Predictive value of compression ultrasonography for deep vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients: clinical implications of the site of vein noncompressibility.

BACKGROUND: Compression ultrasonography has a high negative predictive value for deep vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients. Limited data are available on factors influencing positive predictive value. The objective of this study was to evaluate the positive predictive value of compression ultrasonography according to the anatomic site of vein noncompressibility. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of 756 consecutive outpatients with suspected first-episode deep vein thrombosis. Compression ultrasonography was performed at the initial visit: results were abnormal if a noncompressible segment was identified or normal if all segments were fully compressible. Venography was performed in patients with abnormal compression ultrasonography results. Positive predictive value was determined according to the site of noncompressibility: common femoral vein only, popliteal vein only, or both sites. Venography was the reference standard for the presence of deep vein thrombosis. RESULTS: Positive predictive value was 16.7% (95% confidence interval, 0.4%-64.1%) for noncompressibility isolated to the common femoral vein compared with 91.3% (95% confidence interval, 72.0%-98.9%) for the popliteal vein only and 94.4% (95% confidence interval, 72.7%-99.9%) for both sites (P<.001). Of 15 patients with isolated noncompressibility of the common femoral vein, 8 (53%) had pelvic neoplasm or abscess compared with 2 (5%) of 42 with noncompressibility of the popliteal vein only and 6 (13%) of 47 with noncompressibility of both sites (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The positive predictive value of noncompressibility isolated to the common femoral vein is too low to be used alone as the diagnostic end point for giving anticoagulant therapy. Noncompressibility isolated to the common femoral vein is a diagnostic marker for pelvic disease.

The clinical validity of normal compression ultrasonography in outpatients suspected of having deep venous thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography using vein compression accurately detects proximal deep venous thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients. Repeated testing is required for patients with normal results at presentation, but the optimal management of such patients is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To test the safety of withholding anticoagulation in outpatients suspected of having first-episode deep venous thrombosis who have normal results on simplified compression ultrasonography at presentation and on a single repeated test done 5 to 7 days later. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Noninvasive vascular laboratories at a university teaching hospital and a Veterans Administration medical center. PATIENTS: 405 consecutive outpatients suspected of having first-episode deep venous thrombosis. INTERVENTION: Ultrasonography was performed at presentation. The common femoral and popliteal veins were assessed for compressibility. If the result was normal, anti-coagulation was withheld and testing was repeated 5 to 7 days later. Anticoagulation was withheld from all patients whose results remained normal according to compression ultrasonography, regardless of their symptoms. The safety of this approach was tested by follow-up lasting 3 months. MEASUREMENTS: Objective testing was done during follow-up in all patients with symptoms or signs of venous thromboembolism. The outcome measure was symptomatic venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism during follow-up, confirmed by objective testing. RESULTS: Ultrasonography had normal results in 335 patients (83%) and abnormal results in 70 (17%). None of the patients with normal results died of pulmonary embolism. Venous thromboembolism occurred during follow-up in 2 patients with normal ultrasonographic results (0.6% [95% CI, 0.07% to 2.14%]) and in 4 patients with abnormal results (5.7% [CI, 1.58% to 13.99%]) (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: It is safe to withhold anticoagulation in outpatients suspected of having first-episode deep venous thrombosis if results of simplified compression ultrasonography are normal at presentation and on a single repeated test done 5 to 7 days later.

Venous thromboembolism in the cancer patient.

Patients with malignancies are at increased risk of developing venous thromboembolic disease. Diagnosis and treatment of deep venous thromboembolism and pulmonary embolism in this group of patients poses some unique challenges, but generally should parallel that of patients without malignancy. Prophylaxis with low-dose warfarin should be considered in patients with indwelling central venous catheters and in some patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer. Although patients who present with idiopathic deep venous thromboembolism or pulmonary embolism may be at increased risk of developing clinically apparent malignancy, there is no data to suggest that an aggressive search for cancer in these patients is more appropriate than routine physical exam and laboratory testing.

Monitoring low-dose warfarin therapy by a central laboratory and implications for clinical trials and patient care. The Coumadin Aspirin Reinfarction (CARS) Pilot Study Group.

The central laboratory provides International Normalized Ratio results in close agreement with the local laboratory for monitoring the anticoagulant effect of low-dose warfarin. A central laboratory may have practical advantages for patients in rural areas that lack laboratory facilities for anticoagulant monitoring.

Effect of treatment with low-dose warfarin-aspirin on activated factor VII.

Factor VII is an independent risk factor for ischemic heart disease. We performed a prospective study to evaluate the effect of combined low-dose warfarin-aspirin on activated factor VII (factor VIIa) and to determine if abruptly stopping this treatment is associated with a rebound in the level of factor VIIa. Thirty-three patients with clinically stable coronary artery disease were treated with combined 3 mg warfarin and 80 mg aspirin daily for 8 weeks. The factor VIIa level was measured before treatment, weekly during treatment, and 2 weeks after stopping treatment. The mean percent of pretreatment levels of factor VIIa for weeks 1 through 8 of treatment were 60%, 60%, 72%, 70%, 71%, 70%, 74%, and 87%, respectively (P < .05 compared with pretreatment for weeks 1 through 7 inclusive); 2 weeks after stopping treatment, the level was 122% (95% confidence interval [CI]; 111% to 133%; P < .001 compared with pretreatment). The mean percent level of factor VIIa on-treatment was 74% (P < .001). Factor VIIa is reduced by 26% on average during treatment. This finding provides further rationale for the antithrombotic effect of low-dose warfarin. The results suggest a rebound in the factor VIIa level may occur after treatment is stopped. The potential rebound and its clinical importance should be evaluated by further studies.

Safety and anticoagulation effect of a low-dose combination of warfarin and aspirin in clinically stable coronary artery disease. Coumadin Aspirin Reinfarction (CARS) Pilot Study Group.

The hypothesis that the combination of low-dose aspirin and warfarin therapy is more effective than aspirin alone in secondary prophylaxis after myocardial infarction is to be examined in the Coumadin Aspirin Reinfarction Study. This pilot study addressed the safety and anticoagulation effect of a fixed, low-dose combination in 114 patients (aged 64 +/- 8 years, 85% men) with stable coronary artery disease receiving 3 mg of warfarin plus 80 mg of aspirin daily for 8 weeks. The international normalized ratio (INR) was measured within 72 hours of initial therapy, and weekly. Of the 110 patients with evaluable INRs, 87 patients (79%) maintained the 3 + 80 mg combination, 19 (17%) had the dose reduced to 1 mg warfarin + 80 mg aspirin, and 4 (4%) discontinued therapy because of a confirmed INR of > or = 4.5. At steady state, patients had INRs of 1.48 +/- 0.41 (3 + 80 mg group) and 1.21 +/- 0.23 (1 + 80 mg group), and inter- and intra-patient variability (estimated by the mean of the between- and within-patient SDs at steady state) was 0.49 +/- 0.08 and 0.13 +/- 0.14, respectively. There was no apparent effect of age on INR distribution. Microscopic hematuria was the most frequent (20%) adverse clinical event, but was unrelated to the INR. Three patients required discontinuation of therapy because of bleeding events (persistent hematuria and epistaxis). A fixed low-dose combination of warfarin and aspirin results in a predictable and stable increase in the INR in a large proportion of patients with coronary artery disease.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Treatment of venous thromboembolism.

There have been some important advances in the treatment of venous thromboembolism during the past 18 months. A randomized trial has confirmed earlier observations indicating an adequate initial heparin effect is required to prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism, and it is critical to achieve this effect within the first 24 hours of therapy. The need to use a validated protocol for administering intravenous heparin is now firmly established. The clinician has a choice between two protocols that have been validated by randomized trials and provide both effective and safe heparin therapy. For patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism, the clinician now has a practical noninvasive strategy that avoids pulmonary angiography, identifies patients with proximal-vein thrombosis who require treatment, and avoids the need for treatment and further investigation in the majority of patients.