Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
JAMA ; 328(3): 270-279, 2022 07 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35707974

ABSTRACT

Importance: Hypotension is common during tracheal intubation of critically ill adults and increases the risk of cardiac arrest and death. Whether administering an intravenous fluid bolus to critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation prevents severe hypotension, cardiac arrest, or death remains uncertain. Objective: To determine the effect of fluid bolus administration on the incidence of severe hypotension, cardiac arrest, and death. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial enrolled 1067 critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation with sedation and positive pressure ventilation at 11 intensive care units in the US between February 1, 2019, and May 24, 2021. The date of final follow-up was June 21, 2021. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a 500-mL intravenous fluid bolus (n = 538) or no fluid bolus (n = 527). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was cardiovascular collapse (defined as new or increased receipt of vasopressors or a systolic blood pressure <65 mm Hg between induction of anesthesia and 2 minutes after tracheal intubation, or cardiac arrest or death between induction of anesthesia and 1 hour after tracheal intubation). The secondary outcome was the incidence of death prior to day 28, which was censored at hospital discharge. Results: Among 1067 patients randomized, 1065 (99.8%) completed the trial and were included in the primary analysis (median age, 62 years [IQR, 51-70 years]; 42.1% were women). Cardiovascular collapse occurred in 113 patients (21.0%) in the fluid bolus group and in 96 patients (18.2%) in the no fluid bolus group (absolute difference, 2.8% [95% CI, -2.2% to 7.7%]; P = .25). New or increased receipt of vasopressors occurred in 20.6% of patients in the fluid bolus group compared with 17.6% of patients in the no fluid bolus group, a systolic blood pressure of less than 65 mm Hg occurred in 3.9% vs 4.2%, respectively, cardiac arrest occurred in 1.7% vs 1.5%, and death occurred in 0.7% vs 0.6%. Death prior to day 28 (censored at hospital discharge) occurred in 218 patients (40.5%) in the fluid bolus group compared with 223 patients (42.3%) in the no fluid bolus group (absolute difference, -1.8% [95% CI, -7.9% to 4.3%]; P = .55). Conclusions and Relevance: Among critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation, administration of an intravenous fluid bolus compared with no fluid bolus did not significantly decrease the incidence of cardiovascular collapse. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03787732.


Subject(s)
Critical Illness , Fluid Therapy , Heart Arrest , Hypotension , Intubation, Intratracheal , Shock , Adult , Aged , Critical Illness/therapy , Female , Heart Arrest/etiology , Heart Arrest/mortality , Heart Arrest/therapy , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Hypotension/drug therapy , Hypotension/etiology , Hypotension/prevention & control , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Positive-Pressure Respiration , Shock/etiology , Shock/therapy , Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use
2.
BMJ Open ; 10(9): e036671, 2020 09 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32948554

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular collapse is a common complication during tracheal intubation of critically ill adults. Whether administration of an intravenous fluid bolus prevents cardiovascular collapse during tracheal intubation remains uncertain. A prior randomised trial found fluid bolus administration to be ineffective overall but suggested potential benefit for patients receiving positive pressure ventilation during tracheal intubation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The PREventing cardiovascular collaPse with Administration of fluid REsuscitation during Induction and Intubation (PREPARE II) trial is a prospective, multi-centre, non-blinded randomised trial being conducted in 13 academic intensive care units in the USA. The trial will randomise 1065 critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation with planned use of positive pressure ventilation (non-invasive ventilation or bag-mask ventilation) between induction and laryngoscopy to receive 500 mL of intravenous crystalloid or no intravenous fluid bolus. The primary outcome is cardiovascular collapse, defined as any of: systolic blood pressure <65 mm Hg, new or increased vasopressor administration between induction and 2 min after intubation, or cardiac arrest or death between induction and 1 hour after intubation. The primary analysis will be an unadjusted, intention-to-treat comparison of the primary outcome between patients randomised to fluid bolus administration and patients randomised to no fluid bolus administration using a χ2 test. The sole secondary outcome is 28-day in-hospital mortality. Enrolment began on 1 February 2019 and is expected to conclude in June 2020. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial was approved by either the central institutional review board at Vanderbilt University Medical Center or the local institutional review board at each trial site. Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03787732.


Subject(s)
Respiration, Artificial , Shock , Adult , Critical Illness , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Prospective Studies , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
3.
Case Rep Gastroenterol ; 7(2): 287-92, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23904839

ABSTRACT

Pancreatic cancer is well known to be an aggressive and highly malignant condition with varied ways of presentation. Pancreatic cystic neoplasms are very uncommon causes of pancreatic malignancy and can often be ignored or missed, especially in the early stages. We present the case of a 49-year-old Caucasian male with no past medical history presenting to an outside facility with sudden epigastric pain that was eventually diagnosed as acute pancreatitis. On transfer to our facility, he was eventually found to have metastatic malignant mucinous cystic pancreatic neoplasm. Barely 12 weeks after his initial presentation and following an aggressive hospital course, he passed away.

4.
J Clin Med Res ; 5(5): 327-34, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23986796

ABSTRACT

The concept of "diastolic" heart failure grew out of the observation that many patients who have the symptoms and signs of heart failure had an apparently normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction. Thus it was assumed that since systolic function was "preserved" the problem must lie in diastole, although it is not clear by whom or when this assumption was made. Nevertheless, many guidelines followed on how to diagnose "diastolic" heart failure backed up by indicators of diastolic dysfunction derived from Doppler echoardiography. Diastolic heart failure is associated with a lower annual mortality rate of approximately 8% as compared to annual mortality of 19% in heart failure with systolic dysfunction, however, morbidity rate can be substantial. Thus, diastolic heart failure is an important clinical disorder mainly seen in the elderly patients with hypertensive heart disease. Early recognition and appropriate therapy of diastolic dysfunction is advisable to prevent further progression to diastolic heart failure and death. There is no specific therapy to improve LV diastolic function directly. Medical therapy of diastolic dysfunction is often empirical and lacks clear-cut pathophysiologic concepts. Nevertheless, there is growing evidence that calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, ACE-inhibitors and ARB as well as nitric oxide donors can be beneficial. Treatment of the underlying disease is currently the most important therapeutic approach.

5.
J Thorac Dis ; 2(3): 129-33, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22263033

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to examine the outcomes of surgery for active infective endocarditis. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients underwent surgery for active infective endocarditis in a tertiary care center between January 2000 and June 2003. Modified Duke Criteria was used to include the patients in the study. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 55.72 years (range 18-89 years). Underlying heart disease was the most common cause of acute infection, accounting for 30 % of all the cases. 16 % patients had a recent dental procedure and 10 % had a recent surgical procedure. The most common infective organism was staphylococcus aureus (24%), followed by streptococcus viridians (20%). The most common indications for surgery were congestive heart failure (CHF) (52%), embolic phenomenon (18%) and septic shock (10%). Most common postoperative complication was respiratory failure (30%) followed by renal failure (24%) pacemaker implantation 22%; stroke 18%, bleeding 16% and GI bleeding 2 %. Seven out of 50 patients died during hospital course that accounts for 14% of the motility rate. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for endocarditis continues to be challenging and associated with high operative mortality and morbidity. Age, shock, prosthetic valve endocarditis, impaired ventricular function, and recurrent infections adversely affect long-term survival.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...