Visceral tissue mass and rumen volume in dairy cows during the transition from late gestation to early lactation.

The objectives were to measure the effects of transition and supplemental barley or rumen-protected protein on visceral tissue mass in dairy cows and the effects of transition and barley on rumen volume and liquid turnover. Cows were individually fed a grass silage-based gestation ration to meet energy and protein requirements for body weight stasis beginning 6 wk before expected calving. A corn silage-based lactation ration was individually fed ad libitum after calving. In the visceral mass study, 36 cows were randomly assigned to one of 3 dietary treatments: basal ration or basal ration plus either 800 g dry matter (DM) of barley meal per day or 750 g DM of rumen-protected soybean protein per day. Cows were slaughtered at 21 and 7 d before expected calving date or at 10 and 22 d postpartum. Visceral mass and rumen papillae characteristics were measured. Diets had little effect on visceral mass. The mass of the reticulo-rumen, small intestine, large intestine, and liver was, or tended to be, greater at 22 d postpartum but not at 10 d postpartum before DM intake had increased. Rumen papillae mass increased at 10 d postpartum, perhaps in response to increased concentrates. Mesenteric fat decreased after calving, reflecting body fat mobilization. Ten rumen-cannulated cows were fed the basal gestation ration alone or supplemented with 880 g of barley meal DM. Rumen volumes and liquid dilution rates were measured at 17 and 8 d before calving and at 10, 20, and 31 d postpartum. Feeding barley had no effects. After calving, rumen DM volume and liquid dilution rate increased, but liquid volume did not increase. Changes in gastrointestinal and liver mass during transition were apparently a consequence of changes in DM intake and nutrient supply and not initiation of lactation per se.

The influence of hormones on CD44 expression in endometrial and breast carcinomas.

The expression of distinct variant isoforms of the cell surface glycoprotein CD44 (CD44v) has been found to be associated with metastatic potential of rodent adenocarcinoma cells and with an altered prognosis in several types of human cancer. In hormone-dependent gynecological cancers, different CD44v expression patterns have been observed. The influence of ovarian steroid hormones and their antagonists on CD44v expression is still unclear, since there are only retrospective correlation studies so far. Therefore, we examined the CD44 mRNA expression in a standardized stimulation experiment in a number of breast and endometrial carcinoma cell lines varying in estrogen receptor (ER) status. Higher CD44 overall expression was observed in ER positive endometrial and breast carcinoma cell lines when compared to corresponding ER negative cell lines. The number and composition of alternatively spliced isoforms showed no clear correlation to the ER expression status. Three CD44v isoforms were detected in all cell lines expressing CD44v, two of which have not been reported previously in normal endometrial cells. These isoforms may have specific functions in this type of carcinoma. In the second part of the study, the influence of (anti-) hormones on CD44 expression in endometrial carcinoma cell lines was examined. CD44 overall expression showed an increase when the cells were grown in medium containing fetal calf serum (FCS) as compared to cells maintained in medium-free of FCS. CD44 expression was transiently increased by estradiol (1 h). The CD44 splice pattern of endometrial cancer cell lines RL95-2 and Hec-1-A, after treatment with (anti-) hormones showed constant and high expression rates for distinct CD44v-isoforms such as CD44E (CD44v8-v10). Only certain weakly expressed isoforms changed their expression level during the experimental period, but no direct correlation to hormone treatment was observed. In conclusion, estradiol or FCS increase CD44 overall expression, but there seems to be no direct influence of ovarian steroid hormones on the CD44v splice machinery in endometrial carcinoma cell lines.

Feeding patterns of lactating cows of three different breeds fed hay, corn silage, and grass silage.

Feeding behavior of 35 lactating cows of three different breeds (Holstein-Friesian = HF, Simmental = SI, and Jersey = JER) was compared in the present study. The cows were kept in a loose housing system and fed hay, corn silage (CS) and grass silage (GS) ad lib. Within 7 consecutive days, 2918 meals were recorded and analyzed: 2503 meals were eaten during the light phase (0430-2200), and 57% of these diurnal meals consisted of only one feedstuff (43% hay, 9% CS, 5% GS). During the dark phase, only 23% of the 415 meals consisted of hay alone, but 16% of CS and 21% of GS alone. This circadian distribution showed no breed differences, yet meal patterns did: HF and SI cows ate 11 meals per day, and JER cows ate more than 13 meals/day. Meal size was 9.8MJ, 7.9MJ, and 5.8MJ for HF, SI, and JER cows, respectively. HF cows had the highest 24 h energy intake and JER cows the lowest, but the latter spent the most time feeding. During the light phase all three breeds obtained the most energy from hay, followed by CS and GS. In contrast, during the dark phase most energy was derived from GS, and hay contributed the least. A significant premeal correlation was observed for cows of all breeds, in particular during the time with the highest feeding activity (0800-1300). During the dark phase no premeal correlation could be detected; instead a significant postmeal correlation appeared, in particular in HF and SI cows.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Eating patterns of lactating dairy cows of three different breeds fed grass ad lib.

Eating behavior of lactating cows of three breeds (Holstein-Friesian = HF, Simmental = SI, and Jersey = JER) was compared in the present study. The cows were kept in a loose housing system and fed grass and hay ad lib along with concentrates. Within 11 days, 1396, 1504, and 1682 grass meals were recorded and analyzed for HF, SI, and JER cows, respectively. In cows of all three breeds, 89% of the grass meals (= 94% of the total grass intake) occurred during the light phase (0400-2200) and peaks of grass intake with large meals were always observed shortly after refilling the troughs. A similar diurnal distribution was evident for concentrate intake, but was less pronounced (28% eaten during the dark phase), and peaks of concentrate intake occurred also in the evening and after midnight. Hay intake was negligible and was not considered for meal pattern analysis. JER cows ate generally less than HF or SI cows, but spent more time eating. Grass meal frequency was higher, but grass meal size and mean eating rate within grass meals was smaller for JER cows than for HF and SI cows. Significant correlations between the size of grass meals and the duration of either the interval preceding or following that same meal were observed only for some animals (in particular JER and SI cows) during the main eating period in the morning (0800-1300), but barely in the afternoon (1300-1700). Thus, the short-term physiological control of meal-taking in dairy cows kept under normal farming conditions seems to be markedly influenced by external factors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)