Denitrification potential of surface soils of constructed wetlands in Newtown Creek, an urban superfund site.

Denitrification, the anaerobic microbial conversion of nitrate (NO3 - ), a common water pollutant, to nitrogen (N) gases, is often high in the soil of natural wetlands. In areas where natural wetlands have been degraded or destroyed, constructed and restored wetlands have been used to restore ecosystem services like denitrification. Thus, denitrification in restored and constructed wetlands could play an important role in treating anthropogenic N sources such as combined sewer overflow discharges which can be high in NO3 - . In this study, we measured denitrification potential using an anaerobic slurry assay and made a suite of ancillary measurements (soil moisture content, microbial biomass carbon [C] and N content, potential net N mineralization and nitrification, soil inorganic N pools, and soil respiration) in four constructed salt marsh wetlands, and a series of wetland habitat basins in Newtown Creek, NY, an urban superfund site. Samples were also taken from natural salt marshes located at Paerdegat Basin, Jamaica Bay, NY. Our results show that constructed Spartina alterniflora marshes in ultra-urban Newtown Creek support denitrification potential equivalent to rates of natural marshes in Jamaica Bay and reference marshes in other urban estuaries. There were significant positive correlations between microbial biomass C and N content and organic matter content and denitrification potential. Results suggest that constructed wetlands can support wetland vegetation, soils, and microbial life and contribute to N removal under ultra-urban conditions.

Ribbed mussel in an urban waterway filters bacteria introduced by sewage.

The ribbed mussel has been demonstrated to tolerate high levels of urban pollution and inhabits intertidal regions of the New York City estuary. The ability of this bivalve to filter bacteria raises the question of whether it can remove from the water column the fecal bacteria introduced to urban waterways by septic system leakage or sewer overflow. The study here addresses the hypothesis that ribbed mussel filters bacteria introduced by combined sewer overflow (CSO) discharge. Mussels and water were collected from a highly polluted region of the NYC estuary in order to conduct two sets of five trials for filtration of coliform and coccoid fecal indicator bacteria, respectively, Escherichia coli and Enterococcus species. Mussels and water samples were collected in proximity to a major CSO outfall within 1-2 days of a rainfall event to ensure high baseline values of bacterial contamination for filtration trials. For any given Enterococcus or E. coli trial, equal volume water samples were serially distributed across aerated tanks either containing a mussel or not. Comparison of with-mussel versus no-mussel tank water contamination across pooled trials showed significant (P < 0.05) reduction in water exposed to mussel filtration for both, Enterococcus and E. coli trials. For Enterococcus trials, measures of turbidity (suspended particle density) were taken concurrently with measures of bacterial contamination. Regression of contamination against turbidity, with measures standardized across trials, yielded a significant positive association (n = 50, P < 0.0001) across all tank water with a mussel. Thus, contamination reduction was associated with particle removal by mussel filtration.

Core and Shell Song Systems Unique to the Parrot Brain.

The ability to imitate complex sounds is rare, and among birds has been found only in parrots, songbirds, and hummingbirds. Parrots exhibit the most advanced vocal mimicry among non-human animals. A few studies have noted differences in connectivity, brain position and shape in the vocal learning systems of parrots relative to songbirds and hummingbirds. However, only one parrot species, the budgerigar, has been examined and no differences in the presence of song system structures were found with other avian vocal learners. Motivated by questions of whether there are important differences in the vocal systems of parrots relative to other vocal learners, we used specialized constitutive gene expression, singing-driven gene expression, and neural connectivity tracing experiments to further characterize the song system of budgerigars and/or other parrots. We found that the parrot brain uniquely contains a song system within a song system. The parrot "core" song system is similar to the song systems of songbirds and hummingbirds, whereas the "shell" song system is unique to parrots. The core with only rudimentary shell regions were found in the New Zealand kea, representing one of the only living species at a basal divergence with all other parrots, implying that parrots evolved vocal learning systems at least 29 million years ago. Relative size differences in the core and shell regions occur among species, which we suggest could be related to species differences in vocal and cognitive abilities.

Avian brains and a new understanding of vertebrate brain evolution.

We believe that names have a powerful influence on the experiments we do and the way in which we think. For this reason, and in the light of new evidence about the function and evolution of the vertebrate brain, an international consortium of neuroscientists has reconsidered the traditional, 100-year-old terminology that is used to describe the avian cerebrum. Our current understanding of the avian brain - in particular the neocortex-like cognitive functions of the avian pallium - requires a new terminology that better reflects these functions and the homologies between avian and mammalian brains.

Song and the limbic brain: a new function for the bird's own song.

The neurobiological investigation of the avian song system has largely focused on the unique neural features of vocal control systems that contribute to learned motor patterns in songbirds. The role of emotion has been disregarded in developing a theory of song learning and performance. Here we review emerging evidence in support of Darwin's observation that vocal communication is emotional expression. We propose that neural pathways mediating emotional state remained integrated with the vocal control system as forebrain vocal control pathways evolved to support learned communication patterns. Vocalizations are therefore both a motor component of an emotional state and can influence emotional state via sensory feedback during vocal production. By acknowledging the importance of emotion in vocal communication, we are proposing that the song system and limbic brain are functionally linked in the production and reception of song.