Assessment of pulmonary arterial circulation 3 months after hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: Dual-energy CT (DECT) angiographic study in 55 patients.

BACKGROUND: During COVID-19, the main manifestations of the disease are not only pneumonia but also coagulation disorders. The purpose of this study was to evaluate pulmonary vascular abnormalities 3 months after hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in patients with persistent respiratory symptoms. METHODS: Among the 320 patients who participated in a systematic follow-up 3 months after hospitalization, 76 patients had residual symptoms justifying a specialized follow-up in the department of pulmonology. Among them, dual-energy CT angiography (DECTA) was obtained in 55 patients. FINDINGS: The 55 patients had partial (n = 40; 72.7%) or complete (n = 15; 27.3%) resolution of COVID-19 lung infiltration. DECTA was normal in 52 patients (52/55; 94.6%) and showed endoluminal filling defects in 3 patients (3/55; 5.4%) at the level of one (n = 1) and two (n = 1) segmental arteries of a single lobe and within central and peripheral arteries (n = 1). DECT lung perfusion was rated as non-interpretable (n = 2;3.6%), normal (n = 17; 30.9%) and abnormal (n = 36; 65.5%), the latter group comprising 32 patients with residual COVID-19 opacities (32/36; 89%) and 4 patients with normal lung parenchyma (4/36; 11%). Perfusion abnormalities consisted of (a) patchy defects (30/36; 83%), (b) PE-type defects (6/36; 16.6%) with (n = 1) or without proximal thrombosis (n = 5); and (c) focal areas of hypoperfusion (2/36; 5.5%). Increased perfusion was seen in 15 patients, always matching GGOs, bands and/or vascular tree-in- bud patterns. INTERPRETATION: DECT depicted proximal arterial thrombosis in 5.4% of patients and perfusion abnormalities suggestive of widespread microangiopathy in 65.5% of patients. Lung microcirculation was abnormal in 4 patients with normal lung parenchyma.

Long-term evaluation of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with fibrotic idiopathic interstitial pneumonias.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with fibrotic idiopathic pulmonary pneumonia (f-IIP). Here, we report the results of an observational study in routine clinical practice of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation for f-IIP patients. METHODS: A total of 112 consecutive patients (61 with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and 51 with fibrotic nonspecific interstitial pneumonitis) were enrolled, of whom 65 had mild-to-moderate disease (forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥50% predicted and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (D LCO) ≥30% predicted) and 47 had severe disease (FVC <50% predicted and/or D LCO <30% predicted). The 2-month pulmonary rehabilitation programme consisted of a once-weekly visit with retraining, therapeutic education and psychosocial support. Patients were provided with an individualised action plan and were followed-up bimonthly for 12 months. Exercise tolerance (6-min stepper test (6MST)), mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)) and quality of life (QoL) (Visual Simplified Respiratory Questionnaire (VSRQ)) were assessed before (T0), immediately after (T2), 6 months after (T8) and 12 months after (T14) the end of the pulmonary rehabilitation programme. RESULTS: 6MST strokes, HADS Anxiety score and VSRQ score were each significantly improved at T2 (n=101), T8 (n=76) and T14 (n=62) compared with T0 values. The improvements in outcomes were not influenced by disease severity or subtype. Patients who completed the study had significantly better baseline FVC and D LCO values than those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Home-based pulmonary rehabilitation provides long-term benefits in exercise tolerance, anxiety and QoL for patients with f-IIP. Pulmonary rehabilitation should be prescribed systematically as part of the therapeutic arsenal for these patients.