Proton pump inhibitors use prior to COVID-19 hospitalization is associated with higher Clostridioides difficile infection rate.

BACKGROUND: There are uncertainties regarding associations of prior proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use with susceptibility for COVID-19 and risks associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We aimed to evaluate the associations of prior PPI use with outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We have retrospectively evaluated a total of 5959 consecutively hospitalized patients with COVID-19 from a tertiary-level institution in the period 3/2020-6/2021. Associations of prior PPI use with outcomes of in-hospital mortality, mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, venous thromboembolism, arterial thrombosis, major bleeding, bacteremia, and Clostridioides difficile infection (C. diff.) were evaluated in entire and case-matched cohorts. RESULTS: Among 5959 evaluated patients, there were 1967 (33%) PPI users. In an entire cohort, prior PPI use was associated with higher in-hospital mortality and higher occurrence of C. diff. Association of prior PPI use with mortality diminished, whereas association with C. diff. persisted after multivariable adjustments. In a matched cohort, prior PPI use was associated only with higher risk of C. diff. but not other outcomes in line with multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Although prior PPI use might not have a significant impact on clinical course and mortality of SARS-CoV-2 infection, it may predispose patients to the development of complications like higher occurrence of C. diff. and thus substantially impact the course of treatment.

Serological Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Hemodialyzed Patients and the Association with Later COVID-19 Positivity.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine may differ in hemodialysis patients. The aim of this prospective multicenter study was to determine the degree of serological response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in the population of dialysis patients and its association with later SARS-CoV-2 infections. METHODS: A blood sample was taken for the determination of COVID-19 serological status (IgG antibodies) in 706 dialysis patients 16 weeks after vaccination with the second dose (Pfizer-BioNTech). RESULTS: Only 314 (44.5%) hemodialyzed patients had a satisfactory response to the COVID-19 vaccine. Eighty-two patients (11.6%) had a borderline response, while 310 patients (43.9%) had an unsatisfactory (negative) post-vaccinal antibody titer. A longer dialysis vintage had an increased odds ratio (OR) of 1.01 for the occurrence of COVID-19 positivity after vaccination. In the group of subsequently positive patients, 28 patients (13.6%) died from complications of COVID-19. We have found differences in mean survival time between patients with and without appropriate responses to vaccination in favor of patients with a satisfactory serological response. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that the dialysis population will not have the same serological response to the vaccine as the general population. The majority of dialysis patients did not develop a severe clinical picture or die at the time of positivity for COVID-19.

The performance of the WHO COVID-19 severity classification, COVID-GRAM, VACO Index, 4C Mortality, and CURB-65 prognostic scores in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: data on 4014 patients from a tertiary center registry.

AIM: To evaluate the predictive properties of several common prognostic scores regarding survival outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 4014 consecutive COVID-19 patients hospitalized in our tertiary level institution from March 2020 to March 2021. Prognostic properties of the WHO COVID-19 severity classification, COVID-GRAM, Veterans Health Administration COVID-19 (VACO) Index, 4C Mortality Score, and CURB-65 score regarding 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, presence of severe or critical disease on admission, need for an intensive care unit treatment, and mechanical ventilation during hospitalization were evaluated. RESULTS: All of the investigated prognostic scores significantly distinguished between groups of patients with different 30-day mortality. The CURB-65 and 4C Mortality Score had the best prognostic properties for prediction of 30-day mortality (area under the curve [AUC] 0.761 for both) and in-hospital mortality (AUC 0.757 and 0.762, respectively). The 4C Mortality Score and COVID-GRAM best predicted the presence of severe or critical disease (AUC 0.785 and 0.717, respectively). In the multivariate analysis evaluating 30-day mortality, all scores mutually independently provided additional prognostic information, except the VACO Index, whose prognostic properties were redundant. CONCLUSION: Complex prognostic scores based on many parameters and comorbid conditions did not have better prognostic properties regarding survival outcomes than a simple CURB-65 prognostic score. CURB-65 also provides the largest number of prognostic categories (five), allowing more precise risk stratification than other prognostic scores.

Left atrium size and red cell distribution width predict atrial fibrillation progression from paroxysmal or persistent to permanent.

Objective: Stratifying patients with paroxysmal or short-term persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) who are at greater risk of developing permanent AF is challenging. Aim of our prospective study was to evaluate association of laboratory parameters (biochemistry and complete blood count (CBC)) together with standard demographic, clinical and echocardiography parameters, with AF progression.Methods: We prospectively recruited 579 patients with AF and divided them into two groups at index hospitalization: paroxysmal or persistent (non-permanent AF), and long-term persistent or permanent AF patients (permanent AF). Clinical, echocardiographic, and relevant CBC parameters were collected. Non-permanent AF patients were selected for follow-up, with a median follow-up time of 21 months. Endpoint was progression to permanent AF.Results: Out of 409 patients with non-permanent AF, 109 (26.6%) progressed within follow-up. In a multivariate Cox regression model only increased left atrium (LA) diameter (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.20-3.87, p = 0.010), and increased red cell distribution width (RDW; HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.03-1.39, p = 0.022) showed significant independent association with progression. There were 221/409 patients with both LA ≤45 mm and RDW level ≤14.5% who progressed at a rate of only 17.6%, and showed relative risk of AF progression of 0.47 (95% CI 0.34-0.67; p < 0,001).Conclusion: Together with LA size, RDW was independently associated with AF progression. Patients with both LA size ≤45 mm and RDW level ≤14.5% are most probably the best candidates for rhythm control strategies.