Symptomatic lower-limb giant-cell arteritis: Characteristics, management and long-term outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To describe characteristics and long-term outcomes of the rare symptomatic lower-limb giant-cell arteritis (LL-GCA). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 8 patients (6 women; mean±SD age, 63.6±10.9 years; follow-up, 137.3±57.3 months). RESULTS: Four patients satisfied≥3 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) GCA-classification criteria; 4 had<3 criteria and histological LL-GCA proof or associated typical upper-limb involvement. Patients had 2.1±1.1 vascular risk factors. Bilateral and rapidly progressive arterial claudication was the first LL sign; 2 had rest ischemia. Imaging-visualized most-to-least frequent inflammatory lesion localizations were: superficial femoral, popliteal, tibiofibular trunk, posterior tibial arteries. All received corticosteroids for 132±76.2 months; 2 required immunosuppressive agent adjunction. Only 3 required 1-6 revascularizations: twice during the first month post-diagnosis and twice later. Thromboendarterectomy and endovascular procedures did not work while bypasses were successful. LL-claudication regressed for 7 (10.5±12.1 months) and disappeared for 5 (16.8±9.8 months). Three patients stopped corticosteroids (26-90 months), 1 restarted 45 months later. Every patient relapsed once (23.9±26.7 months, mean corticosteroid dose: 0.28±0.30mg/kg/day). LL-GCA caused only 1 of the 4 deaths. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic LL-GCA attributable long-term mortality seems to be low despite frequent relapses and corticosteroid-dependence.

Tolerance of Iloprost and results of treatment of chronic severe lower limb ischaemia in diabetic patients. A retrospective study of 64 consecutive cases.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the tolerance and report obtained results with a stable prostacyclin analogue (iloprost) in diabetic patients with severe forms of permanent lower limb ischaemia. METHODS: Sixty-four consecutive unselected patients, in stage III and IV of Leriche and Fontaine, turned down for vascular surgery after angiography and treated with iloprost during 28 days, were enrolled in this study. Patients were followed-up clinically (ischemic pain, trophic change, walking distance) and with transcutaneous oxymetry (D28). Long-term assessment (6 and 12 months) was expressed as rate of death, major amputation and of live patients with viable limbs and walking. There was no manifestation of intolerance to iloprost. Were considered as responders patients offering a lack or significant decrease in pain, a reduction of trophic lesions and improvement or recovery of walking. RESULTS: Response at two months is lasting: 29 responders (45.3%) and 35 non-responders (54.7%). At 6 months and one year, we observed that 8 (12.5%) and 15 (24.1%) patients respectively had died; 19 (29.6%) and 22 (34.3%) patients underwent major amputation, but 41 (64%) and 34 (53.1%) patients were still alive with their limb and conservative walking. In responder group, at 6 months, 28 (96.5%) patients were alive without amputation for only 13 (37.1%) among non-responders. At one year, 79.3% of the responders and 31.4% of the non-responders were alive without amputation. A total loss of walking, a segmental amputation and a previous amputation of opposite limb were more often noted in no responder group. But no predictive factor was referred to TcPO(2) in particular. Results ware similar in the group of 136 non diabetic patients treated during the same period (67.9% alive with limb at 6 months). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study, despite its limitations, underlines the clinical particularities of critical ischaemia in diabetics and the good tolerance to iloprost. This point allowed patients, in non-surgical chronic critical ischaemia, to avoid being confined to bed and to access to benefits of a early physiotherapy, in association with local treatment. However, no predictive criterion of long-term results could be established, except initial clinical severity and clinical change one month after treatment.

[Tolerance and therapeutic results of iloprost in obliterative arteriopathy in lower limbs at the severe chronic ischemia stage. A retrospective study of 29 consecutive cases]. / Tolérance et résultats thérapeutiques observés de l'iloprost dans l'artériopathie oblitérante des membres inférieurs au stade d'ischémie chronique sévère.

The aim of this retrospective, study was to assess the tolerance and therapeutic effect of a stable prostacyclin (iloprost) analog in severe forms of permanent lower limb ischemia. Ninety consecutive unselected patients, in Leriche and Fontaine stages III or IV, turned down for vascular surgery after angiography and treated with iloprost for 28 days were enrolled in the study. Patients were followed up clinically (ischemic pain, trophic changes, walking distance) and with transcutaneous oxymetry (D28). Long-term assessment (mean 2 years) was expressed as rates of death, major amputation and "patients alive with limb". There were no manifestations of intolerance to iloprost. At two months, 42 out of 90 patients (47%) were considered as responders because of a lack (n=36) or significant decrease (n=6) in pain, reduction of trophic lesions and conservative walking. At long term (6 months, one and two years) we observed that 10 (11%), 17 (20%) and 22 (25%) patients respectively had died, 24 (27%), 26 (30%) and 28 (32%) patients underwent major amputation, but 60 (68%), 54 (62%) and 49 (56%) patients still alive with their limb and conservative walking. No predictive factors were noted, but diabetic patients without microangiopathy or recent bypass occlusions (respectively 43% and 56% out of patients were alive with limb at 6 months) were associated with bad results. This retrospective study, despite its limitations, underlines the good tolerance to, and effectiveness of iloprost in non surgical chronic critical ischemia. However, no predictive criterion of long-term effectiveness could be established, except initial clinical severity and clinical change one month after treatment.