous SPS diagnosis had been made, leading to a miss-rate of 24.0% (95% confidence interval: 7.3-40.7). The reasons for missed diagnosis were polyps removed before establishment of the WHO criteria, unavailable pathology reports, and failure to apply the criteria by the clinician. CONCLUSION: The miss-rate for the diagnosis of SPS is considerable, even during longer follow-up with repeated colonoscopies. A preventable reason for missing SPS cases is failure to apply the WHO criteria. Awareness of this CRC predisposition syndrome needs to be raised to decrease the miss-rate of SPS.

Low prevalence of serrated polyposis syndrome in screening populations: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The most frequently cited prevalence for serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS) is 1 in every 3000 people screened, but this value is debated. Additionally, changes in 2010 in the World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria for SPS might affect reported prevalence. An updated estimate of SPS prevalence is necessary to predict the number of cases in screening programs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases up to February 2014. Studies reporting the prevalence of SPS, as defined by WHO criteria, in screening populations were selected. RESULTS: Six studies reported prevalence of SPS in screening populations, varying from 0 to 0.66 %. The highest prevalences (0.34 % and 0.66 %) were seen in studies from screening programs with patients pre-selected by fecal blood test. Primary colonoscopy-based screening programs, that have the lowest risk of bias, reported SPS prevalences ranging from 0 to 0.09 %. Across studies, 56 patients were diagnosed with SPS of whom 3 presented with synchronous colorectal cancer at index endoscopy. CONCLUSION: The true prevalence of SPS is unclear because of the risk of bias across studies, but is likely to be below 0.09 % as derived from primary colonoscopy screening programs. The prevalence in pre-selected screening populations after positive fecal testing is higher, with reported values of 0.34 % and 0.66 %. Large and high quality primary colonoscopy screening studies, reporting SPS prevalence in adequately described populations, are necessary for better estimation of the true prevalence of SPS in average-risk patients.

Genetic polymorphism 609C>T in NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 enhances the risk of proximal colon cancer.

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancer is responsible for the majority of deaths among all types of cancer. Lifestyle factors may not only be the main risk factor for GI cancer but reactive oxygen species (ROS) may also be involved. The single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) 609C>T (rs1800566) and 465C>T (rs1131341) in the NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) gene lead to a decline in NQO1 enzyme activity. NQO1 catalyzes the two-electron reduction of quinones to hydroquinones, thereby preventing the formation of ROS. Such polymorphisms in NQO1 may increase the risk of GI cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the SNPs rs1800566 and rs1131341 in the NQO1 gene on the risk of GI cancer in the Netherlands. Real-time polymerase chain reaction techniques were conducted to determine the NQO1 genotypes of 1457 patients with GI cancer and 1457 age- and gender-matched controls in a case-control study. Binary logistic regression analyses showed no statistically significant difference in genotype distributions between patients and controls: odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for rs1800566 were 1.09 (0.93-1.28) and 1.17 (0.77-1.77) for the CT and TT genotypes, respectively. ORs for rs1131341 CT and TT genotypes were 1.21 (0.90-1.63) and 0.54 (0.05-5.94), respectively. For rs1800566, a significant association between the CT genotype and proximal colon cancer was detected (OR=1.60; 95% CI=1.09-2.35). The NQO1*2 T allele of SNP rs1800566 was found associated with an increased risk for proximal colorectal cancer, whereas SNP rs1131341 was rare in our Dutch population and was not associated with GI cancer.

Polymorphisms in the insulin-like growth factor axis are associated with gastrointestinal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Numerous factors influence the development of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis plays a role in embryonic and postnatal growth and tissue repair. Elevated levels of IGFs, low levels of IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs) and over-expression of IGF receptor (IGFR-I) were associated with several stages of cancer. Here, the prevalence of the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs6214 in the IGF type I (IGF-I) gene and rs6898743 in the growth hormone receptor (GHR) gene in patients with GI cancer and controls was studied. MATERIALS & METHODS: In this Dutch case-control study, DNA isolated from blood of 1,457 GI cancer patients; 438 patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), 475 with esophageal cancer (EC) and 544 with colorectal cancer (CRC) and 1,457 matched controls, was used to determine the rs6214 and rs6898743 genotypes by polymerase chain reaction. The association between these SNPs and GI cancer, HNC, esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (ESCC) and proximal or distal CRC was studied. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated via unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall for GI cancer, the ORs for SNPs rs6214 and rs6898743 were approximately 1.0 (p-value>0.05), using the most common genotypes GG as reference. An OR of 1.54 (95% CI, 1.05-2.27) was found for EC for genotype AA of rs6214. The ORs for EAC were 1.45 (95% CI, 1.04-2.01) and 1.71 (95% CI, 1.10-2.68), for genotypes GA and AA, respectively. Genotype GC of rs6898743 showed an OR of 0.47 (95% CI, 0.26-0.86) for ESCC. CONCLUSION: The A allele of SNP rs6214 in the IGF-I gene was associated with EAC, and with HNC in women. The GC genotype of rs6898743 in the GHR gene was negatively associated with ESCC.

Polymorphisms in alcohol-metabolizing enzymes and esophageal carcinoma susceptibility: a Dutch Caucasian case-control study.

Esophageal cancer (EC), mainly consisting of squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in the Eastern world and adenocarcinoma (EAC) in the Western world, is strongly associated with dietary factors such as alcohol use. We aimed to clarify the modifying role in EC etiology in Caucasians of functional genotypes in alcohol-metabolizing enzymes. In all, 351 Caucasian patients with EC and 430 matched controls were included and polymorphisms in CYP2E1, ADH and near ALDH2 genes were determined. In contrast to the results on ESCC in mainly Asian studies, we found that functional genotypes of alcohol-metabolizing enzymes were not significantly associated with EAC or ESCC in an European population.

No role for glutathione S-transferase genotypes in Caucasian esophageal squamous cell or adenocarcinoma etiology: an European case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Identifying and monitoring high-risk patients can aid the prevention of esophageal cancer (EC). The interaction of environmental risk factor exposure and genetic susceptibility may contribute to the etiology of EC. Biotransformation enzymes such as Glutathione S-Transferases (GSTs ) detoxify mutagenic and genotoxic compounds and therefore control the rate of detoxification of carcinogens. Functional polymorphisms in the genes coding for GSTs alter their enzyme activity in vitro, and were reported to modify EC risk in Asians. We hypothesized that altered enzyme activity GST genotypes influence the susceptibility for esophageal adeno- (EAC) and squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in Caucasians. METHODS: We performed a case-control study including 440 Caucasian patients with EC and 592 healthy Caucasian controls matched for age and sex. Functional polymorphisms were selected and genotypes were determined in GST classes Alpha, Mu, Theta and Pi by means of polymerase chain reaction. Genotypes were classified into predicted high, intermediate and low enzyme activity categories based on in vitro activity data. The distribution of the activity genotypes were compared between patients with EAC or ESCC, and controls. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by logistic regression analyses. Gene-gene interactions were tested and for comparison purposes, the predicted low and intermediate activity genotypes were combined. Genotypes with similar risks for EAC or ESCC were combined and analyzed for multiplicative effects. RESULTS: Our analyses includes 327 patients with EAC and 106 patients with ESCC. Low or intermediate activity enzyme genotypes for GSTM1, GSTA1, GSTP1 I105V and A114V as well as for GSTT1, did not significantly modify the risk for ESCC or EAC in our Dutch population. CONCLUSION: Functional genotypes in GST genes are not involved in EAC or ESCC susceptibility in Caucasians, in contrast to results on ESCC from Asia or Africa.

Barrett associated MHC and FOXF1 variants also increase esophageal carcinoma risk.

Barrett's esophagus, with gastroesophageal reflux disease and obesity as risk factors, predisposes to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Recently a British genome wide association study identified two Barrett's esophagus susceptibility loci mapping within the major histocompatibility complex (MHC; rs9257809) and closely to the Forkhead-F1 (FOXF1; rs9936833) coding gene. An interesting issue is whether polymorphisms associated with Barrett's esophagus, are also implicated in esophageal carcinoma (EC), and more specifically EAC genesis. Assessing the individual genetic susceptibility can help identify high risk patients more prone to benefit from surveillance programs. Our hypothesis: Barrett associated MHC and FOXF1 variants modify EC risk in Caucasians. In a Dutch case-control study, 431 patients with EC and 605 healthy controls were included. Polymorphisms at chromosomes 6p21 (MHC) and 16q24 (FOXF1) were determined by means of real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. The FOXF1 rs9936833 variant C allele was associated with an increased EAC susceptibility; OR, [95% CI]; 1.21, [0.99-1.47]. A sex-stratified analysis revealed a similar association in males; 1.24 [1.00-1.55]. The variant MHC rs9257809 G allele as well as the MHC heterozygous AG genotype significantly increased ESCC risk; 1.76 [1.16-2.66] and 1.74 [1.08-2.80], respectively. Sex-stratification showed that the variant G allele was especially present in female patients; 2.32 [1.04-5.20]. In conclusion, this study provides evidence that MHC rs9257809 and FOXF1 rs9936833 variants, associated with Barrett's esophagus, also increase ESCC and EAC susceptibility in Caucasians. FOX proteins are transcription factors involved in organogenesis of the GI tract, while MHC haplotypes are strongly associated with smoking behavior, a crucial risk factor for ESCC. Assessing the individual genetic susceptibility can help identify high risk patients more prone to benefit from (Barrett) surveillance programs.

GWAS-uncovered SNPs in PLCE1 and RFT2 genes are not implicated in Dutch esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma etiology.

Susceptibility to esophageal carcinoma (EC) is influenced by the interaction between genetic and environmental factors. To clarify the etiology of EC, several genome-wide association studies have identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in PCLE1 and RFT2 genes as esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) susceptibility loci in Asian populations. This study aimed to determine whether these SNPs also modify the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and ESCC in western populations of Caucasian ethnicity. A European case-control study including 349 EC patients and 580 controls matched for age, sex, geographical location, and race was carried out. The SNPs rs2274223 in the PCLE1 gene at chromosome 10q23 and rs13042395 in the RFT2 gene at chromosome 20p13 were determined using PCR. Genotype distributions were compared between patients and controls, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The total EC group included 86 patients with ESCC and 258 patients with EAC. The distribution of PLCE1 and RFT2 genotypes did not differ between patients with EAC or ESSC, and the controls. In contrast to the modulation of the risk of ESCC in Asians, it is unlikely that the PLCE1 rs2274223 and RFT2 13042395 SNPs play a role in EAC or ESCC susceptibility in Dutch Caucasians.

EPHX1 polymorphisms do not modify esophageal carcinoma susceptibility in Dutch Caucasians.

Esophageal cancer (EC) has a globally increasing incidence with poor curative treatment options and survival rates. Crucial risk factors are exposure to toxins or carcinogens. Microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH) is a biotransformation enzyme essential for the detoxification of xenobiotics. Polymorphisms in exon 3 and exon 4 of the microsomal epoxide hydrolase gene (EPHX1) modify catalytic activity of this enzyme and subsequently may play a role in EC etiology. This case-control study investigated whether these polymorphisms in the EPHX1 gene influence esophageal cancer susceptibility in a Dutch Caucasian population. A case-control study including 349 Caucasian EC patients and 581 Caucasian healthy controls was conducted and the polymorphisms Tyr113His (exon 3) and His139Arg (exon 4) in the EPHX1 gene were determined, using polymerase chain reaction. The distribution of exon 3 and exon 4 genotypes were compared between cases and controls. Analyses included a stratification according to tumor histology; esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) or squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Furthermore, on the basis of allelic in vitro enzyme activity assays, exon 3 and 4 genotypes were combined and categorized according to their predicted high, medium or low enzyme activity. Homozygosity and heterozygosity for both exon 3 and 4 polymorphisms were correlated with a decreased esophageal squamous cell carcinoma risk. Heterozygosity and homozygosity for both polymorphisms correlated with an increased and a decreased esophageal adenocarcinoma risk, respectively. Predicted intermediate and high activity genotypes were risk and protective factors for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and esophageal adenocarcinoma, respectively. However, none of these associations were statistically significant. In conclusion, the polymorphisms in exon 3 and exon 4 of the EPHX1 gene do not seem to be modifiers of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma or esophageal adenocarcinoma risk in Dutch Caucasians.

High enzyme activity UGT1A1 or low activity UGT1A8 and UGT2B4 genotypes increase esophageal cancer risk.

Esophageal cancer (EC) has a globally increasing incidence with poor curative treatment options and survival rates. Environmental and dietary factors have crucial roles in esophageal carcinogenesis. Polymorphisms in the UGT genes, a superfamily of enzymes essential for the detoxification of carcinogens, may alter enzyme activity and subsequently may play a role in EC etiology. Rather than solely establishing differences in genotype distribution, we investigated whether functional polymorphisms in UGT genes that can predict enzyme activity in vivo, may influence EC risk. A case-control study including 351 Caucasian EC patients and 592 Caucasian controls was conducted and polymorphisms in seven UGT genes were determined, using the polymerase chain reaction. On the basis of allelic in vitro enzyme activity measurements, genotypes were categorized according to their predicted in vivo enzyme activity into high, medium and low categories. Predicted enzyme activity groups were combined and compared between patients and controls. The UGT1A1 and UGT1A8 predicted high enzyme activity genotypes were significantly more (OR=1.62; 95% CI, 1.02-2.56) and less frequent (OR=0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.84) among patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), respectively. High (OR=0.42; 95% CI, 0.22-0.84) and medium (OR=0.25; 95% CI, 0.12-0.52) activity UGT2B4 genotypes were significantly less often present in ESCC patients. No association was detected between UGT genotypes and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) risk. Polymorphisms in UGT genes, resulting in altered enzyme activity genotypes, do not seem modifiers of EAC risk. However, the predicted high activity UGT1A1 genotype, associated with low serum levels of the antioxidant bilirubin, was associated with an increased ESCC risk. The UGT1A8 and UGT2B4 genotypes associated with decreased predicted enzyme activities, were significantly associated with an increased risk of ESCC, probably by a decreased detoxification of carcinogens.