Fluorescein Sodium-Guided Neuroendoscopic Resection of Deep-Seated Malignant Brain Tumors: Preliminary Results of 18 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Deep-seated intracranial lesions are challenging to resect completely and safely. Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) promotes the resection of malignant brain tumors (MBTs). Classically, FGS is performed using microscope equipped with a special filter. Fluorescence-guided neuroendoscopic resection of deep-seated brain tumors has not been reported yet. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of the fluorescence-guided neuroendoscopic surgery in deep-seated MBTs. METHODS: A total of 18 patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) and metastatic tumor (MT) underwent fluorescein sodium (FS)-guided neuroendoscopic surgery. Tumor removal was carried out using bimanual microsurgical techniques under endoscopic view. The degree of fluorescence staining was classified as "helpful" and "unhelpful" based on surgical observation. Extent of resection was determined using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score was used for evaluation of general physical performances of patients. RESULTS: A total of 11 patients had HGG, and 7 had MT. No technical difficulty was encountered regarding the use of endoscopic technique. "Helpful" fluorescence staining was observed in 16 patients and fluorescent tissue was completely removed. Postoperative MRI confirmed gross total resection (88.9%). In 2 patients, FS enhancement was not helpful enough for tumor demarcation and postoperative MRI revealed near total resection (11.1%). No complication, adverse events, or side effects were encountered regarding the use of FS. KPS score of patients was improved at 3-mo follow-up. CONCLUSION: FS-guided endoscopic resection is a feasible technique for deep-seated MBTs. It is safe, effective, and allows for a high rate of resection. Future prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these preliminary data.

Sellar Defect Reconstruction with Vascularized Superior Turbinate Mucosal Flaps in Endonasal Endoscopic Transsellar Approach.

BACKGROUND: The pedicled nasoseptal flap (NSF) constitutes the primary reconstructive option for most skull base defects in endonasal endoscopic approaches. The superior nasal turbinate (ST) has received little attention. We report our preliminary experience with the use of the ST mucosal flap in selected cases. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent endonasal endoscopic approaches and identified 9 patients who were reconstructed with vascularized ST mucosal flaps as part of a double-layer or triple-layer reconstruction. When there was no intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, we used a double-layer technique. If there was an intraoperative CSF leak, regardless of the quality of leakage, we preferred a triple-layer repair technique. In patients with high-flow leaks, triple-layer repair was performed using only autologous tissue grafts and flaps. RESULTS: Intraoperative CSF leaks were noted in 7 of 9 patients. Among them, 4 patients had low-flow CSF leaks (grade 1 and 2) and 3 patients had high-flow CSF leaks (grade 3). All reconstructions had complete defect coverage with the ST flaps and NSFs were preserved. All the flaps were viable at 4 weeks without a CSF leak or complication at the reconstruction site. There was no contraction or partial loss of the flap. After a mean follow-up period of 9 months, none of the patients required a flap revision, developed a mucocele, infection, or other complication. CONCLUSIONS: An ST flap can be used for the vascularized reconstruction of sellar defects if it is bilaterally available. This option should not be overlooked and wasted.

Comparison of Three Methods Used for Estimating Area of Foramen Magnum.

OBJECTIVE: To compare whether there are any differences between the 3 methods used for measure area of foramen magnum (FM) in skulls. METHODS: The FMs of 150 skulls were examined. Antero-posterior diameter, transverse diameter were measured using by Vernier caliper. The area of the FM was calculated by using 2 different formulas as described previously by Radinsky and Teixeira.The authors also applied stereological assessment method for estimating the surface area of FMs. The area was calculated 3 times manually using stereological point grid system for each skull.The authors compared the mean surface area of FMs obtained from each of these 3 methods estimating surface area of FMs whether there were any significant differences in between their results. RESULTS: The mean areas of the FMs estimated according to Teixeria formula, Radinsky formula, and Cavalieri stereological method were respectively as follows: 790.47 ±â€Š99.86 mm, 783.66 ±â€Š99.34 mm, and 748.06 ±â€Š100.19 mm. The authors observed significant differences (P < 0.05) in between the mean surface areas of FMs obtained from each of these 3 methods used for estimating the area. CONCLUSION: There were significant differences (P < 0.05) in between the mean surface areas of FMs obtained from each of these 3 methods used for estimating the area.