Management of Biofilm with Breast Implant Surgery.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand how bacteria negatively impact aesthetic and reconstructive breast implants. 2. Understand how bacteria infect breast implants. 3. Understand the evidence associated with common implant infection-prevention strategies, and their limitations. 4. Understand why implementation of bacteria-mitigation strategies such as antibiotic administration or "no-touch" techniques may not indefinitely prevent breast implant infection. SUMMARY: Bacterial infection of aesthetic and reconstructive breast implants is a common and expensive problem. Subacute infections or chronic capsular contractures leading to device explantation are the most commonly documented sequelae. Although bench and translational research underscores the complexities of implant-associated infection, high-quality studies with adequate power, control groups, and duration of follow-up are lacking. Common strategies to minimize infections use antibiotics-administered systemically, in the breast implant pocket, or by directly bathing the implant before insertion-to limit bacterial contamination. Limiting contact between the implant and skin or breast parenchyma represents an additional common strategy. The clinical prevention of breast implant infection is challenged by the clean-contaminated nature of breast parenchyma, and the variable behavior of not only specific bacterial species but also their strains. These factors impact bacterial virulence and antibiotic resistance.

A prospective randomized clinical trial to assess antibiotic pocket irrigation on tissue expander breast reconstruction.

Bacterial infection is the most common complication following staged post-mastectomy breast reconstruction initiated with a tissue expander (TE). To limit bacterial infection, antibiotic irrigation of the surgical site is commonly performed despite little high-quality data to support this practice. We performed a prospective randomized control trial to compare the impact of saline irrigation alone to a triple antibiotic irrigation regimen (1 g cefazolin, 80 mg gentamicin, and 50,000 units of bacitracin in 500 mL of saline) for breast implant surgery. The microbiome in breasts with cancer (n = 16) was compared to those without (n = 16), as all patients (n = 16) had unilateral cancers but bilateral mastectomies (n = 32). Biologic and prosthetic specimens procured both at the time of mastectomy and during TE removal months later were analyzed for longitudinal comparison. Outcomes included clinical infection, bacterial abundance, and relative microbiome composition. No patient in either group suffered a reconstructive failure or developed an infection. Triple antibiotic irrigation administered at the time of immediate TE reconstruction did not reduce bacterial abundance or impact microbial diversity relative to saline irrigation at the time of planned exchange. Implanted prosthetic material adopted the microbial composition of the surrounding host tissue. In cancer-naïve breasts, relative to saline, antibiotic irrigation increased bacterial abundance on periprosthetic capsules (P = 0.03) and acellular dermal matrices (P = 0.04) and altered the microbiota on both. These data show that, relative to saline only, the use of triple antibiotic irrigation in TE breast reconstruction does impact the bacterial abundance and diversity of certain biomaterials from cancer-naïve breasts. IMPORTANCE The lifetime risk of breast cancer is ~13% in women and is treated with a mastectomy in ~50% of cases. The majority are reconstructed, usually starting with a tissue expander to help restore the volume for a subsequent permanent breast implant or the women's own tissues. The biopsychosocial benefits of breast reconstruction, though, can be tempered by a high complication rate of at least 7% but over 30% in some women. Bacterial infection is the most common complication, and can lead to treatment delays, patient physical and emotional distress and escalating health care cost. To limit this risk, plastic surgeons have tried a variety of strategies to limit bacterial infection including irrigating the pocket created after removing the breast implant with antibiotic solutions, but good-quality data are scarce. Herein, we study the value of antibiotics in pocket irrigation using a robust randomized clinical trial design and molecular microbiology approaches.

Staphylococcus aureus Breast Implant Infection Isolates Display Recalcitrance To Antibiotic Pocket Irrigants.

Breast implant-associated infections (BIAIs) are the primary complication following placement of breast prostheses in breast cancer reconstruction. Given the prevalence of breast cancer, reconstructive failure due to infection results in significant patient distress and health care expenditures. Thus, effective BIAI prevention strategies are urgently needed. This study tests the efficacy of one infection prevention strategy: the use of a triple antibiotic pocket irrigant (TAPI) against Staphylococcus aureus, the most common cause of BIAIs. TAPI, which consists of 50,000 U bacitracin, 1 g cefazolin, and 80 mg gentamicin diluted in 500 mL of saline, is used to irrigate the breast implant pocket during surgery. We used in vitro and in vivo assays to test the efficacy of each antibiotic in TAPI, as well as TAPI at the concentration used during surgery. We found that planktonically grown S. aureus BIAI isolates displayed susceptibility to gentamicin, cefazolin, and TAPI. However, TAPI treatment enhanced biofilm formation of BIAI strains. Furthermore, we compared TAPI treatment of a S. aureus reference strain (JE2) to a BIAI isolate (117) in a mouse BIAI model. TAPI significantly reduced infection of JE2 at 1 and 7 days postinfection (dpi). In contrast, BIAI strain 117 displayed high bacterial burdens in tissues and implants, which persisted to 14 dpi despite TAPI treatment. Lastly, we demonstrated that TAPI was effective against Pseudomonas aeruginosa reference (PAO1) and BIAI strains in vitro and in vivo. Together, these data suggest that S. aureus BIAI strains employ unique mechanisms to resist antibiotic prophylaxis treatment and promote chronic infection. IMPORTANCE The incidence of breast implant associated infections (BIAIs) following reconstructive surgery postmastectomy remains high, despite the use of prophylactic antibiotic strategies. Thus, surgeons have begun using additional antibiotic-based prevention strategies, including triple antibiotic pocket irrigants (TAPIs). However, these strategies fail to reduce BIAI rates for these patients. To understand why these therapies fail, we assessed the antimicrobial resistance patterns of Staphylococcus aureus strains, the most common cause of BIAI, to the antibiotics in TAPI (bacitracin, cefazolin, and gentamicin). We found that while clinically relevant BIAI isolates were more susceptible to the individual antibiotics compared to a reference strain, TAPI was effective at killing all the strains in vitro. However, in a mouse model, the BIAI isolates displayed recalcitrance to TAPI, which contrasted with the reference strain, which was susceptible. These data suggest that strains causing BIAI may encode specific recalcitrance mechanisms not present within reference strains.

Semi-Quantitative Assay to Measure Urease Activity by Urinary Catheter-Associated Uropathogens.

Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are one of the most common healthcare-associated infections in the US, accounting for over 1 million cases annually and totaling 450 million USD. CAUTIs have high morbidity and mortality rates and can be caused by a wide range of pathogens, making empiric treatment difficult. Furthermore, when urease-producing uropathogens cause symptomatic CAUTI or asymptomatic catheter colonization, the risk of catheter failure due to blockage increases. The enzyme urease promotes catheter blockage by hydrolyzing urea in urine into ammonia and carbon dioxide, which results in the formation of crystals that coat the catheter surface. If CAUTI is left untreated, the crystals can grow until they block the urinary catheter. Catheter blockage and subsequent failure reduces the quality of life for the chronically catheterized, as it requires frequent catheter exchanges and can promote more severe disease, including dissemination of the infection to the kidneys or bloodstream. Thus, understanding how urease contributes to catheter blockages and/or more severe disease among the broad range of urease-producing microbes may provide insights into better prevention or treatment strategies. However, clinical assays that detect urease production among clinical isolates are qualitative and prioritize the detection of urease from Proteus mirabilis, the most well-studied uropathogenic urease producer. While urease from other known urease producers, such as Morganella morganii, can also be detected with these methods, other uropathogens, including Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumonia, are harder to detect. In this study, we developed a high throughput, semiquantitative assay capable of testing multiple uropathogens in a rapid and efficient way. We validated the assay using Jack Bean urease, the urease producing species: Proteus spp., M. morganii, K. pneumonia, and S. aureus strains, and the non-urease producer: Escherichia coli. This modified assay more rapidly detected urease-producing strains compared to the current clinical test, Christensen Urea Agar, and provided semiquantitative values that may be used to further investigate different aspects of urease regulation, production, or activity in these diverse species. Furthermore, this assay can be easily adapted to account for different environmental stimuli affecting urease production, including bacterial concentration, aeration, or addition of anti-urease compounds.