Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Am Surg ; 89(5): 1479-1484, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34905976

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Isolated hip fractures (IHFs) are a cause of morbidity and mortality in the geriatric population aged >65 years. Frailty has been identified as a determinant for patient outcomes in other surgical specialties. The purpose of this study is to determine if frailty severity is a predictor of outcomes in IHF in the geriatric population. METHODS: This is a retrospective study in a state and ACS Level 2 trauma center. Patients with IHF were reviewed between January 2018 and January 2020. Primary outcome was in-patient mortality. Secondary outcomes include perioperative outcome measures such as UTI, HCAP, DVT, readmission, length of stay, ICU length of stay, nutritional status, and discharge destination. Patients were stratified into mild (1-2), moderate (3-5), and severe (5-7) frailty using the Rockwood Frailty Score (RFS). Clinical characteristics and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: We identified 470 patients with IHF who were stratified by mild (N=316), moderate (N-123), and severe (N=31) frailty. Frailty worsened with increasing age (P < .0001). Those who were less frail were more likely discharged home (P < .04). Severely frail patients were more likely discharged to hospice (P < .01). Severely frail patients also were more likely to develop DVT (P < .04) and have poorer nutritional status (P < .02). There were no differences among groups for in-patient mortality. CONCLUSION: Severely frail patients are more likely to be malnourished at baseline and be discharged to hospice care. The RFS is a reliable objective tool to identify high-risk patients and guide goals of care discussion for operative intervention in isolated traumatic hip fractures.


Subject(s)
Frailty , Hip Fractures , Humans , Aged , Frailty/complications , Frailty/epidemiology , Frail Elderly , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Hip Fractures/surgery , Geriatric Assessment , Length of Stay
2.
Neurosurg Rev ; 45(6): 3511-3521, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36173528

ABSTRACT

Butterfly glioblastoma (bGBM) is a grade 4 glioma with a poor prognosis. Surgical treatment of these cancers has been reviewed in the literature with some recent studies supporting resection as a safe and effective treatment instead of biopsy and adjuvant therapy. This meta-analysis was designed to determine whether there are significant differences in overall survival (OS) and postoperative neurologic deficits (motor, speech, and cranial nerve) following intervention in patients who underwent tumor resection as part of their treatment, compared to patients who underwent biopsy without surgical resection. A literature search was conducted using PubMed (National Library of Medicine) and Embase (Elsevier) to identify articles from each database's earliest records to May 25, 2021, that directly compared the outcomes of biopsy and resection in bGBM patients and met predetermined inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effects of the two management strategies on OS and postoperative neurologic deficits. Six articles met our study inclusion criteria. OS was found to be significantly longer for the resection group at 6 months (odds ratio [OR] 2.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-7.05) and 12 months (OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.10-12.76) than for the biopsy group. No statistically significant differences were found in OS at 18 and 24 months. Resection was associated with an increased rate of postoperative neurologic deficit (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.02-4.09). Resection offers greater OS up to 1 year postintervention than biopsy alone; however, this comes at the cost of higher rates of postoperative neurologic deficits.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Glioblastoma , Glioma , Humans , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Glioma/surgery , Biopsy , Treatment Outcome
3.
Am Surg ; 87(4): 623-630, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33135937

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Infections within intensive care unit (ICU) are a persistent problem among the critically ill. Viral pneumonias have already been established as having a season variations. We attempt to evaluate the seasonal variations of pneumonia among the traumatically injured and the critically ill. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study among traumatized patients admitted from 1997 to 2017 to an ICU within the state of Florida was performed who were diagnosed with pneumonia. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to adjust for confounders. Time periods were divided into seasons: summer, winter, spring, and fall. A subset analysis of geriatric patients (>65 years) was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 869 553 patients were identified. The most common viral infection was influenza with adenovirus the least. The most common bacterial pneumonia was Staphylococcus aureus with Bordetella pertussis the least. Pneumonias had a seasonal variation. Compared to summer, winter had a higher likelihood of pneumonia overall (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR)1.13). This was seen in the spring (AOR 1.04) but not in fall (AOR 1.00). Viral infections were more pronounced (AOR 3.79) in all other seasons, while bacterial showed increased likelihood during winter (AOR 1.05). In geriatrics, pneumonia was again more likely in the winter (AOR 1.22) with both viral and bacterial infections being more pronounced during winter (AOR 4.79, AOR 1.09). DISCUSSION: Pneumonias are seen more frequently within the ICU during the winter for the traumatized patient. This held true with the critically ill geriatric population as well. This effect was observed in both viral and bacterial pneumonias.


Subject(s)
Pneumonia, Bacterial/complications , Pneumonia, Bacterial/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Seasons , Wounds and Injuries/complications , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Florida/epidemiology , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
5.
J Robot Surg ; 13(2): 193-199, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30276634

ABSTRACT

Despite advantages of minimally invasive surgery, many hepatobiliary surgeons are hesitant to offer this approach for major hepatic resection due to concerns of difficulty in liver manipulation, bleeding control, and suboptimal oncologic outcomes. The robotic surgical system has revolutionized the way traditional laparoscopic liver resection is undertaken. Limitations of traditional laparoscopy are being resolved by robotic technology. We aimed to describe aspects of minimally invasive liver surgery and our standardized technical approach. We discussed technical aspects of performing robotic total right hepatic lobectomy and described our standardized institutional method. A 79-year-old man with an 11-cm biopsy-proven hepatocellular carcinoma was taken to the operating room for a robotic total right hepatic lobectomy. Past medical and surgical history was consistent with hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Robotic extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle approach was used to gain inflow vascular control. Right hepatic artery and portal vein were individually dissected and isolated prior to division. An intraoperative robotic ultrasound was utilized to guide liver parenchymal transection, securing negative margins. Robotic vessel sealing device was used as the main energy device during the parenchymal transection. Right hepatic vein was transected intrahepatically using a linear stapler. Operative time was 200 min without intraoperative complications. Estimated blood loss was 100 ml. Postsurgical recovery was uneventful and he was discharged home on postoperative day 4. Minimally invasive robotic total right hepatic lobectomy is feasible with excellent perioperative outcomes.


Subject(s)
Hepatectomy/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Aged , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/surgery , Hepatic Artery/surgery , Hepatic Veins/surgery , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Margins of Excision , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Operative Time , Portal Vein/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Surgical Staplers , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography , Vascular Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Vascular Surgical Procedures/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...